Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators aim to evaluate the biological and mechanical short- and long-term outcome of IL in partially or completely edentulous patients. Moreover, the investigators aim to detect potential influencing risk factors predicting undesirable prosthetic outcome.
Since its introduction in the late 1990s, immediate implant loading concepts (IL) have become a frequent alternative for delayed implant procedures. IL concepts reduce chair time, the number of surgical interventions and pain, and offer instant comfort to the patient. Its reduced treatment time results in obvious socioeconomic advantages. Although there is at present abundant evidence that supports IL, evaluation of long-term biological and mechanical stability outcomes of large patient populations could allow quality improvement and more accurate patient selection. The Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and the Department of Dentistry of the General Hospital Saint-John Bruges act as one of the pioneers of IL in Belgium, routinely performing the concept since 2001.
The investigators aim to evaluate the biological and mechanical short- and long-term outcome of IL in partially or completely edentulous patients. Moreover, the investigators aim to detect potential influencing risk factors predicting undesirable prosthetic outcome.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| implant survival rate | Percentage of people in the study for which implant is still present of the fixture in the oral cavity | within 6 months post placement of implants |
| implant survival rate | Percentage of people in the study for which implant is still present of the fixture in the oral cavity | until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Infection rate | Percentage of people in the study that develop an infection at the site of the implant in the oral cavity | within 6 months post placement of implants |
| Infection rate | Percentage of people in the study that develop an infection at the site of the implant in the oral cavity |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients of all ages with loss of all or almost all teeth due to terminal periodontal disease and/or untreatable endodontic problems, that requested treatment according to the IL protocol between 01/01/2001 and 31/12/2015. Patients should have adequate bone volume to predominantly receive an implant of ≥13x3.5mm anteriorly and an implant of ≥9 x 3.5mm posteriorly. All patients, with or without a pre-prosthetic sinus floor augmentation, are included in de study.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Johan Abeloos, MD | division of maxillofacial surgery, department of surgery, general hospital Saint-John Bruges | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Hospital Saint-John Bruges | Bruges | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007576 | Jaw, Edentulous, Partially |
| D007575 | Jaw, Edentulous |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007571 | Jaw Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D009066 | Mouth, Edentulous |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up |
| correlation between patient-mediated factors and occurrence of implant instability | correlation between patient-mediated factors (age, gender, comorbidities, etc) and occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon | within 6 months post placement of implants |
| correlation between patient-mediated factors and occurrence of implant instability | correlation between patient-mediated factors (age, gender, comorbidities, etc) and occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon | until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up |
| correlation between clinical factors and the occurrence of implant instability | correlation between clinical factors (surgeon, surgical procedure, etc) as and the occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon | within 6 months post placement of implants |
| correlation between clinical factors and the occurrence of implant instability | correlation between clinical factors (surgeon, surgical procedure, etc) as and the occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon | until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up |
| correlation between implant characteristics and occurrence of implant instability | correlation between implant characteristics (design/finish/material) and occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon | within 6 months post placement of implants |
| correlation between implant characteristics and occurrence of implant instability | correlation between implant characteristics (design/finish/material) and occurrence of implant instability, as clinically evaluated by the treating surgeon | until a maximum of 15 years of follow-up |
| D009059 |
| Mouth Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |