Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, one arm, baseline-controlled, clinical study for the evaluation of the UltraShape Power treatment using the U-Sculpt Power Transducer for non-invasive abdominal fat and circumference reduction.
Up to 120 healthy adult volunteers, seeking noninvasive abdominal fat and circumference reduction, male and females, 18 to 60 years of age from 6 investigational sites. Eligible subjects will receive 3 bi-weekly treatments (2 weeks interval) with the UltraShape Power device utilizing the U-Sculpt Power Transducer according to the study protocol. Subjects will return for 3 follow-up visits: four weeks (4wk FU), eight weeks (8wk FU) and 12 weeks (12wk FU) after the last treatment (Third Treatment).
Each subject will be enrolled for total expected study duration of 16 weeks. Subject's abdominal fat thickness and circumference will be measured at the measurements points and will be assessed at each visit. Additionally, a subject questionnaire will be completed in each follow-up visit (4wk, 8wk and 12wk FU). Finally, photography will be performed under visible light conditions of the front, right, left and back view. Most of the assessments will occur at each of the visits (all treatments and all follow-up visits) to the clinic.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| UltraShape Power treatment to abdomen | Experimental | Eligible subjects will receive 3 treatments, 2 weeks interval, with the UltraShape Power device according to the study protocol and user manual. The subject will return for 3 follow up visits: four weeks (4wk FU), eight weeks (8wk FU) and 12 weeks (12wk FU) after the last treatment, for total expected study duration of 16 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UltraShape Power | Device | Tissue selectivity is achieved by a proprietary knowledge of ultrasound parameters ensuring specific destruction of the fat cells only within the target area. All other types of tissue, such as blood vessels, muscles and peripheral nerves remain intact. There are no thermal effects. Fat cell destruction is achieved by ultrasound-induced mechanical effects during a very short exposure time |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Abdominal Fat Thickness Compared to Baseline as Measured by Ultrasound | Abdominal fat thickness change post UltraShape treatments at 12 weeks follow-up (12wk FU) after final treatment versus baseline | Baseline and 16 weeks (4 weeks treatment + 12 week follow up) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Abdominal Fat Thickness Compared to Baseline as Measured by Ultrasound | Abdominal fat thickness change as measured by ultrasound post UltraShape Power treatments at 4-week, 8-week and 12-week (from baseline visit) versus baseline | Baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (from baseline visit) |
| Change in Abdominal Circumference Compared to Baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
A subject is eligible to participate in the study if he/she meets all the following inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
A subject is not eligible for participation in this study if he or she meets any of the following exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ruthie Amir, MD | Syneron Medical | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laser Skin Surgery Center of Northern California | Sacramento | California | 95816 | United States | ||
| Prana Medical Aesthetics |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20442099 | Background | Ascher B. Safety and efficacy of UltraShape Contour I treatments to improve the appearance of body contours: multiple treatments in shorter intervals. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Mar;30(2):217-24. doi: 10.1177/1090820X09360692. | |
| 17457840 | Background | Moreno-Moraga J, Valero-Altes T, Riquelme AM, Isarria-Marcosy MI, de la Torre JR. Body contouring by non-invasive transdermal focused ultrasound. Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Apr;39(4):315-23. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20478. |
Not provided
Not provided
Overall results shared with study investigators.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Treated and Untreated Abdomen | Circumference and fat thickness reduction of abdomen after Ultrashape treatments (three treatments with U-sculpt Power transducer Isppa 660 W/cm^2) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Treated and Untreated Abdomen | Circumference and fat thickness measurements of abdomen before and after Ultrashape treatments of the same subjects |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Abdominal Fat Thickness Compared to Baseline as Measured by Ultrasound | Abdominal fat thickness change post UltraShape treatments at 12 weeks follow-up (12wk FU) after final treatment versus baseline | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage change | Baseline and 16 weeks (4 weeks treatment + 12 week follow up) |
|
|
Subjects were assessed and followed up for adverse events at each treatment (3 treatments at 2 weeks interval) and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the Ultrashape Power treatment
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treated Abdomen | Subjects treated on the abdomen with Ultrashape ultrasound treatments |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welts | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Small mild welts |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of Clinical Affairs | Syneron Medical | +972-73-2442347 | shlomitm@syneron-candela.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 5, 2016 | Feb 12, 2019 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
Abdominal circumference change post UltraShape Power treatments |
| Baseline and at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks (from baseline visit) |
| Number of Investigators Reporting Satisfaction With Participants' Treatment Outcome | Satisfaction assessment will be performed independently by the investigator using a 4-point Likert scale questionnaire from 0 = dissatisfied to 3= very satisfied. The values in the data table reflect the number of Investigators who were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" (i.e., "reported a 2 or 3") with Participant Treatment Outcome, as assessed by the questionnaire. | 8, 12 and 16 weeks (from baseline visit) |
| Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction With Treatment Outcome | Satisfaction assessment will be performed independently by the subjects using a 4-point Likert scale questionnaire from 0 = dissatisfied to 3= very satisfied. The values in the data table reflect the number of participants who were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" (i.e., "reported a 2 or 3") with Treatment Outcome, as assessed by the questionnaire. | 8, 12 and 16 weeks (from baseline visit) |
| Pain Scale for Rating Discomfort Associated With Treatment | Comfort assessment will be performed independently by the subjects using a numerical scale (0-no discomfort to 10-Worst possible discomfort). The subjects will answer this questionnaire after each of the three treatments. | Day 0 (1st treatment), at 2 weeks (2nd treatment) and at 4 weeks (3rd treatment) |
| Jacksonville Beach |
| Florida |
| 32250 |
| United States |
| Baumann Cosmetic and Research Institute, Inc | Miami | Florida | 33137 | United States |
| DuPage Medical Group | Naperville | Illinois | 60563 | United States |
| A Womans Touch Plastic Surgery | Louisville | Kentucky | 40205 | United States |
| Syneron Candela Institute for Education Clinic | Wayland | Massachusetts | 01778 | United States |
| Union Square Laser Dermatology | New York | New York | 10003 | United States |
| Jewell Plastic Surgery | Eugene | Oregon | 97401 | United States |
| 26714982 | Background | Chang SL, Huang YL, Lee MC, Chang CH, Lin YF, Cheng CY, Hu S. Long-term follow-up for noninvasive body contouring treatment in Asians. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Feb;31(2):283-7. doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1852-0. Epub 2015 Dec 29. |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Fat Thickness | Mean | Standard Deviation | millimeter |
|
| Midline Circumference | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeter |
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Abdominal Fat Thickness Compared to Baseline as Measured by Ultrasound | Abdominal fat thickness change as measured by ultrasound post UltraShape Power treatments at 4-week, 8-week and 12-week (from baseline visit) versus baseline | One participant did not attend the 4 week FU (8 weeks from baseline visit) and three participants did not attend the 8 weeks FU (12 weeks from baseline) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage change | Baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (from baseline visit) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Abdominal Circumference Compared to Baseline | Abdominal circumference change post UltraShape Power treatments | One participant did not attend the 4 week FU (8 weeks from baseline visit) and three participants did not attend the 8 weeks FU (12 weeks from baseline) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeter | Baseline and at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks (from baseline visit) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Investigators Reporting Satisfaction With Participants' Treatment Outcome | Satisfaction assessment will be performed independently by the investigator using a 4-point Likert scale questionnaire from 0 = dissatisfied to 3= very satisfied. The values in the data table reflect the number of Investigators who were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" (i.e., "reported a 2 or 3") with Participant Treatment Outcome, as assessed by the questionnaire. | One participant did not attend the 4 week FU (8 weeks from baseline visit) and three participants did not attend the 8 weeks FU (12 weeks from baseline) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 8, 12 and 16 weeks (from baseline visit) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Reporting Satisfaction With Treatment Outcome | Satisfaction assessment will be performed independently by the subjects using a 4-point Likert scale questionnaire from 0 = dissatisfied to 3= very satisfied. The values in the data table reflect the number of participants who were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" (i.e., "reported a 2 or 3") with Treatment Outcome, as assessed by the questionnaire. | One participant did not attend the 4 week FU (8 weeks from baseline visit) and three participants did not attend the 8 weeks FU (12 weeks from baseline) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 8, 12 and 16 weeks (from baseline visit) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pain Scale for Rating Discomfort Associated With Treatment | Comfort assessment will be performed independently by the subjects using a numerical scale (0-no discomfort to 10-Worst possible discomfort). The subjects will answer this questionnaire after each of the three treatments. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Day 0 (1st treatment), at 2 weeks (2nd treatment) and at 4 weeks (3rd treatment) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 62 |
| 0 |
| 62 |
| 11 |
| 62 |
| Pruitis / itching | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Itching following treatment |
|
| Blanching | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | Mild blanching |
|
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Fat thickness change at 12 weeks |
|
|
|
| Abdominal circumference change at 12 weeks |
|
|
| Abdominal circumference change at 16 weeks |
|
|
|
| Investigator satisfaction rate at 16 week |
|
|
|
| Subject satisfaction rate at 16 week |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|