This measure will be assessed using the Function Index for Trauma (FIX-IT) The instrument quantifies clinical healing by assessing weight-bearing and fracture site pain on an ordinal scale. Minimum (worst) score possible is 0 and Maximum (best) score possible is 12.

This measure will be assessed using the Function Index for Trauma (FIX-IT) The instrument quantifies clinical healing by assessing weight-bearing and fracture site pain on an ordinal scale. Minimum (worst) score possible is 0 and Maximum (best) score possible is 12.

Radiographic fracture healing is defined as bridging of three of the four cortices (as seen on x-ray/CT).

Radiographic fracture healing is defined as bridging of three of the four cortices (as seen on x-ray/CT).

Radiographic fracture healing is defined as bridging of three of the four cortices without fracture line (as seen on x-ray/CT).

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Radiographic fracture healing is defined as bridging of three of the four cortices (as seen on x-ray/CT).

Thirty-two subjects were enrolled globally. After 3 months follow-up, 29 subjects remained in the study for data collection, thus 29 subjects were analyzed for the primary endpoint. However, the participation flow reports 20 subjects completed, which is reporting the number of subjects that were available for data collection at the 12 month follow-up.

Adverse Events were summed for all time points for the totality of the study. I.E. - complications reported for all sites at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months were summed and reported as a single secondary outcome measure for the study.

Complications were reported for all 32 subjects. If a subject was lost to follow-up, all existing complications for that subject remained in the data for reporting.

This measure will be assessed using the Function Index for Trauma (FIX-IT) The instrument quantifies clinical healing by assessing weight-bearing and fracture site pain on an ordinal scale. Minimum (worst) score possible is 0 and Maximum (best) score possible is 12.

Thirty-two subjects were enrolled globally. At 6 weeks follow-up, 28 subjects completed their visit and contributed to study data collection, thus 28 subjects were analyzed for this 6 week secondary endpoint. However, the participation flow reports 20 subjects completed, which is reporting the number of subjects that were available for data collection at the 12 month follow-up.

This measure will be assessed using the Function Index for Trauma (FIX-IT) The instrument quantifies clinical healing by assessing weight-bearing and fracture site pain on an ordinal scale. Minimum (worst) score possible is 0 and Maximum (best) score possible is 12.

Thirty-two subjects were enrolled globally. At 6 months follow-up, 27 subjects completed their visit and contributed to study data collection, thus 27 subjects were analyzed for this 6 month secondary endpoint. However, the participation flow reports 20 subjects completed, which is reporting the number of subjects that were available for data collection at the 12 month follow-up.

This measure will be assessed using the Function Index for Trauma (FIX-IT) The instrument quantifies clinical healing by assessing weight-bearing and fracture site pain on an ordinal scale. Minimum (worst) score possible is 0 and Maximum (best) score possible is 12.

Thirty-two subjects were enrolled globally. At 12 months follow-up, 20 subjects completed their visit and contributed to study data collection, thus 20 subjects were analyzed for this 12 month secondary endpoint.

Radiographic fracture healing is defined as bridging of three of the four cortices (as seen on x-ray/CT).

Thirty-two subjects were enrolled globally. After 6 weeks follow-up, 28 subjects completed their visit and contributed to study data collection, thus 28 subjects were analyzed for this 6 week secondary endpoint. However, the participation flow reports 20 subjects completed, which is reporting the number of subjects that were available for data collection at the 12 month follow-up.

Radiographic fracture healing is defined as bridging of three of the four cortices (as seen on x-ray/CT).

Thirty-two subjects were enrolled globally. After 6 months follow-up, 27 subjects completed their visit and contributed to study data collection, thus 27 subjects were analyzed for this 6 month secondary endpoint. However, the participation flow reports 20 subjects completed, which is reporting the number of subjects that were available for data collection at the 12 month follow-up.

Radiographic fracture healing is defined as bridging of three of the four cortices without fracture line (as seen on x-ray/CT).

Radiographic fracture healing at 12 months follow-up for subjects that completed their clinic visit, or showed radiographic union prior to lost to follow-up. Twenty subjects completed their 12 month follow-up visit, of these, 15 showed radiographic union. In addition to these 15 subjects, 4 subjects had previously shown radiographic healing; however, they did not complete their 12 month protocol visit but were included in this 12 month results for a total of 24 participants analyzed.