Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bendtsen, Thomas Fichtner, M.D, Ph.D. | UNKNOWN |
| AP Moeller Foundation | OTHER |
| Aarhus University Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main objective is to complete a double-blinded randomized controlled crossover trial of lumbar plexus block with the Shamrock technique guided by ultrasound (US)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image fusion vs. the Shamrock technique guided by ultrasound in healthy volunteers.
The investigators will assess block procedure-related parameters, anatomical spread of local anesthetic, and motor and sensory effects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shamrock guided by US/MR image fusion | Experimental | Use of US/MR image fusion guided Shamrock technique to place lumbar plexus block (20 ml 2% lidocaine with epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine). |
|
| Shamrock guided by US | Other | Use of US guided Shamrock technique to place lumbar plexus block (20 ml 2% lidocaine with epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound/MR image fusion guided lumbar plexus block (Shamrock) | Procedure |
| ||
| Ultrasound guided lumbar plexus block (Shamrock) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants with a successful block of the femoral and obturator nerves (reduced muscle force compared to baseline assessed with handheld dynamometer), and of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (assessed with cold and pinprick test) | Block success is defined as the number of volunteers with a successful motor block of the femoral nerve and the obturator nerve, and with a successful sensory block of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Motor block is a proxy marker of sensory block. A participant with a successful motor block has reduced muscle force after block compared to baseline muscle force assessed with handheld dynamometer, and a participant with a successful sensory block has decreased/absent sensation for cold and/or pinprick. | Assessed 60 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time for preparation of block procedure (seconds) | Time for block preparation is defined as the time period from the time point when the volunteer is placed on the block bed to the time point when the pre-ultrasound scanning before intervention is complete. | Assessed 3 minutes prior to intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jennie MC Strid, M.D. | Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Offical | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Procedure |
|
| Lidocaine-epinephrine added gadoterate meglumine | Drug | Perineural injection of 20 ml 2% lidocaine with 0.0005% epinephrine added 1 ml of gadoterate meglumine (0.13 ml) and sodium chloride (NaCl, 0.87 ml). The 1 ml of gadoterate meglumine-NaCl is added to the local anesthetic prior to the perineural injection in order to enhance visualization of the local anesthetic on MRI scanning after the intervention. |
|
| Time for block procedure (seconds) | Time for block procedure is defined as the time period from the time point when the ultrasound probe is placed on the skin after completed preparation to the time point when the block needle is pulled out after injection of local anesthetics (end of intervention). | Assessed 0 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Electrical nerve stimulation strength (mA) | Minimal electrical nerve stimulation (mA) required to trigger neuromuscular response and confirm correct placement of block needle prior to injection of local anesthetics. | Assessed 1 minute before injection of injectate. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Electrical nerve stimulation response (quadriceps, sartorius, other muscular, paresthesia, none) | Type of neuromuscular response on electrical nerve stimulation. | Assessed 1 minute before injection of injectate. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Needle advancements | Number of needle advancements during intervention. | Assessed 0 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Injection site | Assessed 0 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Block needle depth | Assessed 0 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Discomfort | Estimated on numeric rating scale 0-10 | Assessed 0 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Mean arterial pressure change | Mean arterial pressure is measured prior to intervention and 5 min after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Number of participants with visual confirmed contact between the injectate and the spinal nerves L2-S1, the femoral, the obturator, and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerves, and the lumbosacral trunk assessed on MRI | Assessed on MRI sampled 10-40 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Number of participants with visually confirmed epidural spread of the injectate assessed on MRI. | Assessed on MRI sampled 10-40 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Number of participants with motor block | Muscle strength of the femoral, obturator, superior gluteal, and sciatic nerves are estimated with handheld dynamometer during knee extension, hip adduction, hip abduction, and knee flexion. Motor block is assessed as reduced muscle strength compared to baseline. | Baseline muscle strength is estimated prior to first intervention. Post-block muscle strength is estimated 60 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Number of participants with sensory block | Sensory block is defined as decreased or absent sensation for cold, warmth, touch, and pinprick are assessed for the dermatomes T8-S3 and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. | Estimated 70 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Cost-effectiveness (ICER) | ICER is estimated as the difference in mean marginal cost of the blocks. | Calculated 1 month after study completion. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Quantitative diffusion weighted MRI reproducibility | Assessed on MRI sampled 40-55 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| Image evaluation of diffusion weighted MRI reproducibility | Assessed on MRI sampled 40-55 minutes after intervention. Data will be presented 10 months after study completion. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006620 | Hip Fractures |
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005264 | Femoral Fractures |
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D025981 | Hip Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided