Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| AF219-012 | Other Identifier | Afferent Pharmaceuticals | |
| 2015-005064-42 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of three dose regimens of gefapixant ([MK-7264] 7.5 mg, 20 mg, and 50 mg) relative to placebo in reducing awake objective cough frequency. The primary hypothesis for this trial is that at least one dose regimen of gefapixant is superior to placebo with respect to the mean change from baseline in awake cough frequency (on the log scale).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received one matching placebo tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
|
| Gefapixant 7.5 mg | Experimental | Participants received one 7.5 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
|
| Gefapixant 20 mg | Experimental | Participants received one 20 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
|
| Gefapixant 50 mg | Experimental | Participants received one 50 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gefapixant | Drug | Gefapixant administered as one 7.5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg tablet twice daily, depending upon randomization. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated standard error (SE) reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Awake Cough Frequency minus Baseline Awake Cough Frequency). | Baseline Visit (Day -1), Day 84 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment 24-Hour Cough Frequency minus Baseline 24-Hour Cough Frequency). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Afferent Pharmaceuticals Clinical Research | Afferent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36348054 | Derived | Schelfhout J, Nguyen AM, Birring SS, Bacci ED, Vernon M, Muccino DR, La Rosa C, Smith JA. Validation and Meaningful Change Thresholds for an Objective Cough Frequency Measurement in Chronic Cough. Lung. 2022 Dec;200(6):717-724. doi: 10.1007/s00408-022-00587-2. Epub 2022 Nov 8. | |
| 35614875 | Derived | Nguyen AM, Schelfhout J, Muccino D, Bacci ED, La Rosa C, Vernon M, Birring SS. Leicester Cough Questionnaire validation and clinically important thresholds for change in refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;16:17534666221099737. doi: 10.1177/17534666221099737. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Of 367 screened, 253 were randomized to treatment with placebo or 7.5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg gefapixant. One participant randomized to receive 7.5 mg gefapixant was discontinued before receiving treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received one matching placebo tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| FG001 | Gefapixant 7.5 mg | Participants received one 7.5 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| FG002 | Gefapixant 20 mg | Participants received one 20 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| FG003 | Gefapixant 50 mg | Participants received one 50 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
All Randomized Participants
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received one matching placebo tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| BG001 | Gefapixant 7.5 mg | Participants received one 7.5 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated standard error (SE) reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Awake Cough Frequency minus Baseline Awake Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline primary endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | log coughs/hour | Baseline Visit (Day -1), Day 84 |
Up to ~14 weeks (Day 99)
All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. One participant randomized to receive 7.5 mg gefapixant was discontinued before receiving treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received one matching placebo tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frostbite | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development | Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. | 1-800-672-6372 | ClinicalTrialsDisclosure@merck.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000096822 | Chronic Cough |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003371 | Cough |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012818 | Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000597312 | Gefapixant |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo (for gefapixant) | Drug |
|
|
| Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
| Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment 24-Hour Cough Frequency minus Baseline 24-Hour Cough Frequency). | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
| Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment 24-Hour Cough Frequency minus Baseline 24-Hour Cough Frequency). | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
| Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Awake Cough Frequency minus Baseline Awake Cough Frequency). | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28, |
| Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Awake Cough Frequency minus Baseline Awake Cough Frequency). | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
| Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at the Follow-up Visit (Day 98) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at the Follow-up visit (Day 98) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. Change from Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Awake Cough Frequency minus Baseline Awake Cough Frequency). | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 98 |
| Change From Baseline in Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | Cough VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Participants were asked to mark on a 100 mm scale between 0 (no cough) and 100 (the worst cough severity). Cough VAS was evaluated at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28). Baseline cough VAS was defined as the cough VAS at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline with associated SE reported for each treatment group. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
| Change From Baseline in Cough Severity VAS After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | Cough VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Participants were asked to mark on a 100 mm scale between 0 (no cough) and 100 (the worst cough severity). Cough VAS was evaluated at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56). Baseline cough VAS was defined as the cough VAS at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline with associated SE reported for each treatment group. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
| Change From Baseline in Cough Severity VAS After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | Cough VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Participants were asked to mark on a 100 mm scale between 0 (no cough) and 100 (the worst cough severity). Cough VAS was evaluated at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84). Baseline cough VAS was defined as the cough VAS at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline with associated SE reported for each treatment group. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
| Change From Baseline in Cough Severity VAS At Day 85/Early Termination | Cough VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Participants were asked to mark on a 100 mm scale between 0 (no cough) and 100 (the worst cough severity). Cough VAS was evaluated at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Day 85/Early Termination. Baseline cough VAS was defined as the cough VAS at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline with associated SE reported for each treatment group. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 85 |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in Awake Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 28. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in Awake Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 56. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in Awake Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 84. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at the Follow-up Visit (Day 98) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at the Follow-up visit (Day 98) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in Awake Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 98. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 98 |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 28. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 56. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 84. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
| Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency at the Follow-up Visit (Day 98) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 14 (Day 98) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 98. | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 98 |
| Change From Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | Sleep Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period while the participant was asleep divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period that the participant was asleep. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Objective Sleep Cough Frequency minus Baseline Sleep Cough Frequency). | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
| Change From Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | Sleep Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period while the participant was asleep divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period that the participant was asleep. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Objective Sleep Cough Frequency minus Baseline Sleep Cough Frequency). | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
| Change From Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | Sleep Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period while the participant was asleep divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period that the participant was asleep. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Objective Sleep Cough Frequency minus Baseline Sleep Cough Frequency). | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily Cough Severity Diary (CSD) Total Score at Week 1 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 1 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 2 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 2 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 3 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 3 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 4 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 5 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 5 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 6 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 6 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 7 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 7 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 8 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 9 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 9 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 10 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 10 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 11 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 11 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 12 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily Cough Score (DCS) at Week 1 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 1 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 2 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 2 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 3 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 3 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 4 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 5 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 5 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 6 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 6 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 7 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 7 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 8 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 9 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 9 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 10 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 10 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 11 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 11 |
| Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 12 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | The LCQ instrument is designed to assess the impact of cough on various aspects of a participant's life over the preceding 2 weeks. It consists of 19 items which are divided over 3 domains: Physical (items 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14 and 15), Psychological (4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, and 17), and Social (7, 8, 18, 19). A 7-point Likert scale is used to rate each item. For each domain, the domain score (range 1-7) is the sum of the individual item scores within the domain divided by the number of items in the domain. The total score is the sum of the three domain scores and ranges from 3-21; a higher score corresponds to a better health status. Baseline LCQ was defined as the LCQ collected at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline in total LCQ score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. | Baseline, Day 28 |
| Change From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | The LCQ instrument is designed to assess the impact of cough on various aspects of a participant's life over the preceding 2 weeks. It consists of 19 items which are divided over 3 domains: Physical (items 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14 and 15), Psychological (4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, and 17), and Social (7, 8, 18, 19). A 7-point Likert scale is used to rate each item. For each domain, the domain score (range 1-7) is the sum of the individual item scores within the domain divided by the number of items in the domain. The total score is the sum of the three domain scores and ranges from 3-21; a higher score corresponds to a better health status. Baseline LCQ was defined as the LCQ collected at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline in total LCQ score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. | Baseline, Day 56 |
| Change From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score At Day 85/Early Termination | The LCQ instrument is designed to assess the impact of cough on various aspects of a participant's life over the preceding 2 weeks. It consists of 19 items which are divided over 3 domains: Physical (items 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14 and 15), Psychological (4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, and 17), and Social (7, 8, 18, 19). A 7-point Likert scale is used to rate each item. For each domain, the domain score (range 1-7) is the sum of the individual item scores within the domain divided by the number of items in the domain. The total score is the sum of the three domain scores and ranges from 3-21; a higher score corresponds to a better health status. Baseline LCQ was defined as the LCQ collected at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline in total LCQ score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. | Baseline, Day 85/Early Termination |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" According to the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | The self-reported measure Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a participant's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The counts and percentages of ordered responses to the participant's global perception of change were computed for each treatment group on Day 28 and the percentage of participants with improvements (either "very much improved" or "much improved" on the PGIC scale) was reported for each treatment group. | Day 28 |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" According to the PGIC After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | The self-reported measure Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a participant's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The counts and percentages of ordered responses to the participant's global perception of change were computed for each treatment group on Day 28 and the percentage of participants with improvements (either "very much improved" or "much improved" on the PGIC scale) was reported for each treatment group. | Day 56 |
| Percentage of Participants Reporting "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" According to the PGIC at Day 85/Early Termination | The self-reported measure Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a participant's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The counts and percentages of ordered responses to the participant's global perception of change were computed for each treatment group on Day 28 and the percentage of participants with improvements (either "very much improved" or "much improved" on the PGIC scale) was reported for each treatment group. | Day 85/Early Termination |
| Percentage of Participants Rated as "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" by Clinicians According to the Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Day 85/Early Termination | The Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC) reflects a clinician's belief about the efficacy of treatment. CGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a clinician's rating of a participant's overall improvement. Clinicians rated the participant's change at Week 12 (Day 85) as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The counts and percentages of ordered responses to the clinician's global perception of change were computed for each treatment group, and the percentage of participants rated by clinicians as having improvement (either "very much improved" or "much improved" on the CGIC scale) was reported for each treatment group. | Day 85/Early Termination |
| Acceptability Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Were Likely to Take Study Medication For At Least One Year | At the end of the treatment period (Day 85), participants were asked "How likely would you be to take this medication?" This question was asked in reference to the time frame of "At least one year". The counts and percentages of ordered categorical responses to this question were computed for each treatment group. | Day 85/Early Termination |
| Acceptability Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Were Likely to Take Study Medication For At Least Six Months | At the end of the treatment period (Day 85), participants were asked "How likely would you be to take this medication?" This question was asked in reference to the time frame of "At least six months". The counts and percentages of ordered categorical responses to this question were computed for each treatment group. | Day 85/Early Termination |
| Acceptability Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Were Likely to Take Study Medication For At Least Four Weeks | At the end of the treatment period (Day 85), participants were asked "How likely would you be to take this medication?" This question was asked in reference to the time frame of "At least four weeks". The counts and percentages of ordered categorical responses to this question were computed for each treatment group. | Day 85/Early Termination |
| Acceptability Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Were Likely to Take Study Medication Twice Daily | At the end of the treatment period (Day 85), participants were asked "How likely would you be to take this medication?" This question was asked in reference to the time frame of "Twice daily". The counts and percentages of ordered categorical responses to this question were computed for each treatment group. | Day 85/Early Termination |
| Taste Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Experienced Taste Effect After Taking Medication by Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | The tolerance to taste-related adverse events (AEs) was evaluated at the end of the study (Day 84) and a structured taste questionnaire was administered to participants experiencing a taste-related AE. Participants were asked to indicate the frequency that they experienced the taste effect by answering the question "How frequently do you experience the taste effect after taking each dose of medication?" The counts and percentages of categorical frequency responses to the individual items were computed for each treatment group. | Day 84 |
| Taste Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Found Taste Effect of Study Medication Bothersome After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | The tolerance to taste-related adverse events (AEs) was evaluated at the end of the study (Day 84) and a structured taste questionnaire was administered to participants experiencing a taste-related AE to determine what degree the participant found the taste effect bothersome by answering the question "How bothersome is the taste effect of the medication? The counts and percentages of categorical responses to the individual items were computed for each treatment group. | Day 84 |
| 34697975 | Derived | Martin Nguyen A, Bacci ED, Vernon M, Birring SS, Rosa C, Muccino D, Schelfhout J. Validation of a visual analog scale for assessing cough severity in patients with chronic cough. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec;15:17534666211049743. doi: 10.1177/17534666211049743. |
| 33825965 | Derived | Morice AH, Birring SS, Smith JA, McGarvey LP, Schelfhout J, Martin Nguyen A, Xu ZJ, Wu WC, Muccino DR, Sher MR. Characterization of Patients With Refractory or Unexplained Chronic Cough Participating in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial of the P2X3-Receptor Antagonist Gefapixant. Lung. 2021 Apr;199(2):121-129. doi: 10.1007/s00408-021-00437-7. Epub 2021 Apr 7. |
| 32109425 | Derived | Smith JA, Kitt MM, Morice AH, Birring SS, McGarvey LP, Sher MR, Li YP, Wu WC, Xu ZJ, Muccino DR, Ford AP; Protocol 012 Investigators. Gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group, phase 2b trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):775-785. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30471-0. Epub 2020 Feb 25. |
| Adverse Event |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Lack of Efficacy |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Noncompliance |
|
| Cough Improvement |
|
| BG002 | Gefapixant 20 mg | Participants received one 20 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| BG003 | Gefapixant 50 mg | Participants received one 50 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Participants received one matching placebo tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| OG001 | Gefapixant 7.5 mg | Participants received one 7.5 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| OG002 | Gefapixant 20 mg | Participants received one 20 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
| OG003 | Gefapixant 50 mg | Participants received one 50 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment 24-Hour Cough Frequency minus Baseline 24-Hour Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | log coughs/hour | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment 24-Hour Cough Frequency minus Baseline 24-Hour Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | log coughs/hour | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment 24-Hour Cough Frequency minus Baseline 24-Hour Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | log coughs/hour | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Awake Cough Frequency minus Baseline Awake Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | log coughs/hour | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28, |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Awake Cough Frequency minus Baseline Awake Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | log coughs/hour | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at the Follow-up Visit (Day 98) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at the Follow-up visit (Day 98) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. Change from Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Awake Cough Frequency minus Baseline Awake Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided baseline and follow-up visit (Day 98) data during the treatment period. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | coughs/hour | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 98 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cough Severity Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | Cough VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Participants were asked to mark on a 100 mm scale between 0 (no cough) and 100 (the worst cough severity). Cough VAS was evaluated at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28). Baseline cough VAS was defined as the cough VAS at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline with associated SE reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cough Severity VAS After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | Cough VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Participants were asked to mark on a 100 mm scale between 0 (no cough) and 100 (the worst cough severity). Cough VAS was evaluated at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56). Baseline cough VAS was defined as the cough VAS at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline with associated SE reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cough Severity VAS After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | Cough VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Participants were asked to mark on a 100 mm scale between 0 (no cough) and 100 (the worst cough severity). Cough VAS was evaluated at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84). Baseline cough VAS was defined as the cough VAS at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline with associated SE reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cough Severity VAS At Day 85/Early Termination | Cough VAS was scored from 0 to 100 using a 100 mm visual analogue scale. Participants were asked to mark on a 100 mm scale between 0 (no cough) and 100 (the worst cough severity). Cough VAS was evaluated at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Day 85/Early Termination. Baseline cough VAS was defined as the cough VAS at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline with associated SE reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 85 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in Awake Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 28. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one Day 28 endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in Awake Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 56. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one Day 56 endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in Awake Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 84. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one Day 84 endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in Awake Objective Cough Frequency at the Follow-up Visit (Day 98) | Awake Objective Cough Frequency (per hour) was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period (in general, 24-hr interval) while the participant was awake divided by the total duration (in hours) for the monitoring period that the participant was awake. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at the Follow-up visit (Day 98) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in Awake Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 98. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one Day 98 endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 98 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 28. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one Day 28 endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 56. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one Day 56 endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 84. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one Day 84 endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Objective Cough Frequency at the Follow-up Visit (Day 98) | 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period (generally 24 hours). 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 14 (Day 98) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. The percentage of participants that met responder criteria for ≥70%, ≥50%, and ≥30% change (reduction) from baseline levels in 24-hr Objective Cough Frequency were reported for each treatment group at Day 98. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one Day 98 endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 98 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | Sleep Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period while the participant was asleep divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period that the participant was asleep. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 4 (Day 28) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Objective Sleep Cough Frequency minus Baseline Sleep Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | log coughs/hour | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | Sleep Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period while the participant was asleep divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period that the participant was asleep. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 8 (Day 56) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Objective Sleep Cough Frequency minus Baseline Sleep Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | log coughs/hour | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 56 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | Sleep Objective Cough Frequency was defined as the total number of cough events during the monitoring period while the participant was asleep divided by the total duration in hours for the monitoring period that the participant was asleep. 24 hour sound recordings were made at Baseline (Study Day -1) and at Week 12 (Day 84) using a digital recording device. An independent cough monitoring center documented the time of each cough event over the 24 hour period, as well as the time when the participant went to sleep and the time the participant woke. LS mean change from baseline (in log scale) with associated SE reported for each treatment group. Change from Baseline in Sleep Objective Cough Frequency = (Post-Treatment Objective Sleep Cough Frequency minus Baseline Sleep Cough Frequency). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | log coughs/hour | Baseline (Study Day -1), Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily Cough Severity Diary (CSD) Total Score at Week 1 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 2 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 2 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 3 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 3 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 4 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 5 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 6 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 6 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 7 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 7 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 8 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 9 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 9 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 10 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 11 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 11 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily CSD Total Score at Week 12 | The daily CSD instrument has a total of 7 items, each with scores ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The total daily CSD is the sum of these 7 item scores (Min=0, Max=70). Mean total daily score (the sum of 7 item scores divided by 7) was derived for each day. Weekly mean total daily score was defined as the average of the mean total daily scores for each week. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean total daily CSD score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. Baseline was defined as the average CSD scores collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Study Day -7 to Day -1). | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Daily Cough Score (DCS) at Week 1 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 2 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 2 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 3 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 3 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 4 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 5 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 5 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 6 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 6 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 7 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 7 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 8 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 9 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 9 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 10 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 11 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 11 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean DCS at Week 12 | The DCS has a score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). Weekly mean daily score was defined as the average of the daily scores for each week. Baseline was defined as the average DCS score collected during the week prior to Day 1 (Day -7 to Day -1). Participants rated the severity of their cough using the DCS each day. LS mean change from baseline of the weekly mean Daily Cough Score with associated SE was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | The LCQ instrument is designed to assess the impact of cough on various aspects of a participant's life over the preceding 2 weeks. It consists of 19 items which are divided over 3 domains: Physical (items 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14 and 15), Psychological (4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, and 17), and Social (7, 8, 18, 19). A 7-point Likert scale is used to rate each item. For each domain, the domain score (range 1-7) is the sum of the individual item scores within the domain divided by the number of items in the domain. The total score is the sum of the three domain scores and ranges from 3-21; a higher score corresponds to a better health status. Baseline LCQ was defined as the LCQ collected at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline in total LCQ score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Day 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | The LCQ instrument is designed to assess the impact of cough on various aspects of a participant's life over the preceding 2 weeks. It consists of 19 items which are divided over 3 domains: Physical (items 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14 and 15), Psychological (4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, and 17), and Social (7, 8, 18, 19). A 7-point Likert scale is used to rate each item. For each domain, the domain score (range 1-7) is the sum of the individual item scores within the domain divided by the number of items in the domain. The total score is the sum of the three domain scores and ranges from 3-21; a higher score corresponds to a better health status. Baseline LCQ was defined as the LCQ collected at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline in total LCQ score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Day 56 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) Total Score At Day 85/Early Termination | The LCQ instrument is designed to assess the impact of cough on various aspects of a participant's life over the preceding 2 weeks. It consists of 19 items which are divided over 3 domains: Physical (items 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 14 and 15), Psychological (4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 16, and 17), and Social (7, 8, 18, 19). A 7-point Likert scale is used to rate each item. For each domain, the domain score (range 1-7) is the sum of the individual item scores within the domain divided by the number of items in the domain. The total score is the sum of the three domain scores and ranges from 3-21; a higher score corresponds to a better health status. Baseline LCQ was defined as the LCQ collected at Baseline (Study Day -1). LS mean change from baseline in total LCQ score was reported for each treatment group with associated SE. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and at least one post baseline endpoint observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Day 85/Early Termination |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reporting "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" According to the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) After 4 Weeks of Treatment (Day 28) | The self-reported measure Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a participant's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The counts and percentages of ordered responses to the participant's global perception of change were computed for each treatment group on Day 28 and the percentage of participants with improvements (either "very much improved" or "much improved" on the PGIC scale) was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and 1 Day 28 PGIC observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 28 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reporting "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" According to the PGIC After 8 Weeks of Treatment (Day 56) | The self-reported measure Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a participant's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The counts and percentages of ordered responses to the participant's global perception of change were computed for each treatment group on Day 28 and the percentage of participants with improvements (either "very much improved" or "much improved" on the PGIC scale) was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and 1 Day 56 PGIC observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 56 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reporting "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" According to the PGIC at Day 85/Early Termination | The self-reported measure Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) reflects a participant's belief about the efficacy of treatment. PGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Participants rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The counts and percentages of ordered responses to the participant's global perception of change were computed for each treatment group on Day 28 and the percentage of participants with improvements (either "very much improved" or "much improved" on the PGIC scale) was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and 1 Day 85 PGIC observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 85/Early Termination |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Rated as "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" by Clinicians According to the Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at Day 85/Early Termination | The Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC) reflects a clinician's belief about the efficacy of treatment. CGIC is a 7-point scale depicting a clinician's rating of a participant's overall improvement. Clinicians rated the participant's change at Week 12 (Day 85) as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." The counts and percentages of ordered responses to the clinician's global perception of change were computed for each treatment group, and the percentage of participants rated by clinicians as having improvement (either "very much improved" or "much improved" on the CGIC scale) was reported for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and provided at least 1 baseline and 1 Day 85 CGIC observation during the treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 85/Early Termination |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptability Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Were Likely to Take Study Medication For At Least One Year | At the end of the treatment period (Day 85), participants were asked "How likely would you be to take this medication?" This question was asked in reference to the time frame of "At least one year". The counts and percentages of ordered categorical responses to this question were computed for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had available Acceptability Questionnaire data for the one year question at Day 85. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 85/Early Termination |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptability Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Were Likely to Take Study Medication For At Least Six Months | At the end of the treatment period (Day 85), participants were asked "How likely would you be to take this medication?" This question was asked in reference to the time frame of "At least six months". The counts and percentages of ordered categorical responses to this question were computed for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had available Acceptability Questionnaire data for the six month question at Day 85. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 85/Early Termination |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptability Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Were Likely to Take Study Medication For At Least Four Weeks | At the end of the treatment period (Day 85), participants were asked "How likely would you be to take this medication?" This question was asked in reference to the time frame of "At least four weeks". The counts and percentages of ordered categorical responses to this question were computed for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had available Acceptability Questionnaire data for the four week question at Day 85. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 85/Early Termination |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptability Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Were Likely to Take Study Medication Twice Daily | At the end of the treatment period (Day 85), participants were asked "How likely would you be to take this medication?" This question was asked in reference to the time frame of "Twice daily". The counts and percentages of ordered categorical responses to this question were computed for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication and had available Acceptability Questionnaire data for the twice daily question at Day 85. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 85/Early Termination |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Taste Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Experienced Taste Effect After Taking Medication by Frequency After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | The tolerance to taste-related adverse events (AEs) was evaluated at the end of the study (Day 84) and a structured taste questionnaire was administered to participants experiencing a taste-related AE. Participants were asked to indicate the frequency that they experienced the taste effect by answering the question "How frequently do you experience the taste effect after taking each dose of medication?" The counts and percentages of categorical frequency responses to the individual items were computed for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication, who had experienced a taste-related AE, and who had Day 84 taste questionnaire data available. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Taste Questionnaire: Percentage of Participants That Found Taste Effect of Study Medication Bothersome After 12 Weeks of Treatment (Day 84) | The tolerance to taste-related adverse events (AEs) was evaluated at the end of the study (Day 84) and a structured taste questionnaire was administered to participants experiencing a taste-related AE to determine what degree the participant found the taste effect bothersome by answering the question "How bothersome is the taste effect of the medication? The counts and percentages of categorical responses to the individual items were computed for each treatment group. | All randomized participants who had taken at least 1 dose of study medication, who had experienced a taste-related AE, and who had Day 84 taste questionnaire data available. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 63 |
| 21 |
| 63 |
| EG001 | Gefapixant 7.5 mg | Participants received one 7.5 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. | 0 | 63 | 26 | 63 |
| EG002 | Gefapixant 20 mg | Participants received one 20 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. | 0 | 63 | 45 | 63 |
| EG003 | Gefapixant 50 mg | Participants received one 50 mg gefapixant tablet administered by mouth twice daily for 12 weeks. | 1 | 63 | 52 | 63 |
| Hypoaesthesia oral | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Paraesthesia oral | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ageusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypogeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
In order to ensure that the Sponsor will be able to make comments and suggestions where pertinent, material for public dissemination will be submitted to the Sponsor for review at least sixty (60) days prior to submission for publication, public dissemination, or review by a publication committee. All reasonable comments made by the Sponsor in relation to a proposed publication by the Trust, University and/or the Investigator will be incorporated into the publication.
| D012816 |
| Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Day 28 24-hour Cough Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.7099 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.05 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.33 |
| 0.23 |
| Other |
| Day 28 24-hour Cough Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0003 | LS Mean Difference | -0.52 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.80 | -0.24 | Other |
Day 56 24-hour Cough Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0695 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.28 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.58 |
| 0.02 |
| Other |
| Day 56 24-hour Cough Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0001 | LS Mean Difference | -0.62 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.93 | -0.31 | Other |
Day 84 24-hour Cough Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 84 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0811 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.25 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.53 |
| 0.03 |
| Other |
| Day 84 24-hour Cough Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 84 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0014 | LS Mean Difference | -0.47 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.76 | -0.19 | Other |
Day 28 Awake Cough Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.5874 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.08 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.36 |
| 0.20 |
| Other |
| Day 28 24-hour Cough Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0008 | LS Mean Difference | -0.49 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.78 | -0.21 | Other |
|
Day 56 Awake Cough Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0498 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.32 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.63 |
| -0.00 |
| Other |
| Day 56 Awake Cough Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0004 | LS Mean Difference | -0.59 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.92 | -0.27 | Other |
Day 28 Cough Severity VAS: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.4917 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -2.9 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -11.3 |
| 5.4 |
| Other |
| Day 28 Cough Severity VAS: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0228 | LS Mean Difference | -9.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | -18.2 | -1.4 | Other |
Day 56 Cough Severity VAS: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.4702 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -3.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -12.0 |
| 5.6 |
| Other |
| Day 56 Cough Severity VAS: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0197 | LS Mean Difference | -10.7 | 2-Sided | 95 | -19.8 | -1.7 | Other |
Day 84 Cough Severity VAS: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 84 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.1365 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -6.4 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -14.8 |
| 2.0 |
| Other |
| Day 84 Cough Severity VAS: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 84 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0108 | LS Mean Difference | -11.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -19.7 | -2.6 | Other |
|
Day 85/Early Termination Cough Severity VAS: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 85/Early Termination estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0519 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -8.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -16.6 |
| 0.1 |
| Other |
| Day 85/Early Termination Cough Severity VAS: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 85/Early Termination estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0003 | LS Mean Difference | -15.9 | 2-Sided | 95 | -24.3 | -7.5 | Other |
| ≥50% Change |
|
| ≥30% Change |
|
| Day 28: ≥70% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.7238 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥70% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0144 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥50% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0922 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥50% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.3812 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥50% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0088 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥30% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0653 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥30% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.6443 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥30% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.1511 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| ≥50% Change |
|
| ≥30% Change |
|
| Day 56: ≥70% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0947 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥70% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0080 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥50% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0283 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥50% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.1493 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥50% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0026 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥30% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0652 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥30% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.3601 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥30% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0086 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| ≥50% Change |
|
| ≥30% Change |
|
| Day 84: ≥70% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.2803 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥70% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0427 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥50% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0209 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥50% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.3401 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥50% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0031 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥30% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0283 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥30% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.6233 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥30% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0001 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| ≥50% Change |
|
| ≥30% Change |
|
| Day 98: ≥70% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.9007 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥70% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.1602 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥50% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.3440 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥50% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.9876 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥50% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0993 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥30% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.5968 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥30% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.8726 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥30% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.4092 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| ≥50% Change |
|
| ≥30% Change |
|
| Day 28: ≥70% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.7098 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥70% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0068 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥50% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.1284 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥50% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.2670 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥50% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0013 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥30% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.4343 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥30% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.5384 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28: ≥30% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0822 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| ≥50% Change |
|
| ≥30% Change |
|
| Day 56: ≥70% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0223 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥70% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0001 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥50% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0165 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥50% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.6255 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥50% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0085 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥30% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0722 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥30% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.3577 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56: ≥30% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0006 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| ≥50% Change |
|
| ≥30% Change |
|
| Day 84: ≥70% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.1177 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥70% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0236 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥50% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0192 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥50% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.3301 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥50% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0008 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥30% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0285 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥30% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.3856 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 84: ≥30% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0001 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| ≥50% Change |
|
| ≥30% Change |
|
| Day 98: ≥70% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.5055 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥70% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.1602 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥50% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.2721 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥50% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.9763 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥50% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0993 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥30% Change: 7.5 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.4575 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥30% Change: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.9706 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 98: ≥30% Change: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Cough frequency responder endpoints were analyzed by a GLMM with treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction, and country as fixed effects. Comparison of response rates between each gefapixant treatment group and placebo was conducted using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country, unless stated otherwise). Missing data was categorized as discontinued or missing. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.3258 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
Day 28 Sleep Cough Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.9813 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.01 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.53 |
| 0.52 |
| Other |
| Day 28 Sleep Cough Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.6746 | LS Mean Difference | -0.11 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.65 | 0.42 | Other |
Day 56 Sleep Cough Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.9826 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.01 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.55 |
| 0.56 |
| Other |
| Day 56 Sleep Cough Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.1672 | LS Mean Difference | -0.40 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.98 | 0.17 | Other |
Day 84 Sleep Cough Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 84 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.7782 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.08 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.46 |
| 0.61 |
| Other |
| Day 84 Sleep Cough Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 84 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value (on log scale) as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.3167 | LS Mean Difference | 0.28 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.27 | 0.83 | Other |
Week 1 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 1 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.2013 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.3 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.1 |
| 0.7 |
| Other |
| Week 1 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 1 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.9962 | LS Mean Difference | 0.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.4 | 0.4 | Other |
Week 2 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 2 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.7635 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.1 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.4 |
| 0.6 |
| Other |
| Week 2 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 2 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0951 | LS Mean Difference | -0.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.9 | 0.1 | Other |
Week 3 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 3 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.2499 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.3 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.9 |
| 0.2 |
| Other |
| Week 3 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 3 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0612 | LS Mean Difference | -0.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.1 | 0.0 | Other |
Week 4 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 4 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.3129 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.3 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.8 |
| 0.3 |
| Other |
| Week 4 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 4 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.1046 | LS Mean Difference | -0.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.0 | 0.1 | Other |
Week 5 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 5 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.1430 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.4 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.0 |
| 0.1 |
| Other |
| Week 5 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 5 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0221 | LS Mean Difference | -0.7 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.2 | -0.1 | Other |
Week 6 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 6 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0710 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.5 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.1 |
| 0.0 |
| Other |
| Week 6 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 6 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0274 | LS Mean Difference | -0.7 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.2 | -0.1 | Other |
Week 7 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 7 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.3320 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.3 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.9 |
| 0.3 |
| Other |
| Week 7 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 7 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0792 | LS Mean Difference | -0.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.1 | 0.1 | Other |
Week 8 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 8 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.4371 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.8 |
| 0.4 |
| Other |
| Week 8 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 8 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.1907 | LS Mean Difference | -0.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.0 | 0.2 | Other |
Week 9 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 9 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.1132 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.5 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.1 |
| 0.1 |
| Other |
| Week 9 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 9 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0737 | LS Mean Difference | -0.6 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.2 | 0.1 | Other |
Week 10 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 10 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.1769 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.4 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.0 |
| 0.2 |
| Other |
| Week 10 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 10 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0313 | LS Mean Difference | -0.7 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.3 | -0.1 | Other |
Week 11 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 11 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0665 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.2 |
| 0.0 |
| Other |
| Week 11 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 11 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0155 | LS Mean Difference | -0.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.4 | -0.1 | Other |
Week 12 CSD Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 12 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0662 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.2 |
| 0.0 |
| Other |
| Week 12 CSD Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 12 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0197 | LS Mean Difference | -0.7 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.4 | -0.1 | Other |
Week 1 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 1 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.2428 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.3 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.2 |
| 0.8 |
| Other |
| Week 1 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 1 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.7383 | LS Mean Difference | -0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.6 | 0.4 | Other |
Week 2 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 2 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.4599 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.4 |
| 0.9 |
| Other |
| Week 2 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 2 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.2837 | LS Mean Difference | -0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.0 | 0.3 | Other |
Week 3 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 3 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.6108 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.8 |
| 0.5 |
| Other |
| Week 3 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 3 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.4220 | LS Mean Difference | -0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.9 | 0.4 | Other |
Week 4 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 4 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.4044 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.3 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.9 |
| 0.4 |
| Other |
| Week 4 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 4 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.3031 | LS Mean Difference | -0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.0 | 0.3 | Other |
Week 5 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 5 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.1136 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.5 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.2 |
| 0.1 |
| Other |
| Week 5 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 5 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0352 | LS Mean Difference | -0.7 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.4 | -0.0 | Other |
Week 6 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 6 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0651 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.3 |
| 0.0 |
| Other |
| Week 6 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 6 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0848 | LS Mean Difference | -0.6 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.2 | 0.1 | Other |
Week 7 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 7 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.3514 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.3 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.0 |
| 0.4 |
| Other |
| Week 7 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 7 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.2809 | LS Mean Difference | -0.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.1 | 0.3 | Other |
Week 8 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 8 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.4456 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.3 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.0 |
| 0.4 |
| Other |
| Week 8 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 8 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.4629 | LS Mean Difference | -0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.0 | 0.4 | Other |
Week 9 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 9 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0854 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.3 |
| 0.1 |
| Other |
| Week 9 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 9 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.2672 | LS Mean Difference | -0.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.1 | 0.3 | Other |
Week 10 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 10 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0918 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.3 |
| 0.1 |
| Other |
| Week 10 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 10 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.1263 | LS Mean Difference | -0.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.2 | 0.2 | Other |
Week 11 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 11 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0828 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.3 |
| 0.1 |
| Other |
| Week 11 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 11 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0575 | LS Mean Difference | -0.7 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.4 | 0.0 | Other |
Week 12 DCS Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 12 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0882 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.3 |
| 0.1 |
| Other |
| Week 12 DCS Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Week 12 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0961 | LS Mean Difference | -0.6 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.4 | 0.1 | Other |
Day 28 LCQ Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.7601 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.0 |
| 1.3 |
| Other |
| Day 28 LCQ Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 28 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0004 | LS Mean Difference | 2.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.9 | 3.2 | Other |
Day 56 LCQ Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.1321 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.9 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.3 |
| 2.2 |
| Other |
| Day 56 LCQ Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 56 estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0192 | LS Mean Difference | 1.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.2 | 2.7 | Other |
|
Day 85/Early Termination LCQ Total Score: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 85/Early Termination estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. |
| Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model |
| 0.0967 |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 1.0 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.2 |
| 2.3 |
| Other |
| Day 85/Early Termination LCQ Total Score: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo Day 85/Early Termination estimated treatment differences (gefapixant vs. placebo) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated using a MMRM model, which included fixed effects for treatment group, visit, country, treatment-by-visit interaction, and Baseline value as a covariate. | Mixed Effect Repeated Measures model | 0.0028 | LS Mean Difference | 1.9 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.7 | 3.1 | Other |
Day 28 PGIC: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo
The distribution of responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated using CMH test.
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.5021 |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 28 PGIC: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0665 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
Day 56 PGIC: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo
The distribution of responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated using CMH test.
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.0994 |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 56 PGIC: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0009 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
Day 85/Early Termination PGIC: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo
The distribution of responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated using CMH test.
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.0166 |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 85/Early Termination: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | <0.0001 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
Day 85/Early Termination CGIC: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo
The distribution of responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated using CMH test.
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.0751 |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Day 85/Early Termination CGIC: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0010 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Unlikely |
|
| Neither likely or unlikely |
|
| Likely |
|
| Extremely likely |
|
1 Year Acceptability: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "Extremely likely" responses was compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.7687 |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| 1 Year Acceptability: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "Extremely likely" responses was compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.4364 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Unlikely |
|
| Neither likely or unlikely |
|
| Likely |
|
| Extremely likely |
|
6 Month Acceptability: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "Extremely likely" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.6372 |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| 6 Month Acceptability: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "Extremely likely" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.2155 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Unlikely |
|
| Neither likely or unlikely |
|
| Likely |
|
| Extremely likely |
|
4 Week Acceptability: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "Extremely likely" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.5091 |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| 4 Week Acceptability: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "Extremely likely" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.2790 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Unlikely |
|
| Neither likely or unlikely |
|
| Likely |
|
| Extremely likely |
|
Twice Daily Acceptability: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "Extremely likely" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.2333 |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Twice Daily Acceptability: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "Extremely likely" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0534 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Never |
|
| Occasionally |
|
| Often |
|
| Almost Always |
|
| Always |
|
| No Taste Effect Noted + Never |
|
Taste Effect Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "No Taste Effect Noted" or "Never" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| <0.0001 |
| Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Taste Effect Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "No Taste Effect Noted" or "Never" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | <0.0001 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Not At All |
|
| A Little |
|
| Somewhat |
|
| Very |
|
| Extremely |
|
| No Taste Effect Noted + Not At All |
|
| Taste Effect Frequency: 20 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "No Taste Effect Noted" or "Not at All" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | <0.0001 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |
| Taste Effect Frequency: 50 mg gefapixant vs. placebo The distribution of "No Taste Effect Noted" or "Not at All" responses were compared between each of the gefapixant treatment groups and placebo using the stratified CMH test (stratified by country). P-values calculated for gefapixant vs. placebo using CMH test. | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | <0.0001 | Superiority or Other (legacy) |