Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ospemifene 60 mg once daily (QD) compared with placebo in treatment of vulvo-vaginal atrophy (VVA) due to menopause in women with moderate to severe vaginal dryness as the most bothersome symptom (MBS) of VVA.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Experimental | Participants will take one tablet of ospemifene 60 mg orally, once a day for 12 weeks. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants will take one tablet of matching placebo, orally, once a day for 12 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ospemifene | Drug | 60 mg tablet |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12 | The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to > 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12 | The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Shionogi Clinical Trials Administrator Clinical Support Help Line | Shionogi | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37619252 | Derived | Lara LA, Cartagena-Ramos D, Figueiredo JB, Rosa-E-Silva ACJ, Ferriani RA, Martins WP, Fuentealba-Torres M. Hormone therapy for sexual function in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 24;8(8):CD009672. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009672.pub3. | |
| 30694917 | Derived | Archer DF, Goldstein SR, Simon JA, Waldbaum AS, Sussman SA, Altomare C, Zhu J, Yoshida Y, Schaffer S, Soulban G. Efficacy and safety of ospemifene in postmenopausal women with moderate-to-severe vaginal dryness: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Menopause. 2019 Jan 28;26(6):611-621. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001292. |
Not provided
Not provided
After a screening period of up to 4 weeks, participants who met all eligibility criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ospemifene 60 mg once daily or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Randomization was stratified by severity of most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness on Day 1 and by the presence or absence of the uterus.
Participants were randomized at 68 sites in the United States.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Ospemifene | Participants received one tablet of ospemifene 60 mg orally, once a day for 12 weeks. |
| FG001 | Placebo | Participants received one tablet of matching placebo, orally, once a day for 12 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
The intent-to-treat population included participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. One participant who enrolled at 2 different sites was excluded.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Ospemifene | Participants received one tablet of ospemifene 60 mg orally, once a day for 12 weeks. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants received one tablet of matching placebo, orally, once a day for 12 weeks. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used. | Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of cells | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
From the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose; 14 weeks
Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Four participants randomized to placebo received ospemifene in error and are counted in the ospemifene group for safety assessments. One participant randomized to placebo who enrolled at 2 different sites at the same time was excluded.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Ospemifene | Participants received one tablet of ospemifene 60 mg orally, once a day for 12 weeks. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shionogi Clinical Trials Administrator | Shionogi Inc. | 800-849-9707 | shionogiclintrials-admin@shionogi.co.jp |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 2, 2016 | Feb 19, 2019 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 17, 2017 | Feb 19, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C119141 | Ospemifene |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo |
| Drug |
Tablet identical to the ospemifene tablet without drug |
|
| Baseline and Week 12 |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were defined as AEs that were considered by the investigator to be related to investigational medicinal product, for which causal relationship with the study drug could be reasonably explained. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes:
| From the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose; 14 weeks |
| Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 |
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy. | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 |
| Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH | The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to > 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall. | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 |
| Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8 | The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 |
| Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching | The severity of vaginal and/or vulvar irritation or itching was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination | The severity of difficult or painful urination was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity | The severity of vaginal pain associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity | The severity of vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Maturation Value | The maturation value is an indicator of the level of maturation attained by the vaginal epithelium. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at the central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. Parabasal cells (P), intermediary cells (I), and superficial cells (S) were counted and results were expressed as the maturation value (MV), whereby superficial cells were assigned a point value of 1.0, intermediate cells were assigned a point value of 0.5, and parabasal cells were assigned a point value of 0. The maturation value (MV) was defined as: (percentage of superficial cells * 1) + (percentage of intermediate cells * 0.5) + (percentage of parabasal calls * 0). Lower MV indicates lower estrogen effect. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | A participant was defined as a responder if all the following conditions were met::
| Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index | The investigator performed an evaluation of the vagina, assessing overall elasticity, fluid secretion, pH, condition of epithelial mucosa, and moisture. The severity of each characteristic was assessed using a 5-grade scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The total score was calculated as the sum of the 5 individual scores and ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate better vaginal health | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index | The investigator performed a visual examination of the vulva, assessing the labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, introitus appearance and elasticity, color, discomfort and pain, and presence of other findings (eg, petechiae, excoriations, ulcers, etc). The severity of each characteristic was assessed on a 4-point scale as 0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The total score was calculated by adding the 7 individual scores and ranges from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate better vulvar health. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12 | Vulvovaginal imaging was performed by trained site personnel following a standard procedure. Photographs were assessed by an Independent Panel Review (IPR) in a blinded fashion. Nine parameters (labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, urethra, introitus and elasticity, color, erythema, moisture, and other findings (petechiae, excoriation, ulceration, etc.)) were evaluated on a scale from 0 (normal/none) to 3 (severe). The total score was calculated from the sum of the 9 individual scores and ranged from 0 to 27 with lower values indicating better vulvovaginal health; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score | The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain) answered by the participant on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if a question is not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. The total score was calculated by summing each domain score and ranges from 2 to 36, with higher values indicating better sexual function. | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions, organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain), answered by the participant on a scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. For all domains, higher values indicate better sexual function, according to the following: Desire (2 questions): domain score ranges from 1.2 to 6; Arousal (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Lubrication (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Orgasm (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Satisfaction (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0.8 to 6; Pain (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score | The presence or absence of urinary symptoms was assessed using the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6. The symptoms include frequent urination, urine leakage related to the feeling of urgency, urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing, small amounts of urine leakage, difficulty emptying bladder, and pain and discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area. If a symptom was present, participants were asked to assess the degree to which they were bothered by it on the following 4-point scale:
| Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12 | Serum bone sialoprotein (BSP) was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 12 | Type I collagen C-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 12 | Deoxypyridinoline was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 12 | Type I collagen N-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12 | Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | Alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 12 | Osteocalcin was measured as a marker for bone formation. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 12 | Procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide was measured as a marker of bone formation. | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Mean Days of Lubricant Use Per Week | The mean number of days/week that lubricant was used as documented by participants in an electronic daily diary. | Week 1 to Week 12 |
| Mean Days of Intercourse Per Week | The mean number of days/week of intercourse as recorded by participants in an electronic daily diary. | Week 1 to Week 12 |
| Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Participants were asked to record their overall satisfaction with treatment in an electronic diary according to the following categories: Very satisfied, Moderately satisfied, About equally satisfied and dissatisfied, Moderately dissatisfied, and Very dissatisfied. | Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Other - Miscellaneous |
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Presence of Uterus | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Current Hot Flashes | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Previous Hormone Treatment as Prior Treatment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Duration of Vulvovaginal Atrophy (VVA) | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Vaginal Squamous Epithelium: | The percentage of each of the 3 main types of vaginal epithelial cells (parabasal, intermediate, and superficial) indicates the degree of maturation attained by the vaginal epithelium and can be used to detect hormonal effects in menopausal and postmenopausal women. Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. | Participants in the intent-to-treat population with available data | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of cells |
|
| Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Vaginal Squamous Epithelium | The percentage of each of the 3 main types of vaginal epithelial cells (parabasal, intermediate, and superficial) indicates the degree of maturation attained by the vaginal epithelium and can be used to detect hormonal effects in menopausal and postmenopausal women. Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina; a predominance of superficial cells indicates the presence of estrogen. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. | Participants in the intent-to-treat population with available data | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of cells |
|
| Vaginal pH | A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to > 4.5 after menopause. | Mean | Standard Deviation | pH |
|
| Mean Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness | The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Severity of Most Bothersome Symptom of Vaginal Dryness | The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Participants received one tablet of matching placebo, orally, once a day for 12 weeks. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Week 12 | Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used. | Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of cells | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH at Week 12 | The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to > 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall. To calculate least squares (LS) means, a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) model was used. | Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | pH | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Week 12 | The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were defined as AEs that were considered by the investigator to be related to investigational medicinal product, for which causal relationship with the study drug could be reasonably explained. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any AE occurring at any dose that resulted in any of the following outcomes:
| Participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Four participants randomized to placebo received ospemifene in error and are counted in the ospemifene group for safety assessments. One participant randomized to placebo who enrolled at 2 different sites at the same time was excluded. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose; 14 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Parabasal Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Parabasal cells are immature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina. A predominance of parabasal cells indicates absence of estrogenic stimulation and vaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. A decrease in parabasal cells indicates improvement in vaginal atrophy. | Intent-to-treat population with baseline data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of cells | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Superficial Cells in the Maturation Index of the Vaginal Smear at Weeks 4 and 8 | Superficial cells are mature squamous cells in the lining of the vagina that can decrease in number after menopause resulting in vulvovaginal atrophy. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at a central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. An increase in the number of superficial cells indicates improvement in atrophy. | Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of cells | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Vaginal pH | The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is neutral, less than 7 is acidic, and greater than 7 is basic. A typical vaginal pH in women of reproductive age is between 3.5 and 4.5, increasing to > 4.5 after menopause. Vaginal pH was measured by the investigator using a pH indicator strip at the middle third of the vaginal wall. | Intent-to-treat population with available baseline data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | pH | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Severity of Self-reported Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS) of Vaginal Dryness at Weeks 4 and 8 | The severity of the most bothersome symptom of vaginal dryness was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Intent-to-treat population with available data at baseline | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Vaginal and/or Vulvar Irritation or Itching | The severity of vaginal and/or vulvar irritation or itching was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Difficult or Painful Urination | The severity of difficult or painful urination was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Pain Associated With Sexual Activity | The severity of vaginal pain associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Bleeding Associated With Sexual Activity | The severity of vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity was assessed by the participant through the VVA questionnaire as none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3. | Intent-to-treat population; participants whose baseline values were moderate or severe were included | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Maturation Value | The maturation value is an indicator of the level of maturation attained by the vaginal epithelium. Vaginal smear samples were taken from the middle third of the lateral vaginal wall and were evaluated at the central laboratory by a qualified pathologist. Parabasal cells (P), intermediary cells (I), and superficial cells (S) were counted and results were expressed as the maturation value (MV), whereby superficial cells were assigned a point value of 1.0, intermediate cells were assigned a point value of 0.5, and parabasal cells were assigned a point value of 0. The maturation value (MV) was defined as: (percentage of superficial cells * 1) + (percentage of intermediate cells * 0.5) + (percentage of parabasal calls * 0). Lower MV indicates lower estrogen effect. | Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12 | A participant was defined as a responder if all the following conditions were met::
| Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Vaginal Health Index | The investigator performed an evaluation of the vagina, assessing overall elasticity, fluid secretion, pH, condition of epithelial mucosa, and moisture. The severity of each characteristic was assessed using a 5-grade scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The total score was calculated as the sum of the 5 individual scores and ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate better vaginal health | Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Vulvar Health Index | The investigator performed a visual examination of the vulva, assessing the labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, introitus appearance and elasticity, color, discomfort and pain, and presence of other findings (eg, petechiae, excoriations, ulcers, etc). The severity of each characteristic was assessed on a 4-point scale as 0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. The total score was calculated by adding the 7 individual scores and ranges from 0 to 21, where lower scores indicate better vulvar health. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat population with available data at each timepoint | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Vulvovaginal Imaging Total Score at Week 12 | Vulvovaginal imaging was performed by trained site personnel following a standard procedure. Photographs were assessed by an Independent Panel Review (IPR) in a blinded fashion. Nine parameters (labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, urethra, introitus and elasticity, color, erythema, moisture, and other findings (petechiae, excoriation, ulceration, etc.)) were evaluated on a scale from 0 (normal/none) to 3 (severe). The total score was calculated from the sum of the 9 individual scores and ranged from 0 to 27 with lower values indicating better vulvovaginal health; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat population; participants who agreed to participate in the optional vaginal imaging, and with available data at both time points were included. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Total Score | The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain) answered by the participant on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if a question is not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. The total score was calculated by summing each domain score and ranges from 2 to 36, with higher values indicating better sexual function. | Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index Domain Scores at Week 12 | The Female Sexual Function Index consists of 19 questions, organized into 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain), answered by the participant on a scale from 1 to 5. Where relevant, some questions also include an option of 0 if not applicable due to no sexual activity. Each domain score was calculated by adding the scores of each item in the domain and multiplying by a domain factor. For all domains, higher values indicate better sexual function, according to the following: Desire (2 questions): domain score ranges from 1.2 to 6; Arousal (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Lubrication (4 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Orgasm (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6; Satisfaction (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0.8 to 6; Pain (3 questions): domain score ranges from 0 to 6. | Intent-to-treat population with available baseline and Week 12 data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6 Total Score | The presence or absence of urinary symptoms was assessed using the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)-6. The symptoms include frequent urination, urine leakage related to the feeling of urgency, urine leakage related to physical activity, coughing, or sneezing, small amounts of urine leakage, difficulty emptying bladder, and pain and discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area. If a symptom was present, participants were asked to assess the degree to which they were bothered by it on the following 4-point scale:
| Intent-to-treat population with available data at each time point | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Bone Sialoprotein at Week 12 | Serum bone sialoprotein (BSP) was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | pg/mL | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptide (CTX) at Week 12 | Type I collagen C-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | ng/mL | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Deoxypyridinoline at Week 12 | Deoxypyridinoline was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | µmol/mol creatinine | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptide (NTX) at Week 12 | Type I collagen N-telopeptide was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | nmol bone collagen equivalents (BCE)/L | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b at Week 12 | Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b was measured as a marker of bone resorption. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units/L | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | Alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units/L | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Week 12 | Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was measured as a marker of bone formation. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units/L | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin at Week 12 | Osteocalcin was measured as a marker for bone formation. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | ng/mL | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 12 | Procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide was measured as a marker of bone formation. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | ng/mL | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Days of Lubricant Use Per Week | The mean number of days/week that lubricant was used as documented by participants in an electronic daily diary. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days/week | Week 1 to Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Days of Intercourse Per Week | The mean number of days/week of intercourse as recorded by participants in an electronic daily diary. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days/week | Week 1 to Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Satisfaction With Treatment at Week 12 | Participants were asked to record their overall satisfaction with treatment in an electronic diary according to the following categories: Very satisfied, Moderately satisfied, About equally satisfied and dissatisfied, Moderately dissatisfied, and Very dissatisfied. | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Estradiol at Week 12 | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | pg/mL | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Follicle-Stimulating Hormone at Week 12 | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | IU/L | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Luteinizing Hormone at Week 12 | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | IU/L | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin at Week 12 | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | nmol/L | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Testosterone at Week 12 | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ng/dL | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Free Testosterone at Week 12 | Intent-to-treat population with available data | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | nmol/L | Baseline and Week 12 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 317 |
| 5 |
| 317 |
| 37 |
| 317 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Participants received one tablet of matching placebo, orally, once a day for 12 weeks. | 0 | 310 | 3 | 310 | 42 | 310 |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transient global amnesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Enterocolitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Comminuted fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hot flush | Vascular disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The sponsor can embargo results from a PI's center until the combined results from the completed study have been published in full or the sponsor confirms there will be no multicenter study publication. Results communications must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication. By written request, the sponsor can extend the embargo up to an additional 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to scientific content and cannot further extend the embargo.
| >= 55 to < 65 years |
|
| >= 65 years |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| White |
|
| Other |
|
| Moderate |
|
| Severe |
|
| Superiority |
| Adverse events leading to withdrawal |
|
| Treatment-related AEs leading to withdrawal |
|
| Serious adverse events |
|
| Treatment-related serious adverse events |
|
| Adverse events with outcome of death |
|
Week 8 |
| Mixed-effects model repeated measures |
MMRM model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects; and baseline value modeled as a covariate. |
| <0.0001 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -21.8 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -25.4 |
| -18.1 |
| Superiority |
Week 8 |
| Mixed-effects model repeated measures |
MMRM model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects; and baseline value modeled as a covariate. |
| <0.0001 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 7.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 5.5 |
| 9.0 |
| Superiority |
Week 8 |
| Mixed-effects model repeated measures |
MMRM model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects; and baseline value modeled as a covariate. |
| <0.0001 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.63 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.75 |
| -0.51 |
| Superiority |
|
Week 8 |
| Generalized estimating equations model |
GEE model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects and baseline severity of dryness as a covariate. |
| <0.0001 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 2.01 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 1.47 |
| 2.74 |
Odds ratio is the exponential of the mean of cumulative log odds ratio. |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 |
|
|
Week 8 |
| Generalized estimating equations model |
GEE model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects and baseline severity of dryness as a covariate. |
| 0.7869 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 1.07 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.66 |
| 1.75 |
Odds ratio is the exponential of the mean of cumulative log odds ratio. |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | Generalized estimating equations model | GEE model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects and baseline severity of dryness as a covariate. | 0.8894 | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.03 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.65 | 1.64 | Odds ratio is the exponential of the mean of cumulative log odds ratio. | Superiority |
| Week 12 |
|
|
Week 8 |
| Generalized estimating equations model |
GEE model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects and baseline severity of dryness as a covariate. |
| 0.3970 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 1.51 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.58 |
| 3.95 |
Odds ratio is the exponential of the mean of cumulative log odds ratio. |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | Generalized estimating equations model | GEE model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects and baseline severity of dryness as a covariate. | 0.5391 | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.33 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.54 | 3.26 | Odds ratio is the exponential of the mean of cumulative log odds ratio. | Superiority |
| Week 12 |
|
|
Week 8 |
| Generalized estimating equations model |
GEE model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects and baseline severity of dryness as a covariate. |
| 0.0542 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 1.45 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.99 |
| 2.11 |
Odds ratio is the exponential of the mean of cumulative log odds ratio. |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | Generalized estimating equations model | GEE model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects and baseline severity of dryness as a covariate. | 0.0004 | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.97 | 2-Sided | 95 | 1.35 | 2.88 | Odds ratio is the exponential of the mean of cumulative log odds ratio. | Superiority |
| Week 12 |
|
|
Week 8 |
| Generalized estimating equations model |
GEE model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects and baseline severity of dryness as a covariate. |
| 0.7672 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 0.88 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.37 |
| 2.08 |
Odds ratio is the exponential of the mean of cumulative log odds ratio. |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | Generalized estimating equations model | GEE model with treatment, week, treatment by week interaction, and study center as fixed effects and baseline severity of dryness as a covariate. | 0.7101 | Odds Ratio (OR) | 0.86 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.39 | 1.89 | Odds ratio is the exponential of the mean of cumulative log odds ratio. | Superiority |
| Week 8 |
|
|
| Week 12 |
|
|
| ANCOVA |
The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. |
| <0.0001 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 14.73 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 12.50 |
| 16.96 |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | ANCOVA | The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. | <0.0001 | LS Mean Difference | 14.91 | 2-Sided | 95 | 12.55 | 17.28 | Superiority |
| Week 8 |
|
|
| Week 12 |
|
|
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | Fisher Exact | <0.0001 | Superiority |
| Week 8 |
|
|
| Week 12 |
|
|
| ANCOVA |
The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. |
| <0.0001 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 2.9 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 2.4 |
| 3.4 |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | ANCOVA | The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. | <0.0001 | LS Mean Difference | 2.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | 2.2 | 3.4 | Superiority |
| Week 8 |
|
|
| week 12 |
|
|
| ANCOVA |
The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. |
| <0.0001 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -1.1 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.5 |
| -0.6 |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | ANCOVA | The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. | <0.0001 | LS Mean Difference | -1.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.6 | -0.7 | Superiority |
| Week 8 |
|
|
| Week 12 |
|
|
| ANCOVA |
The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. |
| 0.7865 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.19 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.18 |
| 1.56 |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | ANCOVA | The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. | 0.0392 | LS Mean Difference | 1.59 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.08 | 3.09 | Superiority |
| Arousal |
|
|
| Lubrication |
|
|
| Orgasm |
|
|
| Satisfaction |
|
|
| Pain |
|
|
| ANCOVA |
The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. |
| 0.1867 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.20 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.10 |
| 0.49 |
| Superiority |
| Lubrication | ANCOVA | The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. | 0.0161 | LS Mean Difference | 0.40 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.07 | 0.73 | Superiority |
| Orgasm | ANCOVA | The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. | 0.3400 | LS Mean Difference | 0.16 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.16 | 0.48 | Superiority |
| Satisfaction | ANCOVA | The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. | 0.2195 | LS Mean Difference | 0.16 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.10 | 0.41 | Superiority |
| Pain | ANCOVA | The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. | 0.0103 | LS Mean Difference | 0.45 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.11 | 0.80 | Superiority |
| Week 8 |
|
|
| Week 12 |
|
|
| ANCOVA |
The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. |
| 0.1104 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.4 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.1 |
| 0.9 |
| Superiority |
| Week 12 | ANCOVA | The ANCOVA model included treatment group as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. | 0.2448 | LS Mean Difference | 0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.2 | 0.9 | Superiority |
| About equally satisfied and dissatisfied |
|
| Moderately dissatisfied |
|
| Very dissatisfied |
|