Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The PEPITES study evaluates the efficacy and safety of Viaskin Peanut 250 µg peanut protein to induce desensitization to peanut in peanut-allergic children 4 through 11 years of age after a 12-month treatment by epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT).
This is a 12-month, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of Viaskin Peanut, dosed at 250µg peanut protein (per patch) in peanut-allergic children from 4 through 11 years of age.
The overall maximum study duration for each subject is approximately 61 weeks (6-week screening period, 12-month treatment period and 2-week follow-up period).
During the screening period, subjects will undergo a first screening visit and an entry double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) to peanut to confirm their allergy and their entry peanut eliciting dose (ED). The starting dose of the challenge will be 1 mg peanut protein and will escalate up to a highest dose of 300mg peanut protein. Subjects who react at or below the dose of 300mg peanut protein are considered eligible.
Randomization of eligible subjects will occur in a 2:1 ratio to Viaskin Peanut dosed at 250µg peanut protein (active treatment) or placebo. Subjects will be stratified at randomization by their entry/screening DBPCFC ED in 1 of the following 2 strata and by study center:
Subjects will apply a Viaskin patch containing either peanut protein or placebo daily for a period of 12 months. At Month 12, a post-treatment DBPCFC to peanut will be performed, with a starting dose of 1 mg peanut protein with escalation up to a highest dose of 2,000 mg peanut protein. This evaluation will help determine the primary efficacy endpoint of this pivotal study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Viaskin Peanut 250mcg | Experimental | One Viaskin epicutaneous delivery system (patch) containing 250 µg of peanut protein applied on the skin for 24 hours (±4 hours of allowance) daily for a period of 12 months. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | One Viaskin epicutaneous delivery system (patch) containing placebo applied on the skin for 24 hours (±4 hours of allowance) daily for a period of 12 months. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viaskin Peanut 250mcg | Biological | Peanut extract cutaneous patch |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in the Overall Population | The Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges (DBPCFCs) to determine Eliciting Dose (ED) were performed at screening and Month 12, with each challenge occurring over 2 days. The participant was gradually fed increasing amounts of standardized blinded oral formulas containing either peanut protein (during 1 of the 2 days of the challenge), or without any peanut protein (during the other day of the challenge). A participant was defined as a treatment responder if:
Participants with missing treatment response at Month 12 were imputed as non-responders. The percentage of treatment responders at Month 12 is presented. Analysis of the difference in response rates between treatment groups is presented in the subsequent statistical analysis table. Analysis was performed in the overall population. | At Month 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Each Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) Subgroup | The Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges (DBPCFCs) to determine Eliciting Dose (ED) were performed at screening and Month 12, with each challenge occurring over 2 days. The participant was gradually fed increasing amounts of blinded oral formulas containing either peanut protein (during 1 of the 2 days of the challenge), or without any peanut protein (during the other day of the challenge). A participant was defined as a treatment responder if:
Participants with missing treatment response at Month 12 were imputed as non-responders. The percentage of treatment responders at Month 12 is presented below. Analysis of the difference in response rates between treatment groups is presented in the subsequent statistical analysis table. Analysis was performed for each separate screening ED subgroup. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Over Time | Venous blood samples were drawn to assess peanut-specific IgE levels at baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12. The median relative changes from baseline in IgE levels for each timepoint are presented. Relative change from baseline=100×(value at the visit-value at baseline)/value at baseline. | Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12 |
Main Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female children aged 4 through 11 years;
Physician-diagnosis of peanut allergy or children with a well documented medical history of IgE-mediated symptoms after ingestion of peanut and currently following a strict peanut-free diet, but without a physician diagnosis;
Peanut-specific IgE level (ImmunoCAP system) >0.7 kU/L;
Positive peanut skin prick test (SPT) with a largest wheal diameter:
Positive DBPCFC at ≤300 mg peanut protein.
Main Exclusion Criteria:
History of severe anaphylaxis to peanut with any of the following symptoms: hypotension, hypoxia, neurological compromise (collapse, loss of consciousness or incontinence);
Generalized dermatologic disease
Diagnosis of mast cell disorders, including mastocytosis or uricaria pigmentosa as well as hereditary or idiopathic angioedema;
Diagnosis of asthma that fulfills any of the following criteria:
Receiving β-blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers or tricyclic antidepressant therapy;
Received anti-tumor necrosis factor drugs or anti-IgE drugs (such as omalizumab) or any biologic immunomodulatory therapy within 1 year prior to Visit 1, during screening period or during study participation;
Use of systemic long-acting corticosteroids within 12 weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or use of systemic short-acting corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 or during screening;
Prior or concomitant history of any immunotherapy to any food;
Receiving or planning to receive any aeroallergen immunotherapy during their participation in the study. Aeroallergen immunotherapy must be discontinued at the time of Visit 1;
Any disorder in which epinephrine is contraindicated such as coronary artery disease, uncontrolled hypertension, or serious ventricular arrhythmias.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David M Fleischer, MD | Children's Hospital Colorado | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas Children's Hospital | Little Rock | Arkansas | 72202 | United States | ||
| University of California, Rady Children's Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30794314 | Result | Fleischer DM, Greenhawt M, Sussman G, Begin P, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Petroni D, Beyer K, Brown-Whitehorn T, Hebert J, Hourihane JO, Campbell DE, Leonard S, Chinthrajah RS, Pongracic JA, Jones SM, Lange L, Chong H, Green TD, Wood R, Cheema A, Prescott SL, Smith P, Yang W, Chan ES, Byrne A, Assa'ad A, Bird JA, Kim EH, Schneider L, Davis CM, Lanser BJ, Lambert R, Shreffler W. Effect of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Ingestion Among Children With Peanut Allergy: The PEPITES Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Mar 12;321(10):946-955. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1113. | |
| 32502548 |
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 500 participants signed an informed consent form and were enrolled in the study: 144 were screened failed and 356 were eligible and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive DBV712 250µg (n=238) or placebo (n=118).
Maximum study duration for each participant was approximately 61 weeks (6-week screening period, 53-week treatment period and 2-week follow-up period).
This Phase III study was conducted in participants aged 4 to 11 years old with peanut allergy at 31 active centers in Australia, Canada, Germany, Ireland and USA. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive DBV712 250 micrograms (μg) (Viaskin® Peanut 250 μg) or placebo.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | DBV712 250 μg | Participants applied 1 new DBV712 250 μg patch for 24 hours (±4 hours) every day for 12 months. The application duration was progressively increased to a duration of 24 hours daily over a 15-day period (6 hours during the first week, 12 hours during the second week and 24 hours from the third week onwards). |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screening Period |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 9, 2015 | Sep 14, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Biological | Cutaneous patch containing an inactive deposit manufactured to mimic peanut extract |
|
| At Month 12 |
| Cumulative Reactive Dose (CRD) of Peanut Protein at Baseline and Month 12 | The CRD was calculated as the sum of all doses given (including any repeated and partial doses). The median CRD of peanut protein at baseline and Month 12 is presented. Analysis was performed using the modified baseline observation carried forward method to impute missing data at Month 12. | Baseline and Month 12 |
| Relative Changes From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 Subtype (IgG4) Over Time | Venous blood samples were drawn to assess peanut-specific IgG4 levels at baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12. The median relative changes from baseline in IgG4 levels for each timepoint are presented. Relative change from baseline=100×(value at the visit-value at baseline)/value at baseline. | Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| San Diego |
| California |
| 92123 |
| United States |
| Stanford University School of Medicine | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| Children's Hospital Colorado | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| National Jewish Health | Denver | Colorado | 80206 | United States |
| Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Boston Childrens' Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
| Jaffe Food Allergy Institute | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| The University of North Carolina - Chapell Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45229 | United States |
| Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Children's Medical Center of Dallas | Dallas | Texas | 75235 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine - Texas Children's Hospital | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| ASTHMA, Inc. | Seattle | Washington | 98115 | United States |
| Allergy Medical | Brisbane | Australia |
| Princess Margaret Hospital for Children | Perth | Australia |
| Children's Hospital Westmead | Sydney | Australia |
| British Columbia Children's Hospital | Vancouver | British Columbia | V5H 3V4 | Canada |
| Cheema Research Inc. | Mississauga | Ontario | L5A 3V4 | Canada |
| Ottawa Allergy Asthma Research Institute | Ottawa | Ontario | K1Y 4G2 | Canada |
| Gordon Sussman Clinical Research Inc. | Toronto | Ontario | M4V 1R2 | Canada |
| CHUM & CHU Sainte-Justine | Montreal | Quebec | H3T 1C4 | Canada |
| Centre de Recherche Appliquée en Allergie de Québec (CRAAQ) | Québec | QC G1V4M6 | Canada |
| Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin | Berlin | D-13353 | Germany |
| St.-Marien-Hospital | Bonn | D-53115 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Erlangen | Erlangen | Germany |
| Clinical Investigations Unit | Cork | Ireland |
| Our Lady's Children's Hospital | Dublin | Ireland |
| Result |
| Greenhawt M, Kim EH, Campbell DE, Green TD, Lambert R, Fleischer DM. Improvements in eliciting dose across baseline sensitivities following 12 months of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) in peanut-allergic children aged 4 to 11 years. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):3219-3221. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 Jun 2. No abstract available. |
| 33259921 | Derived | Remington BC, Campbell DE, Green TD, Fleischer DM, Koppelman SJ. Post hoc analysis of epicutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy phase 3 results: Relevance for exposure through restaurant meals. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Feb;126(2):208-209. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.11.015. Epub 2020 Nov 28. No abstract available. |
| 31442495 | Derived | Remington BC, Krone T, Kim EH, Bird JA, Green TD, Lack G, Fleischer DM, Koppelman SJ. Estimated risk reduction to packaged food reactions by epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for peanut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Nov;123(5):488-493.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 20. |
| Placebo |
Participants applied 1 new placebo patch for 24 hours (±4 hours) every day for 12 months. The application duration was progressively increased to a duration of 24 hours daily over a 15-day period (6 hours during the first week, 12 hours during the second week and 24 hours from the third week onwards). |
| FG002 | Screened | Total number of participant who signed an Informed Consent and were screened in the study to determine eligibility. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Treatment and Follow-up Periods |
|
|
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | DBV712 250 μg | Participants applied 1 new DBV712 250 μg patch for 24 hours (±4 hours) every day for 12 months. The application duration was progressively increased to a duration of 24 hours daily over a 15-day period (6 hours during the first week, 12 hours during the second week and 24 hours from the third week onwards). |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants applied 1 new placebo patch for 24 hours (±4 hours) every day for 12 months. The application duration was progressively increased to a duration of 24 hours daily over a 15-day period (6 hours during the first week, 12 hours during the second week and 24 hours from the third week onwards). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) Subgroup | Screening ED Subgroup 1: participants with a screening ED of 1 mg, 3 mg or 10 mg peanut protein. Screening ED Subgroup 2: participants with a screening ED of 30 mg, 100 mg or 300 mg peanut protein. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in the Overall Population | The Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges (DBPCFCs) to determine Eliciting Dose (ED) were performed at screening and Month 12, with each challenge occurring over 2 days. The participant was gradually fed increasing amounts of standardized blinded oral formulas containing either peanut protein (during 1 of the 2 days of the challenge), or without any peanut protein (during the other day of the challenge). A participant was defined as a treatment responder if:
Participants with missing treatment response at Month 12 were imputed as non-responders. The percentage of treatment responders at Month 12 is presented. Analysis of the difference in response rates between treatment groups is presented in the subsequent statistical analysis table. Analysis was performed in the overall population. | The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At Month 12 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Each Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) Subgroup | The Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges (DBPCFCs) to determine Eliciting Dose (ED) were performed at screening and Month 12, with each challenge occurring over 2 days. The participant was gradually fed increasing amounts of blinded oral formulas containing either peanut protein (during 1 of the 2 days of the challenge), or without any peanut protein (during the other day of the challenge). A participant was defined as a treatment responder if:
Participants with missing treatment response at Month 12 were imputed as non-responders. The percentage of treatment responders at Month 12 is presented below. Analysis of the difference in response rates between treatment groups is presented in the subsequent statistical analysis table. Analysis was performed for each separate screening ED subgroup. | The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At Month 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Cumulative Reactive Dose (CRD) of Peanut Protein at Baseline and Month 12 | The CRD was calculated as the sum of all doses given (including any repeated and partial doses). The median CRD of peanut protein at baseline and Month 12 is presented. Analysis was performed using the modified baseline observation carried forward method to impute missing data at Month 12. | The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | mg | Baseline and Month 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Relative Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Over Time | Venous blood samples were drawn to assess peanut-specific IgE levels at baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12. The median relative changes from baseline in IgE levels for each timepoint are presented. Relative change from baseline=100×(value at the visit-value at baseline)/value at baseline. | The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized. Only those with non-missing data were included in the analysis. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Percent of change | Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Relative Changes From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 Subtype (IgG4) Over Time | Venous blood samples were drawn to assess peanut-specific IgG4 levels at baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12. The median relative changes from baseline in IgG4 levels for each timepoint are presented. Relative change from baseline=100×(value at the visit-value at baseline)/value at baseline. | The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized. Only those with non-missing data were included in the analysis. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Percent of change | Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12 |
|
Screened arm: Adverse Events (AEs) collected from signing the informed consent up to the end of the screening period. DBV712 250µg and placebo arms: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) collected from Day 1, throughout the 53-week treatment period and additional 2-week follow-up period. Overall time frame of up to 55 weeks.
Adverse Events were collected for the time the informed consent was signed up to the end of the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | DBV712 250 μg | Participants applied 1 new DBV712 250 μg patch for 24 hours (±4 hours) every day for 12 months. The application duration was progressively increased to a duration of 24 hours daily over a 15-day period (6 hours during the first week, 12 hours during the second week and 24 hours from the third week onwards). | 0 | 238 | 10 | 238 | 222 | 238 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Participants applied 1 new placebo patch for 24 hours (±4 hours) every day for 12 months. The application duration was progressively increased to a duration of 24 hours daily over a 15-day period (6 hours during the first week, 12 hours during the second week and 24 hours from the third week onwards). | 0 | 118 | 6 | 118 | 96 | 118 |
| EG002 | Screened | Participants enrolled in the study during the screening period prior randomization | 0 | 500 | 9 | 500 | 83 | 500 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaphylactic reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Food allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tonsillitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Throat irritation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wheezing | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Visual impairment | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coeliac disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Encephalitis influenzal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis streptococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site pruritus | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site swelling | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site eczema | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site reaction | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Application site urticaria | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis allergic | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wheezing | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eczema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Food allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seasonal allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaphylactic reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Allergy to animal | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthropod bite | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Limb injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Medical Officer | DBV Technologies | 33-1-55-42-78-78 | clinicaltrials@dbv-technologies.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 4, 2017 | Sep 14, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D021183 | Peanut Hypersensitivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000074924 | Nut and Peanut Hypersensitivity |
| D005512 | Food Hypersensitivity |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Non-compliance with the investigational product (IP) |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Other |
|
| 6 to 11 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Asian |
|
| Other |
|
| Screening ED Subgroup 2 |
|
| OG001 |
| Placebo |
Participants applied 1 new placebo patch for 24 hours (±4 hours) every day for 12 months. The application duration was progressively increased to a duration of 24 hours daily over a 15-day period (6 hours during the first week, 12 hours during the second week and 24 hours from the third week onwards). |
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|