Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
40 Egyptian Cases with split-thickness skin graft receiving treatment at Zagazig University Hospitals. Study Duration:6 Months .Description of Agent or Moist Exposed Burn Ointment (MEBO).
Intervention:
Objectives: Primary: to determine the efficacy of MEBO versus standard care in improving the healing speed and re-epithelization process of skin graft donor and recipient sites. Secondary to determine the efficacy of MEBO in decreasing recovery time, rate of infections, rate of complications, total treatment costs and its effect on improving pain alleviation.
Description of Study Design: Arm 1 20 MEBO at sites of donor graft and recipient at time of operation and in dressing Arm 2 20 Standard cream Zagazig University Hospital (Antibiotics & analgesics) Estimated Time to Complete 5 months
Background Information.
Skin grafting is a frequently used technique for covering skin defects in cases of row area. The technique evolved from use in the back alleys of India in pre-Christian times to become one of the most valuable clinical tools in modern surgery. There are several techniques for caring for the skin graft site to assure an adequate graft and prompt as well as wound healing.
The use of the split-thickness skin graft (STSG) as reconstructive technique is very common nowadays but this technique is usually a source of pain and discomfort for the patients and may cause significant morbidity and result in hypertrophic or even keloid scarring. The wound heals by a process of re-epithelialization which results in an epithelial cover usually within 7-14 days. The aim of graft management is to maintain an environment that promotes optimal healing and prevents morbidity, which can include pain and infection and ultimately delayed healing.
The dressing of donor and recipient sites which provides a protective barrier should be easy to apply, promote rapid re-epithelialization, and be pain free, infection free, and relatively inexpensive.
MEBO have been proved to have anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial effect due to the presence of - β sitosterol and berberine respectively. Many studies have reported that MEBO provides suitable moist environment needed for burn wounds for optimal healing and re-epithelialization without the need for wound closure by dressing. Also some studies have proved the efficacy of MEBO in secondary healing of partial thickness wounds, such as split thickness skin graft sites, with improved cosmetic results and better scar quality.
In cases of raw area, donor and recipient sites have been traditionally dressed with low-adherent wound contact paraffin gauze or antibiotic-impregnated tulle gras and covered by a secondary dressing made of gauze and absorbent padding.
These dressings are relatively inexpensive. However, during the peri-operative period, patients complain more often of discomfort or pain at the donor area than at the graft site itself besides, the poor cosmetic appearance of donor sites after healing is not readily accepted.
Because the basic pathology of burns closely mimics many aspects of skin graft donor sites, researchers are investigating using MEBO at donor and recipient sites.
Potential Risks
Due its pure and natural origin, MEBO have been reported to have no side effect or potential risks except rare cases of allergy and hypersensitivity.
Known Potential Benefits
MEBO has been proved to have a positive effect on improving healing process with rapid re-epithelialization. According to a recent study, the burn areas and graft sites were markedly less hyperemic and less pigmented and the final cosmetic appearance and patient satisfaction were also higher by using MEBO. The cases who used MEBO had better scar assessment and lower pain scale.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm1 Mebo | Experimental | 20 : receiving Moist Exposed Burn Ointment (MEBO) at sites of donor graft and recipient at time of operation and in dressing |
|
| Arm2 Placebo | Placebo Comparator | 20 : receiving Standard cream Zagazig University Hospital (Antibiotics & analgesics) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moist Exposed Burn Ointment (MEBO) | Drug | is a registered USA patented formulation since 1995. MEBO is pure herbal, natural in origin, containing beta-sitosterol phellodendron amurense, scutellaria baicalensis, coptis chinensis, pheretima aspergillum, Beeswax and sesame oil. 15, 19 The pharmacological effects are attributable to: beta-sitosterol, isolated from phellodendron amurense, flavonoids mainly baicalin isolated from scutellaria baicalensis, alkaloids mainly berberine, isolated from coptis chinensis, Beeswax and sesame oil. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wound Healing Assessment | Standardized digital photographs will be taken of each site at the time of wound inspection, visit 1 and visit 2 then a plastic surgeon and a plastic resident will assessed the healing process blindly. These observers independently will rate the extent of re -epithelialization in each image as none, less than 50%, more than 50% but not complete, or complete. A numeric score was given to each rating as follows: No re epithelialization=0, less than 50%=1, more than 50%=2, and complete=3. Hence, a higher score indicated a greater estimated extent of re -epithelialization. | 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery Time | Time from randomization till primary healing of 75% raw area surface are (BSA) and complete secondary healing of skin graft. | 1 month |
| Rate of Infections | Clinical assessment to detect early signs of infections and Culture for further investigations. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohammad S Alsabbahi, As. Lecturer | Contact | +201092007426 | doctor.sabbahi@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Muhammad H Abdel-All, Professor | Zagazig University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zagazig University Hospitals | Recruiting | Zagazig | Alsharkia | 44519 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12417161 | Background | Atiyeh BS, Dham R, Kadry M, Abdallah AF, Al-Oteify M, Fathi O, Samir A. Benefit-cost analysis of moist exposed burn ointment. Burns. 2002 Nov;28(7):659-63. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(02)00075-x. | |
| 22100189 | Background | Mabrouk A, Boughdadi NS, Helal HA, Zaki BM, Maher A. Moist occlusive dressing (Aquacel((R)) Ag) versus moist open dressing (MEBO((R))) in the management of partial-thickness facial burns: a comparative study in Ain Shams University. Burns. 2012 May;38(3):396-403. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.09.022. Epub 2011 Nov 17. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002056 | Burns |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C472006 | moist exposed burn ointment |
| D000900 | Anti-Bacterial Agents |
| D000700 | Analgesics |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000890 | Anti-Infective Agents |
| D045506 | Therapeutic Uses |
| D020228 | Pharmacologic Actions |
| D020164 | Chemical Actions and Uses |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Zagazig | Drug | Standard care is an antibiotic ointment in combination of analgesic for relief of pain. |
|
|
| 2 weeks |
| Pain Assessment | Visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain (0-10); 0 is the minimum and 10 is the maximum Recording type and dose of administrated analgesics. | 2 weeks |
| Total Treatment Costs | Costs including (administrated medications, examinations costs, follow up visits after discharge). | 1 month |
| Rate of Complications | Rates of allergy, infection and bleeding rate | 1 week |
| Quality of Life | Health related quality of life (HRQL) Questionnaire | 1 month |
| 22132709 | Background | Carayanni VJ, Tsati EG, Spyropoulou GC, Antonopoulou FN, Ioannovich JD. Comparing oil based ointment versus standard practice for the treatment of moderate burns in Greece: a trial based cost effectiveness evaluation. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011 Dec 1;11:122. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-122. |
| 11192048 | Background | Atiyeh BS, Ghanimeh G, Kaddoura IL, Ioannovich J, Al-Amm CA. Split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing: preliminary results of a controlled, clinical comparative study of MEBO and Sofra-Tulle. Ann Plast Surg. 2001 Jan;46(1):87-8. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200101000-00023. No abstract available. |
| 20029295 | Background | Spear M, Bailey A. Treatment of skin graft donor sites with a unique transparent absorbent acrylic dressing. Plast Surg Nurs. 2009 Oct-Dec;29(4):194-200; quiz 201-2. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0b013e3181c4cdd9. |
| 7546582 | Background | Weber RS, Hankins P, Limitone E, Callender D, Frankenthaler RM, Wolf P, Goepfert H. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management. A randomized prospective trial comparing a hydrophilic polyurethane absorbent foam dressing with a petrolatum gauze dressing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Oct;121(10):1145-9. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890100055009. |
| 12694482 | Background | Wiechula R. The use of moist wound-healing dressings in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Pract. 2003 Apr;9(2):S9-17. doi: 10.1046/j.1322-7114.2003.00417.x. |
| 11525858 | Background | Innes ME, Umraw N, Fish JS, Gomez M, Cartotto RC. The use of silver coated dressings on donor site wounds: a prospective, controlled matched pair study. Burns. 2001 Sep;27(6):621-7. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(01)00015-8. |
| 15269581 | Background | Barnea Y, Amir A, Leshem D, Zaretski A, Weiss J, Shafir R, Gur E. Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment. Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Aug;53(2):132-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000112349.42549.b3. |
| 12890465 | Background | Hormbrey E, Pandya A, Giele H. Adhesive retention dressings are more comfortable than alginate dressings on split-skin-graft donor sites. Br J Plast Surg. 2003 Jul;56(5):498-503. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00195-4. |
| 11777142 | Background | Giele H, Tong A, Huddleston S. Adhesive retention dressings are more comfortable than alginate dressings on split skin graft donor sites--a randomised controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001 Nov;83(6):431-4. |
| D018689 |
| Sensory System Agents |
| D018373 | Peripheral Nervous System Agents |
| D045505 | Physiological Effects of Drugs |
| D002491 | Central Nervous System Agents |