Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Purpose: Stroke is a common cause of death and disability in Canada. Injury to the right hemisphere of the brain and the parietal cortex in particular, is common and results in a disorder known as 'neglect' in 40% to 95% of patients. These patients fail to attend to or respond to events occurring in left space; the disorder is devastating for the patient and their caregivers with the patient becoming dependent on assistance for most activities of daily life (ADLs).
The project will implement two visual working memory (VWM) training programs to explore the influence of VWM training on neglect symptoms as well as activities of daily life.
Hypothesis: It is hypothesised that SWM training protocols will lead to improvements of neglect symptoms as well as improvement in ADLs.
The project will develop a novel rehabilitation strategy for treating the neglect syndrome.
Evidence from research in healthy participants employing video games to improve cognition along with research using working memory training protocols showing a broad range of benefits accruing to both trained and untrained tasks, suggests that the investigators approach has great potential to improve the core deficits of the neglect syndrome. Thus, WM training represents a promising avenue for rehabilitating neglect patients who demonstrate core deficits in both spatial attention and VWM to be highly interrelated functions.
To examine the relationship between activities of daily living, attention and spatial working memory the investigators will have participants perform a range of clinical and experimental tasks over several sessions of testing. Below is an outline of the tasks to be used (attached are example of all tasks).
To assess the effects of working memory training on neglect two groups of neglect participants will be assigned to separate training protocols outlined below. Outcomes measures will include the tests outlined above and the VWM tasks themselves that were used in training.
Passive SWM training: the first group of participants will perform the VWM task described above, but do not actively engage in any specific component of the task (i.e., they passively respond to the stimuli appearing on the screen).
Active SWM training: the second training group will perform a task similar to the popular video game Guitar Hero. A sequence of virtual piano keys will be used on a tablet computer to simplify the game. Just as in Guitar Hero, a sequence of coloured targets, each corresponding to a specific piano key will gradually approach a target line at which point participants should hit the corresponding key of the virtual piano. A VWM component will be introduced to the task by presenting participants with a sequence of keys to touch followed by a brief delay. The investigators will manipulate load by changing the number of items in a given sequence (e.g., 1, 2, 3 and 5).
After the delay participants will be required to repeat the sequence just presented by tapping the same keys on the tablet.
Training regimes and outcome measures: Two different lengths of training will be employed for both groups; 2 and 4 weeks, implemented as a between subjects factor. Participants will complete the training protocol for half an hour once per day using the tablet computer.
Outcome measures taken at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks include BIT, VRLAT COVAT, VWM, FAI.
Neglect participants will be contrasted to two control groups: healthy age-matched controls (recruited through WRAP) and a group of right brain damaged (RBD) participants without neglect.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active training | Experimental | Patients will undergo active working memory training (see description of protocol). |
|
| Passive training | Active Comparator | Patients will undergo passive working memory training (see description of protocol). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working memory training | Behavioral | See protocol |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement on behavioural tests | Performance on behavioural tests | Measured at time zero (after intervention), 2 and 4 weeks post and 3 months post intervention. |
| Improvement on self-report measures | Changes to self-reported function in activities of daily living | Measured at time zero (after intervention), 2 and 4 weeks post and 3 months post intervention. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| James Danckert, PhD | University of Waterloo | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Waterloo | Waterloo | Ontario | N2L 3G1 | Canada |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010468 | Perceptual Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |