Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the impact of additional cavity shaving (CS) on pathological cavity margin (CM) status in breast cancer patients. Patients receiving standard breast-conserving surgery (BCS) will be randomized to intra-operative CM assessment versus intra-operative CS followed by CM assessment. The primary objective of this study is to assess the impact of CS on intra-operative CM status, intra-operative re-excision rate, post-operative CM status and re-excision rate, cosmetic outcomes, and on intraoperative time and medical costs.
After stratified and blocked randomization, the patients' name, admission ID and treatment assignment will be written on a slip of paper, and will be placed in a sealed envelop. A label with the patients' name and admission ID will be placed on the sealed envelop, which will be kept in a locked file. On the day of surgery, a research coordinator will bring the sealed envelope to the operation room. During the standard-of-care BCS, the tumor was excised with a rim of grossly normal tissue. Additional resections are allowed when any of the margins of the tumor-containing specimen were suspected to be inadequate on the basis of standard gross evaluation by surgeons. Prior to intra-operative CM assessment, the research co-ordinator will unseal the envelop and determine which procedure has been designated to the patient. The cosmetic outcome and the quality of life will be evaluated at the day of discharge, after completion of radiotherapy and one year by the patient herself, her partner and a research co-ordinator.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cavity shaving and CM assessment | Experimental | Standardized BCS with additional cavity shaving before CM assessment. |
|
| CM assessment | Placebo Comparator | Standardized BCS with CM assessment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cavity shaving | Procedure | Resect the residual cavity circumferentially (superior, inferior, medial, lateral) and the thickness of the cavity shaving depends on the surgeon's discretion (Recommended 0.5-1.0cm). The principles of the cavity shaving includes: 1) do not compromise the cosmetic outcomes; 2) covers the entire cavity; |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Positivity rate of CMs by intraoperative frozen section analysis. | Proportion of patients with at least one positive(invasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ, excluding LCIS) CMs on intraoperative frozen section analysis | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intra-operative rate of suspected/positive CM | Proportion of patients with at least one positive(invasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ, excluding LCIS) or suspected CMs on intraoperative frozen section analysis. Suspected CMs were defined as CMs with severe atypical hyperplasia observed by frozen section analysis. | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Volume of cavity shaving tissue. | Water displacement method was used to measure the volume of the tissue resected by cavity shaving. | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Weight of cavity shaving tissue. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Fengxi Su, M.D. | Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University. | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun-Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun-Yat-Sen University | Guangzhou | Guangdong | 510120 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12393820 | Background | Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152. | |
| 12393819 |
Not provided
Not provided
The de-identified individual participant data will be available after the research paper has been published.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Standardized BCS+CM assessment. | Procedure | For standardized BCS(Chen K, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012), we resect a rim of 1 cm macroscopically normal tissue around the tumor. The anterior and posterior margins of the tumor-containing specimen extended up to the subdermal plane of the skin and down to the pectoralis major fascia, respectively. The anterior and posterior CMs assessment will not be needed. A surgical blade was used for resecting the CMs (superior, inferior, medial and lateral) to render the thickness of the CMs as thin as possible. No procedures were required for distinguishing the inner and outer surface. They were then frozen and cut parallel, but not perpendicular to the largest surface area. CMs were defined as positive when in situ or invasive carcinoma was found intraoperatively by frozen-section analysis. |
|
| Rate of intra-operative re-excision for suspected/positive CMs | For patients with positive CMs, intra-operative re-excision was required. For patients with suspected CMs,intra-operative re-excision is left to the surgeon's discretion | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Rate of a second-time surgery for post-operative positive CMs | Positive CMs by post-operative pathological analysis may require a second-time surgery for re-excision. | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Proportion of patients successfully undergone BCT | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Cost-effectiveness of cavity shaving in BCS as measured by operative time of the surgery | Surgery time(start from making the incision to closure) will be analyzed. | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Cost-effectiveness of cavity shaving in BCS as measured by medical cost of the surgery | Medical costs will be analyzed. | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Cosmetic outcome | Patients', partners' and physicians' perceptions of the cosmetic outcomes as measured by Harvard/NSABP/RTOG criteria | One year after surgery. |
| Adverse events | One year after surgery. |
| Quality of life. | Chinese version of validated QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaire | One year after surgery. |
| Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Relationship between the volume of tissue excised in association aesthetic outcomes | Volume of the excised tissue, including the tumor-containing specimen will be analyzed. | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Risk factors for positive CMs | Completion of surgery for all enrolled patients (approximately 12 months) |
| Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini A, Aguilar M, Marubini E. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1227-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020989. |
| 24521674 | Background | Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, Klimberg S, Chavez-MacGregor M, Freedman G, Houssami N, Johnson PL, Morrow M. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 1;88(3):553-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.012. |
| 19826024 | Background | Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman AK, Griggs JJ, Hawley ST, Hamilton AS, Graff JJ, Katz SJ. Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA. 2009 Oct 14;302(14):1551-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1450. |
| 16038815 | Background | Cendan JC, Coco D, Copeland EM 3rd. Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Aug;201(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.014. |
| 26028131 | Background | Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN, Butler M, Stavris K, Li F, Yao X, Bossuyt V, Harigopal M, Lannin DR, Pusztai L, Horowitz NR. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):503-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504473. Epub 2015 May 30. |
| 21494401 | Background | Kayar R, Civelek S, Cobanoglu M, Gungor O, Catal H, Emiroglu M. Five methods of breast volume measurement: a comparative study of measurements of specimen volume in 30 mastectomy cases. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2011 Mar 27;5:43-52. doi: 10.4137/BCBCR.S6128. |
| 22488098 | Background | Chen K, Zeng Y, Jia H, Jia W, Yang H, Rao N, Song E, Cox CE, Su F. Clinical outcomes of breast-conserving surgery in patients using a modified method for cavity margin assessment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(11):3386-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2331-5. Epub 2012 Apr 10. |
| 31429019 | Derived | Chen K, Zhu L, Chen L, Li Q, Li S, Qiu N, Yang Y, Su F, Song E. Circumferential Shaving of the Cavity in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(13):4256-4263. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07725-w. Epub 2019 Aug 19. |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |