Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Inability to recruit sufficient no. of subjects over an acceptable time period
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect on pain intensity (PI) of structured discontinuation of long-term opioid analgesic therapy compared to continuation of opioid therapy in Suboptimal and Optimal Responders to high-dose, long-term opioid analgesic therapy for chronic low back pain (CLBP).
This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study which consisted of a common Screening Visit for all subjects, then different schedules for Optimal and Suboptimal Responders, followed by a common schedule for the Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period (BSODP) and Follow-up Period.
The original protocol (10 Jan 2016) was amended twice: Amendment 1 (07 Jul 2016) and Amendment 2 (08 Feb 2017). Screening of subjects only started after Amendment 1 approval. Approximately half the subjects were screened under Amendment 1 and half under Amendment 2. The original statistical analysis plan (SAP) was amended twice as well based on the protocol amendments. The current SAP is version 1.3, dated 11 April 2018, which added a section to list the analyses that were not being completed as a result of the premature termination of this study.
The duration of the entire study for each subject was approximately 33 to 37 weeks. For Suboptimal Responders: the study duration included Screening Period of up to 3 weeks, Run-in Period of 1 week, Baseline Period of 1 week, Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period of 24 weeks, and Follow-up Period of 4 weeks.
For Optimal Responders: the study duration included Screening Period of up to 3 weeks, Observation Period of 1 week, Taper Period up to 2 weeks, Open Label Titration Period of 3 weeks, Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period of 24 weeks, and Follow-up Period of 4 weeks.
The primary endpoint was the change in the mean Average PI score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) from Baseline to the 1 week period before the Week 12 visit. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics (number of observations [n], mean, standard deviation, median, first and third quartiles, minimum, and maximum for continuous variables; and frequency and percentage for categorical variables). Due to the inability to recruit a sufficient number of subjects over an acceptable period of time, the study was terminated prematurely and efficacy analyses were reduced and only a brief summary of the statistical analyses of the primary endpoint in each group (Suboptimal Responders and Optimal Responders) were performed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Suboptimal Responder | Experimental |
| |
| Structured discontinuation opioid therapy Optimal responders | Experimental |
| |
| Continuation of opioid therapy Suboptimal responders | Experimental |
| |
| Structured Continuation of opioid therapy Optimal responders | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) | Drug | Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) | Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing. PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. | From baseline to the 1 week period prior to the Week 12 visit |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) | Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing. PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Be male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female aged 18 to 75 years, inclusive.
Have a clinical diagnosis of non-radicular CLBP (pain that occurs in an area with boundaries between the lowest rib and the crease of the buttocks) of Class 1 or proximal radicular (above the knee) pain of Class 2 based on the Quebec Task Force Classification for Spinal Disorders (subjects with previous surgery or chronic pain syndrome, i.e., classes 9.2 or 10, will be allowed if their pain does not radiate or radiates only proximally) for a minimum of 12 months and
Have been taking ER/LA opioids or immediate release opioids (at least 4 times at day) for at least 12 months.
Have been taking one of the 3 index ER opioid drugs around-the-clock at a twice-a-day frequency for at least 3 consecutive months at a total daily dose within the range shown below.
Daily Dose Range
Be considered, in the opinion of the Investigator, to be in generally good health other than CLBP at screening based upon the results of a medical history, physical examination, 12-lead ECG, and laboratory profile.
Speak, read, write, and understand English (to reduce heterogeneity of data), understand the consent form, and be able to effectively communicate with the study staff.
Have access to the Internet (to access the patient support program).
Voluntarily provide written informed consent.
Be willing and able to complete study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G & L Research | Foley | Alabama | United States | |||
| Horizon Research Partners |
Prior to randomization, subjects gave consent and entered a pre-assignment period that assessed eligibility for the intervention phase of the study.
First Subject First Visit 14 September 2016; Date of Early Study Termination 29 January 2018
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal Responder | Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) Suboptimal Responder |
| FG001 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal Responder |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Feb 8, 2017 | Jun 27, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) | Drug | Continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER) |
|
| From baseline to weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 |
| Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) | Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. This outcome measure applies only to Suboptimal Responders. | Weeks 12 and 24 |
| Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) | Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. This outcome measure applies only to Optimal Responders. | Weeks 12 and 24 |
| Change From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) | The MOS Sleep Scale is a 12-item questionnaire which measures sleep quality in 7 scales over the past 4 weeks: sleep disturbance, snoring, sleep short of breath or headache, sleep adequacy, sleep somnolence, and 2 sleep problems indexes. In addition, the average hours of sleep over the past 4 weeks is recorded as a raw measure and also coded as an optimal sleep index. The MOS is scored and the sleep scales calculated according to the MOS Sleep Scale User's Manual v1.0 (Spritzer and Hays, 2003). The scores on the dimensions and the sleep indices were converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores reflecting more of the attribute implied by the name (e.g. greater sleep disturbance, greater sleep adequacy of sleep). | Weeks 12 and 24 |
| Participants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) | Optimal Sleep Index is based on the average number of hours of sleep each night during the past 4 weeks. Index=1 represents 7-8 hours and Index=0 represents < 7 hours or > 8 hours. | 4 weeks prior to baseline and prior to 12 and 24 week visits |
| Change From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) | The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of mood of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = "not at all" to 3= "nearly every day"; the total score, which is the sum of the score for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score ≥10 is considered major depression and ≥20 is severe major depression. | Weeks 12 and 24 |
| Number of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) | The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of depression of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = "not at all" to 3= "nearly every day"; the total score, which is the sum of the scores for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score >= 10 is considered major depression and >= 20 is severe major depression. | Baseline, 12 and 24 week visit |
| Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument | The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments.The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/depression. Each is rated in 5 levels from no problems/pain/anxiety to being unable/extreme pain/extreme anxiety. The responses for each category are summarized by treatment and visit with frequencies and percentages reporting each level. | Baseline and weeks 12, 24 |
| Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument) | The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The visual analog scale (VAS) rates the subject's health on a 0-100 scale from the worst imaginable health state to the best imaginable health state. | Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit |
| Digit Symbol Substitution Test | Overall neuropsychological function is assessed using the DSST, a test that is sensitive to brain damage, dementia, age, and depression, and is a widely used instrument for measuring the neuropsychological effects of opioid therapy. The digits (1-9) are paired with symbols, and the test consists of matching the symbol for a series of digits as fast as possible. Score is number of correct symbols in 90 seconds. A decrease from baseline detects deterioration in processing speed. An increase from baseline detects improvement in processing speed. | Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit |
| Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the participant's level of improvement/worsening from the beginning to the end of treatment. Participants are asked to select the category of change that most closely describes any change experienced in the pain of their painful areas from the beginning of the Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period to Week 12 and to Week 24. The scale has levels describing change as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. | Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit |
| Sexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for Women | For the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)(15-items) each question is scored on a scale of 0 or 1 to 5, with 0 as no sexual attempts, 1 as the highest frequency, and 5 as the lowest, except where 1=1-2, 2=3-4, 3=5-6, 4=7-10 attempts, and 5=11 or more attempts. Missing responses are scored as 0. For the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)(19 items) each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 or 1-5. The FSFI examines the following 6 domains with minimum and maximum scores as indicated: desire(1.2-6.0), arousal(0-6.0), lubrication(0-6.0), orgasm(0-6.0), satisfaction(0.8-6.0), and pain(0-6.0). A computational formula sums the scores within each domain and multiplies that sum by a prescribed weighting factor: desire 0.6, arousal 0.3, lubrication 0.3, orgasm 0.4, satisfaction 0.4, pain 0.4. Higher scores indicate greater functionality. The single final score range is 2.0 to 36, which is reported as an average for each group of female study participants as change from baseline. | Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit |
| Mobile |
| Alabama |
| United States |
| Healthscan Clinical Trials | Montgomery | Alabama | United States |
| Center for Pain and Supportive Care | Phoenix | Arizona | United States |
| The Pain Center of Arizona | Phoenix | Arizona | United States |
| Quality of Life Medical and Research Centers | Tucson | Arizona | United States |
| Coastal Pain and Spinal Diagnostics | Carlsbad | California | United States |
| Aviva Research | Escondido | California | United States |
| Global Clinical Trials | Irvine | California | United States |
| The Helm Center for Pain Management | Laguna Woods | California | United States |
| Alexander Ford, MD | Los Angeles | California | United States |
| Samaritan Center for Medical Research | Los Gatos | California | United States |
| Catalina Research Institute | Montclair | California | United States |
| North Country Clinical Research | Oceanside | California | United States |
| Westview Clinical Research | Placentia | California | United States |
| Foothills Pain Management Clinic | Pomona | California | United States |
| Northern California Research | Sacramento | California | United States |
| Breakthrough Clinical Trials | San Bernardino | California | United States |
| Optimus Medical Group | San Francisco | California | United States |
| Mountain View Clinical Research | Denver | Colorado | United States |
| Care Research Center | Doral | Florida | United States |
| Direct Helpers Research Center | Hialeah | Florida | United States |
| Eastern Research | Hialeah | Florida | United States |
| Finlay Medical Research | Miami | Florida | United States |
| Future Clinical Research | Miami | Florida | United States |
| South Florida Clinical Research | Miami | Florida | United States |
| Empire Clinical Research | Miami Lakes | Florida | United States |
| Martin E Hale, MD | Plantation | Florida | United States |
| Florida Medical Pain Management | St. Petersburg | Florida | United States |
| Clinical Research of West Florida | Tampa | Florida | United States |
| Palm Beach Research Center | West Palm Beach | Florida | United States |
| Georgia Institute for Clinical Research | Marietta | Georgia | United States |
| Sestron Clinical Research | Marietta | Georgia | United States |
| Healthcare Research Network II | Blue Island | Illinois | United States |
| Indiana Pain and Spine Clinic | South Bend | Indiana | United States |
| Mid-American Psysiatrists | Overland Park | Kansas | United States |
| WK River Cities Clinical Research Center | Shreveport | Louisiana | United States |
| MedVadis Research Corporation | Watertown | Massachusetts | United States |
| Oakland Medical Research | Troy | Michigan | United States |
| Healthcare Research Network | Hazelwood | Missouri | United States |
| St Louis Clinical Trials | St Louis | Missouri | United States |
| Red Rock Clinical Research | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States |
| OnSite Clinical Solutions | Mooresville | North Carolina | United States |
| Clinical Trials of America | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States |
| The Center for Clinical Research | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States |
| Prestige Clinical Research | Franklin | Ohio | United States |
| North Star Medical Research | Middleburg Heights | Ohio | United States |
| Cutting Edge Research Group | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States |
| Medical Research International | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States |
| SP Research | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States |
| Brandywine Clinical Research | Downingtown | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Founders Research Corporation | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Carolina Center for Advanced Management of Pain | Spartanburg | South Carolina | United States |
| Healthy Concepts | Rapid City | South Dakota | United States |
| Comprehensive Pain Specialists | Hendersonville | Tennessee | United States |
| New Phase Research and Development | Knoxville | Tennessee | United States |
| Biopharma Informatic Research Center | Houston | Texas | United States |
| Coastal Medical Group | Houston | Texas | United States |
| Highland Clinical Research | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States |
| Interventional Pain and Spine Specialists | Chester | Virginia | United States |
| Healing Hands of Virginia | Richmond | Virginia | United States |
Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Suboptimal Responder |
| FG002 | Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
| FG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal Responder | Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Suboptimal Responder |
| BG001 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Suboptimal Responder |
| BG002 | Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
| BG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in the Mean Average Pain Intensity (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) | Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing. PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | From baseline to the 1 week period prior to the Week 12 visit |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Mean Average Pain Intensity Score (PI) Score on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) | Baseline is defined as the mean of the available Average PI scores on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) over the 7-day Baseline Period. For the scheduled post-randomization visits, mean Average Pain Intensity is defined as the means of the respective PI scores over the 7 days preceding the visit. If there is only one daily PI score available, the mean is not calculated, and the data point is considered missing. PI = Pain Intensity. Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | From baseline to weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Improvement Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) | Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. This outcome measure applies only to Suboptimal Responders. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Weeks 12 and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Suboptimal Responders With Pain Intensity (PI) Score Worsening Relative to Baseline PI Measured on the 0-10 Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS) | Percent pain intensity difference (PID) relative to baseline is defined as 100* ((baseline Average PI - mean Average PI at visit)/baseline Average PI). The percentages are based on number of subjects in the Intent-to-Treat set per treatment group. PI is measured on the Numerical Ratings Scale (NRS). Higher scores indicate more pain intensity; lower scores less pain intensity. Scale range 0-10. This outcome measure applies only to Optimal Responders. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Weeks 12 and 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on Sleep Quality Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) | The MOS Sleep Scale is a 12-item questionnaire which measures sleep quality in 7 scales over the past 4 weeks: sleep disturbance, snoring, sleep short of breath or headache, sleep adequacy, sleep somnolence, and 2 sleep problems indexes. In addition, the average hours of sleep over the past 4 weeks is recorded as a raw measure and also coded as an optimal sleep index. The MOS is scored and the sleep scales calculated according to the MOS Sleep Scale User's Manual v1.0 (Spritzer and Hays, 2003). The scores on the dimensions and the sleep indices were converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores reflecting more of the attribute implied by the name (e.g. greater sleep disturbance, greater sleep adequacy of sleep). | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Weeks 12 and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Participants Sleep Quantity Measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) | Optimal Sleep Index is based on the average number of hours of sleep each night during the past 4 weeks. Index=1 represents 7-8 hours and Index=0 represents < 7 hours or > 8 hours. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 4 weeks prior to baseline and prior to 12 and 24 week visits |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) | The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of mood of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = "not at all" to 3= "nearly every day"; the total score, which is the sum of the score for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score ≥10 is considered major depression and ≥20 is severe major depression. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Weeks 12 and 24 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Reporting Major or Severe Major Depression Using Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) | The PHQ-8 is an 8-item questionnaire that aims at assessing the level of depression of a subject. Each item is scored from 0 = "not at all" to 3= "nearly every day"; the total score, which is the sum of the scores for each item, can be from 0 to 24. A score >= 10 is considered major depression and >= 20 is severe major depression. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 12 and 24 week visit |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument | The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments.The EQ-5D-5L measures quality of life in 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/depression. Each is rated in 5 levels from no problems/pain/anxiety to being unable/extreme pain/extreme anxiety. The responses for each category are summarized by treatment and visit with frequencies and percentages reporting each level. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline and weeks 12, 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Participant Reported Quality of Life Assessment Using Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D-5L Standardized Instrument) | The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered general measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The visual analog scale (VAS) rates the subject's health on a 0-100 scale from the worst imaginable health state to the best imaginable health state. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Digit Symbol Substitution Test | Overall neuropsychological function is assessed using the DSST, a test that is sensitive to brain damage, dementia, age, and depression, and is a widely used instrument for measuring the neuropsychological effects of opioid therapy. The digits (1-9) are paired with symbols, and the test consists of matching the symbol for a series of digits as fast as possible. Score is number of correct symbols in 90 seconds. A decrease from baseline detects deterioration in processing speed. An increase from baseline detects improvement in processing speed. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a test | Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) | The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the participant's level of improvement/worsening from the beginning to the end of treatment. Participants are asked to select the category of change that most closely describes any change experienced in the pain of their painful areas from the beginning of the Blinded Structured Opioid Discontinuation Period to Week 12 and to Week 24. The scale has levels describing change as: very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sexual Function Measured Using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) for Men and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) for Women | For the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)(15-items) each question is scored on a scale of 0 or 1 to 5, with 0 as no sexual attempts, 1 as the highest frequency, and 5 as the lowest, except where 1=1-2, 2=3-4, 3=5-6, 4=7-10 attempts, and 5=11 or more attempts. Missing responses are scored as 0. For the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)(19 items) each question is scored on a scale of 0-5 or 1-5. The FSFI examines the following 6 domains with minimum and maximum scores as indicated: desire(1.2-6.0), arousal(0-6.0), lubrication(0-6.0), orgasm(0-6.0), satisfaction(0.8-6.0), and pain(0-6.0). A computational formula sums the scores within each domain and multiplies that sum by a prescribed weighting factor: desire 0.6, arousal 0.3, lubrication 0.3, orgasm 0.4, satisfaction 0.4, pain 0.4. Higher scores indicate greater functionality. The single final score range is 2.0 to 36, which is reported as an average for each group of female study participants as change from baseline. | Intent to Treat Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Change from Baseline to 12 and 24 week visit |
|
Up to 34 Weeks Post Randomization
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Suboptimal Responder | Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Suboptimal Responder | 0 | 13 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 13 |
| EG001 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Suboptimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Suboptimal Responder | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 12 |
| EG002 | Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Respond | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| EG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urinary Tract Infection | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug Screen Positive | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urine Alcohol Test Positive | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver Function Test Abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Irritable Bowel Syndrome | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perineal Abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis streptococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug withdrawal syndrome | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematotympanum | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint dislocation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug dispensing error | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (18.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
This study was terminated because it could not recruit the planned study population. Randomized study participants were too few to show changes in pain intensity scores or clinical effects. The safety profile reflects current prescribing information.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Han, Associate Director, Statistics | Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 484-354-3547 | jhan9@its.jnj.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 11, 2018 | Jun 28, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009293 | Opioid-Related Disorders |
| D000079524 | Narcotic-Related Disorders |
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| 25-49 |
|
| 50-64 |
|
| Equal to or greater than 65 |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder
| OG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
| OG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
| OG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
| OG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
| Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder |
Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
| OG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
| OG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
| Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder |
Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
| OG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder
| OG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Suboptimal Responder |
| OG002 | Structured Discontinuation Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured discontinuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
| OG003 | Continuation of Opioid Therapy Optimal Responder | Structured continuation of opioid therapy (morphine sulfate ER, oxycodone ER, oxymorphone ER), Optimal Responder |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|