Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Ottawa | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Low back pain is common, costly and affecting up to 80% of the population with the lumbar discectomy being a frequent spinal procedure for disc herniations. Pain & mobility impairments persist in patients following microdiscectomy with long term issues of back pain. The question remains as to why some patients recover quickly and without lasting difficulties while other patients persist with prolonged disability following the same surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine how to guide the patient towards full function and evaluate the timing to initiate strengthening, neurodynamics and a walking exercise program.
The direction of treatment for low back pain both surgically and conservatively seeks to improve function in both daily and sporting activities for all patients. The patients continuing to suffer from a significant level of pain, disability and reduced function following single level microdiscectomy may benefit from a multi-factorial approach. A reduction in neurodynamic mobility related to dural adhesions is considered to be a contributing factor in this persistent peripheral neuropathic pain. The clinical efficacy of this study will address an exercise protocol post surgery in order to provide an optimal approach in the prevention of scar tissue that may be contributing to persistent pain post microdiscectomy. Mobility and motor control impairments are considered the consequence to the onset of pain. Education, neurodynamics and stabilization exercises are instrumental in the recovery post microdiscectomy with a reduction in pain and disability and the goal towards full functioning. The introduction of a neurodynamic protocol as an early exercise intervention may serve to reduce pain inhibition resulting with improved mobility and motor control. The recording of step count per day following a lumbar microdiscectomy will serve to document daily and physical activity levels following surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not there is a significant difference in pain levels and lumbar mobility between an early exercise intervention group versus a late exercise intervention group post microdiscectomy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early exercise intervention group | Experimental | Education, stabilization and neurodynamic level one exercises will be provided to the intervention group within one to two weeks following a unilateral lumbar microdiscectomy L3-4, L4-5, L5-S1. Within 4-6 weeks, this group will be provided with education, stabilization and neurodynamic level two exercises and a pedometer to monitor step count between week 4 and week 10 following the surgery. |
|
| Late exercise intervention group | Active Comparator | Education, stabilization and neurodynamic level one and two exercises will be provided to the active comparator group within 4-6 weeks following a unilateral lumbar microdiscectomy L3-4, L4-5, L5-S1. Within 4-6 weeks, this group will also be given instructions and a pedometer to monitor step count between week 4 and week 10 following the surgery. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise Intervention | Behavioral | Early versus later stabilization and neurodynamic exercise intervention following a post-op lumbar microdiscectomy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire | Pain and function related to low back pain | 3 months |
| Numeric Pain Rating Scale | Pain related to low back pain | 3 months |
| Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire | Psychological barriers related to low back pain | 3 months |
| Patient Specific Functional Scale | Function related to low back pain | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lumbar mobility of flexion and extension | Range of lumbar motion related to low back pain | 3 months |
| Slump test mobility | Mobility restrictions in the slump test related to low back pain |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Fahad Alkherayf, MD MSc FRCSC | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus | Ottawa | Ontario | K1Y 4E9 | Canada |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| The Ottawa Hospital website | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 3 months |
| Straight leg raise | Mobility restrictions in the straight leg raise related to low back pain | 3 months |
| 50 ft Walk test | Time to complete 50 ft walk test | 3 months |
| Step count per day | Step count per day related to Low back pain | 4 weeks |
| Return to work | Timing for return to work related to low back pain | 3 months |