Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators sought to compare the time to intubation and success rate of the endotracheal intubation using standard double-lumen tube and video tube ETView DL in an adult cadaver model in normal and difficult airway conditions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal airway | Experimental | intubation with normal airway Cormack-Lehane classivication I |
|
| difficult airway | Experimental | intubation with difficult airway Cormack-Lehane classivication III |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VivaSight DL | Device | intubation using VivaSight DL tube |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time required for endotracheal intubation | time from pick up the tube to first ventilation | 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time required for visual confirmation of double lumen tube position position | Time required for visual confirmation of double lumen tube position position | 1 day |
| success rate of intubation attempt |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine | Warsaw | Masovia | 02-005 | Poland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26020389 | Background | Kurowski A, Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Czyzewski L. Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians?: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e850. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000850. | |
| 26527175 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| conventional double-lumen tube |
| Device |
intubation using conventional double-lumen tube |
|
success rate of first intubation attempt
| 1 day |
| Ease of intubation | To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each intubation method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult). | 1 day |
| Szarpak L, Kurowski A, Zasko P, Karczewska K, Czyzewski L, Bogdanski L, Adamczyk P, Truszewski Z. Double-lumen tube tracheal intubation in a manikin model using the VivaSight Double Lumen: a randomized controlled comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;34(1):103-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Oct 23. No abstract available. |