Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients for upper limb surgeries who are candidates for infraclavicular block will be screened. Two techniques of infraclavicular block will be compared. Measured outcomes are performance times, block onset times, patient satisfaction, quality of block, and requirement for supplementary analgesia.
Infraclavicular brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance is used for surgeries on the upper limb. Traditionally, the block is performed at the lateral infraclavicular fossa where the cords are variable in position relative to the axillary artery. A recently introduced technique is the costoclavicular approach where the cords are viewed as relatively more superficial and clustered together compared to the traditional technique. Those meeting the inclusion criteria and will consent to participate in the study will be randomized to have either an infraclavicular block in the paracoracoid approach (Group 1) or an infraclavicular block in the costoclavicular approach (Group 2). All groups will have the same injectable volume (35 mls) and local anesthetic concentration (ropivacaine 0.5%). There will be 35 study patients for each group for a total of 70 patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Costoclavicular | Experimental | Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block using Ropivacaine 0.5% 35 mL using the costoclavicular approach |
|
| Paracoracoid | Active Comparator | Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block using Ropivacaine 0.5% 35 mL using the paracoracoid or standard approach |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine | Drug | Local anesthetic |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Block onset time | From the time needle is removed from the patient's skin up to the time when block is considered adequate for surgery | 1 hour |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Procedure duration | From the time the US probe touches the skin to the time the needle is removed | 1 hour |
| Quality of block | 1 hour | |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Shalini Dhir | Western University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Joseph's Hospital | London | Ontario | N6A 4V2 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25899958 | Background | Karmakar MK, Sala-Blanch X, Songthamwat B, Tsui BC. Benefits of the costoclavicular space for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: description of a costoclavicular approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):287-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000232. No abstract available. | |
| 16500953 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001134 | Arm Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077212 | Ropivacaine |
| D014463 | Ultrasonography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000813 | Anilides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000814 | Aniline Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Ultrasound | Device | Ultrasound guided block |
|
| Patient satisfaction |
Satisfaction score (VAS ranging from 0 = completely dissatisfied to 10 = completely satisfied) |
| 1 day |
| Requirement for supplemental analgesia or anesthesia | Quality of block will be assessed if adequate for surgery | 1 day |
| Bigeleisen P, Wilson M. A comparison of two techniques for ultrasound guided infraclavicular block. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Apr;96(4):502-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael024. Epub 2006 Feb 24. |
| 22484026 | Background | Mosaffa F, Gharaei B, Rafeeyan M, Gachkar L. Comparing vertical and coracoid approaches for infraclavicular block in orthopedic surgery of the forearm and hand. J Clin Anesth. 2012 May;24(3):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.07.013. Epub 2012 Apr 5. |
| 23549315 | Background | Acar S, Gurkan Y, Solak M, Toker K. Coracoid versus lateral sagittal infraclavicular block. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(1):32-7. doi: 10.3944/aott.2013.2615. |
| D000588 |
| Amines |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |