Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Principal objective: To compare the efficacy of laser-assisted dermabrasion + autologous epidermal cells suspension grafting versus dermabrasion using micro-needling technique + autologous epidermal cells suspension grafting and dermabrasion using micro-needling technique + placebo suspension grafting in stable vitiligo.
A total of 10 patients with stable non-segmental vitiligo will be included in the ITT population.
In each patient, three separate test areas will be selected in the same part of the body.
One area will be pre-treated with dermaroller and receive the hyaluronic acid suspension alone and the two others will receive the epidermal cell suspension in hyaluronic acid after pre-treatment either with dermaroller or laser-assisted dermabrasion, each patient being his own control.
Targeted phototherapy with excimer lamp (308 nMm) will be applied on all test areas 1 week after cell grafting.
Condition Stable lesion of Vitiligo of adulthood
Background Laser-assisted dermabrasion is the gold standard for preparing the grafting bed of epidermal suspension but it requires a technical platform and a trained physician. Side effects are not uncommon. We have demonstrated in an ex vivo study that micro-needles create holes in the epidermis allowing cells to reach the lower layers of the epidermis. We hypothesize that the use of micro-needles could be an effective and easy technique for preparing the grafting bed for epidermal suspensions.
Objectives Principal objective: To compare the efficacy of laser-assisted dermabrasion + autologous epidermal cells suspension grafting versus dermabrasion using micro-needling technique + autologous epidermal cells suspension grafting and dermabrasion using micro-needling technique + placebo suspension grafting in stable vitiligo.
The secondary objectives are
Methods Prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled, blind assessor trial.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria Hypersensibility to local anaesthetics or one of the components of the device (trypsin, hyaluronic acid)
Interventions After inclusion visit, randomization will occur during visit 1, the day of the surgery to determine which lesion will be treated by dermaroller+hyaluronic acid, dermaroller+VITICELL® or laser-assisted dermabrasion+VITICELL®.
Dermabrasion procedures:
Three test areas will be selected on the same part of body. Each lesion will respectively treated by:
Dermabrasion using laser:
To prepare the graft recipient site, the upper layer of epidermis is removed by superficial dermabrasion using Erbium or CO2 ablative laser. The test area is ready to receive suspension cells when the dermis will appeared. The cells suspension will be applied on the wound.
Dermabrasion using dermaroller: The dermaroller is applied on the treated areas, this dermabrasion technique is based on micro holes performed using 540 micro needles (200µm depth) which should allow the penetration of the suspension cells or hyaluronic acid alone. Twelve passages will be performed on the treated area in order to achieve 60% of coverage.
VITICELL® treated area:
A small sample of skin (biopsy) will be collected from the gluteal area. The biopsy will be measured 4 cm2 (2x2cm) systematically. While the investigator is preparing the areas to be treated, the skin will be placed into the VITICELL® kit by other heath professional. The VITICELL® kit will transform the patient's collected skin into a cellular suspension. The suspension of epidermal cells is then applied (100µL per cm2) onto the 2 selected lesions/areas after dermabrasion with dermaroller or laser.
Hyaluronic acid with PBS treated area:
The suspension of hyaluronic acid is applied (100 µL/cm2) onto the selected lesion after dermabrasion with dermaroller.
Following the surgery, the treated area and biopsy site will be covered with a dressing and must be protected from direct sun and physical impact for a period of 6 -7days. After this period the dressing will be removed.
Phototherapy:
The phototherapy will begin a week after cells grafting and will be used 2 times a week for all the treatment duration.
The ultraviolet (UV) spectrum has been used on test areas. These different wavelength will promote melanogenesis and melanocyte proliferation on graft side.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dermabrasion | Active Comparator | Dermabrasion using dermaroller: The dermaroller is applied on the treated areas, this dermabrasion technique is based on micro holes performed using 540 micro needles (200µm depth) which should allow the penetration of the suspension cells or hyaluronic acid alone. Twelve passages will be performed on the treated area in order to achieve 60% of coverage. |
|
| Laser | Placebo Comparator | To prepare the graft recipient site, the upper layer of epidermis is removed by superficial dermabrasion using Erbium or CO2 ablative laser. The test area is ready to receive suspension cells when the dermis will appeared. The cells suspension will be applied on the wound. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dermabrasion | Device | Preparing the graft bed before epidermal cell suspension The epidermis can be removed using ablative CO2 or Erbium laser. We will assess the efficacy of using instead micro-needles to create micro-holes that will allow the melanocytes to reach the lower layers of the epidermis and thus repigment the lesional skin. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of repigmentation lesions | Rate of repigmentation lesions at 3 months | at 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Global satisfaction expressed by the patient | Global satisfaction expressed by the patient per treated area at the end of the treatment | at 3 months |
| EVA scale | Pain expressed by the patient during the procedure (EVA scale) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Passeron Thierry, PhD | Dermatology, CHU de Nice | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU de Nice | Nice | Alpes-Maritimes | 06200 | France | ||
| CHU de Bordeaux |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003869 | Dermabrasion |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003357 | Cosmetic Techniques |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D062109 | Dermatologic Surgical Procedures |
| D019651 | Plastic Surgery Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Laser placebo | Device | The epidermis can be removed using ablative CO2 or Erbium laser. We will assess the efficacy of using instead micro-needles to create micro-holes that will allow the melanocytes to reach the lower layers of the epidermis and thus repigment the lesional skin. |
|
| During the procedure |
| -Contrast between treated and perilesional area (Nottingham scale) | Contrast between treated and perilesional area (Nottingham scale) | at 3 months |
| Bordeaux |
| 33 000 |
| France |
| CH Creteil | Paris | Île-de-France Region | France |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |