Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Foundation of Cardiovascular Research and Education Enschede | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine the preference of patients regarding the vascular access site in future coronary procedures. We hypothesize that patients prefer the lesser invasive procedure via radial access.
Rationale: To explore patient preference for vascular access site in percutaneous coronary procedures, by assessing the perceived importance of benefits and risks of both transradial access and transfemoral access. In addition, direct preference for vascular access and preference for shared decision-making were evaluated.
Objective: To investigate the patient preference of vascular access -transradial versus transfemoral- in future percutaneous coronary procedures, by use of the Best-Worst Scaling.
Study design: Single-center, prospective, observational registry
Study population: A consecutive series of patients, who between June and August 2014, underwent elective coronary procedures at Thoraxcentrum Twente in Enschede.
Intervention: All subjects will receive a questionnaire containing basic baseline questions and a best-worst scaling scenario in which they were asked to indicate the most and least desirable characteristics of the vascular access approach.
Furthermore, their direct preference was asked and to which extent they preferred to participate in the decision-making process regarding the choice for vascular access route in future percutaneous coronary procedures.
Main study endpoints:
The primary endpoint is the patient preference on specific treatment characteristics with regard to vascular access in coronary procedures.
Secondary endpoints include
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| study population | All patients who underwent elective coronary procedures belonged to the one group, they received standard care without any additional interventions, but were asked to fill in a questionnaire. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Questionnaire | Other | Questionnaire containing a Best-worst Scaling scenario |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The best and worst treatment characteristics of transradial and transfemoral access, by using a software-generated Best-Worst Scaling Questionnaire - case 2 | Best-Worst Scaling Questionnaire will be used to assess which treatment characteristics patients find most and least desirable in percutaneous coronary procedures performed via transradial and transfemoral access. | 30 days |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of times that patients prefer transradial in future percutaneous coronary procedure, when given a discrete choice via a questionnaire. | When given the discrete choice, which access site patients would prefer in future percutaneous coronary procedures. | 30 days |
| Percentage of patients that wants to be directly involved in the decision-making process when making the choice for access site in future coronary procedures, by use of a questionnaire. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A consecutive series of patients, who between June and August 2014, underwent elective coronary procedures at Thoraxcentrum Twente in Enschede.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Harald Verheij | research manager | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medisch Spectrum Twente | Enschede | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28470994 | Derived | Kok MM, Weernink MGM, von Birgelen C, Fens A, van der Heijden LC, van Til JA. Patient preference for radial versus femoral vascular access for elective coronary procedures: The PREVAS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):17-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27039. Epub 2017 May 4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| D057240 | Patient Preference |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011795 | Surveys and Questionnaires |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The valuation of participation in decision-making on the choice of vascular access together with the interventional cardiologist |
| 30 days |
| D001161 |
| Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D017060 | Patient Satisfaction |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |