Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to compare the clinical results of patella resurfacing or not under subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Even though the excellent results of total knee arthroplasty(TKA), there is persistent controversy over whether or not to replace the patella. Anterior knee pain continued to be a unsolved problem of TKA patients. Some surgeons always performed patella resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty but the others didn't do that. It's up to surgeon's preference. There were several studies of patellar resurfacing or not in TKA. But previous studies almost have been done under other approach, not a subvastus approach.
This study prospectively randomized patients receiving bilateral TKA with patellar resurfacing or not in each knee. Patients preference and clinical results was investigated in both knee of same patients who received patellar resurfacing or not during minimum 2 year follow up.
The primary objective of this work was to compare pain, stiffness and function between groups at minimum 2 year postoperatively. Secondarily, we compared pain, patient preference at minimum 2 year postoperatively. The investigators hypothesized that there would be no difference between the two groups of subjects in the measured outcomes.
Patients receiving TKA were prospectively enrolled before surgery and randomized intraoperatively to either receive patella replacement or not in both knee of same patients. Subjects were assessed pre-operatively and at 6 months, 1, 2 years postoperatively for pain, function, and stiffness using a disease-specific (Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC]) . Other measurements like Knee Society score, Feller's score, Patient satisfaction (VAS) also checked pre-operatively and at 6 months, 1, 2 years postoperatively.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| patella resurfacing group | Experimental | Procedure: Patellar component Resurfacing with onlay technique |
|
| patella retention | Active Comparator | Procedure: patellar retention Trimming of osteophytes when appropriate |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patella resurfacing | Procedure |
| ||
| Patella retention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index) pain scale | Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years | |
| Knee Society score | Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feller's score | Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years | |
| Patients satisfaction using Visual Analog Score for pain | Change from preoperative score to postoperative 2 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yong In, MD, PhD | Contact | 8290445228 | iy1000@catholic.ac.kr | |
| Mansoo Kim, MD | Contact | 8272333875 | kms3779@naver.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yong In, MD, PhD | the Catholic Univerisity of Korea Seoul St Mary's hospital | Study Chair |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Procedure |
|