Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2016-00346 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| 2015-0006 | Other Identifier | M D Anderson Cancer Center | |
| P30CA016672 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized clinical trial studies and compares 3 techniques in performing autologous fat grafting (AFG) in patients undergoing surgery to reshape or rebuild (reconstruct) a part of the body changed by previous surgery and inserted into another part of the body. AFG, also called fat injections or fat transplant, is a procedure in which an individual's own body fat (usually from abdomen or legs) is used during reconstructive surgery. Doctors want to compare 3 techniques for processing the fat tissue collected during surgery and the length of time needed to complete each AFG technique and surgery. Comparing 3 AFG techniques and the time to complete them during surgery may help doctors determine the best technique to perform fat grafting in the future.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Measure and compare the rate of fat processed, defined as the volume of fat processed per unit time associated with the use of three aforementioned adipose tissue processing techniques.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To measure total fat grafting time: time from initiation of fat harvesting to the end of fat injection.
II. To measure volume of fat processed: volume of fat obtained after fat processing.
III. To measure total operation room (OR) time: time from patient entry into the OR (or when the patient barcode is read on entering the OR) to the time at which the patient leaves the OR.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.
ARM I (REVOLVE TM): Patients undergo AFG reconstructive surgery comprising washing and low velocity spinning using a commercially available system that washes the lipoaspirate with lactated Ringer's solution separates non-fat material from the fat with gentle centrifugal force and suction.
ARM II (CYTORI PUREGRAT TM): Patients undergo AFG reconstructive surgery comprising gravity filtration using a commercially available system in which the lipoaspirate is rinsed with lactated Ringer's solution (RL) and the non-fat material is filtered through mesh.
ARM III (COLEMAN TECHNIQUE): Patients undergo AFG reconstructive surgery comprising standard centrifugation at 3200 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 3 minutes with the resulting oil and aqueous layers discarded.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (RESOLVE TM) | Patients undergo AFG reconstructive surgery comprising washing and low velocity spinning using a commercially available system that washes the lipoaspirate with lactated Ringer's solution separates non-fat material from the fat with gentle centrifugal force and suction. |
| |
| Arm II (Cytori PureGraft TM) | Patients undergo AFG reconstructive surgery comprising gravity filtration using a commercially available system in which the lipoaspirate is rinsed with lactated RL and the non-fat material is filtered through mesh. |
| |
| Arm III (Coleman technique) | Patients undergo AFG reconstructive surgery comprising standard centrifugation at 3200 rpm for 3 minutes with the resulting oil and aqueous layers discarded. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autologous Fat Graft | Procedure | Undergo AFG using the RESOLVE TM technique |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of fat processed defined as the volume of fat harvested per minute | Study data will be collected and managed using the Research Electronic Data Capture. This study will measure and compare the rate of fat processed, defined as the volume of fat processed per unit time associated with the use of three adipose tissue processing techniques. | 1 day |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Summer Hanson | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M D Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33890883 | Derived | Hanson SE, Garvey PB, Chang EI, Reece GP, Liu J, Baumann DP, Butler CE. A Randomized Prospective Time and Motion Comparison of Techniques to Process Autologous Fat Grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):1035-1044. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007827. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| MD Anderson Cancer Center Website | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019651 | Plastic Surgery Procedures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
| Autologous Fat Graft | Procedure | Undergo AFG using the Cytori PureGraft TM technique |
|
|
| Autologous Fat Graft | Procedure | Undergo AFG using the Coleman technique |
|
|
| Reconstructive Surgery | Procedure | Undergo reconstructive surgery |
|
|