Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a safe and effective procedure that is considered the standard treatment for large and complex renal stones. Although it has lower complication and morbidity rates than open surgery, the pain and discomfort related to a nephrostomy tube can cause distress for patients.
Managing this pain with opioids can lead to sedation, nausea, vomiting, and constipation, which defeat the purpose of this minimally invasive procedure.
Skin infiltration with bupivacaine around the nephrostomy tube is not effective. Infiltration of renal capsule has shown to facilitate painless insertion of nephrostomy tube, suggesting the role of renal capsule in pain management.
Peritubal infiltration of bupivacaine from renal capsule to the skin along the nephrostomy tract may alleviate postoperative pain. A unilateral Low thoracic paravertebral (PVB) block offers the option of providing extendable perioperative pain relief without the above side effects or the physiologic derangement associated with local anesthetics in the central neuraxial space.
The aim of this study is to determine whether ultrasound guided low thoracic paravertebral block effective post-operative analgesia as compared to peritubal infiltration analgesia in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint is postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary endpoints are visual analogue pain scores, opioid related side effects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low thoracic paravertebral block | Active Comparator | T8-T9 Ultrasound guided paravertebral block with 20 ml %0,25 bupivacaine |
|
| Peritubal infiltration | Active Comparator | Peritubal infiltration with 20 ml %0,25 bupivacaine |
|
| Control Group | No Intervention | No drug |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine | Drug | 20 ml %0,25 bupivacaine |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Opioid consumption | First 24 hours total opioid consumption |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual analog pain score | Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at first hour postoperatively. | postoperative first hour |
| Visual analog pain score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ali Ahiskalioglu, Ass.Prof. | Ataturk University Anesthesiology and Reanimation | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ataturk University | Yakutiye | Erzurum | 25100 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23831069 | Background | Kirac M, Tepeler A, Bozkurt OF, Elbir F, Ozluk C, Armagan A, Unsal A, Biri H. The efficacy of bupivacaine infiltration on the nephrostomy tract in tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.083. Epub 2013 Jul 4. | |
| 23257888 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002045 | Bupivacaine |
| D014463 | Ultrasonography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000813 | Anilides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000814 | Aniline Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Ultrasound | Device |
|
Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at second hour postoperatively.
| postoperative second hour |
| Visual analog pain score | Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at 4th hour postoperatively | postoperative 4th hour |
| Visual analog pain score | Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at 8th hour postoperatively | postoperative 8th hour |
| Visual analog pain score | Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at 12th hour postoperatively. | postoperative 12th hour |
| Visual analog pain score | Post operative pain will be evaluated with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)score of 0-10 (0= no pain and 10= worst imaginable pain) at 24th hour postoperatively | postoperative 24th hour |
| Ak K, Gursoy S, Duger C, Isbir AC, Kaygusuz K, Ozdemir Kol I, Gokce G, Mimaroglu C. Thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain management in percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(3):229-33. doi: 10.1159/000345381. Epub 2012 Dec 14. |
| D000588 |
| Amines |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |