Miniscrews as Anchorage Device for Orthodontic Treatment - Randomized Controlled Trials on Anchorage Capacity, Cost Efficiency and Patient Acceptance
Miniscrews as Anchorage Device for Orthodontic Treatment - Randomized Controlled Trials on Anchorage Capacity, Cost Efficiency and Patient Acceptance
The purpose of this trial is to study and compare two different anchorage techniques. Adolescent patients in need for orthodontic treatment are randomized into Group A and B. Both groups are treated with extractions of the maxillary first premolars and fixed appliance. Anchorage is reinforced by miniscrews in Group A and by molarblock in Group B.
The hypotheses are:
Participants are recruited from the orthodontic specialist clinic in Gävle, Sweden. After informed consent participants are randomized into Group A and B. The treatment starts with extractions of the maxillary first premolars. Extractions are performed by the participants´ general practitioner. Orthodontic treatment starts after the tooth extractions.
All participants get treatment with fixed appliance according to the straight wire concept (3M Victory brackets, .022 slot size, McLaughlin-Bennet-Trevesi prescription). The recommended wire sequence is: .016 Heat Activated Nickel Titanium, .019x.025 Heat Activated Nickel Titanium, .019x.025 Stainless Steel. Treatment time is about two years.
The following measurements are taken at:
T0 (Before treatment start): Study models, baseline questionnaire,
T1 (after tooth extractions, before the orthodontic treatment): Study models, cephalographic x-ray, questionnaire at the evening after tooth extractions, questionnaire one week after tooth extractions.
T2 (After miniscrew placement (Group A), Before space closure): Study models, cephalographic x-ray, questionnaire at the evening after miniscrew placement, questionnaire one week after miniscrew placement.
T3 (After space closure and miniscrew removal): Study models, cephalographic x-ray, questionnaire after screw removal
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: