Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To refine a novel intervention using a combination of a smart phone application with best practice psychotherapy for men who have presented to hospital with intentional self-harm. The outcome will be change in baseline of scores on a depression rating scale the PHQ-9 at six weeks. Moreover, the investigators will ask participants about the acceptability of the intervention and the acceptability of using routine data sources as outcome measures. This will inform methods of recruitment for the larger cluster randomized controlled trial and the creation of a treatment manual.
Self-harm is defined as intentional self-poisoning or self-injury, whether or not there is evidence that the act was intended to result in death. In the past, the term used was 'attempted suicide.' However, peoples' motives for harming themselves are highly variable, a person may have more than one motive and motivation is hard to assess. In line with usual public policy in health and social care, the investigators use the term 'self-harm' describing a behaviour - avoiding the word 'deliberate' because many service users or consumers dislike its connotations.
In Ontario, the number of people who present to hospital emergency departments with self-harm is difficult to accurately assess, but the best estimate is about 30,000 each year. The most common form of self-harm seen in emergency departments (around 80% of episodes) is the intentional consumption of an excess of a medicinal or toxic product, whether or not there is evidence that the act was intended to result in death. Injuries, most commonly self-cutting, form 15-20% of episodes.
Two-thirds of people attending emergency departments because of self-harm are under 35 years of age. They are high users of health and social care services. Self-harm has a strong association with suicide: 7 patients per 1000 (about 1%) die by suicide in the year after attending emergency departments with a non-fatal episode (60 times the general population risk), rising to as many as 30 patients per 1000 over the next 15 years. In a recent longitudinal study conducted at the University of Toronto, "all-cause mortality following a first episode of self-poisoning was 1107 per 100,000 person-years… [with] nearly half of all deaths being suicides, accidents or undetermined intent." About a quarter of suicides are preceded by a hospital visit due to non-fatal self-harm in the previous year. It is the major identifiable risk factor for suicide. Mortality from non-suicidal causes is also high, with significantly more than the expected numbers of deaths from natural causes and from accidents. Whilst four of ten people who present with self-harm are men, they form nearly two thirds of suicides after an episode and are far more likely than women to die of premature death from other causes. The premature deaths are greatly over-represented among young people and the life years lost to the community are many.
Repetition of non-fatal self-harm stands at around 20% annually and is associated with much distress and many unresolved interpersonal problems. It is likely that any reduction in repetition of self-harm will be mirrored by a fall in subsequent suicides. The Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention blueprint for a National Suicide Prevention Strategy (CASP) has identified those who have presented to hospital with non-fatal self-harm as a high risk target group to reduce suicide.
People attending emergency departments after self-harm receive a variable standard of care in Ontario. Many are not assessed for psychological needs, and the little psychological therapy available is not usually covered by Ontario Health Insurance (OHIP). Local data from hospitals in Ottawa show that only 4 out of 10 men who present with intentional self-harm are seen by a mental health professional. Few are offered an evidence-based treatment aimed at reducing their risk of suicide or repeated self-harm. At present, assessment for self-harm in adults in Ontario is highly variable and there is no standard protocol for therapy. Assessment of suicide risk is currently a Required Operating Practice for Canadian Hospital accreditation; however, individuals identified as at-risk for suicide rarely receive recommended care.
Specialist services offer intensive and lengthy treatment for the minority of people who self-harm diagnosed with personality disorders, such as dialectical behavior therapy or mindfulness based therapy. The evidence for the effectiveness of these specialist therapies comes almost entirely from studies in women.
The investigators have received funding for a multicentre cluster randomized trial from the Ontario Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Support for People and Patient Oriented Research and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit funded by Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) and the Ontario Ministries of Health and Research and Innovation (MRI) comparing the delivery of smart phone assisted problem solving therapy with treatment as usual in men who present with self-harm. The rationale for focusing on men is that most suicides are in men and previous trials have found that providing generic treatments to everyone does not work. The intervention will build on previous work by trying to extend the range and intensity of therapy. The investigators will do this by supplementing it with a sophisticated smart phone application that has already demonstrated its effectiveness in men with substance abuse disorders. The investigators will be offering an intervention specifically designed for men who self-harm, as they are hard to engage and are more likely than women to have substance abuse problems. However, before proceeding with the full trial, a pilot study will be implemented to refine the intervention and treatment manual, as well as to test the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention to patients.
The pilot study has two aims. The first is to refine a novel intervention using a combination of a smart phone application with best practice psychotherapy for men who have presented to hospital with intentional self-harm. The primary outcome will be the change from baseline in scores on a depression rating scale the PHQ-9 at six weeks. The second aim is to test acceptability. The investigators will ask patients about the acceptability of the intervention and the acceptability of using routine data sources as outcome measures. This will inform methods of recruitment for the larger cluster randomized controlled trial. We will also create a treatment manual for problem solving therapy that incorporates the use of a smart phone application.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHESS Mobile Health Group | Experimental | The intervention will be six weekly one hour sessions of face-to-face problem solving therapy combined with the CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System - CHESS). The CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application enables users to access relevant resources, create a support network and check in regularly with carers. The intervention will be delivered by Dr. Hatcher, a staff psychiatrist in Liaison Psychiatry at The Ottawa Hospital General Campus. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application | Device | A smart phone application designed to reduce intentional self-harm through problem solving e-therapy. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Scale at Week 6 | Measures change in the severity of depressive symptoms. Total scores on this scale range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms. The scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scale should be interpreted as follows: 0-4: Minimal Depression; 5-9: Mild Depression 10-14: Moderate Depression; 15-19: Moderately Severe Depression; 20 and Above: Severe Depression. | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Functioning | Physical Functioning was measured using the Physical Functioning subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Physical Functioning Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating better physical functioning. | Baseline and Week 5 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment Rates at 6 Months | Will be used to assess the feasibility of recruitment for a larger, multicentre cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). To test feasibility in patients the investigators aim to recruit at least half of the men the study team ask to take part in the pilot study. To test feasibility in referring clinicians, the aim is that at least half of men who present with intentional self-harm to the psychiatric emergency service will be approached and complete the The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) form allowing contact details to be passed on to researchers. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Hatcher, MD, PhD | University of Ottawa | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus | Ottawa | Ontario | K1H 8L6 | Canada | ||
| The Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Canadian Institute for Health Information (2011) Health Indicators 2011. Canadian Institute for Health Information,, Ottawa, Ontario | ||
| 17516016 | Background | Hawton K, Bergen H, Casey D, Simkin S, Palmer B, Cooper J, Kapur N, Horrocks J, House A, Lilley R, Noble R, Owens D. Self-harm in England: a tale of three cities. Multicentre study of self-harm. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;42(7):513-21. doi: 10.1007/s00127-007-0199-7. Epub 2007 May 21. | |
| 12204922 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
No participants were excluded from this study post-enrollment.
Participant recruitment took place over a 6 month period from Sept. 2016 to Feb. 2017. TOH ED staff were asked to approach participants with information about the study and refer any eligible men to the Research Coordinator. Once participants were referred to the Research Coordinator, she contacted them by telephone and scheduled a Baseline Visit.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | CHESS Mobile Health Group | The intervention will be six weekly one hour sessions of face-to-face problem solving therapy combined with the CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System - CHESS). The CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application enables users to access relevant resources, create a support network and check in regularly with carers. The intervention will be delivered by Dr. Hatcher, a staff psychiatrist in Liaison Psychiatry at The Ottawa Hospital General Campus. CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application: A smart phone application designed to reduce intentional self-harm through problem solving e-therapy. Problem solving therapy: Face to face problem solving therapy every week for six weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | CHESS Mobile Health Group | The intervention will be six weekly one hour sessions of face-to-face problem solving therapy combined with the CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System - CHESS). The CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application enables users to access relevant resources, create a support network and check in regularly with carers. The intervention will be delivered by Dr. Hatcher, a staff psychiatrist in Liaison Psychiatry at The Ottawa Hospital General Campus. CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application: A smart phone application designed to reduce intentional self-harm through problem solving e-therapy. Problem solving therapy: Face to face problem solving therapy every week for six weeks. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Scale at Week 6 | Measures change in the severity of depressive symptoms. Total scores on this scale range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms. The scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scale should be interpreted as follows: 0-4: Minimal Depression; 5-9: Mild Depression 10-14: Moderate Depression; 15-19: Moderately Severe Depression; 20 and Above: Severe Depression. | Throughout the course of the study, the following study time points were missed: Week 1 (2 participants), Week 3 (1 participant) and Week 4 (1 participant). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 |
|
6 weeks
Adverse events related to subsequent self-harm were collected from participants by their therapist at each study visit.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | CHESS Mobile Health Group | The intervention will be six weekly one hour sessions of face-to-face problem solving therapy combined with the CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System - CHESS). The CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application enables users to access relevant resources, create a support network and check in regularly with carers. The intervention will be delivered by Dr. Hatcher, a staff psychiatrist in Liaison Psychiatry at The Ottawa Hospital General Campus. CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application: A smart phone application designed to reduce intentional self-harm through problem solving e-therapy. Problem solving therapy: Face to face problem solving therapy every week for six weeks. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subsequent Self-Harm | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Self-Harm | Systematic Assessment | Intentional self-harm |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah MacLean | Ottawa Hospital Research Institute | 6137378899 | 73011 | samaclean@ohri.ca |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 30, 2016 | Nov 8, 2017 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013405 | Suicide |
| D016728 | Self-Injurious Behavior |
| D004630 | Emergencies |
| D000092864 | Suicide Prevention |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Problem solving therapy | Behavioral | Face to face problem solving therapy every week for six weeks. |
|
| Physical Role Limitations | Physical Role Limitations was measured using the Physical Role Limitations subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Physical Role Limitations Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating fewer role limitations due to physical health difficulties. | Baseline, Week 5 |
| Emotional Role Limitations | Emotional Role Limitations was measured using the Emotional Role Limitations subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Emotional Role Limitations Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating fewer role limitations due to emotional health difficulties. | Baseline, Week 5 |
| Vitality | Vitality was measured using the Vitality subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Vitality subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of vitality. | Baseline, Week 5 |
| General Health | General Health was measured using the General Health subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The General Health Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher levels of general health. | Baseline, Week 5 |
| Mental Health Functioning | Mental Health Functioning was measured using the Mental Health subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Mental Health Functioning Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating better mental health functioning. | Baseline, Week 5 |
| Bodily Pain | Bodily Pain was measured using the Bodily Pain subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Bodily Pain Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating lower levels of bodily pain. | Baseline, Week 5 |
| Social Functioning | Social Functioning was measured using the Social Functioning subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Social Functioning Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher social functioning. | Baseline, Week 5 |
| Health-Related Quality of Life | Generic health-related quality of life index. The total scores on this measure range from 11111 to 33333, with lower values indicating higher levels of health-related quality of life. | Baseline and Week 5 |
| Perceived Overall Health | Participants were asked to use the EuroQol 5 Dimensions Visual Analytic Scale to assess their overall health on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best possible health state. | Baseline, Week 5 |
| Participant Exit Questionnaire | The investigators will ask participants about the user comprehension, user practicality and the methods of data collection with regards to the CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application. The Participant Exit Questionnaire will also ask that users make comments or suggestions for future use and development of the application. This will test the acceptability of the intervention and the acceptability of using routine data sources as outcome measures. | within 4 months of study completion |
| Within 6 months of study launch |
| Ottawa |
| Ontario |
| K1Y 4E9 |
| Canada |
| Background |
| Owens D, Horrocks J, House A. Fatal and non-fatal repetition of self-harm. Systematic review. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;181:193-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.181.3.193. |
| 25830811 | Background | Finkelstein Y, Macdonald EM, Hollands S, Sivilotti ML, Hutson JR, Mamdani MM, Koren G, Juurlink DN; Canadian Drug Safety and Effectiveness Research Network (CDSERN). Risk of Suicide Following Deliberate Self-poisoning. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;72(6):570-5. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3188. |
| 20660941 | Background | Da Cruz D, Pearson A, Saini P, Miles C, While D, Swinson N, Williams A, Shaw J, Appleby L, Kapur N. Emergency department contact prior to suicide in mental health patients. Emerg Med J. 2011 Jun;28(6):467-71. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.081869. Epub 2010 Jul 26. |
| 16403244 | Background | Hawton K, Harriss L, Zahl D. Deaths from all causes in a long-term follow-up study of 11,583 deliberate self-harm patients. Psychol Med. 2006 Mar;36(3):397-405. doi: 10.1017/S0033291705006914. Epub 2006 Jan 10. |
| 24033624 | Background | Caterino JM, Sullivan AF, Betz ME, Espinola JA, Miller I, Camargo CA Jr, Boudreaux ED; Emergency Department Safety Assessment and Follow-up Evaluation (ED-SAFE) Investigators. Evaluating current patterns of assessment for self-harm in emergency departments: a multicenter study. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;20(8):807-15. doi: 10.1111/acem.12188. |
| 9703526 | Background | Hawton K, Arensman E, Townsend E, Bremner S, Feldman E, Goldney R, Gunnell D, Hazell P, van Heeringen K, House A, Owens D, Sakinofsky I, Traskman-Bendz L. Deliberate self harm: systematic review of efficacy of psychosocial and pharmacological treatments in preventing repetition. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):441-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.441. |
| 2819914 | Background | Hawton K, McKeown S, Day A, Martin P, O'Connor M, Yule J. Evaluation of out-patient counselling compared with general practitioner care following overdoses. Psychol Med. 1987 Aug;17(3):751-61. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700025988. |
| Background | National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Longer-term care and treatment of self-harm. vol CG133. |
| 25128754 | Background | Carroll R, Metcalfe C, Gunnell D. Hospital management of self-harm patients and risk of repetition: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2014 Oct;168:476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.06.027. Epub 2014 Jun 21. |
| 21816868 | Background | Hatcher S, Sharon C, Parag V, Collins N. Problem-solving therapy for people who present to hospital with self-harm: Zelen randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;199(4):310-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.090126. Epub 2011 Aug 4. |
| 25614531 | Background | Hatcher S, Sharon C, House A, Collins N, Collings S, Pillai A. The ACCESS study: Zelen randomised controlled trial of a package of care for people presenting to hospital after self-harm. Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;206(3):229-36. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.135780. Epub 2015 Jan 22. |
| 21569300 | Background | Hatcher S, Coupe N, Durie M, Elder H, Tapsell R, Wikiriwhi K, Parag V. Te Ira Tangata: a Zelen randomised controlled trial of a treatment package including problem solving therapy compared to treatment as usual in Maori who present to hospital after self harm. Trials. 2011 May 11;12:117. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-117. |
| 24671165 | Background | Gustafson DH, McTavish FM, Chih MY, Atwood AK, Johnson RA, Boyle MG, Levy MS, Driscoll H, Chisholm SM, Dillenburg L, Isham A, Shah D. A smartphone application to support recovery from alcoholism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 May;71(5):566-72. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4642. |
| 16204405 | Background | Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687. |
| 33884617 | Derived | Witt KG, Hetrick SE, Rajaram G, Hazell P, Taylor Salisbury TL, Townsend E, Hawton K. Psychosocial interventions for self-harm in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 22;4(4):CD013668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013668.pub2. |
| 29030503 | Derived | Mackie C, Dunn N, MacLean S, Testa V, Heisel M, Hatcher S. A qualitative study of a blended therapy using problem solving therapy with a customised smartphone app in men who present to hospital with intentional self-harm. Evid Based Ment Health. 2017 Nov;20(4):118-122. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102764. Epub 2017 Oct 13. |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Severity of Depression Symptoms | Severity of depression symptoms was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). This is a 9-item self-report scale which assessed the severity of depressive symptoms over the preceding 2 weeks. Total scores on this scale range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression symptoms. The scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scale should be interpreted as follows: 0-4: Minimal Depression; 5-9: Mild Depression 10-14: Moderate Depression; 15-19: Moderately Severe Depression; 20 and Above: Severe Depression. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Physical Functioning | Physical Functioning was measured using the Physical Functioning subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Physical Functioning Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating better physical functioning. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Physical Role Limitations | Physical Role Limitations was measured using the Physical Role Limitations subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Physical Role Limitations Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating fewer role limitations due to physical health difficulties. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Emotional Role Limitations | Emotional Role Limitations was measured using the Emotional Role Limitations subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Emotional Role Limitations Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating fewer role limitations due to emotional health difficulties. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Vitality | Vitality was measured using the Vitality subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Vitality subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of vitality. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| General Health | General Health was measured using the General Health subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The General Health Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher levels of general health. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Mental Health Functioning | Mental Health Functioning was measured using the Mental Health subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Mental Health Functioning Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating better mental health functioning. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Bodily Pain | Bodily Pain was measured using the Bodily Pain subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Bodily Pain Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating lower levels of bodily pain. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Social Functioning | Social Functioning was measured using the Social Functioning subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Social Functioning Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher social functioning. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| General Health Related Quality of Life | Generic health-related quality of life index. The total scores on this measure range from 11111 to 33333, with lower values indicating higher levels of health-related quality of life. | Median | Full Range | units on a scale |
|
| EuroQol 5 Dimensions Visual Analytic Scale | Participants were asked to use the EuroQol 5 Dimensions Visual Analytic Scale to assess their overall health on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best possible health state. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Physical Functioning | Physical Functioning was measured using the Physical Functioning subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Physical Functioning Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating better physical functioning. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Physical Role Limitations | Physical Role Limitations was measured using the Physical Role Limitations subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Physical Role Limitations Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating fewer role limitations due to physical health difficulties. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Emotional Role Limitations | Emotional Role Limitations was measured using the Emotional Role Limitations subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Emotional Role Limitations Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating fewer role limitations due to emotional health difficulties. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Vitality | Vitality was measured using the Vitality subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Vitality subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating a higher degree of vitality. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | General Health | General Health was measured using the General Health subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The General Health Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher levels of general health. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mental Health Functioning | Mental Health Functioning was measured using the Mental Health subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Mental Health Functioning Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating better mental health functioning. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Bodily Pain | Bodily Pain was measured using the Bodily Pain subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Bodily Pain Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating lower levels of bodily pain. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Social Functioning | Social Functioning was measured using the Social Functioning subscale of the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form 12 (SF-12). The SF-12 is a 12-item self-report survey that assesses general health and well-being using a total of 8 subscales. The Social Functioning Subscale is scored using a range of 0-100, with a higher score indicating higher social functioning. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Health-Related Quality of Life | Generic health-related quality of life index. The total scores on this measure range from 11111 to 33333, with lower values indicating higher levels of health-related quality of life. | Posted | Median | Full Range | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Perceived Overall Health | Participants were asked to use the EuroQol 5 Dimensions Visual Analytic Scale to assess their overall health on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best possible health state. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Participant Exit Questionnaire | The investigators will ask participants about the user comprehension, user practicality and the methods of data collection with regards to the CHESS Mobile Health smart phone application. The Participant Exit Questionnaire will also ask that users make comments or suggestions for future use and development of the application. This will test the acceptability of the intervention and the acceptability of using routine data sources as outcome measures. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants who agreed | within 4 months of study completion |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Recruitment Rates at 6 Months | Will be used to assess the feasibility of recruitment for a larger, multicentre cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). To test feasibility in patients the investigators aim to recruit at least half of the men the study team ask to take part in the pilot study. To test feasibility in referring clinicians, the aim is that at least half of men who present with intentional self-harm to the psychiatric emergency service will be approached and complete the The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) form allowing contact details to be passed on to researchers. | This group includes all participants referred to the study (N=15). | Posted | Number | percentage of participants enrolled | Within 6 months of study launch |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 7 |
| 0 |
| 7 |
| 5 |
| 7 |
|
| Tooth Abscess | Infections and infestations | Self-Harm | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Trip | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Self-Harm | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| PST is a good fit for me |
|
| In PST we worked on what I wanted |
|
| Application was useful |
|
| I would use the application again |
|