Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Procedures:
The study will be conducted in two phases:
Phase 1
Phase 2
Study Design:
Effectiveness of flipped classroom compared to traditional lecture classroom among physiotherapy participants - Quasi Experimental Study: This method of study divides a group of participants from respective year and semester into two groups, controlled (traditional lecture) and flipped classroom without their knowledge at the beginning of study. Each batch of participants, ranging from year 1 to year 3 will have two groups of study.
Subjects:
Physiotherapy Students. participants from each intake will be randomly allocated into TC(traditional classroom) and FC(flipped classroom).
Inclusion Criteria:
- All physiotherapy participants of University Tunku Abdul Rahman
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who are not UTAR physiotherapy participants
Instruments:
Demographic profile of participants Index Of Learning Styles Questionnaire Perception and satisfaction questionnaire Examinations on post teaching session/experiment
Procedures of study:
Study Settings:
Lecture rooms of University Tunku Abdul Rahman Sg. Long Campus.
Sampling Method and Recruitment of Participants:
The number of participants of physiotherapy will first be obtained from the Faculty General Office (FGO) UTAR. Then the participants selected will be grouped into two groups of traditional classroom (TC) and Flipped classroom (FC). Since it is a single blinded study, the participants will not know which group they belong to.
Procedures:
The study will be conducted in two phases:
Phase 1
Phase 2
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flipped classroom | Active Comparator | The flipped classroom is new pedagogical method, which employs asynchronous video lectures and practice problems as homework and active, group-based problem solving activities in the classroom. |
|
| traditional classroom | Active Comparator | The classroom lecture is a special form of communication in which voive, gesture. Movements, facial expression and eye contact can either complement or detract from the content. No matter what your topic, your delivery and manner of speaking immeasurably influence your student's' attentiveness and learning. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching methods | Other | the two teaching methods will be given to two groups of students and their knowledge gain will be analysed |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Exam result | A paper based exam will be conducted with objective and subjective questions. It will be a 30 mark paper, 15 mark allotted for lower order thinking (knowledge and comprehension) and 15 marks allotted for higher order thinking of application and analysis. This exam will be able to detect one of the component of knowledge gain of student. Therefore Students' level of knowledge will be assessed by exam score. | one week |
| Perception and satisfaction questionnaire | This questionnaire comprise of 24 questions, which will measure the perception and satisfaction level of student. Measuring the perception and satisfaction of student, one will be able to measure one of the component of knowledge gain of student. It will comprise of both qualitative and quantitative analysis of the questionnaire. The questionnaire is subdivided into categories (teaching method, time spend in learning, knowledge gain and application, language and communication, satisfaction and motivation) checking all domains of perception and satisfaction. The questionnaire is self developed and is validated before conducting the study. | one week |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Manisha Parai, MPT | Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman | Kajang | Selangor | 43000 | Malaysia |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided