Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study mainly compared the response of the artificial carious enamel lesions to remineralisation in situ. The tested in vitro demineralising protocols were: MC gel, PA gel, MHDP and Buffer solutions.
The lesions were then remineralised in an in situ model, with crossover and double blind design. Fifteen volunteers wore intra-oral appliances containing 2 bovine enamel samples of each demineralising protocol during 3 experimental phases (3 days each). The experimental phases/treatments were: Control (Placebo dentifrice, saliva effect only), Home-care (fluoride dentifrice, 1,100 ppm F, NaF), and Professional/Home-care (varnish- 22,600 ppm F and dentifrice- 1,100 ppm F, NaF).
During the 3-day phase, the appliance was only removed during the main meals (four times a day, maximum 1 h duration each, interval between meals 2-3 h). Immediately after the meals, before replacing the appliance in the mouth, the subjects were advised to perform oral hygiene using a soft end-rounded toothbrush (Colgate® 360º Sensitive Pro-Relief TM) and dentifrice (non-fluoridated from IceFresh, Bauru, SP, Brazil or fluoridated dentifrice from Crest Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the phase and dental floss (Sanifill, São Paulo, Brazil).
The remineralising treatment with dentifrices was done ex vivo, 1 min twice a day (after the first and last oral hygiene of the day) using slurry of the dentifrice (1:3 water, 1 drop of solution/specimen). Thereafter, the appliance was replaced in the mouth and the subjects were advised to rinse with 10 ml of water for 5 s and to expectorate. In respect to Professional/Home-care phase, the varnish (Duraphat, Colgate, SP, Brazil) was applied before the in situ study for 6h and then removed.
The enamel remineralization was quantified using transverse microradiography (% mineral recovery and lesion depth, TMR), surface and cross-sectional hardness. The data were submitted to statistical analysis (p<0.05).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride varnish and fluoride toothpaste | Experimental | Application of fluoride varnish (Duraphat) at the begining of the study. Application of fluoride toothpaste (Crest) twice a day for 3 days. |
|
| placebo toothpaste | Placebo Comparator | Application of placebo toothpaste twice a day for 3 days |
|
| Fluoride toothpaste | Active Comparator | Application of fluoride toothpaste (Crest) twice a day for 3 days |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application of fluoride varnish (22600 ppm F, Duraphat) at the begining of the study | Other |
| ||
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The increase of mineral content (% mineral volume) using transverse microradiography | 3 days | |
| The increase of hardness (KHN or KgF/mm2) artificial caries lesions using surface and cross-sectional hardness | 3 days | |
| Decrease of lesion depth (microns) of artificial caries lesions using transverse microradiography | 3 days |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Application of fluoride toothpaste (1500 ppm F, Crest) twice a day for 3 days of the study |
| Other |
|
| Application of placebo toothpaste (0 ppm F, Ice Fresh) twice a day for 3 days of the study | Other |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003731 | Dental Caries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017001 | Tooth Demineralization |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C023807 | sodium fluoride topical preparation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided