Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15/YH/0493 | Other Identifier | Yorkshire & Humber Ethics Committee |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Health Service, United Kingdom | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a pilot feasibility study assessing the use of a commercial molecular profiling service in the UK's National Health Service (NHS). The impact of knowledge of a patient's molecular profile, and the time it takes to generate this knowledge, will be assessed by analysis of changes in physicians' treatment decisions prior to and following generation of a patient's molecular profile. Implications for benefit with therapies recommended by the profile will also be assessed and the following treatment outcomes collected: best response (based on routine clinical, radiological and biochemical assessment), progression free survival ratio (post Caris Molecular profiling versus prior treatment) and overall survival.
The concept of molecular profiling leading to personalised medicine is based on the hypothesis that using treatments selected by a molecular profiling approach favourably changes the clinical course for an individual patient. In order to best determine the next steps in a particular patient's clinical course, it is necessary to understand not only how that patient has been diagnosed, treated and responded to treatment in the past, but also to fully characterize the molecular profile of the patient's tumour, so that the maximum information on potential positive and negative treatment outcome can be gathered.
In this pilot feasibility study, the treatment plans devised for individual patients by their treating oncologists will be assessed. The primary endpoint is the frequency at which the oncologist changes a treatment plan based on the tumour's molecular phenotype and the respective drugs considered to be associated with higher likelihood of benefit or lack of benefit. Ultimately however, the treatment decision remains in the hands of the treating physicians and the study protocol does not prescribe or dictate the use of any particular treatment.
In patients with recurrent ovarian cancer or other gynecological malignancies in which no standard of care is defined, treatments are currently chosen empirically based on population-based response rates. With the use of molecular profiling treating physicians will get a chance to revise their treatment plans and consider the individual molecular profile of each patient's tumour in light of the known predictive power of biomarkers for the efficacy of certain drugs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Analysis | Experimental | This arm will be subject to Caris Molecular profiling. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic analysis | Other | Molecular profiling |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To measure the number of treatment decisions that will be altered by the results of of the Caris molecular profiling report. | 21 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To analyse best response marker following CMI directed therapy | 3 years | |
| Determine time to treatment failure (TTTF) (defined as the time from completion of prior therapy to start of next treatment) following CMI directed therapy. | 3 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Geoff Hall, PhD FRCP | University of Leeds | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust | Leeds | West Yorkshire | LS9 7TF | United Kingdom |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077216 | Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial |
| D005185 | Fallopian Tube Neoplasms |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D010051 | Ovarian Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Study overall survival following CMI directed therapy. | 3 years |
| Compare the ratio of TTTF after CMI guided therapy to TTTF under previous treatment. | 3 years |
| Assess cost of treatment with CMI versus originally planned treatment. | 3 years |
| To analyse quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in patients treated with CMI-directed therapy. | 3 years |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D010049 | Ovarian Diseases |
| D000291 | Adnexal Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D006058 | Gonadal Disorders |
| D005184 | Fallopian Tube Diseases |