Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency and safety between paclitaxel combined with epirubicin and vinorelbine combined with epirubicin when used in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variations.
Taxane-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone treating breast cancer, however remarkable percentage of breast cancer patients presents with primary or secondary taxane resistance. Currently no established biomarker has been reported clinically for predicting taxane sensitivity. Our previous study indicated that TEKT4 variation decreased the stability of intracellular microtubule, and TEKT4 variant cells behaves higher resistance to microtubule-stabilizing agents such as taxane, while enhanced sensibility to microtubule depolymerization agents such as vinorelbine. This study is intended to confirm that TEKT4 variation predicts the prognosis of taxane-based chemotherapy through the prospective clinical trials.
This study intends to evaluate the efficiency and safety of two neoadjuvant therapies: paclitaxel combined with epirubicin and vinorelbine combined with epirubicin, in treating locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variation.
Primary endpoint of study: pathologic Complete Response (pCR). Secondary endpoints of the study: Objective response rate (CR+PR). Exploratory endpoint: Based on pretreatment tumor and matched blood samples, the correlation between biomarker and efficiency is explored.
This open single center prospective randomized control study includes patients locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) HER2-negative patients with TEKT4 variation diagnosed with histopathology and Sanger sequencing. Patients randomized to Group A or Group B to receive respective neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among which Group A: PE x 4 cycles (paclitaxel + epirubicin), paclitaxel: 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15; epirubicin: 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days. Group B: NE x 4 cycles (vinorelbine + epirubicin), vinorelbine: 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15; epirubicin: 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days.
Patients of both groups were performed with diagnostic puncture before treatment and over half of treatment course in order to obtain information about dynamic change of Ki67 and other parameters; Surgery will be performed after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, followed with subsequent adjuvant therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin | Active Comparator | Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin for 4 cycles, paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days. |
|
| Vinorelbine plus Epirubicin | Experimental | Vinorelbine plus Epirubicin for 4 cycles, vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinorelbine plus Epirubicin | Drug | Evaluate the efficiency and safety of vinorelbine plus epirubicin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variations |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| pathologic Complete Response (pCR) | pCR is defined as the absence of noninvasive tumor residuals in breast and axillary lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0) after neoadjuvant therapy. | 3 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) | ORR is defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. | 3 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Zhimin Shao, MD.PhD. | Fudan University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | 200032 | China |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077235 | Vinorelbine |
| D015251 | Epirubicin |
| D017239 | Paclitaxel |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014748 | Vinca Alkaloids |
| D046948 | Secologanin Tryptamine Alkaloids |
| D026121 | Indole Alkaloids |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin | Drug | standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy |
|
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D006571 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D007211 | Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D054836 | Indolizidines |
| D007212 | Indolizines |
| D004317 | Doxorubicin |
| D003630 | Daunorubicin |
| D018943 | Anthracyclines |
| D009279 | Naphthacenes |
| D011084 | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D000617 | Aminoglycosides |
| D006027 | Glycosides |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D043823 | Taxoids |
| D043822 | Cyclodecanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D004224 | Diterpenes |
| D013729 | Terpenes |