Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01DC014475 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | NIH |
| National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disease that affects first and foremost language abilities. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is slowly progressive decline in a single domain of cognition (e.g. language) not attributable to motor or sensory loss, without impediment of social or occupational function. MCI can be an early sign of neurodegenerative disease, or can be due to normal aging. When language is the prominent affected domain in MCI, the person may later meet criteria for PPA or may progress to the clinical syndrome of Alzheimer's dementia. Spelling, naming, and working memory (e.g. repetition) are among the language abilities affected early in the course of PPA or language-centered MCI, and different variants have distinct deficits in these domains. This research project investigates the behavioral and neuromodulatory effects of high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) during language therapy in PPA participants over time. Anodal HD-tDCS targeting the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) administered in combination with language therapy is expected to be more beneficial when compared to language therapy alone. It will 1) improve language performance or decrease rate of decline, 2) have better-sustained effects at 2 weeks and 2 months post-treatment, and 3) produce generalization to untrained language items and some other cognitive functions. Resting-state fMRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and volumetric data are also collected to investigate changes in functional brain connectivity associated with HD-tDCS in individuals with PPA. A better understanding of the therapeutic and neuromodulatory mechanisms of HD-tDCS as an adjunct to language therapy in PPA may have a significant impact on the development of effective therapies for PPA and MCI, and may offer insight into ways of impeding neurodegeneration that may improve patients' quality of life, as well as extend their ability to work and manage their affairs.
A. Evaluation Tasks
Language Tasks:
Participants will be administered baseline language and cognitive tasks, including 1 or more of the following, depending on their residual language and cognitive skills:
a) writing to dictation b) oral spelling c) oral and written naming of pictures d) word-picture matching f) written and oral picture description g) digit span h) spatial span i) verbal learning j) grammatical sentence production k) oral word repetition l) sentence comprehension
Quality of Life questionnaires:
Participants will be administered standardized and non-standardized quality-of-life questionnaires before, after, and at follow-up intervals of each experimental period. The purpose of these questionnaires is to assess whether the proposed interventions have affected participants' well-being and the general quality of their life.
B. Spoken and Written Word Production Therapy Interventions
Individuals with PPA will receive spoken and written word production intervention tailored to their degree of deficit. Two interventions (basic and advanced) will be implemented, treating the main lexical retrieval deficits in PPA, in oral and written modalities. The goal of the combined interventions is to promote interaction between phonological and orthographic representations and processes in the remediation of lexical retrieval deficits that are prominent in all PPA subtypes.
C. Assessment of Language Therapy Tasks:
Follow-up assessment will probe all sets of trained phoneme-grapheme correspondences, words, or other stimuli (e.g. sentences) to identify whether or not the patient has retained knowledge of the trained items. Differences in baseline measures in pre- and post-therapy accuracy for phoneme-grapheme correspondences for each patient will be evaluated using the following: percentages of total number of points correct, arithmetic differences between percentage scores, and permutation tests (Pearson's chi-square test; Fisher's exact test).
C. HD-tDCS Methods:
Participants will take part in 10-15 consecutive training sessions (3-5 per week), separated by 2 months. Anodal HD-tDCS has typically been shown to up-regulate neuronal excitability and produce enhancement of behavioral performance. A Soterix-CT device will be delivering current at an intensity of 1-2 milliamps(mA) (estimated current density 0.04 mA/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048C/cm2) for a maximum of 20 minutes in the HD-tDCS groups and for a maximum of 30 seconds in the Sham group. For both interventions (HD-tDCS and Sham) the electrical current will be increased in a ramp-like fashion at the onset of the stimulation eliciting a transient tingling sensation on the scalp that usually disappears over seconds.
D. Imaging Methods:
Imaging will be performed at the beginning of enrollment, before and after each 12-to-15-day HD-tDCS treatment, and at follow-up intervals for up to 8 time points per individual on a 3T Philips system, and will consist of resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI), MPRAGE, and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Each scanning session will last approximately 1 hour.
E. Statistical Analyses:
In the within-subject crossover protocol, each participant will be administered three experimental conditions: Control (natural progression), IFG HD-tDCS+language (henceforth abbr. HD-tDCS treatment (word production) and sham HD-tDCS+language (henceforth abbr. sham treatment). To achieve an accurate estimate of degeneration and rate of decline in each participant at their particular stage of the disease progression, each participant will first be enrolled in the control condition (natural progression), such that for the first 12 weeks they will not receive any therapy. Then the participant will receive either the HD-tDCS treatment followed by sham, or vice versa. All analyses, behavioral and imaging, will be under the oversight of the study statisticians.
F. Study duration and number of study visits required of research participants.
Before any intervention, participants will be enrolled in a control condition for 12 weeks during which no therapy will be provided to enable us to assess their personal decline rate. After this period they will be randomly assigned to either sham or HD-tDCS experimental conditions. After 1-3 weeks of HD-tDCS application (3-5 sessions in a week, 10-15 sessions per stimulation site) there will be an interval of approximately 2 months and then we will implement the other two HD-tDCS conditions in a within-subject cross-over design. Participants will be followed up at 2-week and 2-month follow-up intervals.
G. Blinding, including justification for blinding or not blinding the trial, if applicable.
Participants will be blinded to the application of anodal or sham HD-tDCS. To achieve blinding, all participants will be fitted with the HD-tDCS electrodes placed over the left inferior frontal gyrus. The Soterix-CT device will be used for double-blinding purposes.
H. Justification of why participants will not receive routine care or will have current therapy stopped
Participation in this study will not disrupt any current care or therapy.
I. Justification for inclusion of a placebo or non-treatment group
All participants will undergo active and sham conditions, thus serving as their own control.
J. Definition of treatment failure or participant removal criteria
Participants will be removed from the study if they are unable to comply with task instructions or tolerate the HD-tDCS procedure.
K. Description of what happens to participants receiving therapy when the study ends or if a participant's participation in the study ends prematurely
When the study ends participants will continue to receive management with their neurologist as usual. If a patient's participation in the study ends prematurely s/he will still receive care as before. In sum, termination of the study or termination of participation in it will not affect the regular therapy he or she may be receiving.
L. Qualification of investigators:
The PI and co-investigators have extensive research and clinical experience with all study tasks: behavioral language therapy (including spelling, naming, and repetition therapy. The investigators have already published a tDCS study on the behavioral results for the improvement of spelling abilities.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active HD-tDCS plus Speech-Language Therapy | Experimental | Active HD-tDCS will be applied at the beginning of 45min speech-language therapy session and will last for 20 min. |
|
| Sham plus Speech-Language Therapy | Sham Comparator | Sham HD-tDCS will be applied at the beginning of 45min speech-language therapy session. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active HD-tDCS plus Speech-Language Therapy | Device | Stimulation will be delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator. The electrical current will be administered to a pre-specified region of the brain (inferior frontal gyrus). The stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 2mA (estimated current density 0.04 mA/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048C/cm2) in a ramp-like fashion for a maximum of 20 minutes. Speech-language therapy will be oral and written naming. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute Percent Change in Written Naming (Trained Items) | The primary outcome measure was the absolute percentage change in the number of correct letters in the written response, compared to the target response in the trained word lists. This calculation reflects the change in accuracy between two timepoints. For letter accuracy scoring, a rule-based system was used where each letter was assigned one point if correct. Points were deducted for errors such as deletions, additions, substitutions, transpositions, or movements of letters. A second reviewer independently scored the responses and resolved any discrepancies through discussion to ensure consensus. Interrater reliability for letter accuracy scoring was 95%. Average letter accuracy per word was calculated for all trained items. Then the absolute percentage change was calculated by subtracting the earlier time point value (e.g., baseline) from the later one (e.g., immediately after treatment, 2 weeks post, and 2 months post), reflecting the change in accuracy. | Change from Baseline to Immediately after treatment (3 weeks), 2 weeks post treatment (5 weeks), and 2 months post-treatment (11 weeks) for each period of intervention |
| Absolute Percent Change in Written Naming (Untrained Items) | The primary outcome measure was the absolute percentage change in the number of correct letters in the written response, compared to the target response in the untrained word lists.This calculation reflects the change in accuracy between two timepoints. For letter accuracy scoring, a rule-based system was used where each letter was assigned one point if correct. Points were deducted for errors such as deletions, additions, substitutions, transpositions, or movements of letters. A second reviewer independently scored the responses and resolved any discrepancies through discussion to ensure consensus. Interrater reliability for letter accuracy scoring was 95%. Average letter accuracy per word was calculated for all untrained items. Then the absolute percentage change was calculated by subtracting the earlier time point value (e.g., baseline) from the later one (e.g., immediately after treatment, 2 weeks post, and 2 months post), reflecting the change in accuracy. | Change from Baseline to Immediately after treatment (3 weeks), 2 weeks post treatment (5 weeks), and 2 months post-treatment (11 weeks) for each period of intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Sentence Comprehension as Measured by the Subject Object Active Passive (SOAP) Test | The SOAP test is a test that has been shown to measure comprehension of simple and complex sentence structures. It contains sentences with different syntactic complexities: subject relatives, object relative, active and passive voice. The participant has to listen to a sentence and choose the correct picture that corresponds to its meaning amongst 3 alternatives. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating better comprehension. For each participant in each group absolute change from before to after treatment was calculated and the mean absolute change for the group was calculated. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria for MRI Participation:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kyrana Tsapkini, PhD | Johns Hopkins University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | 21204 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26097278 | Background | Tsapkini K, Frangakis C, Gomez Y, Davis C, Hillis AE. Augmentation of spelling therapy with transcranial direct current stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: Preliminary results and challenges. Aphasiology. 2014;28(8-9):1112-1130. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.930410. | |
| 26062526 | Background | Tippett DC, Hillis AE, Tsapkini K. Treatment of Primary Progressive Aphasia. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2015 Aug;17(8):362. doi: 10.1007/s11940-015-0362-5. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Tsapkini 2014 | View source |
Not provided
All 61 participants that were consented started a 12-week natural progression observation where they did not recieve any therapy. After the 12-week period, 37 participants were randomized. Of those not randomized,13 had a primary deficit of apraxia of speech, 7 chose not to participate, 1 did not have measureable language deficits, 3 chose to participate in another trial.
61 patients were consented for eligibility between the study start date and end date at our lab located at Johns Hopkins Hospital.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active HD-tDCS Plus Speech-Language Therapy, Then Sham Plus Speech-Language Therapy | Participants first received active tDCS with speech therapy for two weeks. Active high-Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) was applied at the beginning of 45 min speech-language therapy session and lasted for 20 min. The electrical current was administered to a pre-specified region of the brain (inferior frontal gyrus). The stimulation was delivered at an intensity of 2 miliamps (mA) (estimated current density 0.04 mA/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048 coulombs (C)/cm2) in a ramp-like fashion for a maximum of 20 minutes. Speech-language therapy consisted of oral and written naming. After a washout period of 3 months, they then received sham tDCS plus speech therapy for 2 weeks. Speech-language therapy will be administered during sham stimulation. Current was administered in a ramp-line fashion but after the ramping, the intensity dropped to 0 mA |
| FG001 | Sham Plus Speech-Language Therapy, Then Active HD-tDCS Plus Speech-Language Therapy | Participants first received sham tDCS with speech therapy for 2 weeks. Sham HD-tDCS was applied at the beginning of 45 min speech-language therapy session and lasted for 20 min. The electrical current was administered to a pre-specified region of the brain (inferior frontal gyrus). Speech-language therapy will be administered during sham stimulation. Current was administered in a ramp-line fashion but after the ramping the intensity dropped to 0 mA. After a washout period of 3 months, they then received active tDCS plus speech therapy for two weeks. The stimulation was delivered at an intensity of 2mA (estimated current density 0.04 mA/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048C/cm2) in a ramp-like fashion for a maximum of 20 minutes. Speech-language therapy consisted of oral and written naming. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Phase 1 (3 Weeks) |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 1: Immediate Follow up |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 1, 2-Week Follow-up (Washout) |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 1 2-Month Follow-up (Washout) |
| |||||||||||||
| Intervention Phase 2 (3 Weeks) |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 2: Immediate Follow-up |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 2, 2-Week Follow-up (Washout) |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 2: 2-Month Follow-up (Washout) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active HD-tDCS Plus Speech-Language Therapy, Then Sham Plus Speech-Language Therapy | Participants first received active tDCS with speech therapy for two weeks. Active HD-tDCS was applied at the beginning of 45 min speech-language therapy session and lasted for 20 min. The electrical current was administered to a pre-specified region of the brain (inferior frontal gyrus). The stimulation was delivered at an intensity of 2mA (estimated current density 0.04 mA/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048C/cm2) in a ramp-like fashion for a maximum of 20 minutes. Speech-language therapy consisted of oral and written naming. After a washout period of 3 months, they then received sham tDCS plus speech therapy for 2 weeks. Speech-language therapy will be administered during sham stimulation. Current was administered in a ramp-line fashion but after the ramping, the intensity dropped to 0 mA |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Absolute Percent Change in Written Naming (Trained Items) | The primary outcome measure was the absolute percentage change in the number of correct letters in the written response, compared to the target response in the trained word lists. This calculation reflects the change in accuracy between two timepoints. For letter accuracy scoring, a rule-based system was used where each letter was assigned one point if correct. Points were deducted for errors such as deletions, additions, substitutions, transpositions, or movements of letters. A second reviewer independently scored the responses and resolved any discrepancies through discussion to ensure consensus. Interrater reliability for letter accuracy scoring was 95%. Average letter accuracy per word was calculated for all trained items. Then the absolute percentage change was calculated by subtracting the earlier time point value (e.g., baseline) from the later one (e.g., immediately after treatment, 2 weeks post, and 2 months post), reflecting the change in accuracy. | Participants who completed Written Naming | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | absolute percent change | Change from Baseline to Immediately after treatment (3 weeks), 2 weeks post treatment (5 weeks), and 2 months post-treatment (11 weeks) for each period of intervention |
Adverse events were not assessed during the 12-week control condition (natural progression period) preceding treatment. Adverse events were assessed from randomization to up to 2 months post treatment for each intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active HD-tDCS Plus Speech-Language Therapy | Active HD-tDCS will be applied at the beginning of 45min speech-language therapy session and will last for 20 min. Active HD-tDCS plus Speech-Language Therapy: Stimulation will be delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator. The electrical current will be administered to a pre-specified region of the brain (inferior frontal gyrus). The stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 2mA (estimated current density 0.04 mA/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048C/cm2) in a ramp-like fashion for a maximum of 20 minutes. Speech-language therapy will be oral and written naming. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyrana Tsapkini | Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine | 410-614-2646 | tsapkini@jhmi.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 8, 2024 | Jul 18, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jan 21, 2022 | Jul 18, 2024 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018888 | Aphasia, Primary Progressive |
| D009410 | Nerve Degeneration |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003704 | Dementia |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013070 | Speech Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012049 | Rehabilitation of Speech and Language Disorders |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Sham plus Speech-Language Therapy | Device | Speech-language therapy will be administered during sham stimulation. Current will be administered in a ramp-line fashion but after the ramping the intensity will drop to 0 mA. Speech-language therapy will be oral and written naming. |
|
| Absolute Percent Change in Oral Naming (Trained Items) |
The percent accuracy for each participant's trained oral naming list was calculated, with scores ranging from 0% to 100%. A score of 0% indicates no correct responses, while 100% represents perfect accuracy. Higher percentages reflect better performance. To assess changes in performance from pre- to post-treatment, the percent accuracy for untrained items was compared before and after the intervention. The absolute percentage change was then calculated by subtracting the accuracy at the baseline time point (e.g., baseline) from the accuracy at the later time points (e.g., immediately after treatment, 2 weeks post, and 2 months post). This reflects the change in the participant's ability to name trained items, expressed as absolute percent change. A positive difference indicates improvement in naming accuracy, with a larger change reflecting greater improvement. A negative difference indicates a decline, with a larger change reflecting greater deterioration in naming ability. |
| Change from Baseline to Immediately after treatment (3 weeks), 2 weeks post treatment (5 weeks), and 2 months post-treatment (11 weeks) for each period of intervention |
| Absolute Percent Change in Oral Naming (Untrained Items) | The percent accuracy for each participant's untrained oral naming list was calculated, with scores ranging from 0% to 100%. A score of 0% indicates no correct responses, while 100% represents perfect accuracy. Higher percentages reflect better performance. To assess changes in performance from pre- to post-treatment, the percent accuracy for untrained items was compared before and after the intervention. The absolute percentage change was then calculated by subtracting the accuracy at the baseline time point (e.g., baseline) from the accuracy at the later time points (e.g., immediately after treatment, 2 weeks post, and 2 months post). This reflects the change in the participant's ability to name trained items, expressed as absolute percent change. A positive difference indicates improvement in naming accuracy, with a larger change reflecting greater improvement. A negative difference indicates a decline, with a larger change reflecting greater deterioration in naming ability. | Change from Baseline to Immediately after treatment (3 weeks), 2 weeks post treatment (5 weeks), and 2 months post-treatment (11 weeks) for each period of intervention |
| Change from baseline to immediate follow-up (3 weeks). |
| Change in Functional Connectivity | Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI), investigators will investigate whether tDCS intervention will result in different changes in connectivity between the targeted area (left inferior frontal gyrus) and other nodes in the brain. Global connectivity is measured through the participation coefficient. The participation coefficient is scored on a scale from -1 to +1. Compared with healthy controls a score closer to +1 was associated with worse dementia severity. | Change from before treatment to immediate follow up (3 weeks) |
| 30258975 | Result | Tsapkini K, Webster KT, Ficek BN, Desmond JE, Onyike CU, Rapp B, Frangakis CE, Hillis AE. Electrical brain stimulation in different variants of primary progressive aphasia: A randomized clinical trial. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Sep 5;4:461-472. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.08.002. eCollection 2018. |
| 37287321 | Derived | Wang Z, Ficek BN, Webster KT, Herrmann O, Frangakis CE, Desmond JE, Onyike CU, Caffo B, Hillis AE, Tsapkini K. Specificity in Generalization Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Primary Progressive Aphasia. Neuromodulation. 2023 Jun;26(4):850-860. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Oct 28. |
| 34875098 | Derived | Herrmann O, Ficek B, Webster KT, Frangakis C, Spira AP, Tsapkini K. Sleep as a predictor of tDCS and language therapy outcomes. Sleep. 2022 Mar 14;45(3):zsab275. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab275. |
| 33031971 | Derived | Tao Y, Ficek B, Rapp B, Tsapkini K. Different patterns of functional network reorganization across the variants of primary progressive aphasia: a graph-theoretic analysis. Neurobiol Aging. 2020 Dec;96:184-196. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 8. |
| Tsapkini 2015 | View source |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG001 | Sham Plus Speech-Language Therapy, Then Active HD-tDCS Plus Speech-Language Therapy | Participants first received sham tDCS with speech therapy for 2 weeks. Sham HD-tDCS was applied at the beginning of 45 min speech-language therapy session and lasted for 20 min. The electrical current was administered to a pre-specified region of the brain (inferior frontal gyrus). Speech-language therapy will be administered during sham stimulation. Current was administered in a ramp-line fashion but after the ramping the intensity dropped to 0 mA. After a washout period of 3 months, they then received active tDCS plus speech therapy for two weeks. The stimulation was delivered at an intensity of 2mA (estimated current density 0.04 mA/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048C/cm2) in a ramp-like fashion for a maximum of 20 minutes. Speech-language therapy consisted of oral and written naming. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Active tDCS Plus Speech-Language Therapy | Active tDCS will be applied at the beginning of 45min speech-language therapy session and will last for 20 min. Active tDCS plus Speech-Language Therapy: Stimulation will be delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator. The electrical current will be administered to a pre-specified region of the brain (inferior frontal gyrus). The stimulation will be delivered at an intensity of 2mA (estimated current density 0.04 mA/cm2; estimated total charge 0.048C/cm2) in a ramp-like fashion for a maximum of 20 minutes. Speech-language therapy will be oral and written naming. |
| OG001 | Sham Plus Speech-Language Therapy | Sham HD-tDCS will be applied at the beginning of 45min speech-language therapy session. Sham plus Speech-Language Therapy: Speech-language therapy will be administered during sham stimulation. Current will be administered in a ramp-line fashion but after the ramping the intensity will drop to 0 mA. Speech-language therapy will be oral and written naming. |
|
|
| Primary | Absolute Percent Change in Written Naming (Untrained Items) | The primary outcome measure was the absolute percentage change in the number of correct letters in the written response, compared to the target response in the untrained word lists.This calculation reflects the change in accuracy between two timepoints. For letter accuracy scoring, a rule-based system was used where each letter was assigned one point if correct. Points were deducted for errors such as deletions, additions, substitutions, transpositions, or movements of letters. A second reviewer independently scored the responses and resolved any discrepancies through discussion to ensure consensus. Interrater reliability for letter accuracy scoring was 95%. Average letter accuracy per word was calculated for all untrained items. Then the absolute percentage change was calculated by subtracting the earlier time point value (e.g., baseline) from the later one (e.g., immediately after treatment, 2 weeks post, and 2 months post), reflecting the change in accuracy. | Participants who completed written naming | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | absolute percent change | Change from Baseline to Immediately after treatment (3 weeks), 2 weeks post treatment (5 weeks), and 2 months post-treatment (11 weeks) for each period of intervention |
|
|
|
| Primary | Absolute Percent Change in Oral Naming (Trained Items) | The percent accuracy for each participant's trained oral naming list was calculated, with scores ranging from 0% to 100%. A score of 0% indicates no correct responses, while 100% represents perfect accuracy. Higher percentages reflect better performance. To assess changes in performance from pre- to post-treatment, the percent accuracy for untrained items was compared before and after the intervention. The absolute percentage change was then calculated by subtracting the accuracy at the baseline time point (e.g., baseline) from the accuracy at the later time points (e.g., immediately after treatment, 2 weeks post, and 2 months post). This reflects the change in the participant's ability to name trained items, expressed as absolute percent change. A positive difference indicates improvement in naming accuracy, with a larger change reflecting greater improvement. A negative difference indicates a decline, with a larger change reflecting greater deterioration in naming ability. | Participants who completed oral naming. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | absolute percent change | Change from Baseline to Immediately after treatment (3 weeks), 2 weeks post treatment (5 weeks), and 2 months post-treatment (11 weeks) for each period of intervention |
|
|
|
| Primary | Absolute Percent Change in Oral Naming (Untrained Items) | The percent accuracy for each participant's untrained oral naming list was calculated, with scores ranging from 0% to 100%. A score of 0% indicates no correct responses, while 100% represents perfect accuracy. Higher percentages reflect better performance. To assess changes in performance from pre- to post-treatment, the percent accuracy for untrained items was compared before and after the intervention. The absolute percentage change was then calculated by subtracting the accuracy at the baseline time point (e.g., baseline) from the accuracy at the later time points (e.g., immediately after treatment, 2 weeks post, and 2 months post). This reflects the change in the participant's ability to name trained items, expressed as absolute percent change. A positive difference indicates improvement in naming accuracy, with a larger change reflecting greater improvement. A negative difference indicates a decline, with a larger change reflecting greater deterioration in naming ability. | Participants who completed oral naming. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | absolute percent change | Change from Baseline to Immediately after treatment (3 weeks), 2 weeks post treatment (5 weeks), and 2 months post-treatment (11 weeks) for each period of intervention |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Sentence Comprehension as Measured by the Subject Object Active Passive (SOAP) Test | The SOAP test is a test that has been shown to measure comprehension of simple and complex sentence structures. It contains sentences with different syntactic complexities: subject relatives, object relative, active and passive voice. The participant has to listen to a sentence and choose the correct picture that corresponds to its meaning amongst 3 alternatives. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicating better comprehension. For each participant in each group absolute change from before to after treatment was calculated and the mean absolute change for the group was calculated. | Participants who completed SOAP test | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Change from baseline to immediate follow-up (3 weeks). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Functional Connectivity | Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI), investigators will investigate whether tDCS intervention will result in different changes in connectivity between the targeted area (left inferior frontal gyrus) and other nodes in the brain. Global connectivity is measured through the participation coefficient. The participation coefficient is scored on a scale from -1 to +1. Compared with healthy controls a score closer to +1 was associated with worse dementia severity. | fMRI data were collected from 33 participants with PPA. One participant completed treatment but data was excluded due to rediagnosis. Analysis was only performed for period 1 of the intervention so only 16 participants with tDCS and 16 with sham are compared. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Change from before treatment to immediate follow up (3 weeks) |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 36 |
| 0 |
| 36 |
| 0 |
| 36 |
| EG001 | Sham Plus Speech-Language Therapy | Sham HD-tDCS will be applied at the beginning of 45min speech-language therapy session. Sham plus Speech-Language Therapy: Speech-language therapy will be administered during sham stimulation. Current will be administered in a ramp-line fashion but after the ramping the intensity will drop to 0 mA. Speech-language therapy will be oral and written naming. | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D001037 |
| Aphasia |
| D013064 | Speech Disorders |
| D007806 | Language Disorders |
| D003147 | Communication Disorders |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| Phase 1: change from baseline 2-weeks post treatment |
|
|
| Phase 1: change from baseline 2-months post treatment. (Baseline for Phase 2) |
|
|
| Phase 2: change from baseline immediately after treatment |
|
|
| Phase 2: change from baseline 2-weeks post treatment |
|
|
| Phase 2: change from baseline 2-months post treatment |
|
|
| Phase 1: change from baseline 2-weeks post treatment |
|
|
| Phase 1: change from baseline 2-months post treatment. (Baseline for Phase 2) |
|
|
| Phase 2: change from baseline immediately after treatment |
|
|
| Phase 2: change from baseline 2-weeks post treatment |
|
|
| Phase 2: change from baseline 2-months post treatment |
|
|
| Phase 1: change from baseline 2-weeks post treatment |
|
|
| Phase 1: change from baseline 2-months post treatment. (Baseline for Phase 2) |
|
|
| Phase 2: change from baseline immediately after treatment |
|
|
| Phase 2: change from baseline 2-weeks post treatment |
|
|
| Phase 2: change from baseline 2-months post treatment |
|
|