Impact of Clinical Pharmacy Consultations in Patients With Cancer Treated With Oral Anti-cancer Therapies on the Rate of Serious Adverse Events
Impact of Clinical Pharmacy Consultations in Patients With Cancer Treated With Oral Anti-cancer Therapies on the Rate of Serious Adverse Events
The improvement of the care pathway of oncology patients through Clinical Pharmacy activities for outpatients (such as pharmaceutical consultation) should be implemented and evaluated.
In order to improve the care pathway of patients on anticancer oral therapies, The investigators suggest in this research project to integrate into the medical care a "Clinical Pharmacy follow-up" for the patient at the hospital in the form of "pharmaceutical consultations". These pharmaceutical consultations carried out in coordination with the hospital clinical teams also aim to make the link between the hospital and community pharmacists.
The improvement of the care pathway of oncology patients through Clinical Pharmacy activities for outpatients (such as pharmaceutical consultation) should be implemented and evaluated.
In order to improve the care pathway of patients on anticancer oral therapies, the investigators suggest in this research project to integrate into the medical care a "Clinical Pharmacy follow-up" for the patient at the hospital in the form of "pharmaceutical consultations". These pharmaceutical consultations carried out in coordination with the hospital clinical teams also aim to make the link between the hospital and community pharmacists. These pharmaceutical consultations were initiated in Marseille and Grenoble University Hospitals in order to know the special needs of patients under oral chemotherapies. However, the impact of these pharmaceutical consultations in a population of patients receiving ambulatory oral therapy remains unknown and needs to be evaluated using objective criteria such as the rate of adverse events which the consequences are considerable both for the patient and the society.
These observations prompted us to establish a randomized controlled study with the objective of assessing the impact of the Clinical Pharmacy consultations in cancer patients treated with oral anti-cancer therapies on the general care management: occurrence of serious adverse events (primary outcome).
This bicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label, two-parallel group study is performed to assess the efficacy of pharmaceutical consultations in the experimental group (full clinical medication review) and pharmaceutical interviews in the control group (Patient Therapeutic Education for oral anticancer drugs only). Depending on the result of the randomization the patient will find himself in one of those 2 parallel arms:
Control group: therapeutic education through short pharmaceutical interviews
The patients allocated in the control group will have a "classic" course of treatment. They will receive the best medical care and will be offered to participate in the therapeutic education program in place in the participating centers including:
Moreover, in the control arm, a systematic "short pharmaceutical interview" with an average duration of 15 minutes will be proposed to patients at the initiation of treatment, at D15 after the prescription (considered as the date of inclusion) at M1 and then every 3 months (M3, M6, M9 and M12):
Experimental group: Clinical Pharmacy through Long Pharmaceutical Consultations In this experimental group, patients will receive the same course of treatment as the patients in the control group, including the D0 short pharmaceutical interview, with the same prerogatives of acceptance or rejection of participation in the TPE program. Short pharmaceutical interviews from D15 to M12 will be replaced by long pharmaceutical consultations of 30 to 60 minutes. The latter consisting in a full clinical medication review and incorporating the pedagogic aspects addressed in the short pharmaceutical interviews but for all therapeutic drugs taken by the patient. Additional consultations are possible on the request of the oncologist and/or patient. The consultations carried out at the request of the oncologist and/or the patient will be counted.
The first part of the pharmaceutical consultation focuses on a complete clinical medication review including:
Establishment of the patient profile: medical history, drug allergies and intolerance, comorbidities, age, understanding capacities, organizational capacity…
Establishment of the list of current treatments (cancer treatment, treatment of comorbidities, self-medication, other products). The effective use of drugs will be discussed with the patient.
Study of health behaviors:
List and grade (NCI version 4) of clinical signs and laboratory abnormalities:
The third step of the consultation consists on providing "pharmaceutical interventions" following the pharmaco-therapeutic analysis (18).
These pharmaceutical interventions might concern the prescribers, the other caregivers, or the patient himself. These interventions will be done in the absolute respect for the French Code of Public Health. All these interventions will be documented, tracked, and evaluated, particularly in terms of acceptance by prescribers.
Sample size Both centers have the necessary number of patients needed to ensure the proper recruitment required for the study.
The annual throughput of the AP-HM is about 300 patients. Targeted diseases as part of this research project are gastrointestinal tumors (GIST, colorectal), neuroendocrine, renal, gynecological, urological (prostate) and skin (melanoma) cancers. The annual throughput of Grenoble University Hospital is more than 70 patients. Targeted diseases are renal tumors, breast and colorectal cancers.
The number of subjects to be included required is determined from the primary endpoint, namely the rate of adverse events of grade III-IV. Data from the current practice in the main center (AP- HM) and from the literature estimate this rate at 35%.
The majority of adverse events related to drugs being preventable, the investigators estimate a decrease of 20 points in this rate in the experimental arm, that is to say a rate of 15%. 166 subjects (83 per group) are needed for a power of 90% and an alpha risk of 5%. To compensate the potential lost of the out of sights (estimated around 15%), the investigators will include 190 subjects in total.
The sample size was determined to obtain 90% power to detect a 20 percent difference in between the 2 groups, as this difference is considered to be clinically significant. In accordance with previous studies (26-31), the investigators hypothesized that the occurrence of the primary endpoint will be at 35% in the control group. With the threshold for statistical significance set at a p-value of 0.05 (two-sided alpha), these calculations showed that 166 patients are needed (83 per group). Assuming that potentially 15% of patients will be lost to follow-up, a total of 190 individuals need to be included.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
stephane.honore@ap-hm.fr04 91 38 70 65