Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to assess the visual outcome after the combined binocular implantation of +2.0 D and +3.0 D refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.
Bifocal multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL) are effective in achieving good uncorrected visual acuities in the distance and the near. However, the intermediate vision is of increasing relevance for everyday's life. Several multifocal intraocular lenses have been developed to improvement intermediate vision. Nonetheless, those systems still possess adverse photic effects and do not garantuee spectacle independence. Therefore, the combination of a lower-addition bifocal intraocular lense in the distance-dominant eye with a higher-addition bifocal intraocular lense in the fellow-eye might be a promising approach to address these drawbacks of current binocular and trifocal intraocular lenses.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binocular cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses | Device | Binocular implantation of the combination of Oculentis® MplusX® multifocal intraocular lenses with an addition of +2.0 D in the distance-dominant eye and +3.0 D in the fellow eye. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual acuities in the far, intermediate and near | Visual acuities are tested under photopic conditions at 5 m, intermediate (80 cm) and patient-preferred near distance (≈ 40 cm). | 1 month |
| Visual acuities in the far, intermediate and near | Visual acuities are tested under photopic conditions at 5 m, intermediate (80 cm) and patient-preferred near distance (≈ 40 cm). | 3 months |
| Mesopic vision | Mesopic visual acuities are tested under high-contrast, low-contrast and low-contrast with glare. | 1 month |
| Mesopic vision | Mesopic visual acuities are tested under high-contrast, low-contrast and low-contrast with glare. | 3 months |
| Scotopic contrast sensitivity | Scotopic contrast sensitivity are tested at 0.1 cd/m2, 0.032 cd/m2 and 0.1 cd/m2 with glare. | 1 month |
| Scotopic contrast sensitivity | Scotopic contrast sensitivity are tested at 0.1 cd/m2, 0.032 cd/m2 and 0.1 cd/m2 with glare. | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Spectacle independence in the far, intermediate and near | Spectacle independence as stated by the patient. | 3 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eckart Bertelmann, MD, PhD | Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Department of Ophthalmology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Department of Ophthalmology | Berlin | 13353 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23557223 | Background | Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Javaloy J, Ayala MJ, Vega-Estrada A. Clinical and optical intraocular performance of rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL plate-haptic design versus C-loop haptic design. J Refract Surg. 2013 Apr;29(4):252-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130318-04. | |
| 26469073 | Background | Bonaque-Gonzalez S, Rios S, Amigo A, Lopez-Gil N. Influence on Visual Quality of Intraoperative Orientation of Asymmetric Intraocular Lenses. J Refract Surg. 2015 Oct;31(10):651-7. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150922-01. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 25884577 | Background | Garcia-Domene MC, Felipe A, Peris-Martinez C, Navea A, Artigas JM, Pons AM. Image quality comparison of two multifocal IOLs: influence of the pupil. J Refract Surg. 2015 Apr;31(4):230-5. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20150319-02. |
| 22496436 | Background | Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Pinero DP. Rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL implantation with and without capsular tension ring: refractive and visual outcomes and intraocular optical performance. J Refract Surg. 2012 Apr;28(4):253-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120314-01. |
| 22373031 | Background | Munoz G, Albarran-Diego C, Javaloy J, Sakla HF, Cervino A. Combining zonal refractive and diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2012 Mar;28(3):174-81. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120215-02. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002386 | Cataract |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007905 | Lens Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018918 | Phacoemulsification |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002387 | Cataract Extraction |
| D054140 | Refractive Surgical Procedures |
| D013508 | Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D059708 | Ultrasonic Surgical Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided