Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to test the effect of increasing lung volume with a simple hand-held device to both prevent, and also to relieve, airway constriction in people with asthma and a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2.
Twenty people with late onset non-allergic asthma and a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2 will be recruited. The efficacy of elevating lung volume on both preventing and reversing bronchoconstriction will be tested. Lung volume will be modulated by breathing out against a small level of resistance (positive expiratory pressure).
This study will investigate whether PEEP can prevent and/or reverse bronchoconstriction in asthmatics with a BMI > 30 kg/m2.
People with late-onset non-allergic asthma that develops in the setting of obesity do not respond well to conventional asthma medications, likely because all treatments for asthma have been developed to treat early-onset allergic disease in lean patients. There is a critical need to understand the pathophysiology of airway disease in late-onset, non-allergic obese asthmatics, in order to develop therapies to target this disease.
Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a defining characteristic in asthma. Lung function tests in individuals with late onset asthma in the setting of obesity are suggestive of distal airway closure rather than airway narrowing as a cause of hyperresponsiveness; these individuals tend to have more collapsible lung peripheries than obese individuals who do not develop asthma. If late onset asthma in obesity is related to a tendency of airways to close, it should respond to therapies designed to keep airways open, such as Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP).
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of PEEP on prevention and reversal of bronchoconstriction in obese people with asthma. This will be achieved by investigating the efficacy of PEEP therapy on preventing and reversing bronchoconstriction in response to the inhalation of methacholine, while measuring changes in respiratory impedance using the forced oscillation method.
Participants will initially perform a conventional methacholine challenge test.
Participants will return for 2 visits in which methacholine will be administered concurrently with varying levels of PEEP (using PEEP to prevent bronchoconstriction) while measuring changes in respiratory impedance using the forced oscillation method.
Participants will return for another 2 visits in which PEEP will be administered subsequent to methacholine challenge (using PEEP to reverse bronchoconstriction) while measuring changes in respiratory impedance using the forced oscillation method.
These studies will be completed over 5 visits.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rescue | Experimental | Intervention: Positive expiratory pressure (PEEP) 10 will be applied after the administration of methacholine |
|
| Prophylaxis | Experimental | Intervention: Positive expiratory pressure (PEEP) 10 will be applied during the administration of methacholine |
|
| No PEEP | Placebo Comparator | Intervention: Positive expiratory pressure (PEEP) 0 will be applied during the administration of methacholine |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive Expiratory Pressure | Device | Patient will exhale against positive expiratory pressure 0 mm or 10 mm while inhaling methacholine |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Central and Peripheral Elastance | Investigators compare changes in respiratory system elastance to methacholine. Respiratory system impedance was measured at the 8-min time point and fit with the two-compartment series model of respiratory mechanics. The elastances of the central and distal compartments obtained from good quality fits of this model are reported for each of the following conditions: V2: PEP of 0 was administered during (0-4.5 min) and after (4.5-8 min) methacholine administration. V3: PEP of 0 was administered during (0-4.5 min) and PEP of 10 cmH2O after (4.5-8 min) methacholine administration. V4: This is a repeat of V2 above to test for stability of the response. V5: PEP of 10 cmH2O was administered both during (0-4.5 min) and after (4.5-8 min) methacholine administration. V1 was a baseline visit to establish physiologic parameters required for conducting Visits 2-5. There are no outcome measures for Visit 1. | The end of the experiment (at the 8-min time point) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anne Dixon, BM BCh | University of Vermont | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont Lung Center | Colchester | Vermont | 05446 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24821412 | Background | Al-Alwan A, Bates JH, Chapman DG, Kaminsky DA, DeSarno MJ, Irvin CG, Dixon AE. The nonallergic asthma of obesity. A matter of distal lung compliance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun 15;189(12):1494-502. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201401-0178OC. | |
| 25138203 | Background | Chapman DG, Irvin CG, Kaminsky DA, Forgione PM, Bates JH, Dixon AE. Influence of distinct asthma phenotypes on lung function following weight loss in the obese. Respirology. 2014 Nov;19(8):1170-7. doi: 10.1111/resp.12368. Epub 2014 Aug 19. |
Not provided
Not provided
Results will be published in the archival literature, and this will include a complete description of experimental and analytical methods used. All original experimental data will be stored and available to interested investigators with appropriate regulatory approvals in place.
Clinical study report published December 2021.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were enrolled between 2016-2019. There was a minor delay to the enrollment timeline relative to the proposed starting date due to staffing changes. The uploaded protocol is an IRB approved document. Given that the study is now complete, the IRB record has been closed out and further modification of this protocol is not possible.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | All Patients | Cross over study: Intervention:
All participants were studied in conditions 1, 2 and 3 on separate days, order of visits were randomized |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Study Participants Assigned to Intervention in Cross Over Design | participants underwent the following studies and intervention 1. PEP 10 after methacholine 3. PEP 10 during methacholine 3. PEP 0 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Central and Peripheral Elastance | Investigators compare changes in respiratory system elastance to methacholine. Respiratory system impedance was measured at the 8-min time point and fit with the two-compartment series model of respiratory mechanics. The elastances of the central and distal compartments obtained from good quality fits of this model are reported for each of the following conditions: V2: PEP of 0 was administered during (0-4.5 min) and after (4.5-8 min) methacholine administration. V3: PEP of 0 was administered during (0-4.5 min) and PEP of 10 cmH2O after (4.5-8 min) methacholine administration. V4: This is a repeat of V2 above to test for stability of the response. V5: PEP of 10 cmH2O was administered both during (0-4.5 min) and after (4.5-8 min) methacholine administration. V1 was a baseline visit to establish physiologic parameters required for conducting Visits 2-5. There are no outcome measures for Visit 1. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | cmH2O/L | The end of the experiment (at the 8-min time point) |
|
Duration of each study visit (during methacholine, and for 30 minutes after)
reported by patient to research coordinator
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Rescue | Cross over study: Intervention: Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) 10 will be applied after the administration of methacholine, during administration and after methacholine, and PEP 0 during and after metacholine at separate visits |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anne Dixon, MD | University of Vermont | 802 847 2700 | anne.dixon@uvm.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 5, 2018 | Jun 18, 2020 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Mar 5, 2018 | Jun 18, 2020 | ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001249 | Asthma |
| D009765 | Obesity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001982 | Bronchial Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D008173 | Lung Diseases, Obstructive |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011175 | Positive-Pressure Respiration |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012121 | Respiration, Artificial |
| D058109 | Airway Management |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D012138 | Respiratory Therapy |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
PEP 0 during and after methacholine |
| OG001 | Visit 3 | PEP 0 during methacholine, PEP 10 cmH2O after methacholine |
| OG002 | Visit 4 | PEP 0 during and after methacholine |
| OG003 | Visit 5 | PEP 10 cmH2O during and after methacholine |
|
|
| 0 |
| 18 |
| 0 |
| 18 |
| 0 |
| 18 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D012130 |
| Respiratory Hypersensitivity |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D050177 | Overweight |
| D044343 | Overnutrition |
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D001835 | Body Weight |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |