Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Compression of the abdomen during urography with either a patient-regulated compression device or conventional compression.
Evaluation of radiation dose, image quality and patients' experiences
Patients are subjected to radiation from radiographical studies. The nurse can reduce the radiation dose for the individual by using dose-reducing measures. One of these is compression. It is known that compression in urography reduces the radiation dose because the radiation has less tissue to transverse when it is compressed. By reducing patient radiation doses, the risk of harmful radiation effects is reduced. This study aims to study if a patient-regulated compression device can reduce the radiation dose as effectively as the conventional compression, regulated by the nurse.
Two compression devices are investigated in each patient, in randomized order.
Aims of the study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient-regulated compression | Experimental | Patient-regulated compression device |
|
| Standard compression | Active Comparator | Standard compression device |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient-regulated compression device | Device | Compression of the abdomen with a patient-regulated compression device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation dose measured as Dose-area product | Radiation dose for the investigated exposures, measured as Dose-area product | Immediately |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Image quality measured with Visual Grading | Image quality for the investigated images, measured with Visual Grading | Immediately |
| Patient experience (questionnaire) | A questionnaire will be analysed with qualitative content analysis |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Håkan Geijer, MD, PhD | Örebro University, Sweden | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Radiology | Örebro | 70185 | Sweden |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard compression device | Device | Compression of the abdomen with the standard compression device |
|
| Immediately after the procedure |