Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04-09/2-93/15 | Other Identifier | University Clinical Center Tuzla |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to investigate the natural clinical course, diagnostic possibilities and treatment modalities in moderately severe (MSAP) and severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). The management of severe acute pancreatitis varies with the severity and depends on the type of complication that requires treatment. Although no universally accepted treatment algorithm exists, the step-up approach using close monitoring, percutaneous or endoscopic drainage, followed by minimally invasive video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement has demonstrated to produce superior outcomes to traditional open necrosectomy and may be considered as the reference standard intervention for this disorder.
Despite overall reduced mortality in the last decade, MSAP and SAP are devastating diseases associated with mortality ranging from less than 10% to as high as 85%, according to various studies. The management of SAP is complicated because of the limited understanding of the pathogenesis and multi-causality of the disease, uncertainties in outcome prediction and few effective treatment modalities. Generally, sterile necrosis can be managed conservatively in the majority of cases with a low mortality rate (12%). However, infection of pancreatic necrosis can be observed in 25%-70% of patients with necrotizing disease; it is generally accepted that the infected non-vital tissue should be removed to control the sepsis. Laparotomy and immediate debridement of the infected necrotic tissue have been the gold standard treatment for decades. However, several reports have shown that early surgical intervention for pancreatic necrosis could result in a worse prognosis compared to cases where surgery is delayed or avoided. Therefore, several groups worldwide have developed new, minimally invasive approaches for managing infected necrotizing pancreatitis. The applicability of these techniques depends on the availability of specialized expertise and a multidisciplinary team dedicated to the management of SAP and its complications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous catheter drainage group | Active Comparator | Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) of necrotic tissue and pathological collections formed during acute pancreatitis |
|
| Abdominal paracentesis evacuation group | Active Comparator | Abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) of peritoneal fluid during acute pancreatitis |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous catheter drainage | Procedure | Depending on the operator experience, tandem trocar technique or Seldinger technique can be used. If the Seldinger technique is used, then the catheter tract should be sequentially dilated over a guidewire. Access routes that avoid crossing the bowel and other intervening organs, or major mesenteric, peripancreatic, or retroperitoneal blood vessels are selected to minimize the risk of bacterial contamination and hemorrhage. Successful percutaneous treatment of necrotic collections of the pancreas depends on several important factors. Catheters often need to remain in place for several weeks and sometimes months; hence, close follow-up is required. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants converted to more aggressive treatment | An average of 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients requiring PCD after initial APD | An average of 1 year | |
| Morbidity and mortality in patients requiring PCD | An average of 1 year | |
| Number of PCD interventions required |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Enver Zerem, MD.PhD | University Clinical Center Tuzla | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25320523 | Result | Zerem E. Treatment of severe acute pancreatitis and its complications. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13879-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13879. | |
| 21478061 | Result | Zerem E, Imamovic G, Susic A, Haracic B. Step-up approach to infected necrotising pancreatitis: a 20-year experience of percutaneous drainage in a single centre. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Jun;43(6):478-83. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 Apr 8. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010195 | Pancreatitis |
| D019283 | Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing |
| D018805 | Sepsis |
| D007239 | Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D018746 | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Abdominal paracentesis evacuation | Procedure | Evacuation of peritoneal ascitic fluid using percutaneous catheters |
|
| An average of 1 year |
| 19444515 | Result | Zerem E, Imamovic G, Omerovic S, Imsirovic B. Randomized controlled trial on sterile fluid collections management in acute pancreatitis: should they be removed? Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2770-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0487-2. Epub 2009 May 15. |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |