Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Unable to recruit successfully
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Brain & Behavior Research Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study proposes to assess the effect of trans-cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive control, working memory, functional, clinical, and cognitive outcomes in schizophrenia patients.
Cognitive functions and EEG correlates will be thoroughly assessed in schizophrenia patients undergoing a tDCS treatment and compared with patients receiving a placebo stimulation. The treatment will involve 20 minutes of tDCS application to the left prefrontal and temporo-parietal cortex, twice a day for five days, a procedure shown to be effective in improving other symptoms of psychosis such as negative symptoms and hallucinations. Critically, in addition to standard neuropsychological testing, cognitive assessments will involve tasks that tap cognitive control and working memory, impairments in which comprise two of the core cognitive disturbances in schizophrenia and which have been linked to brain rhythm disturbances measurable by EEG recordings. Investigators will also assess changes in functional outcome by tDCS and investigate relationships between improvements in cognition, brain rhythms and functional outcome. All these assessments will occur just prior to tDCS application, just after completion of the tDCS series, and then again at 2 months follow-up. There will be two separate independent groups of patients who will be randomized to active versus sham treatments. The first group will have early course schizophrenia (less than 5 years of antipsychotic treatment; n=40). The second group will be chronic schizophrenia (greater than 5 years of antipsychotic treatment; n=40).
Relevance
This proposal would be the first integrated study of the effects of tDCS on cognitive symptoms, brain function and functional outcome in schizophrenia. A positive outcome would represent a marked improvement in clinical therapeutics for cognition in psychosis and provide a powerful tool for improving functional outcome in this debilitating disorder. Understanding the impact on brain rhythm disturbances could support the study of similar stimulation-based therapeutic approaches to other neuropsychiatric disorders that shows similar disturbances in cognition and brain rhythms activity, such as bipolar disorder and autism.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Stimulation | Experimental | Active stimulation group will receive 20 min of 2 mA direct current stimulation. |
|
| Sham Stimulation | Sham Comparator | This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Trans-cranial direct-current stimulation | Device | Active stimulation group will receive 20 min of 2 mA direct current stimulation. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Control | The investigators will assess cognitive control using the Preparing to Overcome Prepotency (POP) task. The accuracy mean differences between the high and low control conditions will be used as dependent measures. The study is powered at 0.8 to observe a post-pre treatment improvement in cognitive control with a substantial effect size (d=0.56) compared to sham stimulation with effects relatively stable measured 2 months after baseline. The hypothesized effect size will be d=0.60. | Week 1 |
| Working Memory | The investigators will assess working memory using a working memory task. The accuracy mean differences between the high and low control conditions will be used as dependent measures. The study is powered at 0.8 to observe a post-pre treatment improvement in cognitive control with a substantial effect size (d=0.56) compared to sham stimulation with effects relatively stable measured 2 months after baseline. The hypothesized effect size will be d=0.60. | Week 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Negative Symptoms | A secondary outcome measure is the severity of negative symptoms as quantified by Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). This study is powered at 0.8 to observe a post-pre treatment improvement in negative symptoms with a moderate effect size (d=0.56) compared to sham stimulation with effects relatively stable measured 2 months after baseline. The hypothesized effect size will be d=0.60. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Early course psychosis:
Chronic psychosis:
Same as early course psychosis but >5 years of antipsychotic treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Raymond Cho, MD | Baylor College of Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22581236 | Background | Brunelin J, Mondino M, Gassab L, Haesebaert F, Gaha L, Suaud-Chagny MF, Saoud M, Mechri A, Poulet E. Examining transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a treatment for hallucinations in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;169(7):719-24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11071091. | |
| 22037126 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Data will be open to sharing after primary findings of study have been published.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary reasons for ineligibility were not taking any anti-psychotic medication, and positive drug screen. There were also many who did not even enter screening due to the assessment that they would highly likely not meet the threshold of requirement cognitive impairment (MATRICS score < 40).
The reason we have fewer subjects randomized than enrolled is that some participants did not meet criteria to be randomized. These subjects were consented and completed many assessments, but were ultimately not randomized due to how they scored on some assessments. For instance, some participants MCCB score was too high to be randomized into the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active Stimulation | Active stimulation group will receive 20 min of 2 mA direct current stimulation. Active Trans-cranial direct-current stimulation: Active stimulation group will receive 20 min of 2 mA direct current stimulation. |
| FG001 | Sham Stimulation | This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. Sham Trans-cranial direct current stimulation: This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active Stimulation | Active stimulation group will receive 20 min of 2 mA direct current stimulation. Active Trans-cranial direct-current stimulation: Active stimulation group will receive 20 min of 2 mA direct current stimulation. |
| BG001 | Sham Stimulation |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Cognitive Control | The investigators will assess cognitive control using the Preparing to Overcome Prepotency (POP) task. The accuracy mean differences between the high and low control conditions will be used as dependent measures. The study is powered at 0.8 to observe a post-pre treatment improvement in cognitive control with a substantial effect size (d=0.56) compared to sham stimulation with effects relatively stable measured 2 months after baseline. The hypothesized effect size will be d=0.60. | We have reported all available data. | Posted | Week 1 |
|
Two months.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active Stimulation | Active stimulation group will receive 20 min of 2 mA direct current stimulation. Active Trans-cranial direct-current stimulation: Active stimulation group will receive 20 min of 2 mA direct current stimulation. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minor Burn | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Minor burn and itching at sight of tDCS electrodes |
Despite concerted and exhaustive subject recruitment efforts, the total number of patients completing the protocol was minimal. As such the sample size was inadequate for deriving any meaningful descriptive statistics or statistical comparisons.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond Cho | Baylor College of Medicine | 7137987781 | Raymond.Cho@bcm.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 26, 2018 | Jun 27, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012559 | Schizophrenia |
| D011618 | Psychotic Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019967 | Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065908 | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D003295 | Convulsive Therapy |
| D013000 | Psychiatric Somatic Therapies |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sham Trans-cranial direct current stimulation | Device | This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. |
|
|
| Week 1 |
| Auditory Hallucinations | A secondary outcome measure is the change over time in the severity of auditory hallucinations as assessed by the Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS). In a study conducted using a similar montage and current strength (Brunelin et. al 2012), a reduction in auditory hallucinations with a substantial effect size (d=1.58) was observed in 30 patients with schizophrenia. However, as their study recruited only those patients with severe hallucinations while the current study does not have such an inclusion criterion. The investigators expect a more modest effect size of d=0.60. | Week 1 |
| Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, Bikson M, Wagner T, Merabet L, Edwards DJ, Valero-Cabre A, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A, Ferrucci R, Priori A, Boggio PS, Fregni F. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul. 2012 Jul;5(3):175-195. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 1. |
| 17170134 | Background | Cho RY, Konecky RO, Carter CS. Impairments in frontal cortical gamma synchrony and cognitive control in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 26;103(52):19878-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609440103. Epub 2006 Dec 14. |
| 8610818 | Background | Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;153(3):321-30. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.321. |
| 18559405 | Background | Lisman J, Buzsaki G. A neural coding scheme formed by the combined function of gamma and theta oscillations. Schizophr Bull. 2008 Sep;34(5):974-80. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn060. Epub 2008 Jun 16. |
| 26088110 | Background | Mondino M, Brunelin J, Palm U, Brunoni AR, Poulet E, Fecteau S. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Symptoms of Schizophrenia. Current Evidence and Future Directions. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(23):3373-83. doi: 10.2174/1381612821666150619093648. |
| 19386916 | Background | Stagg CJ, Best JG, Stephenson MC, O'Shea J, Wylezinska M, Kincses ZT, Morris PG, Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H. Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 22;29(16):5202-6. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4432-08.2009. |
| 21343407 | Background | Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614. |
| 20087360 | Background | Uhlhaas PJ, Singer W. Abnormal neural oscillations and synchrony in schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):100-13. doi: 10.1038/nrn2774. |
| 21312410 | Background | Volk DW, Lewis DA. Prefrontal cortical circuits in schizophrenia. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;4:485-508. doi: 10.1007/7854_2010_44. |
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. Sham Trans-cranial direct current stimulation: This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 |
| Sham Stimulation |
This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. Sham Trans-cranial direct current stimulation: This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. |
|
| Primary | Working Memory | The investigators will assess working memory using a working memory task. The accuracy mean differences between the high and low control conditions will be used as dependent measures. The study is powered at 0.8 to observe a post-pre treatment improvement in cognitive control with a substantial effect size (d=0.56) compared to sham stimulation with effects relatively stable measured 2 months after baseline. The hypothesized effect size will be d=0.60. | We have reported all available data. | Posted | Week 1 |
|
|
| Secondary | Negative Symptoms | A secondary outcome measure is the severity of negative symptoms as quantified by Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). This study is powered at 0.8 to observe a post-pre treatment improvement in negative symptoms with a moderate effect size (d=0.56) compared to sham stimulation with effects relatively stable measured 2 months after baseline. The hypothesized effect size will be d=0.60. | We have reported all available data. | Posted | Week 1 |
|
|
| Secondary | Auditory Hallucinations | A secondary outcome measure is the change over time in the severity of auditory hallucinations as assessed by the Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS). In a study conducted using a similar montage and current strength (Brunelin et. al 2012), a reduction in auditory hallucinations with a substantial effect size (d=1.58) was observed in 30 patients with schizophrenia. However, as their study recruited only those patients with severe hallucinations while the current study does not have such an inclusion criterion. The investigators expect a more modest effect size of d=0.60. | We have reported all available data. | Posted | Week 1 |
|
|
| 0 |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| 5 |
| EG001 | Sham Stimulation | This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. Sham Trans-cranial direct current stimulation: This will be an active sham involving brief (15 msec) low current (0.11 mA) pulses every 550 ms. | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
|
| Cognitive Decline | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Cognitive decline related to schizophrenia |
|
Not provided
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D004597 | Electroshock |
| D011580 | Psychological Techniques |