Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The trial was an experimental two-centers, randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, non-inferiority cross-over study.
Screened subjects already treated with Levodopa/Benserazide (LDB) (Madopar®) who agreed to participate in the study entered a 4 weeks period if not on stable regimen of Madopar® (run-in period). Following the run-in period, there were two maintenance periods of 4 weeks each, for a total duration of 8 weeks.
Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) by a computerized randomization system to one of two formulation sequences maintaining the dose stabilized during the run in:
A pharmacokinetic study with a fixed dose (100+25 mg) was performed in a sub-population of 14 subjects.
Population: out-patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease for at least 5 years, receiving L-dopa/benserazide.
The total duration of the trial was approximately 8 weeks for patient divided in two maintenance periods of 4 weeks each.
The trial was an experimental two-centers, randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, non-inferiority cross-over study.
Population: out-patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) for at least 5 years, receiving Levodopa, were enrolled to participate into the study. The study was performed in hospital setting using the facilities of the clinical trial centre in both sites involved in the study. The patients were recruited within the patient population using the hospitals out-patients clinics. Recruitment timing lasted 18 months.
Screened subjects who agreed to participate in the study, taking Levodopa/Benserazide LDB (Madopar®) entered a 4 weeks period with stable regimen of Madopar® (run-in period). The formulations of levodopa admitted in the trial were: Madopar® 100+25; and 200+50 (1/2 or 1 tablet). Following the run-in period, there were two key phases of the study: two maintenance periods (4 weeks each), for a total duration of 8 weeks. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) by a computerized randomization system to one of two formulation sequences maintaining the dose stabilized during the run in:
The random allocation of patients to one of the two treatment groups was centrally managed by the coordinating centre, according to an automatically generated randomization list provided by the team responsible for the data collection monitoring and statistical analysis. An allocation ratio of 1:1 was assumed when generating the list. Patients eligible to enter the randomization procedure was sequentially assigned to the lowest randomization sequence number not yet assigned to any study subject. For each randomization number, a sealed envelope containing the randomization code was prepared by the team that generated the randomization list. Unblinding was permitted only if strictly necessary. In case it was essential to know the treatment assigned to a patient due to serious unexpected adverse events, the envelope containing the patient's randomization code could be open. In such cases, a detailed report on the timing, the causes and the patient's randomization number would have been issued by the person responsible for the trial and archived by the coordinating centre.
Mechanical blinding (encapsulation) was used to ensure the double-blind nature of the study. Because the patients enrolled in the trial received levodopa/benserazide in different doses, over-encapsulation of tablets permitted blinding of most oral dosage forms: ½ tablet, several small tablets, capsules of different sizes or colors. Each capsule was then be placed in a narrow opaque tube and identified as "Treatment 1" and "Treatment 2" before administration to the patient. The patient, the investigator, Medical Monitor and Clinical Monitor remained blinded, whereas the site pharmacist and a nurse who administered study medication were not blind throughout this part of the study.
No interim analysis was planned for this protocol. Amendments: no amendments were presented during the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Levodopa Benserazide Madopar | Active Comparator | Madopar 100+25mg and 200+50mg, tablet, tid e qid, for four weeks |
|
| Levodopa Benserazide Teva Italia | Experimental | Levodopa Benserazide Teva Italia100+25mg and 200+50mg, tablet, tid e qid, for four weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levodopa Benserazide Madopar | Drug | Madopar 100+25mg and 200+50mg, tablet, tid e qid, for four weeks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in bioequivalence in the total Area Under the Curve (AUC-t) between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. | AUC-t: area under the curve within first and last observed point | end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks) |
| Change in therapeutic equivalence measured with the Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale part III between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. | A difference of -3 points on the UPDRS motor score be the margin for non-inferiority | end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Patient Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement scale between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. | end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks) | |
| Change in bioequivalence in minimum concentration (Cmin) between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Out-patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease for at least 5 years, receiving L-dopa/benserazide, were enrolled to participate into the study. The patients were recruited within the patient population using the hospitals out-patients clinics.
Fragile population was included in the trial (Elderly 65-74 years and over 75 years).
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| FABRIZIO STOCCHI, PROFESSOR | IRCCS San Raffaele | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irccs San Raffaele Pisana | Rome | 00163 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20332641 | Result | Stocchi F, Jenner P, Obeso JA. When do levodopa motor fluctuations first appear in Parkinson's disease? Eur Neurol. 2010;63(5):257-66. doi: 10.1159/000300647. Epub 2010 Mar 24. | |
| 15372588 | Result | Olanow CW, Agid Y, Mizuno Y, Albanese A, Bonuccelli U, Damier P, De Yebenes J, Gershanik O, Guttman M, Grandas F, Hallett M, Hornykiewicz O, Jenner P, Katzenschlager R, Langston WJ, LeWitt P, Melamed E, Mena MA, Michel PP, Mytilineou C, Obeso JA, Poewe W, Quinn N, Raisman-Vozari R, Rajput AH, Rascol O, Sampaio C, Stocchi F. Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: current controversies. Mov Disord. 2004 Sep;19(9):997-1005. doi: 10.1002/mds.20243. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C005177 | benserazide, levodopa drug combination |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Levodopa Benserazide Teva Italia | Drug | Levodopa benserazide Teva 100+25mg and 200+50mg, tablet, tid e qid, for four weeks |
|
| end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks) |
| Change in bioequivalence in time to maximum concentration (Tmax) after the last dose between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. | end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks) |
| Change in bioequivalence in the half life (t 1/2) after the last dose between the generic levodopa/benserazide and the originator. | end of maintenance period 1 and maintenance period 2 (each period of 4 weeks) |
| 16805724 | Result | Stocchi F. The levodopa wearing-off phenomenon in Parkinson's disease: pharmacokinetic considerations. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006 Jul;7(10):1399-407. doi: 10.1517/14656566.7.10.1399. |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |