Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1U01NS090259-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| The Parkinson Study Group | NETWORK |
| Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research | OTHER |
| University of Rochester | OTHER |
| National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial to determine whether oral inosine dosed to moderately elevate serum urate (from ≤5.7 mg/dL to 7.1-8.0 mg/dL) over 2 years slows clinical decline in early PD.
Clinical decline will be assessed as change in the primary outcome variable of the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), a composite scale comprising patient- and clinician-reported outcomes.
Capsules containing 500 mg of inosine (active drug) or ~500 mg of lactose (placebo) will be taken orally up to two capsules three times per day (i.e., up to 3 g/day) for 24 months. In the inosine-treated group the number of capsules taken per day will be titrated to serum urate levels - measured at trough at study visits no more than three months apart - in order to achieve concentrations of 7.1-8.0 mg/dL. Initial dosing will be tailored to individualized factors including gender and pretreatment serum urate, and then advanced gradually toward the projected target dose. Adjustments in dosing of placebo capsules in the control arm will be algorithm-based to match dosing of inosine capsules in the active drug arm.
Following study drug discontinuation all subjects will be followed during a 3-month wash-out period by telephone calls and a final study visit. All study visits after screening will include measurement of the primary outcome variable (MDS-UPDRS) and most will include secondary outcome variables: adverse events, dose adjustments, disability warranting initiation of dopaminergic therapy, Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL), 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), Schwab & England Activities of Daily Living (S&E ADL) scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and orthostatic vital signs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inosine | Experimental | Inosine will be dosed by titrating the number of capsules taken daily to achieve an elevation of serum urate to trough levels of 7.1 to 8.0 mg/dL. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo will be dosed to match the capsule titrations of the inosine group. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inosine | Drug | capsules containing 500 mg of inosine |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Clinical Decline | The primary outcome of the trial is rate of change in the Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) I-III total score over 24 months estimated from a shared-baseline, random-slopes mixed model, censoring follow-up of subjects after initiation of dopaminergic therapy. Parts I-III of the MDS-UPDRS include ratings of non-motor experiences of daily living, motor experiences of daily living, and a motor examination. The MDS-UPDRS is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 where higher scores imply worse symptoms. Parts I-III contain 59 total questions (13 in Part I, 13 in Part II, and 33 in Part III). Total scores for Parts I-III are calculated as simple sums of component items with mean imputation by Part if no more than 1, 2, or 7 items are missing for Parts I through III, respectively. Total scores may range from 0 to 236, with 0 meaning no symptoms and 236 meaning worse symptoms. | two years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Developing Adverse Effects | Safety also will be evaluated by comparing active vs. placebo treatment with respect to overall adverse event (AE) and serious AE (SAE) rate. | two years |
| Percentage Developing Adverse Effects |
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Study subjects meeting all of the following criteria will be allowed to enroll in the study:
Willingness and ability to give written informed consent and to comply with trial procedures.
Fulfillment of diagnostic criteria for idiopathic PD with at least two of the cardinal signs of PD (resting tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity) present at 2nd screening and baseline evaluations, as assessed by the Site Investigator.
Absence of current or imminent (within 90 days of enrollment) PD disability requiring dopaminergic therapy, as assessed by the Site Investigator.
Modified Hoehn and Yahr Scale Stage 1 to 2.5 inclusive.
Age 30 or older at the time of PD diagnosis.
Diagnosis of PD made within 3 years prior to 1st Screening Visit.
Non-fasting serum urate ≤ 5.7 mg/dL at 1st Screening Visit (SC1).
If the subject is female, then:
Being surgically sterile (hysterectomy or tubal ligation), or
Being postmenopausal (last menstruation was two years or more prior to 2nd Screening Visit), or
For those of childbearing potential
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Study subjects meeting any of the following criteria during screening evaluations will be excluded from entry into the study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael A Schwarzschild, MD, PhD | Massachusetts General Hospital (PI of Clinical Coordinating Center), PSG (Chair, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee) | Study Chair |
| Alberto Ascherio, MD, DrPH | Harvard School of Public Health, PSG (Co-Chair, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee) | Study Director |
| David Oakes, PhD | University of Rochester (PI of Data Coordinating Center), PSG (Study Statistician/Member, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee) | Study Director |
| Eric A Macklin, PhD | Massachusetts General Hospital, PSG (Study Statistician/Member, SURE-PD3 Steering Committee) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama | 35233 | United States | ||
| Barrow Neurological Institute |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24366103 | Background | Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD Investigators; Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A, Beal MF, Cudkowicz ME, Curhan GC, Hare JM, Hooper DC, Kieburtz KD, Macklin EA, Oakes D, Rudolph A, Shoulson I, Tennis MK, Espay AJ, Gartner M, Hung A, Bwala G, Lenehan R, Encarnacion E, Ainslie M, Castillo R, Togasaki D, Barles G, Friedman JH, Niles L, Carter JH, Murray M, Goetz CG, Jaglin J, Ahmed A, Russell DS, Cotto C, Goudreau JL, Russell D, Parashos SA, Ede P, Saint-Hilaire MH, Thomas CA, James R, Stacy MA, Johnson J, Gauger L, Antonelle de Marcaida J, Thurlow S, Isaacson SH, Carvajal L, Rao J, Cook M, Hope-Porche C, McClurg L, Grasso DL, Logan R, Orme C, Ross T, Brocht AF, Constantinescu R, Sharma S, Venuto C, Weber J, Eaton K. Inosine to increase serum and cerebrospinal fluid urate in Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2014 Feb;71(2):141-50. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5528. | |
| 36865634 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Not-for-profit scientific network of Parkinson centers in North America | View source |
Not provided
De-identified data; per policies of NIH/NINDS and the PSG (Parkinson Study Group)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Inosine | Inosine will be dosed by titrating the number of capsules taken daily to achieve an elevation of serum urate to trough levels of 7.1 to 8.0 mg/dL. Inosine: capsules containing 500 mg of inosine |
| FG001 | Placebo |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 5, 2019 | May 26, 2020 |
Not provided
| NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | capsules containing ~500 mg of lactose and appearing indistinguishable from inosine capsules |
|
|
Safety of oral inosine titrated to elevate trough serum urate to 7.1 - 8.0 mg/dL will be evaluated by comparing active vs. placebo treatment with respect to the percentage of subjects experiencing individual types of AE, as classified by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred term and system organ class.
| two years |
| Percentage of Subjects Tolerant of the Treatment | Tolerability of a treatment will be defined as a percentage of all subjects in a treatment group who are tolerant of the treatment at 12 weeks (short-term tolerability) and 24 months (long-term tolerability). A subject who is tolerant of treatment will be defined as one who remains on-study and on the assigned treatment without one or more dose reductions lasting more than 4 weeks cumulative due to AEs. A treatment will be declared tolerable if the percentage who are tolerant is significantly greater than 50% by one-tailed testing at p < 0.05. | three months; two years |
| Percentage of Participants Developing Disability Warranting Dopaminergic Therapy Over Time | The percentage of participants with disability warranting the initiation of dopaminergic therapy in each treatment group at time from baseline visit (in 180 day increments). | two years |
| Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - 39 Item Version (PDQ-39) Scale | Rate of change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - 39 item version (PDQ-39) scale points (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. The PDQ-39 asks 39 questions organized over eight domains (scales): mobility (10 items), activities of daily living (6 items), emotional well-being (6 items), stigma (4 items), social support (3 items), cognition (4 items), communication (3 items), and bodily discomfort (3 items). Each item has five possible ordinal responses, from never to always, depending on frequency of the symptom over the preceding month. The eight scales' scores are generated by Likert's method of summated ratings and then transformed to a single figure that ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are associated with more symptoms. | two years |
| Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) | Rate of change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) scale points (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. Neuro-QOL is a set of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with neurological disorders. It comprises 17 domains of HRQL covering physical, psychological and social health. Domains tested include anxiety, cognitive function, communication, depression, emotional and behavioral dyscontrol, fatigue, lower extremity function- mobility, positive affect and well- being, stigma, upper extremity function- fine motor and ADL, sleep disturbance, satisfaction with social roles and activities, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. Higher raw scores are associated with more of the concept being measured. All scales range from 8 to 40 except for Positive Affect and Well-Being which ranges from 9 to 45. | two years |
| Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Depression Module | Rate of change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) depression module scale points (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. Neuro-QOL is a set of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with neurological disorders. Higher raw scores are associated with more of the concept being measured. The depression module score ranges from 8 to 40. | two years |
| Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Schwab and England Scale | Rate of change in percentage points on the Schwab and England scale for functional disability (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. The Schwab and England scale is a Site Investigator and subject assessment of the subject's level of independence. The subject will be scored on a percentage scale reflective of his/her ability to perform acts of daily living. Printed scores with associated descriptors range from 0% to 100% in increments of 5%, with higher percentages associated with more independence. A score of 0% implies "vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning; bedridden". A score of 100% implies "subject has full ability and is completely independent; essentially normal". | two years |
| Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) | Rate of change in points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale (for cognition; over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. The MoCA assesses attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Points are awarded for the correct completion of MoCA tasks. Scores for each task are summed for a total score (range 0-30). Higher scores indicate greater cognitive capacity. | two years |
| Symptomatic Effects | Symptomatic effects will be estimated by changes in motor and other features (e.g., as assessed by short-term change in Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS] I-III total score) during the first 3 months of wash-in at the start of period 1 and during the 3-month wash-out of period 2. The MDS-UPDRS includes ratings of non-motor experiences of daily living, motor experiences of daily living, and a motor examination. The MDS-UPDRS is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 where higher scores imply worse features. Parts I-III contain 59 total questions (13 in Part I, 13 in Part II, and 33 in Part III). Total scores are calculated as simple sums of component items with mean imputation by Part if no more than 1, 2, or 7 items are missing for Parts I through III, respectively. Total scores may range from 0 to 236, with 0 meaning no symptoms and 236 meaning worse symptoms. | three months (after both initiation and discontinuation of study drug) |
| Phoenix |
| Arizona |
| 85013 |
| United States |
| Mayo Clinic Arizona | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85259 | United States |
| Banner Sun Health Research Institute | Sun City | Arizona | 85351 | United States |
| University of California San Diego | La Jolla | California | 92093 | United States |
| University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| University of California Davis | Sacramento | California | 95817 | United States |
| University of California San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94143 | United States |
| University of Colorado | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| Rocky Mountain Movement Disorder Center | Englewood | Colorado | 80113 | United States |
| Hartford HealthCare Movement Disorders Center | Vernon | Connecticut | 06066 | United States |
| University of South Florida | Tampa | Florida | 33613 | United States |
| Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30329 | United States |
| Augusta University | Augusta | Georgia | 30912 | United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
| Neurosciences Institute at Central DuPage Hospital | Winfield | Illinois | 60190 | United States |
| Indiana University | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| University of Kansas Medical Center | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| University of Louisville | Louisville | Kentucky | 40202 | United States |
| Oschner Clinic Foundation | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70121 | United States |
| University of Maryland, Baltimore | Baltimore | Maryland | 21201 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins University | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Boston University Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02118 | United States |
| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48105 | United States |
| Michigan State University | East Lansing | Michigan | 48824 | United States |
| Henry Ford Health System | West Bloomfield | Michigan | 48322 | United States |
| Washington University School of Medicine | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| University of Nebraska Medical Center | Omaha | Nebraska | 68198 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89106 | United States |
| Overlook Medical Center, Atlantic Neuroscience Institute | Summit | New Jersey | 07901 | United States |
| Albany Medical College | Albany | New York | 12208 | United States |
| SUNY Downstate Medical Center | Brooklyn | New York | 11203 | United States |
| Weill Cornell Medical Center | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| SUNY Upstate Medical University | Syracuse | New York | 13210 | United States |
| Duke University | Durham | North Carolina | 27705 | United States |
| University of Cincinnati/Cincinnati Children's Hospital | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Ohio State University | Columbus | Ohio | 43221 | United States |
| Oregon Health & Sciences University | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| University of Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Butler Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island | 02906 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29403 | United States |
| Wesley Neurology Clinic, PC | Cordova | Tennessee | 38018 | United States |
| University of Tennessee Health Science Center | Memphis | Tennessee | 38163 | United States |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
| UT Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75390-9036 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| University of Texas Houston Medical School | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Baylor Scott & White Health | Temple | Texas | 76508 | United States |
| The University of Vermont | Burlington | Vermont | 05405 | United States |
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| VCU Parkinson's & Movement Disorder Center (McGuire Veterans Hospital) | Richmond | Virginia | 23230 | United States |
| Sentara Neurology Specialists | Virginia Beach | Virginia | 23456 | United States |
| Inland Northwest Research | Spokane | Washington | 99202 | United States |
| Northwest Neurological PLLC | Spokane | Washington | 99202 | United States |
| Medical College of Wisconsin | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| University of Puerto Rico | San Juan | Massachusetts | 935 | Puerto Rico |
| Derived |
| Di Luca DG, Macklin EA, Hodgeman K, Lopez G, Pothier L, Callahan KF, Lowell J, Chan J, Videnovic A, Lungu C, Lang AE, Litvan I, Schwarzschild MA, Simuni T. Enrollment of Participants From Marginalized Racial and Ethnic Groups: A Comparative Assessment of the STEADY-PD III and SURE-PD3 Trials. Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;13(1):e200113. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200113. Epub 2023 Jan 18. |
| 34519802 | Derived | Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD3 Investigators; Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A, Casaceli C, Curhan GC, Fitzgerald R, Kamp C, Lungu C, Macklin EA, Marek K, Mozaffarian D, Oakes D, Rudolph A, Shoulson I, Videnovic A, Scott B, Gauger L, Aldred J, Bixby M, Ciccarello J, Gunzler SA, Henchcliffe C, Brodsky M, Keith K, Hauser RA, Goetz C, LeDoux MS, Hinson V, Kumar R, Espay AJ, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Christine C, Daley A, Leehey M, de Marcaida JA, Friedman JH, Hung A, Bwala G, Litvan I, Simon DK, Simuni T, Poon C, Schiess MC, Chou K, Park A, Bhatti D, Peterson C, Criswell SR, Rosenthal L, Durphy J, Shill HA, Mehta SH, Ahmed A, Deik AF, Fang JY, Stover N, Zhang L, Dewey RB Jr, Gerald A, Boyd JT, Houston E, Suski V, Mosovsky S, Cloud L, Shah BB, Saint-Hilaire M, James R, Zauber SE, Reich S, Shprecher D, Pahwa R, Langhammer A, LaFaver K, LeWitt PA, Kaminski P, Goudreau J, Russell D, Houghton DJ, Laroche A, Thomas K, McGraw M, Mari Z, Serrano C, Blindauer K, Rabin M, Kurlan R, Morgan JC, Soileau M, Ainslie M, Bodis-Wollner I, Schneider RB, Waters C, Ratel AS, Beck CA, Bolger P, Callahan KF, Crotty GF, Klements D, Kostrzebski M, McMahon GM, Pothier L, Waikar SS, Lang A, Mestre T. Effect of Urate-Elevating Inosine on Early Parkinson Disease Progression: The SURE-PD3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 14;326(10):926-939. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.10207. |
| 33942376 | Derived | Mestre TA, Macklin EA, Ascherio A, Ferreira JJ, Lang AE, Schwarzschild MA; Parkinson Study Group SURE-PD3 Investigators. Expectations of Benefit in a Trial of a Candidate Disease-Modifying Treatment for Parkinson Disease. Mov Disord. 2021 Aug;36(8):1964-1967. doi: 10.1002/mds.28630. Epub 2021 May 4. |
Placebo will be dosed to match the capsule titrations of the inosine group.
Placebo: capsules containing ~500 mg of lactose and appearing indistinguishable from inosine capsules
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Inosine | Inosine will be dosed by titrating the number of capsules taken daily to achieve an elevation of serum urate to trough levels of 7.1 to 8.0 mg/dL. Inosine: capsules containing 500 mg of inosine |
| BG001 | Placebo | Placebo will be dosed to match the capsule titrations of the inosine group. Placebo: capsules containing ~500 mg of lactose and appearing indistinguishable from inosine capsules |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Rate of Clinical Decline | The primary outcome of the trial is rate of change in the Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) I-III total score over 24 months estimated from a shared-baseline, random-slopes mixed model, censoring follow-up of subjects after initiation of dopaminergic therapy. Parts I-III of the MDS-UPDRS include ratings of non-motor experiences of daily living, motor experiences of daily living, and a motor examination. The MDS-UPDRS is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 where higher scores imply worse symptoms. Parts I-III contain 59 total questions (13 in Part I, 13 in Part II, and 33 in Part III). Total scores for Parts I-III are calculated as simple sums of component items with mean imputation by Part if no more than 1, 2, or 7 items are missing for Parts I through III, respectively. Total scores may range from 0 to 236, with 0 meaning no symptoms and 236 meaning worse symptoms. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score per year | two years |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Rate of Developing Adverse Effects | Safety also will be evaluated by comparing active vs. placebo treatment with respect to overall adverse event (AE) and serious AE (SAE) rate. | Only 147 of 149 participants in the inosine group were analyzed because 2 participants never initiated study drug. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Events per 100 patient-years | two years |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Developing Adverse Effects | Safety of oral inosine titrated to elevate trough serum urate to 7.1 - 8.0 mg/dL will be evaluated by comparing active vs. placebo treatment with respect to the percentage of subjects experiencing individual types of AE, as classified by Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred term and system organ class. | Only 147 of 149 participants in the inosine group were analyzed because 2 participants never initiated study drug. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | two years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects Tolerant of the Treatment | Tolerability of a treatment will be defined as a percentage of all subjects in a treatment group who are tolerant of the treatment at 12 weeks (short-term tolerability) and 24 months (long-term tolerability). A subject who is tolerant of treatment will be defined as one who remains on-study and on the assigned treatment without one or more dose reductions lasting more than 4 weeks cumulative due to AEs. A treatment will be declared tolerable if the percentage who are tolerant is significantly greater than 50% by one-tailed testing at p < 0.05. | Only 147 of 149 participants in the inosine group were analyzed because 2 participants never initiated study drug. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of subjects | three months; two years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Developing Disability Warranting Dopaminergic Therapy Over Time | The percentage of participants with disability warranting the initiation of dopaminergic therapy in each treatment group at time from baseline visit (in 180 day increments). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | two years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - 39 Item Version (PDQ-39) Scale | Rate of change in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire - 39 item version (PDQ-39) scale points (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. The PDQ-39 asks 39 questions organized over eight domains (scales): mobility (10 items), activities of daily living (6 items), emotional well-being (6 items), stigma (4 items), social support (3 items), cognition (4 items), communication (3 items), and bodily discomfort (3 items). Each item has five possible ordinal responses, from never to always, depending on frequency of the symptom over the preceding month. The eight scales' scores are generated by Likert's method of summated ratings and then transformed to a single figure that ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are associated with more symptoms. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score per year | two years |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) | Rate of change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) scale points (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. Neuro-QOL is a set of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with neurological disorders. It comprises 17 domains of HRQL covering physical, psychological and social health. Domains tested include anxiety, cognitive function, communication, depression, emotional and behavioral dyscontrol, fatigue, lower extremity function- mobility, positive affect and well- being, stigma, upper extremity function- fine motor and ADL, sleep disturbance, satisfaction with social roles and activities, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. Higher raw scores are associated with more of the concept being measured. All scales range from 8 to 40 except for Positive Affect and Well-Being which ranges from 9 to 45. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score per year | two years |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Depression Module | Rate of change in Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) depression module scale points (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. Neuro-QOL is a set of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with neurological disorders. Higher raw scores are associated with more of the concept being measured. The depression module score ranges from 8 to 40. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score per year | two years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Schwab and England Scale | Rate of change in percentage points on the Schwab and England scale for functional disability (over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. The Schwab and England scale is a Site Investigator and subject assessment of the subject's level of independence. The subject will be scored on a percentage scale reflective of his/her ability to perform acts of daily living. Printed scores with associated descriptors range from 0% to 100% in increments of 5%, with higher percentages associated with more independence. A score of 0% implies "vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning; bedridden". A score of 100% implies "subject has full ability and is completely independent; essentially normal". | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score per year | two years |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Efficacy: Rate of Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) | Rate of change in points on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale (for cognition; over the time between baseline visit and final visit on study drug) will be assessed for subjects in each treatment group. The MoCA assesses attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. Points are awarded for the correct completion of MoCA tasks. Scores for each task are summed for a total score (range 0-30). Higher scores indicate greater cognitive capacity. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score per year | two years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Symptomatic Effects | Symptomatic effects will be estimated by changes in motor and other features (e.g., as assessed by short-term change in Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS] I-III total score) during the first 3 months of wash-in at the start of period 1 and during the 3-month wash-out of period 2. The MDS-UPDRS includes ratings of non-motor experiences of daily living, motor experiences of daily living, and a motor examination. The MDS-UPDRS is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 where higher scores imply worse features. Parts I-III contain 59 total questions (13 in Part I, 13 in Part II, and 33 in Part III). Total scores are calculated as simple sums of component items with mean imputation by Part if no more than 1, 2, or 7 items are missing for Parts I through III, respectively. Total scores may range from 0 to 236, with 0 meaning no symptoms and 236 meaning worse symptoms. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score per period | three months (after both initiation and discontinuation of study drug) |
|
27 months
Only 147 of 149 participants in the inosine group were analyzed because 2 participants never initiated study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Inosine | Inosine will be dosed by titrating the number of capsules taken daily to achieve an elevation of serum urate to trough levels of 7.1 to 8.0 mg/dL. Inosine: capsules containing 500 mg of inosine | 1 | 147 | 16 | 147 | 125 | 147 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Placebo will be dosed to match the capsule titrations of the inosine group. Placebo: capsules containing ~500 mg of lactose and appearing indistinguishable from inosine capsules | 0 | 149 | 21 | 149 | 135 | 149 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiomyopathy | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastric ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hiatus hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Death | General disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Corona virus infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Extradural abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Concussion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal compression fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood sodium decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transitional cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Testicular mass | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip arthroplasty | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Knee arthroplasty | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood creatinine increased | Investigations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crystal urine present | Investigations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mean cell volume increased | Investigations | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
A prespecified interim analysis determined futility for demonstrating the hypothesized inosine effect of a slower rate of change in the primary outcome and prompted early completion of the trial after an average study drug exposure of 17 months.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Michael Schwarzschild | Massachusetts General Hospital | 617-724-9611 | michaels@helix.mgh.harvard.edu |
| SAP_000.pdf |
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 28, 2017 | May 26, 2020 | Prot_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007288 | Inosine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011684 | Purine Nucleosides |
| D011687 | Purines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
| D012263 | Ribonucleosides |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| United States |
|
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|