Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The safety and efficacy of combination of SBRT with sequential S-1 in treating patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and poor medical conditions will be evaluated.
Although the incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is not as high as that of other gastrointestinal carcinoma in China, the cancer mortalities of males and females ranked the sixth and seventh respectively in 2013, with a surprising low 5-year survival rate (<5%). Only 15%-20% patients are suitable for surgeries among those first diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and the 5-year survival rate of patients with R0 resection is still less than 20%.
Therefore, better efficacy is not available via surgeries alone resulting in great emphasis on adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In 1997, gemcitabine was confirmed to be the standard chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. However, it has not been proved that gemcitabine significantly improved prognosis in long term follow-up while some patients are refractory to gemcitabine. Hence, development of more effective chemotherapy is urgent.
S-1 is the prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), comprised of tegafur, gimeracil (dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor) and oteracil (the inhibitor of phosphorylation in gastrointestinal tract) with a ratio of 1:0.4:1. The first phase II clinical trials showed good clinical efficacy with S-1.Moreover, Ueno et al. identified better objective response rates with S-1 than those with gemcitabine. Besides, S-1 is not inferior to gemcitabine regarding to overall survival rates and progression free survival rates. And significant improvement of progression free survival rates can be achieved by combination of S-1 and gemcitabine. There was no difference between incidence rates of adverse effects of S-1 and gemcitabine, with more gastrointestinal toxicities with S-1 while more hematologic toxicities with gemcitabine. Therefore, S-1 is an alternative for treating locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, especially for those resistant to gemcitabine. Although there are no phase III studies on S-1, phase II studies have already shown better disease control rates (52%-58%), median overall survival time (4.5-6.3 months) and tolerable adverse effects in advanced pancreatic cancer resistant to gemcitabine treated with S-1.
Though S-1 is appropriate for advanced pancreatic cancer, it is not superior to gemcitabine with respect to clinical efficacy. In addition, fewer encouraging results are gained with combination of S-1 and other drug. As a result, S-1 combined with radiotherapy is gradually applied in treatment of pancreatic cancer.
5-FU was proved to be radiosensitive thus improving clinical efficacy. S-1 combined with radiotherapy has demonstrated better prognosis with the median overall survival time of 12.9-16.8 months. Furthermore, some patients can be operable after S-1 and radiotherapy.
Compared with conventional radiation, a single-fraction dose and total dose of target volume can be increased in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). In addition, doses of organs at risk would be reduced, thus effectively improving local control rates and reducing radiation related toxicity. Shorter courses of SBRT also enhance patients' compliance and render the initial of other treatment on schedule possible. Nevertheless, there are few studies focusing on S-1 combined with SBRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Especially for patients with poor medical coonditions, though gemcitabine alone is recommended in the NCCN guideline, S-1 may be a better option due to more adverse effects induced by gemcitabine in Asian. Additionally, local ablative treatment combined with chemotherapy may provide more survival benefits for those patients. Hence, efficacy of combination of S-1 and SBRT needs to be further confirmed. Based on our experience in treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer, SBRT combined with sequential S-1 as the initial treatment for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and poor medical conditions is proposed to evaluate its clinical efficacy.
Study Procedure:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination of Cyberknife with S-1 | Experimental | Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer meeting all inclusion criteria will receive combination of Cyberknife with S-1. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| combination of Cyberknife with S-1 | Other | Radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| One-year Overall Survival Rate | One-year overall survival rate is calculated by the ratio of number of patients surviving more than 1 year to the total number of patients enrolled. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Acute Toxicities Following SBRT | The acute toxicities are determined by RTOG Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. | Within 90 days after completion of SBRT |
| Number of Participants With Late Toxicities Following SBRT |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Huo Jun Zhang, MD., PH.D | Changhai Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changhai hospital | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | 200433 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22237781 | Background | Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. Epub 2012 Jan 4. | |
| 10401733 | Background | Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985-1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Jul;189(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00075-7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There were significant events that occur after participant enrollment, but prior to assignment of participants to an arm or group.
The recruitment period was from February 2016 to March 2018 in Changhai Hospital affiliated to Navy Medical University.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer meeting all inclusion criteria will receive combination of Cyberknife with S-1. combination of Cyberknife with S-1: Radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Patients were enrolled according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All patients received follow-ups and were included in the final analysis.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer meeting all inclusion criteria will receive combination of Cyberknife with S-1. combination of Cyberknife with sequential S-1: Radiation therapy combined with sequential chemotherapy |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | One-year Overall Survival Rate | One-year overall survival rate is calculated by the ratio of number of patients surviving more than 1 year to the total number of patients enrolled. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 year |
|
|
1 year
Radiation-induced acute toxicities are adverse effects that occur within 90 days after treatment, and determined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, "Acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria". Late toxicities occurring three months after SBRT are evaluated by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research on the Treatment of Cancer, "Late radiation morbidity scoring schema".
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Combination of Cyberknife With S-1 | Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer meeting all inclusion criteria will receive combination of Cyberknife with S-1. combination of Cyberknife with S-1: Radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nausea and vomitting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | Radiation-induced acute toxicities are adverse effects that occur within 90 days after treatment, and determined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, "Acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria". |
Not provided
Lacks of comparison of gemcitabine alone or palliative radiotherapy recommended in NCCN guideline.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Huojun Zhang | Changhai Hospital affiliated to Navy Medical University | 86-021-31162207 | chyyzhj@163.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 9, 2020 | Sep 22, 2020 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010190 | Pancreatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C079198 | S 1 (combination) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
stereotactic bodt radiation therapy plus sequential S-1 for locally pancreatic cancer
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The late toxicities are determined by RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria.
| 90 days after SBRT |
| The Median Progression Free Survival Time Will be Determined. | Progression-free survival is the time from the date of enrollment to the confirmation of disease progression at any sites, including local progression or metastasis, or death from any causes, if this occurred before disease progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. | 3 years |
| The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | The analysis of quality of life is based on The European Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): Quality of Life Questionnare-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. The scale range of all domains of QLQ-C30 is 0-100 (the minimum and maximum score is 0 and 100 points, respectively). | 1 years |
| Median Overall Survival Will be Determined. | Median overall survival is calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. | 3 years |
| 12607060 | Background | Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW, Lorenz D, Post S, Trede M. Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg. 2003 Mar;27(3):324-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-002-6659-z. Epub 2003 Feb 27. |
| 15585381 | Background | Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Gomez HF, Sun CC, Crane CH, Wolff RA, Evans DB. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Dec;8(8):935-49; discussion 949-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.046. |
| 15990186 | Background | Hoyer M, Roed H, Sengelov L, Traberg A, Ohlhuis L, Pedersen J, Nellemann H, Kiil Berthelsen A, Eberholst F, Engelholm SA, von der Maase H. Phase-II study on stereotactic radiotherapy of locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2005 Jul;76(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.12.022. |
| 9196156 | Background | Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff P, Nelson R, Dorr FA, Stephens CD, Von Hoff DD. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2403. |
| 16006754 | Background | Ueno H, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, Takezako Y, Morizane C. An early phase II study of S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2005;68(2-3):171-8. doi: 10.1159/000086771. Epub 2005 Jul 4. |
| 23547081 | Background | Ueno H, Ioka T, Ikeda M, Ohkawa S, Yanagimoto H, Boku N, Fukutomi A, Sugimori K, Baba H, Yamao K, Shimamura T, Sho M, Kitano M, Cheng AL, Mizumoto K, Chen JS, Furuse J, Funakoshi A, Hatori T, Yamaguchi T, Egawa S, Sato A, Ohashi Y, Okusaka T, Tanaka M. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 1;31(13):1640-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.3680. Epub 2013 Apr 1. |
| 18398614 | Background | Morizane C, Okusaka T, Furuse J, Ishii H, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Nakachi K, Najima M, Ogura T, Suzuki E. A phase II study of S-1 in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Jan;63(2):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-008-0741-7. Epub 2008 Apr 9. |
| 20352216 | Background | Sudo K, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura K, Denda T, Hara T, Ishihara T, Yokosuka O. Phase II study of S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-resistant advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Feb;67(2):249-54. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1311-3. Epub 2010 Mar 30. |
| Background | Mizuno N, Yamao K, Komatsu Y, et al. Randomized phase II trial of S-1 versus S-1 plus irinotecan (IRIS) in patients with gemcitabinerefractory pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30 (suppl 34): abstr 263 |
| Background | Okusaka T, Ohkawa S, Isayama H, et al. Randomized phase II trial of S-1 versus S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) in patients with GEM refractory pancreatic cancer. ESMO, 2012, abstract 1437 |
| 25273077 | Background | Ge F, Xu N, Bai Y, Ba Y, Zhang Y, Li F, Xu H, Jia R, Wang Y, Lin L, Xu J. S-1 as monotherapy or in combination with leucovorin as second-line treatment in gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study. Oncologist. 2014 Nov;19(11):1133-4. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0223. Epub 2014 Oct 1. |
| 15169811 | Background | Rich TA, Shepard RC, Mosley ST. Four decades of continuing innovation with fluorouracil: current and future approaches to fluorouracil chemoradiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2214-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.009. |
| 25183386 | Background | Moningi S, Marciscano AE, Rosati LM, Ng SK, Teboh Forbang R, Jackson J, Chang DT, Koong AC, Herman JM. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer: the new frontier. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2014 Dec;14(12):1461-75. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2014.952286. Epub 2014 Sep 3. |
| 23560842 | Background | Berber B, Sanabria JR, Braun K, Yao M, Ellis RJ, Kunos CA, Sohn J, Machtay M, Teh BS, Huang Z, Mayr NA, Lo SS. Emerging role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013 Apr;13(4):481-7. doi: 10.1586/era.13.19. |
| 34274393 | Derived | Zhu X, Cao Y, Lu M, Zhao X, Jiang L, Ye Y, Ju X, Zhang H. Stereotactic body radiation therapy with sequential S-1 for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and poor performance status: An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Radiother Oncol. 2021 Sep;162:178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 16. |
| 27909037 | Derived | Zhu X, Ju X, Cao F, Fang F, Qing S, Shen Y, Jia Z, Cao Y, Zhang H. Safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy combined with S-1 simultaneously followed by sequential S-1 as an initial treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (SILAPANC) trial: study design and rationale of a phase II clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 1;6(12):e013220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013220. |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Acute Toxicities Following SBRT | The acute toxicities are determined by RTOG Acute Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 90 days after completion of SBRT |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Late Toxicities Following SBRT | The late toxicities are determined by RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Criteria. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 90 days after SBRT |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Median Progression Free Survival Time Will be Determined. | Progression-free survival is the time from the date of enrollment to the confirmation of disease progression at any sites, including local progression or metastasis, or death from any causes, if this occurred before disease progression. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | 3 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Quality of Life Will be Analyzed. | The analysis of quality of life is based on The European Organization for Reasearch and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): Quality of Life Questionnare-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. The scale range of all domains of QLQ-C30 is 0-100 (the minimum and maximum score is 0 and 100 points, respectively). | All domains of QLQ-C30 at 6 months after treatment are reported. Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. The scale range of all following domains is 0-100 (the minimum and maximum score is 0 and 100 points, respectively). | Posted | Mean | Full Range | units on a scale | 1 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Median Overall Survival Will be Determined. | Median overall survival is calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | 3 years |
|
|
|
| 63 |
| 63 |
| 6 |
| 63 |
| 0 |
| 63 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Emotional functioning |
|
| Cognitive functioning |
|
| Social functioning |
|
| Fatigue |
|
| Nausea and vomiting |
|
| Pain |
|
| Dyspnea |
|
| Insomnia |
|
| Appetite loss |
|
| Constipation |
|
| Diarrhea |
|
| Financial difficulties |
|