Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to collect data to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the Image Readyâ„¢ MR (Magnetic Resonance) Conditional Defibrillation System when used in the 1.5T (Tesla) MRI environment under the labeled Conditions of Use (Phase I).
Additionally, the study will assess medically necessary MR scans according to the labeled Conditions of Use to provide real-world scanning data (Phase I and Phase II).The study also aims to demonstrate the continued ability of the ImageReady MR Conditional Defibrillation System to sense and detect ventricular fibrillation (VF) post MRI scan by collecting and analyzing data from spontaneous VF episodes, "for-cause" VF inductions, and from an optional VF induction Sub-study.
.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ImageReady MR Conditional Defibrillation System Group | Other | Prospective, non-randomized, confirmatory study.Subjects will initially be enrolled into Phase I to undergo a non-diagnostic study required MR Scan. Once Phase I is complete, subjects will be enrolled into Phase II where there is no requirement to undergo a non-diagnostic study required MR scan Up to 37 subjects will be used for an interim analysis. Of these subjects, the first 20 who undergo the study required MRI scan and complete the MRI + 1 Month Visit will be used for this analysis. The second cohort will consist of subjects who will receive the non-diagnostic study required MR scan until 137 CRT-D and 28 VR ( single chamber) ICD subjects undergo the study required MR scan (complete or incomplete). De novo implants and existing implants may be enrolled in Phase I There will be a non-diagnostic study required MR scan (during the MRI visit) There will be a study required MRI visit and MRI + 1 month visit |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ImageReady MR Conditional Defibrillation System | Device | ImageReady MR Conditional Defibrillation System Components: Device Name Device Model Number Pulse Generators Phase I and II Phase II Only * CRT-D (IS1/DF4/IS4) VR ICD (DF4) DR ( dual chamber) ICD (IS1/DF4) ORIGENâ„¢ MINI ICD ORIGEN EL ICD ORIGEN X4 CRT INOGENâ„¢ MINI ICD INOGEN EL ICD INOGEN X4 CRT DYNAGENâ„¢ MINI ICD DYNAGEN EL ICD DYNAGEN X4 CRT-D AUTOGEN â„¢ MINI ICD* AUTOGEN EL ICD* AUTOGEN X4 CRT-D* Right Atrial Leads and Accessories FINELINEâ„¢ II Sterox FINELINE II Sterox EZ Suture Sleeves for FINELINE II Leads INGEVITYâ„¢ MRI* Suture Sleeve for INGEVITY MRI* IS-1 Lead Port Plug 7145 Right Ventricular Leads and Accessories RELIANCE 4-FRONTâ„¢ (DF4)* Suture Sleeve for RELIANCE 4-FRONT leads*; ENDOTAK RELIANCEâ„¢ (DF4) Left Ventricular Leads and Accessories ACUITYâ„¢ X4 (IS4) Suture Sleeve for ACUITY X4 leads * May only be used internationally outside the US |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Free From MR (Magnetic Resonance) Scan-related Complications | MR scan-related CFR (Complication-free rate) between the MR Scan and the MRI + 1 (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Month Visit | The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
| Percentage of Participants That Had an Increase in Average Pacing Thresholds ≤ 0.5V (Volt) (at 0.5 ms) in the RV | Increases in RV pacing threshold (at 0.5 ms) pre- MR scan and 1 Month post-MR scan were calculated for subjects. Subjects that had an increase in average pacing thresholds ≤ 0.5V (at 0.5 ms) from pre-MR Scan to MRI Visit + 1 Month follow-up were considered a success. | The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
| Percentage of Participants That Had an Increase in Average LV ( Left Ventricle) Pacing Threshold ≤ 1.0V (Volt) at 0.5 ms. | Increases in average LV pacing threshold (at 0.5 ms) pre- MR scan and 1 Month post-MR scan were calculated for subjects. Subjects that had an increase in pacing thresholds measurements ≤ 1.0V (at 0.5 ms) from pre-MR Scan at MRI Visit to MRI + 1 Month Visit were considered a success. | The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
| Percentage of Participants That Had a Decrease in RV ( Right Ventricle) Sensed Amplitude | Decreases in RV sensed amplitude pre-MR scan and 1 Month post-MR scan were calculated for subjects. Subjects were considered a success if the average sensed amplitude at the MRI + 1 Month Visit remains ≥ 5.0 mV and above 50% of the pre-MR scan value. Subjects who had an average pre-scan RV sensed amplitude measurement < 5.0 mV were excluded from this analysis. | The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
| Percentage of Participants That Decrease in LV ( Left Ventricle) Sensed Amplitude | Decreases in average LV sensed amplitude pre-MR scan and 1 Month post-MR scan were calculated for subjects. Subjects were considered a success if the average sensed amplitude at the MRI + 1 Month Visit remained ≥ 5.0 mV and above 50% of the average pre-MR scan value. Subjects who had an average pre-scan LV sensed amplitude measurement < 5.0 mV were excluded from this analysis. |
Not provided
Not provided
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Subject implanted with an ICD or CRT-D pulse generator with battery at Explant status
Subject has other active or abandoned implanted cardiac rhythm devices, components or accessories present such as pulse generators, leads, lead adaptors or extenders
Presence of metallic objects that represent a contraindication to MR imaging at the discretion of the Radiologist and impacting the ability to conduct the study protocol
Subject needs or will need a medically necessary MR scan, before completing the 1-month post-MR follow-up visit (Phase I only)
Subject with:
Subject is not clinically capable of tolerating the absence of pacing or Resynchronization therapy support in a supine position for the duration that the pulse generator is in MRI Protection Mode, per Physician discretion
Subject is not clinically capable of tolerating the absence of Tachycardia therapy support for the duration that the pulse generator is in MRI Protection Mode, per Physician discretion
Subjects with a planned RA( right atrium), RV ( right ventricle) or LV (left ventricle) lead revision or extraction within 30 days of enrollment (Phase I only)
Subjects with an implanted lead that is planned to be extracted during the study implant procedure
Subjects currently requiring dialysis
Subject has a mechanical heart valve
Subject has a known or suspected sensitivity to dexamethasone acetate (DXA)
Subject is currently on the active heart transplant list
Subject has documented life expectancy of less than 12 months
Subject is enrolled in a concurrent study, with the exception of local mandatory governmental registries and observational studies/registries, without the written approval from Boston Scientific
Women of childbearing potential who are or might be pregnant, and will receive an ICD or CRT-D pulse generator
VF Induction Sub-study Exclusion Criteria:
In addition to meeting all of the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria of the ENABLE MRI study, subjects enrolled in the VF Induction Sub-study must also not meet any of the following VF Induction Sub-study exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gregory Voss | Boston Scientific Corporation | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heart Center Research, LLC | Huntsville | Alabama | United States | |||
| Cardiology Associates of Northeast Arkansas |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32911050 | Derived | Rinaldi CA, Vitoff PJ, Nair DG, Bernstein R, Mountantonakis SE, Rapacciuolo A, Carter N, Tse HF, Green UB. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging scanning in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators incorporating quadripolar left ventricular leads. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2064-2071. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Sep 7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | ImageReady MR Conditional Defibrillation System Group | This is a prospective, non-randomized, confirmatory study. Some defibrillator systems are not able to be used with MRI scanners because the material they are made out. Boston Scientific has a defibrillation system with a new feature that blocks interference from an MRI scanner when the defibrillator system is set to the "MRI protection mode". This new MRI scan feature was considered "investigational" , meaning was investigated because it was not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patient use. This new defibrillation system is called the ImageReady Defibrillation System. Together, the defibrillator and the lead(s) are called the ImageReady System. The ImageReady system is considered investigational in the US because not all the component parts are approved by the FDA. Patients who have a ImageReady defibrillator will undergo an MRI and data will be collected. Periodic checks were planned to check the defibrillator system. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 11, 2016 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
| Jonesboro |
| Arkansas |
| 72653 |
| United States |
| Huntington Memorial Hospital | Pasadena | California | United States |
| University of California - San Diego-N | San Diego | California | United States |
| John Muir Medical Center | Walnut Creek | California | United States |
| Manatee Memorial Hospital | Bradenton | Florida | United States |
| Lakeland Regional Medical Center | Lakeland | Florida | United States |
| University Community Hospital | Tampa | Florida | United States |
| Emory University Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| St. John's hospital | Springfield | Illinois | United States |
| St. Vincent's Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States |
| University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa | United States |
| Marquette General Hospital | Marquette | Michigan | United States |
| Centracare Heart and Vascular Center | Saint Cloud | Minnesota | United States |
| HealthEast St. Joseph's Hospital | Saint Paul | Minnesota | United States |
| North Mississippi Medical Center | Tupelo | Mississippi | United States |
| Cox Health | Springfield | Missouri | United States |
| Northwell Health | New York | New York | United States |
| University of North Carolina Hospital | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | United States |
| OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute - Riverside Methodist Hospital | Columbus | Ohio | United States |
| The Toledo Hospital | Toledo | Ohio | United States |
| Providence St. Vincent Medical Center | Portland | Oregon | United States |
| Bryn Mawr Medical Specialists | Bryn Mawr | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Thomas Jefferson University Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Rapid City Regional Hospital | Rapid City | South Dakota | United States |
| St. Thomas Research Institute, LLC | Nashville | Tennessee | United States |
| SouthEast Texas Clinical Research Center | Beaumont | Texas | United States |
| University of Texas Houston Health Science Center | The Woodlands | Texas | United States |
| Trinity Mother Frances Health System | Tyler | Texas | United States |
| University of Utah Hospital and Clinics | Salt Lake City | Utah | United States |
| Sentara Norfolk General Hospital | Norfolk | Virginia | United States |
| Virginia Commonwealth University Health System | Richmond | Virginia | United States |
| Providence Regional Medical Center Everett | Everett | Washington | United States |
| PeaceHealth Southwest Medical | Vancouver | Washington | United States |
| Academisch Ziekenhuis Middelheim | Antwerp | Belgium |
| Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin | Berlin | Germany |
| Medizinische Hochschule Hannover MHH | Hanover | Germany |
| Klinikum Magdeburg | Magdeburg | Germany |
| Prince of Wales Hospital | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| Queen Mary Hospital | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
| Rambam Medical Center | Haifa | Israel |
| Soroka MC | Petah Tikva | Israel |
| Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center | Tel Aviv | Israel |
| Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center | Tel Litwinsky | Israel |
| Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura 'Giovanni Paolo II' | Campobasso | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II | Naples | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini | Roma | Italy |
| Ospedale S.G. Calibita Fatebenefratelli - Isola Tiberina | Roma | Italy |
| Ospedale san giovanni calibita | Roma | Italy |
| Policlinico Casilino | Roma | Italy |
| Osp. S. Maria Della Misericordia | Udine | Italy |
| Institut Jantung Negara | Kuala Lumpur | Malaysia |
| University of Malaya Medical Centre | Kuala Lumpur | Malaysia |
| Hospital Clinic de Barcelona | Barcelona | Spain |
| Heart and Chest Hospital | Liverpool | United Kingdom |
| Guys and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust | London | United Kingdom |
| Freeman Hospital | Newcastle | United Kingdom |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| Phase 2 |
|
Subjects enrolled into Phase I and underwent a required (non-diagnostic, non-medically necessary) MRI. The data from phase I (N=237) was used for the PMA application and approval. Enrollment was stopped for phase II once 500 enrolled subjects were reached. Baseline participants are 498 patients as two patients were enrolled in error.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ImageReadyâ„¢ MR Conditional Defibrillation System | This is a prospective, non-randomized, confirmatory study. Some defibrillator systems are not able to be used with MRI scanners because the material they are made out. Boston Scientific has a defibrillation system with a new feature that blocks interference from an MRI scanner when the defibrillator system is set to the "MRI protection mode". This new MRI scan feature was considered "investigational" , meaning was investigated because it was not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patient use. This new defibrillation system is called the ImageReady Defibrillation System. Together, the defibrillator and the lead(s) are called the ImageReady System. The ImageReady system is considered investigational in the US because not all the component parts are approved by the FDA. Patients who have a ImageReady defibrillator will undergo an MRI and data will be collected. Periodic checks were planned to check the defibrillator system. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Free From MR (Magnetic Resonance) Scan-related Complications | MR scan-related CFR (Complication-free rate) between the MR Scan and the MRI + 1 (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) Month Visit | All implanted subjects that completed any portion of the study required MR scan and did not have a Medically Necessary Scan (MNS) performed prior to the MRI+1 Month Visit were included in the Primary Safety Endpoint analysis set. | Posted | Number | 97.5% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants That Had an Increase in Average Pacing Thresholds ≤ 0.5V (Volt) (at 0.5 ms) in the RV | Increases in RV pacing threshold (at 0.5 ms) pre- MR scan and 1 Month post-MR scan were calculated for subjects. Subjects that had an increase in average pacing thresholds ≤ 0.5V (at 0.5 ms) from pre-MR Scan to MRI Visit + 1 Month follow-up were considered a success. | Did not include subjects that had a MNS between implant and the MRI+1Month Visit; Failed to meet Conditions of Use; Experienced lead-related complication; Had an incomplete scan or no scan, died or withdrew consent, missed a visit, missed lead measurements | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants with success | The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants That Had an Increase in Average LV ( Left Ventricle) Pacing Threshold ≤ 1.0V (Volt) at 0.5 ms. | Increases in average LV pacing threshold (at 0.5 ms) pre- MR scan and 1 Month post-MR scan were calculated for subjects. Subjects that had an increase in pacing thresholds measurements ≤ 1.0V (at 0.5 ms) from pre-MR Scan at MRI Visit to MRI + 1 Month Visit were considered a success. | did not include subjects with a MNS between implant and the MRI + 1 Month Visit;failed to meet labeled MRI Conditions of Use, had lead-related complication;had an incomplete scan or no scan; missing lead measurements; missed a visits, subject died or withdrew consent | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants with succes | The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants That Had a Decrease in RV ( Right Ventricle) Sensed Amplitude | Decreases in RV sensed amplitude pre-MR scan and 1 Month post-MR scan were calculated for subjects. Subjects were considered a success if the average sensed amplitude at the MRI + 1 Month Visit remains ≥ 5.0 mV and above 50% of the pre-MR scan value. Subjects who had an average pre-scan RV sensed amplitude measurement < 5.0 mV were excluded from this analysis. | Did not include subjects that had a MNS between implant and the MRI+1Month Visit; Failed to meet Conditions of Use; Experienced lead-related complication; Had an incomplete scan or no scan, died or withdrew consent, missed a visit, missed lead measurements; had an average pre-scan RV sensed amplitude measurement < 5.0 mV. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants with succes | The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants That Decrease in LV ( Left Ventricle) Sensed Amplitude | Decreases in average LV sensed amplitude pre-MR scan and 1 Month post-MR scan were calculated for subjects. Subjects were considered a success if the average sensed amplitude at the MRI + 1 Month Visit remained ≥ 5.0 mV and above 50% of the average pre-MR scan value. Subjects who had an average pre-scan LV sensed amplitude measurement < 5.0 mV were excluded from this analysis. | did not include subjects with a MNS between implant and the MRI + 1 Month Visit;failed to meet labeled MRI Conditions of Use, had lead-related complication;had an incomplete scan or no scan; missing lead measurements; missed a visits, subject died or withdrew consent; Average LV sensed amplitude <5mV (3 patients) | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants with succes | The time between the MR Scan and MRI + 1 Month |
|
Safety data are presented for subjects as from enrollment until study completion ( 4 May 2018)
Investigators were asked to classify whether an adverse event was considered serious or nonserious,whether it was anticipated or unanticipated; met USADE(Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect); UADE (Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect) definition and whether it was device or procedure related. All reportable events experienced by the study subject after giving informed consent were to be reported. Two patients were enrolled in error and three patients were withdrawn (intent); 495 at risk
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ImageReady MR Conditional Defibrillation System Group | This is a prospective, non-randomized, confirmatory study. Some defibrillator systems are not able to be used with MRI scanners because the material they are made out. Boston Scientific has a defibrillation system with a new feature that blocks interference from an MRI scanner when the defibrillator system is set to the "MRI protection mode". This new MRI scan feature was considered "investigational" , meaning was investigated because it was not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patient use. This new defibrillation system is called the ImageReady Defibrillation System. Together, the defibrillator and the lead(s) are called the ImageReady System. The ImageReady system is considered investigational in the US because not all the component parts are approved by the FDA. Patients who have a ImageReady defibrillator will undergo an MRI and data will be collected. Periodic checks were planned to check the defibrillator system | 18 | 495 | 139 | 495 | 122 | 495 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unable to capture - LV PG System | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Extracardiac stimulation - LV PG System | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Inappropriate Tachy Therapy - SVT - PG System Therapy | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardia - PG System Therapy | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infection (>30 days post-implant) - PG System - Subject related | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment - Elevated threshold -RV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment - Multiple signs - RV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment - No reported signs - RV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment - No reported signs - LV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post-surgical wound discomfort/bruising/swelling | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Respiratory - Procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hematoma - Pocket (<=30 days post-implant) | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumothorax - Procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericardial effusion - Procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Venous occlusion - Procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other - PG system procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dyspnea - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Peripheral edema - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Heart failure symptoms - Unspecified | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Multiple heart failure symptoms | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)/Monomorphic VT | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia (NSVT) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sinus tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Tachycardia/Other SVT (eg AVRT, AVNRT, EAT) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial (Type I) Flutter | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension/Orthostatic Hypotension | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypertension/Hypertensive Crisis | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiogenic shock | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Coronary Artery Disease | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Peripheral vascular disease | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Syncope | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest pain - Ischemic | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest pain - Other | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Hypotension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Anesthesia | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| COPD exacerbation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Medication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Systemic infection | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Physical trauma | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abnormal laboratory values | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Localized Infection | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neurological | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pulmonary | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Genitourinary | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Psychological | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Endocrine | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cancer | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Multi-system failure | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Unable to capture - RV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Conductor coil fracture - RA Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Migration - PG System - Subject related | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myocardial perforation with tamponade | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest pain - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pulmonary edema - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal insufficiency/failure - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dehydration - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Aortic stenosis | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Mitral regurgitation | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Valvular damage/Valvular insufficiency | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Intracardiac thrombus | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Incessant VT/VT Storm | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fever and/or Virus | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hematological | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Integumentary | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unable to capture - LV PG System | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Extracardiac stimulation - LV PG System | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Inappropriate Tachy Therapy - SVT - PG System Therapy | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardia - PG System Therapy | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infection (>30 days post-implant) - PG System - Subject related | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment - Elevated threshold -RV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment - Multiple signs - RV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment - No reported signs - RV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dislodgment - No reported signs - LV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post-surgical wound discomfort/bruising/swelling | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Respiratory - Procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hematoma - Pocket (<=30 days post-implant) | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumothorax - Procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericardial effusion - Procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Venous occlusion - Procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other - PG system procedure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dyspnea - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Peripheral edema - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Heart failure symptoms - Unspecified | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Multiple heart failure symptoms | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)/Monomorphic VT | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia (NSVT) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sinus tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Tachycardia/Other SVT (eg AVRT, AVNRT, EAT) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial (Type I) Flutter | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension/Orthostatic Hypotension | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypertension/Hypertensive Crisis | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiogenic shock | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Coronary Artery Disease | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Peripheral vascular disease | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Syncope | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest pain - Ischemic | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest pain - Other | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Hypotension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Anesthesia | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| COPD exacerbation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adverse reaction - Medication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Systemic infection | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Physical trauma | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abnormal laboratory values | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Localized Infection | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neurological | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pulmonary | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Genitourinary | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Psychological | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Endocrine | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cancer | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Multi-system failure | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Elevated threshold - LV PG System | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Psychological effect due to device therapy - PG System - Subject related | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| pain at device site | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Conductor coil fracture - RA Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Extracardiac stimulation - RV Lead | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Syncope - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypertension - Heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVC) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Distal thromboemboli | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericardial effusion - Unrelated (non study) procedure or device | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hematological | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| HEENT | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Trial Manager | Boston Scientific | +32479983495 | anneleen.viville@bsci.com |
| Jun 7, 2018 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Asian |
|
| Other |
|
| American Indian |
|
| Unknown |
|
| United States |
|
| Italy |
|
| United Kingdom |
|
| Malaysia |
|
| Israel |
|
| Germany |
|
| Spain |
|
| Austria |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|