Participants recorded micturitions in the e-diary during three days. The mean number of micturitions was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded a micturition per day during the 3-day period. Only voluntary micturitions were counted and the episodes of incontinence were not included.

The analysis population was the full analysis set (FAS), which consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug, reported at least 1 baseline micturition recorded in the 3-day e-diary and at least 1 postbaseline micturition. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for missing values in the EoT.

Participants recorded micturitions in the e-diary during three days. The mean number of micturitions was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded a micturition per day during the 3-day period. Only voluntary micturitions were counted and the episodes of incontinence were not included.

The analysis population was the FAS.

The mean volume voided per micturition during 3 days of the 3-day micturition diary period.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded an incontinence episode per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.

The analysis population was the full analysis set - incontinence (FAS-I), which consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and reported 1 micturition at baseline and postbaseline in the 3-day e-diary. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

Urgency was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. An urgency episode was defined as any micturition or incontinence episode with a severity of grade 3 or 4, assessed by participants based on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS), where 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. The mean number of urgency episodes (grade 3 and/or 4) per day was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded an urgency episode (grade 3 and/or 4) with or without incontinence per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). The IPSS total score classification ranges from mild (0 to 7) to moderate (8 to 19) or severe (20 to 35). Higher IPSS scored indicated more severe symptoms.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The subscale voiding score is the sum of the responses to 4 voiding symptoms questions (incomplete emptying, intermittency, weak stream, and straining). The lowest and highest possible scores range from 0 to 20 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). Each question is assigned points from 0 to 5 indicating increasing severity of the particular symptom. The subscale storage score is the sum of the responses to 3 storage symptoms questions (frequency, urgency, and nocturia). The lowest and highest possible scores range from 0 to 15 (mildly symptomatic to severely symptomatic). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) consists of 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life (QoL) with total score and subscores (voiding, storage and QoL). The QoL assessment was a single question asking the participant how he would feel about tolerating his current level of symptoms for the rest of his life. The lowest and highest possible score ranges from 0 to 6 (very pleased to terrible). A higher score is indicative of worse condition and a negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

Urgency Incontinence was defined as the complaint of involuntary leakage accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded an urgency incontinence episode per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.

The analysis population was the FAS-I. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the Symptom Bother Scale of the Overactive Bladder questionnaire (OAB-q). The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consists of 8 questions, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). Lower scores on OAB-q symptom bother indicate a better response.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Coping subscale ranges from 8 to 48. The Coping score was calculated by adding the 8 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Concern subscale ranges from 7 to 42. The Concern score was calculated by adding the 7 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Sleep subscale ranges from 5 to 30. The Sleep score was calculated by adding the 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with 33 questions relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The HRQL portion consists of 25 HRQL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. A higher score on OAB-q HRQL indicated a better response. The lowest and highest possible scores for the Social Interaction subscale ranges from 5 to 30. The Social Interaction score was calculated by adding the 5 response scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The EQ-5D-5L is an international standardized non-disease specific generic instrument for describing and valuing health status. It has a multidimensional measure of health-related QoL, capable of being expressed as a single index value and specifically designed to complement other health status measures. The EQ-5D-5L has five dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems/unable to perform the activity). Health-state utility (HSU) data are estimates of the preference for a given state of health on a cardinal numeric scale, where a value of 1.0 represents full health, 0.0 represents dead, and negative values represent states worse than death. Missing EoT values were imputed using LOCF method.

The analysis population was the FAS.

The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale that asks participants to rate their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems. A higher score indicated a worse perception of bladder condition.

The analysis population was the FAS. Missing values in the EoT were imputed using the LOCF method.

The TUFS was calculated by adding the PPIUS scores of every void in a participant's 3-day diary, and dividing this by the number of days recorded in the diary. Due to a programming failure in the e-diary data for the number of pads used was not collected.

The analysis population was the FAS.

A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night one or more time to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the date/time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the date/time the participant gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). A night time episode of incontinence is not considered a nocturia episode. The mean number of nocturia episodes per day (24 hours) was calculated as the average number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.

The analysis population was the full analysis set - nocturia (FAS-N), which consisted of all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of double-blind study drug and reported 1 micturition at baseline and postbaseline in the 3-day e-diary.

The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale that asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) to 100 (Yes, completely).

The analysis population consisted of the FAS. LOCF was used for EOT.