Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled therapeutic study in participants with confirmed diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC).
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of arimoclomol (compared to placebo) when it is administered as an add-on therapy to the participant's current prescribed best routine clinical care; participant's routine clinical care may, or may not, include miglustat.
The CT-ORZY-NPC-002 study has been expanded to include an open label paediatric sub-study including participants aged 6 to <24 months at study enrolment.
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled therapeutic study in participants with confirmed diagnosis of Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC).
Participants must either 1) have completed Visit 2 (end of study [EOS]) of the CT-ORZY-NPC-001 study or 2) meet the eligibility criteria of this study including a requirement of stable treatment with miglustat for 6 months (if on miglustat therapy) prior to enrolment into the study.
Aim:
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of arimoclomol (compared to placebo) when it is administered as an add-on therapy to the participant's current prescribed best routine clinical care; participant's routine clinical care may, or may not, include miglustat.
Randomization:
Participants will be randomized to receive placebo or arimoclomol (with an allocation ratio of 1:2).
Pharmacokinetic evaluation (age below 12):
To confirm the selected dose, participants less than 12 years of age will undergo an arimoclomol single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation before randomization and the start of continuous (multiple dosing) treatment.
Early Escape Clause:
In participants whose disease progression is too severe and/or too fast, the "early escape clause" will allow the Investigator to apply the escape route which implies that the participant can be treated with arimoclomol (as per blinded phase study schedule) and be followed up according to the study schedule or until the analysis of data from the controlled, 12-month blinded phase study period does not support the efficacy and/or safety of arimoclomol.
Study duration:
The duration of the blinded phase study period will be 12-months.
Following this, all participants will be offered to continue into the extension phase of the study where every participant will receive arimoclomol and be followed up and attend site visits every 6 months until 60 months after randomization. The extension phase runs until arimoclomol has received Regulatory Approval or until the analysis of data from the controlled, blinded phase 12-month study period does not support the efficacy and/or safety of arimoclomol.
The CT-ORZY-NPC-002 protocol has been updated to include a paediatric sub-study including new and naïve participants aged 6 to <24 months at study enrolment.
Aim:
The purpose of the paediatric sub-study, is to assess the safety and tolerability of 36 months of open-label arimoclomol when administered as an add-on therapy to the participant's current prescribed best routine clinical care; participant's routine clinical care may, or may not, include miglustat.
The Paediatric sub-study will run at the open sites participating in the main study. A total of 3-5 participants are planned to be enrolled. All participants will be treated with arimoclomol.
Main Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of NPC1 or NPC2;
NPC diagnosis confirmed by:
Males and females aged 6 to <24 months, with a cap of maximum 3 participants above 18 months
Treated or not treated with miglustat;
The Legal Authorised Representative (LAR) has read and signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to any study-related procedures
The LAR agrees for the participant to participate in all aspects of the trial design
Main Exclusion Criteria:
Arms and Intervention:
1 arm open label treatment with arimoclomol capsules 100 mg (dispersed in water) for oral administration (3 times daily). Doses: The dose in mL is based on the participant's weight in kg.
Randomization: Open Label
Pharmacokinetic: To confirm the selected dose, participants will undergo an arimoclomol single-dose pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation before the start of continuous treatment.
Visit schedule time frame: Screening (V1); enrollment Week 1 (V2 baseline), Weeks 2 (V3), continuing visits at months 1 (V4), 3 (V5), 6 (V6), 9 (V7), 12 (V8), 15 (V8a), 18 (V9), 24 (V10), 30 (V11) and 36 (V12).
Primary objective: Safety and tolerability
Main Endpoint measures:
Safety data: Adverse events (AEs); Vital signs; Hematology; Clinical chemistry
Clinical status data: Clinical signs and symptoms captured through physical examination; Change from baseline in patient weight and height; Change in Bayley III score: Developmental delay scoring
Imaging data: Changes from baseline in the size of the liver and spleen assessed by ultrasound
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arimoclomol Single PK Dose | Experimental | Participants less than 12 years received a single oral dose of arimoclomol capsule, based on participant's body weight, on Day 1. |
|
| Arimoclomol (12-month Double-blind Phase) | Experimental | Participants received arimoclomol capsules orally three times a day (TID) for 12 months. The dose was 31-124 mg arimoclomol base TID (equivalent to 50-200 mg arimoclomol citrate TID), based on participant's body weight. |
|
| Placebo (12-month Double-blind Phase) | Placebo Comparator | Participants received matching placebo capsules (with regard to weight, appearance, smell, flavor etc.) orally TID for 12 months. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| arimoclomol | Drug |
| ||
| Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Niemann-Pick Disease Type C (NPC) Disease Severity Assessed Based on the 5-domain NPCCSS Total Scores | NPC disease severity was assessed based on the 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS). The 5-domain NPCCSS focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. | Baseline to Month 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Responders in Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) - Defined as Percentage of Participants Where the CGI-I Score Remains Stable or Shows Improvement (This Outcome Measure Was Considered Co-primary by the FDA) | The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that rates total improvement of participant's condition. The clinician rates the participants from 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, or 7=Very much worse. Scores thus range from 1-7 with lower scores indicating greater improvement. Responders were the participants with a score of 1 or 2 at Month 12. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
EITHER NP-C participants who have entered the CT-ORZY-NPC-001 study and who have completed Visit 2 (EOS) of the CT-ORZY-NPC-001 study.
OR
NPC participants who did not enter or complete the CT-ORZY-NPC-001 study but are fulfilling all of criteria listed below:
◦Diagnosis of NPC1 or NPC2;
NPC diagnosis confirmed by:
Genetically confirmed (deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA] sequence analysis) by mutations in both alleles of NPC1 or NPC2, OR
Mutation in only one allele of NPC1 or NPC2 plus either positive filipin staining or elevated cholestane triol/oxysterols (>2 x upper limit of normal).
Males and females aged from 2 years to 18 years and 11 months;
Treated or not treated with miglustat;
If a participant is under prescribed treatment with miglustat, it has to be under stable dose of the medication for at least 6 continuous months prior to inclusion in the CT-ORZY-NPC-002 study;
o If a participant has been discontinued from prescribed treatment with miglustat, they must have been discontinued for at least 3 continuous months prior to inclusion in the CT-ORZY-NPC-002 study;
Body mass index (BMI) Z score ≥ -2 SD (standard deviation) for age, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) standards;
Presenting at least one neurological symptom of the disease (for example, but not limited to, hearing loss, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy, ataxia, dementia, dystonia, seizures, dysarthria, or dysphagia);
Ability to walk either independently or with assistance.
Highly effective birth control methods include: Combined (oestrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal or transdermal); progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable or implantable); intrauterine device (IUD); intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS); bilateral tubal occlusion; and vasectomised partner.
All sexually active male participants with female partners of child-bearing potential (post-menarchal) must use a condom with or without spermicide in addition to the birth control used by their partners during the study and until 3 months after the last dose of IMP.
Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective birth control method only if it is defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the study and for 1 week after the last dose of IMP (for female participants of child-bearing potential) and for 3 months after the last dose of IMP (for male participants with female partners of child-bearing potential). The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated by the Investigator in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant.
•Ability to comply with the protocol-specified procedures/evaluations and scheduled visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
This includes treatment with any investigational drug during the study in an attempt to treat NP-C;
Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
Current participation in another trial is not permitted unless it is a non-interventional study and the sole purpose of the trial is for long-term follow up/survival data (registry);
For participants who have not completed the CT-ORZY-NPC-001 study, fulfilling any of the criteria listed below:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Karl-Eugen Mengel | SphinCS GmbH, Hochheim, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland | Oakland | California | 94609 | United States | ||
| Mayo Clinic Children's Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33579322 | Background | Patterson MC, Lloyd-Price L, Guldberg C, Doll H, Burbridge C, Chladek M, iDali C, Mengel E, Symonds T. Validation of the 5-domain Niemann-Pick type C Clinical Severity Scale. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Feb 12;16(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01719-2. | |
| 34418116 | Result | Mengel E, Patterson MC, Da Riol RM, Del Toro M, Deodato F, Gautschi M, Grunewald S, Gronborg S, Harmatz P, Heron B, Maier EM, Roubertie A, Santra S, Tylki-Szymanska A, Day S, Andreasen AK, Geist MA, Havnsoe Torp Petersen N, Ingemann L, Hansen T, Blaettler T, Kirkegaard T, I Dali C. Efficacy and safety of arimoclomol in Niemann-Pick disease type C: Results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 2/3 trial of a novel treatment. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2021 Nov;44(6):1463-1480. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12428. Epub 2021 Sep 7. |
Not provided
Not provided
To confirm the selected dose of arimoclomol for participants less than 12 years of age, the 28 participants below 12 years old received a single arimoclomol dose for PK evaluation before randomization and the start of continuous treatment. A total of 50 participants were randomized in the blinded phase (continuous dose phase) and the study is ongoing in an open-label period.
The study was conducted at 14 sites in Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and United States.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arimoclomol Single PK Dose | Participants less than 12 years received a single oral dose of arimoclomol capsule, based on participant's body weight, on Day 1. |
| FG001 | Arimoclomol (12-month Double-blind Phase) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Dose Treatment Period |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jun 21, 2022 | May 12, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
|
| Month 12 |
| Percentage of Responders in 5-domain NPCCSS - Defined as Participants Where the 5-domain NPCCSS Score Remains Stable or Improves as Compared to Baseline | NPC disease severity was assessed based on the 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS). The 5-domain NPCCSS focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. Stable was defined as a participant's total score for the 5 domains being the same at month 12 as at baseline. Improvement was defined as a participant's total score at month 12 being lower than at baseline. | Baseline to Month 12 |
| Time to Worsening | Time to worsening was defined as the time until the participant reached the predefined minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 2 points compared to baseline on the 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS). The 5-domain NPCCSS focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. The values reported per group are the 25th percentile Kaplan-Meier estimates and 95% confidence interval. | Baseline to Month 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Worsening | Worsening was defined as participants that have reached the predefined MCID of 2 points on their 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS). The 5-domain NPCCSS focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. | Months 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in 17-domain NPCCSS Apart From Hearing Domains (i.e. Hearing and Auditory Brainstem Response) | The NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) is a disease-specific, clinician-reported outcome measure developed to characterize and quantify NPC disease progression. The 17-domain NPCCSS includes clinical signs and symptoms in nine major and eight minor domains, which are rated on scales of 0-5 (for the major domains) or 0-2 (for the minor domains). The total score is the sum of the score of each of the 17 domains and ranges from 0 to 61, with a high score indicating a more severe clinical impairment. | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| Change From Baseline in 5-domain NPCCSS Score | The 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. | Baseline to 6 months |
| Changes From Baseline in Each Individual Domain of the NPCCSS | The NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) is a disease-specific, clinician-reported outcome measure developed to characterize and quantify disease progression. The 17-domain NPCCSS includes clinical signs and symptoms in nine major (ambulation, cognition, eye movement, fine motor, hearing, memory, seizures, speech, swallowing,) and eight minor (auditory brainstem response, behavior, gelastic cataplexy, hyperreflexia, incontinence, narcolepsy, psychiatric, respiratory problems) domains, which are rated on scales of 0-5 (for the major domains) or 0-2 (for the minor domains). A higher score indicates a more severe clinical impairment. | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| Change From Baseline in the NPC Clinical Database (NPC-CDB) Score (Modified "Stampfer Score") | The NPC Clinical Database (NPC-cdb) score aims to reflect the current clinical status of the participant. The NPC-cdb score represents both historical symptoms and a current status. The test consists of ten areas: visceral signs, development, motor function, ocular-motor abnormalities, seizures/cataplexy/narcolepsy, cognitive abilities and memory, behavioral and psychiatric abnormalities, speech, hearing, and abilities in daily life. The current status score is a severity-weighted sum of 72 symptoms considered as disease-relevant at the time of assessment. Each symptom contributes with a score between 1 and 5, the maximum score is 125. An increase in score reflects a reduction in the participant's abilities. | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (EQ-5D-Y) | The EQ-5D-Y descriptive system includes 5 descriptive items: Mobility, self-care, doing usual activities, having pain or discomfort, and feeling anxiety or depressed. Each dimension has 3 levels: No problems, some problems, and a lot of problems. The change in the 5 individual items of the EQ-5D-Y per participant was explored by using the pareto principle at 6 and 12 months to show the number (%) of participants who felt:
| Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| Change From Baseline in the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score | The SARA included eight items reflecting neurologic manifestations of cerebellar ataxia. The test provides a direct and simple description of motor function in a participant. The test consists of 8 test items: gait, stance, sitting, speech disturbance, finger chase, nose-finger test, fast alternating hand movements, and heel-shin slide. The total score of the 8 items ranges from 0 (normal cerebellar function) to 40 (not able to perform any of the test items). | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| Change From Baseline in the Time Spent to Complete the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) | The 9HPT test is a direct and simple measurement of fine motor coordination function, eye/hand coordination, and the ability to follow a simple direction. The 9HPT is a timed test in which nine pegs are inserted and removed from nine holes in the pegboard. Both hands are tested starting with the dominant hand. The time spent in completing the 9 HPT using each hand was recorded. | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| Percentage of Participants Within Each Severity Category of the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) | The CGI-S is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the participant's illness at the time of assessment. A rating of 1 is considered normal, or with the least severe symptoms, a rating of 7 is extremely ill, or the worst symptoms. Scores thus range from 1-7 with lower scores indicating less severe disease. | Months 6 and 12 |
| Percentage of Participants Within Each Category of the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) | The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that rates total improvement of participant's condition. The clinician rates the participants from 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, or 7=Very much worse. Scores thus range from 1-7 with lower scores indicating greater improvement. | Months 6 and 12 |
| Rochester |
| Minnesota |
| 55905 |
| United States |
| University Hospital Copenhagen (Rigshospitalet) | Copenhagen | 2100 | Denmark |
| CHU de Montpellier | Montpellier | 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5 | France |
| Hôpital Trousseau | Paris | 75571 PARIS Cedex 12 | France |
| Villa Metabolica, Universitätsmedizin Mainz | Mainz | 55131 | Germany |
| Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital der Universität München | Munich | 80337 | Germany |
| Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù | Rome | 00165 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Santa Maria della Misericordia" di Udin | Udine | 33100 | Italy |
| The Children´s Memorial Istitute Warsaw | Warsaw | 04-730 | Poland |
| Hospital Vall D'Hebron | Barcelona | 08035 | Spain |
| INSELSPITAL University Hospital Bern | Bern | CH-3010 | Switzerland |
| Birmingham Children's Hospital | Birmingham | B4 6NH | United Kingdom |
| Great Ormond Street Hospital | London | WC1N 3JH | United Kingdom |
Participants received arimoclomol capsules, orally based on participant's body weight, three times a day (TID) for 12 months.
| FG002 | Placebo (12-month Double-blind Phase) | Participants received matching placebo to arimoclomol capsules, orally based on participant's body weight, TID for 12 months. |
| COMPLETED | One participant who was a screening failure received single-dose arimoclomol for PK evaluation. |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Continuous Treatment Period |
|
|
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arimoclomol (12-month Double-blind Phase) | Participants received arimoclomol capsules, orally based on participant's body weight, TID for 12 months. |
| BG001 | Placebo (12-month Double-blind Phase) | Participants received matching placebo to arimoclomol capsules, orally based on participant's body weight, TID for 12 months. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age at Diagnosis of First Neurological Symptom | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| 5-domain Niemann-Pick Disease Type C Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) Score | The 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| 17-domain NPCCSS Except Hearing Domains | The NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) is a disease-specific, clinician-reported outcome measure developed to characterize and quantify NPC disease progression. The 17-domain NPCCSS includes clinical signs and symptoms in nine major and eight minor domains, which are rated on scales of 0-5 (for the major domains) or 0-2 (for the minor domains). The total score is the sum of the score of each of the 17 domains and ranges from 0 to 61, with a high score indicating a more severe clinical impairment. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
| ||||||||||||||
| Participants Currently Treated With Miglustat | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Niemann-Pick Disease Type C (NPC) Disease Severity Assessed Based on the 5-domain NPCCSS Total Scores | NPC disease severity was assessed based on the 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS). The 5-domain NPCCSS focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. Overall Number analyzed is the number of participants evaluated at a specified timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline to Month 12 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Responders in Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) - Defined as Percentage of Participants Where the CGI-I Score Remains Stable or Shows Improvement (This Outcome Measure Was Considered Co-primary by the FDA) | The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that rates total improvement of participant's condition. The clinician rates the participants from 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, or 7=Very much worse. Scores thus range from 1-7 with lower scores indicating greater improvement. Responders were the participants with a score of 1 or 2 at Month 12. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. | Posted | Number | percentage of responders | Month 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Responders in 5-domain NPCCSS - Defined as Participants Where the 5-domain NPCCSS Score Remains Stable or Improves as Compared to Baseline | NPC disease severity was assessed based on the 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS). The 5-domain NPCCSS focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. Stable was defined as a participant's total score for the 5 domains being the same at month 12 as at baseline. Improvement was defined as a participant's total score at month 12 being lower than at baseline. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. | Posted | Number | percentage of responders | Baseline to Month 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Worsening | Time to worsening was defined as the time until the participant reached the predefined minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 2 points compared to baseline on the 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS). The 5-domain NPCCSS focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. The values reported per group are the 25th percentile Kaplan-Meier estimates and 95% confidence interval. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Baseline to Month 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Worsening | Worsening was defined as participants that have reached the predefined MCID of 2 points on their 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS). The 5-domain NPCCSS focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Months 6 and 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in 17-domain NPCCSS Apart From Hearing Domains (i.e. Hearing and Auditory Brainstem Response) | The NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) is a disease-specific, clinician-reported outcome measure developed to characterize and quantify NPC disease progression. The 17-domain NPCCSS includes clinical signs and symptoms in nine major and eight minor domains, which are rated on scales of 0-5 (for the major domains) or 0-2 (for the minor domains). The total score is the sum of the score of each of the 17 domains and ranges from 0 to 61, with a high score indicating a more severe clinical impairment. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. Here, "Number analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluated at specified timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in 5-domain NPCCSS Score | The 5-domain NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) focuses on domains identified by participants, caregivers, and NPC experts as the most clinically relevant when assessing disease progression in NPC: Ambulation, fine motor skills, swallow, cognition, and speech. The scale is derived from the original 17-domain NPCCSS. Each domain is rated on a scale of 0-5 based on clinical assessments, observations, and interviews with participants/caregiver. The total score is a sum of the score of each of the 5 domains and ranges from 0-25, with a higher score indicating more severe clinical impairment. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline to 6 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Changes From Baseline in Each Individual Domain of the NPCCSS | The NPC Clinical Severity Scale (NPCCSS) is a disease-specific, clinician-reported outcome measure developed to characterize and quantify disease progression. The 17-domain NPCCSS includes clinical signs and symptoms in nine major (ambulation, cognition, eye movement, fine motor, hearing, memory, seizures, speech, swallowing,) and eight minor (auditory brainstem response, behavior, gelastic cataplexy, hyperreflexia, incontinence, narcolepsy, psychiatric, respiratory problems) domains, which are rated on scales of 0-5 (for the major domains) or 0-2 (for the minor domains). A higher score indicates a more severe clinical impairment. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. Here, "Number analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluated at specified timepoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the NPC Clinical Database (NPC-CDB) Score (Modified "Stampfer Score") | The NPC Clinical Database (NPC-cdb) score aims to reflect the current clinical status of the participant. The NPC-cdb score represents both historical symptoms and a current status. The test consists of ten areas: visceral signs, development, motor function, ocular-motor abnormalities, seizures/cataplexy/narcolepsy, cognitive abilities and memory, behavioral and psychiatric abnormalities, speech, hearing, and abilities in daily life. The current status score is a severity-weighted sum of 72 symptoms considered as disease-relevant at the time of assessment. Each symptom contributes with a score between 1 and 5, the maximum score is 125. An increase in score reflects a reduction in the participant's abilities. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (EQ-5D-Y) | The EQ-5D-Y descriptive system includes 5 descriptive items: Mobility, self-care, doing usual activities, having pain or discomfort, and feeling anxiety or depressed. Each dimension has 3 levels: No problems, some problems, and a lot of problems. The change in the 5 individual items of the EQ-5D-Y per participant was explored by using the pareto principle at 6 and 12 months to show the number (%) of participants who felt:
| FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" is the number of participants with data for the outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluated at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score | The SARA included eight items reflecting neurologic manifestations of cerebellar ataxia. The test provides a direct and simple description of motor function in a participant. The test consists of 8 test items: gait, stance, sitting, speech disturbance, finger chase, nose-finger test, fast alternating hand movements, and heel-shin slide. The total score of the 8 items ranges from 0 (normal cerebellar function) to 40 (not able to perform any of the test items). | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Time Spent to Complete the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) | The 9HPT test is a direct and simple measurement of fine motor coordination function, eye/hand coordination, and the ability to follow a simple direction. The 9HPT is a timed test in which nine pegs are inserted and removed from nine holes in the pegboard. Both hands are tested starting with the dominant hand. The time spent in completing the 9 HPT using each hand was recorded. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | seconds | Baseline to 6 and 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Within Each Severity Category of the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Severity (CGI-S) | The CGI-S is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the participant's illness at the time of assessment. A rating of 1 is considered normal, or with the least severe symptoms, a rating of 7 is extremely ill, or the worst symptoms. Scores thus range from 1-7 with lower scores indicating less severe disease. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" is the number of participants with data for the outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluated at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Months 6 and 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Within Each Category of the Clinical Global Impression Scale of Improvement (CGI-I) | The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that rates total improvement of participant's condition. The clinician rates the participants from 1=Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, or 7=Very much worse. Scores thus range from 1-7 with lower scores indicating greater improvement. | FAS included those participants who were randomized and who had received at least one dose of randomized treatment medication. Here, "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" is the number of participants with data for the outcome measure and "Number analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluated at specified timepoint. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Months 6 and 12 |
|
|
From first dose of study drug up to last dose of blinded study treatment (Month 12)
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least one dose of study drug. Adverse events were reported separately for the single dose period where 28 participants less than 12 years old received a single dose of arimoclomol, and the 12-month continuous dose period where all participants received randomized treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Arimoclomol Single PK Dose | Participants less than 12 years received a single oral dose of arimoclomol capsule, based on participant's body weight, on Day 1. | 0 | 28 | 2 | 28 | 4 | 28 |
| EG001 | Arimoclomol (12-month Double-blind Phase) | Participants received arimoclomol capsules, orally based on participant's body weight, TID for 12 months. | 1 | 34 | 5 | 34 | 30 | 34 |
| EG002 | Placebo (12-month Double-blind Phase) | Participants received matching placebo to arimoclomol capsules, orally based on participant's body weight, TID for 12 months. | 0 | 16 | 6 | 16 | 13 | 16 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardio-respiratory Arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Craniocerebral Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypophagia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malnutrition | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Foot Deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epileptic Encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory Distress | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angioedema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspiration Bronchial | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Pain Upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Phimosis | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deafness Neurosensory | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deafness Unilateral | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear Pain | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypothyroidism | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pupils Unequal | Eye disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aphthous Ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dental Caries | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lip Dry | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mouth Cyst | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Odynophagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Salivary Hypersecretion | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gait Disturbance | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medical Device Site Dermatitis | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral Swelling | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Secretion Discharge | General disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic Lesion | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Food Allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seasonal Allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conjunctivitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eye Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fungal Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis Viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hand-foot-and-mouth Disease | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hordeolum | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Localised Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medical Device Site Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Onychomycosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral Candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral Fungal Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin Candida | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vulvovaginal Mycotic Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eschar | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Head Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint Dislocation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ligament Sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural Pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood Creatinine Increased | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Body Temperature Abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Body Temperature Increased | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| C-reactive Protein Increased | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vitamin D Decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight Decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased Appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Iron Deficiency | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Refeeding Syndrome | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vitamin C Deficiency | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coccydynia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in Extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Scoliosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aphasia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cognitive Disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lethargy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Memory Impairment | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Migraine | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Motor Dysfunction | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle Spasticity | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peroneal Nerve Palsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Petit Mal Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Quadriplegia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Speech Disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aggression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Agitation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hallucination, auditory | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hallucination, visual | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sleep Disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oliguria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Premenstrual Syndrome | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Interstitial Lung Disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal Congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal Pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Productive Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sleep Apnoea Syndrome | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acne | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angioedema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dandruff | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eczema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Henoch-Schonlein Purpura | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrostomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataplexy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (19.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Affairs | Zevra Denmark A/S | +1-888-289-5607 | medicalaffairs@zevra.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 10, 2018 | May 12, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D052556 | Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C |
| D016464 | Lysosomal Storage Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009542 | Niemann-Pick Diseases |
| D013106 | Sphingolipidoses |
| D020140 | Lysosomal Storage Diseases, Nervous System |
| D020739 | Brain Diseases, Metabolic, Inborn |
| D001928 | Brain Diseases, Metabolic |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D015616 | Histiocytosis, Non-Langerhans-Cell |
| D015614 | Histiocytosis |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D008661 | Metabolism, Inborn Errors |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D008064 | Lipidoses |
| D008052 | Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D052439 | Lipid Metabolism Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C486387 | arimoclomol |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Safety Reasons |
|
| Death |
|
| Participant Meets Criteria for IMP Administration to be Stopped and Subsequent Withdrawal |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| No |
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|