Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this pilot study was to compare the manual chest compressions (CC) versus CC feedback device TrueCPR vs mechanical CC device LifeLine ARM during simulated pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resuscitation on the flor | Experimental | 2 min asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The patient lies on the floor |
|
| Resuscitation on the stretcher | Experimental | 2 min asynchronous cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The patient lies on a stretcher |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually chest compressions | Other | Chest compressions performed manually without any device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| chest compressions effectiveness | the percentage of correct chest compressions relative to the total number of chest compressions | 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Depth | correct depth according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation | 1 day |
| Pressure point | correct pressure point according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Łukasz Szarpak | Warsaw | 00-832 | Poland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26612703 | Background | Truszewski Z, Szarpak L, Kurowski A, Evrin T, Zasko P, Bogdanski L, Czyzewski L. Randomized trial of the chest compressions effectiveness comparing 3 feedback CPR devices and standard basic life support by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;34(3):381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Nov 4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Cardiopump | Device | Chest compressions performed with Cardiopump |
|
| LifeLine ARM | Device | Chest compressions performed using mechanical chest compressions system LifeLine ARM |
|
| 1 day |
| Complete pressure release | Complete pressure release measure by manikin software | 1 day |
| Rate of chest compressions | correct chest compressions rate according to European Resuscitation Council 2015 guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation | 1 day |
| Ease-of-use | To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each chest compression method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult). | 1 day |