Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-005542-11 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multiple-dose, clinical similarity study to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of ABP 798 compared with rituximab in subjects with grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular B-cell NHL and low tumor burden.
Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 375 mg/m^2 intravenous infusion of either ABP 798 or rituximab once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABP 798 | Experimental | ABP 798 was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 as an intravenous (IV) infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20. |
|
| Rituximab | Active Comparator | Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 as an IV infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABP 798 | Biological | ABP 798 was supplied as a sterile, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV infusion at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100 mg/10 mL or 500 mg/50 mL single-dose vials. Subjects were to receive premedications before each infusion. Premedications were to be given according to local practice for administration of rituximab therapy. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Responded (Overall Response Rate - ORR) by Week 28 Based on Independent Central Assessment of Disease | Overall response within the first treatment cycle was assessed according to International Working Group - Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma criteria (IWG-NHL criteria [Cheson et al, 1999]) by a central reader. Response was evaluated using computerized tomography (CT) scans and positron emission tomography (PET) (to assess nodal disease/organ enlargement), and bone marrow biopsy (to assess bone marrow infiltration). ORR was the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or partial response (PR). Participants that do not meet the criteria for response were considered non-responders. CR was defined as no evidence of disease. CRu showed nodes in the original sum of the products (SPD) regressed by >75% and/or indeterminate bone marrow results. PR was a ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes; >=50% decrease in liver and spleen nodes, and no increase in size of other nodes nor any new sites of disease. | Post treatment up to Week 28 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Responded (Overall Response Rate - ORR) at Week 12 Based on Independent Central Assessment of Disease | Overall response within the first treatment cycle was assessed according to International Working Group - Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma criteria (IWG-NHL criteria [Cheson et al, 1999]) by a central reader. Response was evaluated using computerized tomography (CT) scans and positron emission tomography (PET) (to assess nodal disease/organ enlargement), and bone marrow biopsy (to assess bone marrow infiltration). ORR was the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or partial response (PR). Participants that do not meet the criteria for response were considered non-responders. CR was defined as no evidence of disease. CRu showed nodes in the original sum of the products (SPD) regressed by >75% and/or indeterminate bone marrow results. PR was a ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes; >=50% decrease in liver and spleen nodes, and no increase in size of other nodes nor any new sites of disease. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Males and females 18 years of age and older
Histological confirmed (by lymph node or extranodal region biopsy), Grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular B-cell NHL expressing CD20 within 12 months before randomization
Stage 2, 3, or 4 (per Cotswold's Modification of Ann Arbor Staging System) with measurable disease (per International Working Group)
Low tumor burden based on the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| MD | Amgen | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Encinitas | California | 92024-1332 | United States | ||
| Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33044684 | Derived | Niederwieser D, Hamm C, Cobb P, Mo M, Forsyth C, Tucci A, Hanes V, Delwail V, Hajek R, Chien D. Efficacy and Safety of ABP 798: Results from the JASMINE Trial in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Comparison with Rituximab Reference Product. Target Oncol. 2020 Oct;15(5):599-611. doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00748-4. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| AmgenTrials clinical trials website | View source |
Not provided
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.
Participants were randomized centrally to receive either ABP 798 or rituximab in a 1:1 manner. The randomization was stratified based on geographic region (Europe, Americas, Japan, Asia Pacific - Other) and age group (> 60 years of age, ≤ 60 years of age).
A total of 380 subjects were screened and 256 participants (128 in the ABP 798 treatment group and 128 in the rituximab treatment group) were randomized at 91 centers across 20 countries.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | ABP 798 | ABP 798 was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 as an intravenous (IV) infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20. |
| FG001 | Rituximab | Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 as an IV infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 17, 2017 | Jun 26, 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Rituximab | Biological | Rituximab was procured from commercial supplies in the US and was supplied as a sterile, clear, colorless, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV infusion at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100-mg/10 mL or 500-mg/50 mL single-dose vials. Subjects were to receive premedications before each infusion. Premedications were to be given according to local practice for administration of rituximab therapy. |
|
|
| Week 12 |
| Pharmacokinetic Serum Concentrations by Visit | Pharmacokinetic serum samples were analyzed by a central lab. Lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.25 ug/mL. PK concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were assigned a value of 0. Geometric mean and geometric CV were only calculated using concentrations >0. | Weeks 2, 3, 4, 12 and 20 |
| Percentage of Participants With Complete Depletion of Clusters of Differentiation 19-Positive (CD19+) Cell Count From Baseline to Day 8 | Complete depletion of CD19+ cell count at any postdose time was defined as CD19+ cell counts < 20 cell/μL (0.02 * 10^9 cell/L). Participants with missing CD19+ cell count at baseline or participants with CD19+ cell count < 20 cell/μL at baseline were to be excluded from the derivation of complete depletion of CD19+ cell count. | Baseline (Day 1), Study Day 8 |
| Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Results by Visit | Samples were analyzed by a central lab. | Baseline (Day 1), Day 8 (Week 2), Weeks 3, 4, 28 |
| Total Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Results by Visit | Samples were analyzed by a central lab. | Baseline (Day 1), Day 8 (Week 2), Weeks 3, 4, 28 |
| Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Each AE was graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild AE Grade 2 = Moderate AE Grade 3 = Severe AE Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 = Death related to AE. Serious adverse events include any event that is fatal, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other significant medical hazard. IP = investigational product | Day 1 (post treatment) to Week 28 |
| Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Interest (AEOIs) | The AEOIs prespecified for this study were infusion reactions including hypersensitivity, cardiac disorders, serious infections, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, hematological reactions, hepatitis B reactivation, opportunistic infections, severe mucocutaneous reactions, tumor lysis syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation, and reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Infusion reactions including hypersensitivity adverse events of interest must have start date the same as, or one day after, an investigational product administration start date. | Day 1 (post treatment) to Week 28 |
| Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibodies | Samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect antibodies capable of binding to ABP 798/rituximab (Binding Antibody Assay). Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based assay to determine neutralizing activity against ABP 798/rituximab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay). Developing antibody incidence was defined as participants with a negative or no binding antibody result at baseline and a positive antibody result at any post-baseline time point. | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 20 and 28 |
| Participants' Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Status Based on the Independent Central Assessment of Disease | PFS was based on disease assessments determined by the central, independent, blinded radiologists' and oncologist's review. | Day 1 up to Week 28 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Survived -- Overall Survival (OS) | Percentage of participants who were alive at the end of the study. | Day 1 up to Week 28 |
| Mount Sterling |
| Kentucky |
| 40353 |
| United States |
| Research Site | Billings | Montana | 59102 | United States |
| Research Site | Zanesville | Ohio | 43701 | United States |
| Research Site | Roanoke | Virginia | 24014 | United States |
| Research Site | Gosford | New South Wales | 2250 | Australia |
| Research Site | Frankston | Victoria | 3199 | Australia |
| Research Site | Perth | Western Australia | 6000 | Australia |
| Research Site | Plovdiv | 4002 | Bulgaria |
| Research Site | Stara Zagora | 6000 | Bulgaria |
| Research Site | Windsor | Ontario | N8W 2X3 | Canada |
| Research Site | Medellín | Antioquia | 050034 | Colombia |
| Research Site | Bogota | Cundinamarca | 110111 | Colombia |
| Research Site | Prague | Prague | 150 06 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Ostrava - Poruba | Severomoravsky KRAJ | 708 52 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Bordeaux | Aquitaine | 33077 | France |
| Research Site | Clermont-Ferrand | Auvergne | 63050 | France |
| Research Site | Cesson-Sévigné | Brittany Region | 35576 | France |
| Research Site | Boulogne-sur-Mer | Hauts-de-France | 62321 | France |
| Research Site | La Rochelle | Poitou-charentes | 17000 | France |
| Research Site | Poitiers | Poitou-charentes | 86021 | France |
| Research Site | Batumi | 6000 | Georgia |
| Research Site | Tbilisi | 0112 | Georgia |
| Research Site | Tbilisi | 0160 | Georgia |
| Research Site | Tbilisi | 0186 | Georgia |
| Research Site | Freiburg im Breisgau | Baden-Wurttemberg | 79110 | Germany |
| Research Site | Augsburg | Bavaria | 86156 | Germany |
| Research Site | Würzburg | Bavaria | 97080 | Germany |
| Research Site | Kassel | Hesse | 34125 | Germany |
| Research Site | Münster | North Rhine-Westphalia | 48149 | Germany |
| Research Site | Leipzig | Saxony | 04103 | Germany |
| Research Site | Flensburg | Schleswig-Holstein | 24939 | Germany |
| Research Site | Athens | Attica | 11525 | Greece |
| Research Site | Athens | Attica | 11527 | Greece |
| Research Site | Patra | Peloponnese | 26504 | Greece |
| Research Site | Surat | Gujarat | 395010 | India |
| Research Site | Vadodara | Gujarat | 390001 | India |
| Research Site | Bangalore | Karnataka | 560068 | India |
| Research Site | Mangalore | Karnataka | 575001 | India |
| Research Site | Nashik | Maharashtra | 422004 | India |
| Research Site | Pune | Maharashtra | 411 001 | India |
| Research Site | Bikaner | Rajasthan | 334 003 | India |
| Research Site | Be’er Ya‘aqov | Rehoboth | 7030000 | Israel |
| Research Site | San Giovanni Rotondo | Foggia | 71013 | Italy |
| Research Site | Bergamo | Lombardy | 24127 | Italy |
| Research Site | Pesaro | Pesaro E Urbino | 61100 | Italy |
| Research Site | Aviano | Pordenone | 33081 | Italy |
| Research Site | Candiolo | Torino | 10060 | Italy |
| Research Site | Brescia | 25123 | Italy |
| Research Site | Milan | 20141 | Italy |
| Research Site | Milan | 20153 | Italy |
| Research Site | Padova | 35128 | Italy |
| Research Site | Parma | 43126 | Italy |
| Research Site | Ravenna | 48100 | Italy |
| Research Site | Rimini | 47900 | Italy |
| Research Site | Terni | 05100 | Italy |
| Research Site | Chiba | Chiba | 260-8717 | Japan |
| Research Site | Fukuoka | Fukuoka | 811-1395 | Japan |
| Research Site | Maebashi | Gunma | 371-8511 | Japan |
| Research Site | Kobe | Hyōgo | 650-0047 | Japan |
| Research Site | Tsu | Mie-ken | 514-8507 | Japan |
| Research Site | Utsunomiya | Tochigi | 320-0834 | Japan |
| Research Site | Tachikawa | Tokyo | 190-0014 | Japan |
| Research Site | Tokyo | 150-8935 | Japan |
| Research Site | Mexico City | Mexico City | 01120 | Mexico |
| Research Site | Chihuahua City | 31203 | Mexico |
| Research Site | Torun | Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship | 87-100 | Poland |
| Research Site | Krakow | Lesser Poland Voivodeship | 31-826 | Poland |
| Research Site | Legnica | Lower Silesian Voivodeship | 59-220 | Poland |
| Research Site | Gdansk | Pomeranian Voivodeship | 80-219 | Poland |
| Research Site | Târgu Mureş | Mureș County | 540042 | Romania |
| Research Site | Târgu Mureş | Mureș County | 540136 | Romania |
| Research Site | Timișoara | Timiș County | 300021 | Romania |
| Research Site | Bucharest | 030171 | Romania |
| Research Site | Seoul | Gyeonggi-do | 135-710 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Seoul | Gyeonggi-do | 158-710 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Jinju | Gyeongsangnam-do | 52727 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Pusan | Gyeongsangnam-do | 48108 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Daegu | 41931 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Daegu | 42415 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Seoul | 03080 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Seoul | 03181 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Seoul | 03722 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Ulsan | 44033 | South Korea |
| Research Site | Sabadell | Barcelona | 08208 | Spain |
| Research Site | Córdoba | Cordoba | 14004 | Spain |
| Research Site | Majadahonda | Madrid | 28222 | Spain |
| Research Site | La Laguna Tenerife | Santa CRUZ DE Tenerife | 38320 | Spain |
| Research Site | Barcelona | 08003 | Spain |
| Research Site | Cadiz | 11009 | Spain |
| Research Site | Cáceres | 10003 | Spain |
| Research Site | Madrid | 28046 | Spain |
| Research Site | Salamanca | 37007 | Spain |
| Research Site | Kyiv | Kyiv City | 03115 | Ukraine |
| Research Site | Kyiv | Kyiv City | 04112 | Ukraine |
| Research Site | Uzhhorod | Zakarpattia Oblast | 88014 | Ukraine |
| Research Site | Chernivtsi | 58013 | Ukraine |
| Research Site | Dnipropetrovsk | 49055 | Ukraine |
| Treated |
|
| COMPLETED | Completed Week 28 |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Enrolled
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ABP 798 | ABP 798 was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 as an intravenous (IV) infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20. |
| BG001 | Rituximab | Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 as an IV infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
| |||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
| |||||||||||||||
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | Scale used to assess how a patient's disease is progressing, how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the patient: 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory, able to carry out work of a light nature; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about > 50% of waking hours; 3 = Capable of only limited self care, confined to a bed or chair > 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled, confined to bed or chair; 5 = Dead. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Time Since Original Diagnosis | Mean | Standard Deviation | months |
| |||||||||||||||
| Previous Radiation Treatment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Responded (Overall Response Rate - ORR) by Week 28 Based on Independent Central Assessment of Disease | Overall response within the first treatment cycle was assessed according to International Working Group - Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma criteria (IWG-NHL criteria [Cheson et al, 1999]) by a central reader. Response was evaluated using computerized tomography (CT) scans and positron emission tomography (PET) (to assess nodal disease/organ enlargement), and bone marrow biopsy (to assess bone marrow infiltration). ORR was the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or partial response (PR). Participants that do not meet the criteria for response were considered non-responders. CR was defined as no evidence of disease. CRu showed nodes in the original sum of the products (SPD) regressed by >75% and/or indeterminate bone marrow results. PR was a ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes; >=50% decrease in liver and spleen nodes, and no increase in size of other nodes nor any new sites of disease. | The modified full analysis set included all randomized participants with evidence of disease at baseline per the tumor assessment from the central, independent, blinded assessments. Analyses for the modified full analysis set was based on randomized treatment assignment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Post treatment up to Week 28 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Responded (Overall Response Rate - ORR) at Week 12 Based on Independent Central Assessment of Disease | Overall response within the first treatment cycle was assessed according to International Working Group - Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma criteria (IWG-NHL criteria [Cheson et al, 1999]) by a central reader. Response was evaluated using computerized tomography (CT) scans and positron emission tomography (PET) (to assess nodal disease/organ enlargement), and bone marrow biopsy (to assess bone marrow infiltration). ORR was the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or partial response (PR). Participants that do not meet the criteria for response were considered non-responders. CR was defined as no evidence of disease. CRu showed nodes in the original sum of the products (SPD) regressed by >75% and/or indeterminate bone marrow results. PR was a ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes; >=50% decrease in liver and spleen nodes, and no increase in size of other nodes nor any new sites of disease. | The modified full analysis set included all randomized participants with evidence of disease at baseline per the tumor assessment from the central, independent, blinded assessments. Analyses for the modified full analysis set was based on randomized treatment assignment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetic Serum Concentrations by Visit | Pharmacokinetic serum samples were analyzed by a central lab. Lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 0.25 ug/mL. PK concentrations below the lower limit of quantification were assigned a value of 0. Geometric mean and geometric CV were only calculated using concentrations >0. | Safety Analysis Set of participants with available data. Participants with PK concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were excluded from these analyses. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | microgram/mL | Weeks 2, 3, 4, 12 and 20 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Complete Depletion of Clusters of Differentiation 19-Positive (CD19+) Cell Count From Baseline to Day 8 | Complete depletion of CD19+ cell count at any postdose time was defined as CD19+ cell counts < 20 cell/μL (0.02 * 10^9 cell/L). Participants with missing CD19+ cell count at baseline or participants with CD19+ cell count < 20 cell/μL at baseline were to be excluded from the derivation of complete depletion of CD19+ cell count. | Full analysis set of participants with available data. Participants with missing CD19+ cell count at baseline or participants with CD19+ cell count < 20 cell/μL at baseline were to be excluded from the derivation of complete depletion of CD19+ cell count. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (Day 1), Study Day 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Results by Visit | Samples were analyzed by a central lab. | Full analysis set of participants with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | g/L | Baseline (Day 1), Day 8 (Week 2), Weeks 3, 4, 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Total Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Results by Visit | Samples were analyzed by a central lab. | Full analysis set of participants with available data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | g/L | Baseline (Day 1), Day 8 (Week 2), Weeks 3, 4, 28 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Each AE was graded for severity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03, where Grade 1 = Mild AE Grade 2 = Moderate AE Grade 3 = Severe AE Grade 4 = Life-threatening or disabling AE Grade 5 = Death related to AE. Serious adverse events include any event that is fatal, life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other significant medical hazard. IP = investigational product | Safety Analysis Set | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 (post treatment) to Week 28 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Interest (AEOIs) | The AEOIs prespecified for this study were infusion reactions including hypersensitivity, cardiac disorders, serious infections, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, hematological reactions, hepatitis B reactivation, opportunistic infections, severe mucocutaneous reactions, tumor lysis syndrome, gastrointestinal perforation, and reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Infusion reactions including hypersensitivity adverse events of interest must have start date the same as, or one day after, an investigational product administration start date. | Safety analysis set | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 1 (post treatment) to Week 28 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-drug Antibodies | Samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based bridging immunoassay to detect antibodies capable of binding to ABP 798/rituximab (Binding Antibody Assay). Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based assay to determine neutralizing activity against ABP 798/rituximab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay). Developing antibody incidence was defined as participants with a negative or no binding antibody result at baseline and a positive antibody result at any post-baseline time point. | Safety Analysis Set | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 12, 20 and 28 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Participants' Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Status Based on the Independent Central Assessment of Disease | PFS was based on disease assessments determined by the central, independent, blinded radiologists' and oncologist's review. | Safety Analysis Set | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 1 up to Week 28 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Survived -- Overall Survival (OS) | Percentage of participants who were alive at the end of the study. | Safety Analysis Set | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 1 up to Week 28 |
|
|
Day 1 to 28 weeks
Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of adverse events that exceed the indicated frequency threshold.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ABP 798 | ABP 798 was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 as an intravenous (IV) infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20. | 0 | 128 | 5 | 128 | 59 | 128 |
| EG001 | Rituximab | Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 as an IV infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20. | 0 | 126 | 5 | 126 | 61 | 126 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coronary artery stenosis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis ulcerative | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Limb traumatic amputation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erectile dysfunction | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Throat irritation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Amgen Inc. | 866-572-6436 | medinfo@amgen.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 11, 2016 | Jun 26, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069283 | Rituximab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058846 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
Not provided
Not provided
| > 60 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Asian, Non-Japanese |
|
| Asian, Japanese |
|
| Missing |
|
| Other |
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native |
|
| White, Asian-Non-Japanese |
|
| Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Not allowed to collect |
|
| Grade 1 |
|
| Asia Pacific - Other |
|
| Americas |
|
| Japan |
|
| No |
|
| Risk Difference (RD) | 7.7 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.2 | 18.6 | Other |
| OG001 |
| Rituximab |
Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m^2 as an IV infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20. |
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|