Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| MA-213 | Other Identifier | Medtronic |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of this multicenter, prospective, randomized study is to assess the diagnostic yield of Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) versus Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) in a screening population.
This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of CCE versus CTC in the identification of colonic polyps in a screening population.
Subjects will be enrolled at up to 20 clinical sites in the United States. Subjects who meet the eligibility criteria will be screened by the gastroenterology site for study participation at a baseline visit which will also include a blood test for renal function (eGFR), and will be evaluated on the randomized procedure day (CCE versus CTC) and again on the day of both the blinded and unblinded OC procedures. Telephone follow-ups will be conducted 5 - 9 days after the CCE/CTC procedure and 5 - 9 days after the unblinded OC procedure to assess subject well-being and capture any Adverse Events (AEs), regardless of relationship to the CCE, CTC, or Optical colonoscopy (OC) procedures.
All CCE RAPID® videos and CTC images will be evaluated by local and central readers. All study analyses will be based on central reader results for both CCE and CTC. Two sets of central readers will be utilized, one set for reading of the CCE RAPID® videos and one set for reading the CTC studies. Both groups of readers will be experts in the reading process for their respective procedures. Readers will provide a report of their findings to the sponsor within 2 weeks of capsule ingestion or CTC procedure in order to allow subjects to return within 5 weeks capsule ingestion or CTC procedure to undergo confirmatory OC. The first OC procedure will be performed with the clinician blinded to the CCE or CTC results. Immediately following this blinded procedure, the clinician will review the CCE or CTC results report provided by the sponsor from the central readers, and a second unblinded OC procedure will be performed if there are discrepancies between the CCE/CTC findings and OC.
Colonoscopy must not be performed by the same person who conducts the local CCE reading, or anyone who has reviewed CCE/CTC results for that subject.
Bowel preparation regimens for all three procedure types will be standardized across sites.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLON Capsule endoscopy | Experimental | Subjects will be instructed to follow a detailed dietary and colon preparation regimen prior to and during the CCE procedure day. With the exception of Gastrografin, all colon preparation products will be standard colon cleansing products approved by the FDA. Between 45 and 75 minutes after the final Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) ingestion, the subject will swallow the PillCam COLON Capsule with a cup of water. If necessary, capsule position will be monitored to ensure adequate booster administration. Subjects will keep a timed diary of key preparation steps and bowel activity, including capsule excretion. Subjects will be allowed to leave the unit 10 hours after capsule ingestion if the capsule is not yet excreted. Subjects leaving before excretion will be instructed to disconnect the recorder at excretion or 12 hours after capsule ingestion (whichever comes first). |
|
| Computed Tomographic Colonography | Active Comparator | Subjects will be instructed to follow a detailed dietary and colon preparation regimen prior to and during the Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) procedure day. The CTC procedure and study interpretation will be conducted in accordance with the ACR-SAR-SCBT-MR Practice Parameter for the Performance of CT Colonography in Adults. Colon insufflation will be performed with the subject in the lateral decubitus or supine position.With the subject in the supine position, a CT scout image will be taken to confirm adequate colon distention. If adequate bowel distention is not achieved, additional air will be insufflated into the colon. After scanning the subject in the supine position, the subject will be placed in the prone position, and additional CO2 will be administered. Subsequently, CT will be performed with the subject in the prone position. If a prone position is not possible for the subject, a left lateral decubitus position is preferred for optimal gas and fluid redistribution. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLON Capsule endoscopy | Device |
| ||
| Computed Tomographic Colonography |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With an Actionable Lesion on CCE vs. CTC Confirmed by Optical Colonoscopy | Proportion of subjects shown to have an actionable lesion, defined as any polyp or mass lesion ≥6 mm. Diagnostic yield of CCE/CTC will be calculated in relation to the confirmatory Optical colonoscopy results | 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity of CCE Versus CTC in the Detection of Polyps ≥6 mm | Sensitivity (the percentage of patients with disease who test positive) assessed in relation to the confirmatory optical colonoscopy (OC) results on a "per subject" basis | 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
| Specificity of CCE Versus CTC in the Detection of Polyps ≥6 mm |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Brooks Cash, MD | University of South Alabama | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of South Alabama | Mobile | Alabama | 36688 | United States | ||
| Borland-Groover Clinic |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33443017 | Derived | Cash BD, Fleisher MR, Fern S, Rajan E, Haithcock R, Kastenberg DM, Pound D, Papageorgiou NP, Fernandez-Urien I, Schmelkin IJ, Rex DK. Multicentre, prospective, randomised study comparing the diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in a screening population (the TOPAZ study). Gut. 2021 Nov;70(11):2115-2122. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322578. Epub 2020 Dec 18. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | COLON Capsule Endoscopy | Subjects who had Colon capsule followed by optical colonoscopy within 5-6 weeks. |
| FG001 | Computed Tomographic Colonography | Subjects who had computed Tomographic Colonography followed by optical colonoscopy within 5-6 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 8, 2017 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
|
Specificity (the percentage of patients without disease who test negative) assessed in relation to the confirmatory optical colonoscopy (OC) results on a "per subject" basis |
| 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
| Predictive Value of a Positive Test (PPV) of CCE Versus CTC in the Detection of Polyps ≥6 mm | Predictive value of a positive test (PPV) is the percentage of patients with positive tests who have disease assessed in relation to the confirmatory OC results on a "per subject" basis | 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
| Predictive Value of a Negative (NPV) of CCE Versus CTC in the Detection of Polyps ≥6 mm | Predictive value of a negative test (NPV) is the percentage of patients with negative tests who do not have disease, assessed in relation to the confirmatory OC results on a "per subject" basis. | 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
| Jacksonville |
| Florida |
| 32256 |
| United States |
| Loyola University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60153 | United States |
| Indiana University Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| Indianapolis Gastroenterology and Hepatology | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46237 | United States |
| Baystate Hospital | Springfield | Massachusetts | 01199 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic Rochester | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Clinical Research Professionals | St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| NYU | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| Columbia University | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| Asheville Gastroenterology Associates | Asheville | North Carolina | 28801 | United States |
| Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| Virginia Gastroenterology institute | Suffolk | Virginia | 23434 | United States |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Baseline Analysis population is based on the Full Analysis set defined as all randomized subjects who underwent colonoscopy and CTC or CCE procedures.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | COLON Capsule Endoscopy | Subjects who had colon capsule endoscopy followed by optical colonoscopy within 5-6 weeks. |
| BG001 | Computed Tomographic Colonography | Subjects who had Computed Tomographic Colonography followed by optical colonoscopy within 5-6 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Mean | Full Range | year |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| BMI (Body Mass Index) | Mean | Full Range | kg/m^2 |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With an Actionable Lesion on CCE vs. CTC Confirmed by Optical Colonoscopy | Proportion of subjects shown to have an actionable lesion, defined as any polyp or mass lesion ≥6 mm. Diagnostic yield of CCE/CTC will be calculated in relation to the confirmatory Optical colonoscopy results | Per protocol Analysis set (PPAS) is comprised of randomized subjects without major protocol deviations (violations with significant impact on subject outcomes) and who don't meet any of the following criteria: Subject withdraws, Capsules remained in the stomach/SB during the entire procedure, colonoscopy could not be done, technical failure | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sensitivity of CCE Versus CTC in the Detection of Polyps ≥6 mm | Sensitivity (the percentage of patients with disease who test positive) assessed in relation to the confirmatory optical colonoscopy (OC) results on a "per subject" basis | Per protocol Analysis (PPAS) set is comprised of randomized subjects without major protocol deviations (violations with significant impact on subject outcomes) and who don't meet any of the following criteria: Subject withdraws, Capsules remained in the stomach/SB during the entire procedure, colonoscopy could not be done, technical failure | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Specificity of CCE Versus CTC in the Detection of Polyps ≥6 mm | Specificity (the percentage of patients without disease who test negative) assessed in relation to the confirmatory optical colonoscopy (OC) results on a "per subject" basis | Per protocol Analysis (PPAS) set is comprised of randomized subjects without major protocol deviations (violations with significant impact on subject outcomes) and who don't meet any of the following criteria: Subject withdraws, Capsules remained in the stomach/SB during the entire procedure, colonoscopy could not be done, technical failure | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Predictive Value of a Positive Test (PPV) of CCE Versus CTC in the Detection of Polyps ≥6 mm | Predictive value of a positive test (PPV) is the percentage of patients with positive tests who have disease assessed in relation to the confirmatory OC results on a "per subject" basis | Per protocol Analysis set is comprised of all randomized subjects without major protocol deviations (violations that may have a significant impact on subject outcomes) and who don't meet any of the following criteria: Subject withdraws, Capsules remained in the stomach/SB during the entire procedure, colonoscopy could not be done, technical failure | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Predictive Value of a Negative (NPV) of CCE Versus CTC in the Detection of Polyps ≥6 mm | Predictive value of a negative test (NPV) is the percentage of patients with negative tests who do not have disease, assessed in relation to the confirmatory OC results on a "per subject" basis. | Per protocol Analysis set (PPAS) is comprised of randomized subjects without major protocol deviations (violations with significant impact on subject outcomes) and who don't meet any of the following criteria: Subject withdraws, Capsules remained in the stomach/SB during the entire procedure, colonoscopy could not be done, technical failure | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 5-6 weeks from randomized procedure |
|
|
Adverse event data was collected over a 5-6 week period
Adverse events have been collected at the start of the CCE/CTC bowel preparation up until colonoscopy Follow-up call. The following AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected:
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | COLON Capsule Endoscopy | Subjects who had colon capsule endoscopy followed by optical colonoscopy within 5-6 weeks. | 0 | 145 | 2 | 145 | 4 | 145 |
| EG001 | Computed Tomographic Colonography | Subjects who had Computed Tomographic Colonography followed by optical colonoscopy within 5-6 weeks. | 0 | 141 | 1 | 141 | 8 | 141 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haematochezia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal Haemorrage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural haemorrahage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chalazion | Eye disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorectal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemmorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hordeolum | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liron Bar Yaakov, Senior Manager Clinical Affairs | Medtronic GIH (Given Imaging LTD) | 972-526060466 | liron.baryaakov@medtronic.com |
| Jul 31, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011127 | Polyps |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004724 | Endoscopy |
| D023881 | Colonography, Computed Tomographic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D019060 | Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D014057 | Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
| D007090 | Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D011856 | Radiographic Image Enhancement |
| D007089 | Image Enhancement |
| D010781 | Photography |
| D011859 | Radiography |
| D014056 | Tomography, X-Ray |
| D003938 | Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|