Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Type & Design:
Post-market, international, multicentre Prospective, parallel groups, open-label, baseline controlled
Objectives:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physica CR | Patients who have undamaged and functional collateral and posterior cruciate ligaments for the group requiring Physica CR |
| |
| Physica PS | Patients who have undamaged and functional collateral ligaments for the group requiring Physica PS |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physica CR | Device | Cruciate retaining total knee replacement |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical change in Knee Society Score (KSS) | KSS is divided into two components: the first ("Knee Score", KKSS) assesses the knee clinically through the physical examination, and the second ("Function Score", FKSS) assesses the individual's functionality, while both attain a total of 100 points each. The Clinical KSS (KKSS) evaluates pain (50 points), stability (25 points) and range of motion (25 points). The Functional KSS (FKSS) evaluates the walking distance (50 points), and the act of climbing and descending stairs (50 points). The system for selecting patients is provided through three categories: A- unilateral or bilateral (opposite knee replaced successfully), B- unilateral, other knee symptomatic and C- polyarthritis or clinical disease. Scores rating from 80 to 100 is considered excellent, from 70 to 79 good, from 60 to 69 fair, and less than 60 poor. | From preoperative (baseline) to 5 years after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Functional change in Timed up and Go (TUG) test | The Timed-get-up-and-go test (TUG) is a simple test widely used to assess a person's mobility, requiring both static and dynamic balance. Subjects are instructed to walk as quickly as they feel safe and comfortable. Time (seconds) is taken to rise from a chair (seat height, 46 cm), walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, then sit down wearing regular footwear. The TUG has excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Timing starts on the signal to start and terminates once the participant sits back down fully with their back resting on the back of the chair. Regular walking aid is allowed and recorded if required. Two trials are performed and the faster of the 2 trials is recorded to nearest 10th of a second. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous partial knee replacement or patellofemoral joint replacement and previous patellectomy
Primary Total Knee Replacement (TKR) in the affected knee
Varus deformity >20° or Valgus deformity >15°
Patients with a fixed flexion contracture >20°
Previous intra-articular fractures of the affected knee
Patients with previous methaphysal tibial or femoral osteotomy performed less than 5 years before the screening visit, in case of plate removal surgery it is done early than 1 year ago to screening.
Previous knee replacement on the contralateral side within the last year and whose outcome is achieving an KSS< 60 points
Patients with symptomatic Osteoarthritis (OA) of the spine if the assessment of pain with Numeric Rating Scale is >4
Patients with an history of infections (on the affected knee or systemic)
Muscular insufficiency or absence of muscoligamentous supporting structures required for adequate soft tissue balance
Patients who have damaged or absence of the posterior cruciate ligament for the group requiring Physica CR
Patients with known or suspicious metal hypersensitivity
Recurrent medical history of severe allergic or immune-mediated reactions
Vascular insufficiency of lower limbs severe enough to interfere with the study evaluation
Current treatment or treatment within the previous 2 years before the screening visit for malignant and life-threatening non-malignant disorders
Any clinically significant pathology based on clinical history that the Investigator feels may affect the study evaluation including:
Patients who have known co-existent medical condition with less 5 years of life expectancy
Previous organ transplant surgery
Any psychiatric illness that would prevent comprehension of the details and nature of the study
Participation in any experimental drug/device study within the 6 months prior to the screening visit
Female patients who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy
Not provided
Not provided
General population of subjects requiring a primary TKR with a diagnosis of painful primary or secondary osteoartrithis not responding to other conservative treatments, after the review of medical history and the radiographic evaluation of the affected knee.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Giuseppe Peretti, MD | I.R.C.C.S. Galeazzi (Milan, Italy) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc ASBL | Brussels | Brussels Capital | 1200 | Belgium | ||
| I.R.C.C.S. Galeazzi |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Physica PS |
| Device |
Posterior Stabilized total knee replacement |
|
| From preoperative (baseline) to 5 years after surgery |
| Change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | KOOS was developed and is validated for several cohorts of younger and/or more active patients with knee injury and/or knee osteoarthritis. KOOS is a 42-item self-administered self-explanatory questionnaire that covers five patient-relevant dimensions: Pain, Other Disease-Specific Symptoms, Active Daily Living Function, Sport and Recreation Function, and knee-related Quality of Life. The KOOS's five patient-relevant dimensions are scored separately: Pain (nine items); Symptoms (seven items); ADL Function (17 items); Sport and Recreation Function (five items); Quality of Life (four items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No Problems) to 4 (Extreme Problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with zero representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopaedic scales and generic measures. | From preoperative (baseline) to 5 years after surgery |
| Change in Satisfaction Visual Analogue Scale (Satisfaction VAS) | A Satisfaction Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) system was developed to evaluate patient satisfaction with the TKR at follow-up, similar to the system used to measure pain. The scale consists of a 10-cm-long horizontal line ranging from completely satisfied to totally unsatisfied. On top of the scale the question: "Are you satisfied with your knee prosthesis?" is placed. Facial expressions are put above the line to express satisfaction visually. The patient receives this scale and is asked to mark the line at a point that would match his/her satisfaction. With a ruler, the number of millimetres is measured and converted to points. The satisfaction VAS system ranges from 100 (best, completely satisfied) to 0 (worst, totally unsatisfied) points. | From 3 months to 5 years after surgery |
| Change in Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) | The Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS-12) comprises measures for the assessment of joint-specific patient-reported outcome and focus on patients' awareness of a specific joint in everyday life. FJS-12 is a 12-item questionnaire that integrates variables such as pain, stiffness, function on activities of daily living, patients' expectations and activity levels and finally psychosocial factors. It consists of 12 questions and is scored using a 5-point Likert response format (never-almost never-seldom-sometimes-mostly) with the raw scores transformed onto a 0-100 point scale. High scores indicate good outcome, that is, a high degree of "forgetting" the joint. FJS-12 evaluation isn't performed preoperatively. | From 3 months to 5 years after surgery |
| Components stability - radiolucent lines evaluation | The radiographical assessment includes a modified evaluation of presence, location and thickness of periprosthetic radiolucent lines. The sums of the width of radiolucent lines for every component are categorised as follows: 4 or less and non progressive is probably not significant; 5-9 should be closely followed for progression; 10 or greater signifies possible or impending failure regardless of symptoms. Signs of a radiographically loose prosthesis include progressively enlarging luciencies, subsidence of the component or a change in alignment from previous films. | From discharge to 5 years after surgery |
| Survival rate of Physica CR and PS | Survival rate of the implant (Kaplan-Meier) | At 3 years and 5 years after surgery |
| Incidence of device-related AE/SAE/DD/ADE/SADE | Incidence of device-related adverse events( AE), serious adverse events (SAE), device deficiency (DD), adverse device effect (ADE), serious adverse device effect (SADE). | From intraoperative to 5 years after surgery |
| Milan |
| Milano |
| 20161 |
| Italy |
| Casa di cura Citta' di Parma | Parma | Parma | 43100 | Italy |
| Clinique d'Eich - centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg | Luxembourg | Luxembourg | 1460 | Luxembourg |
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |