Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2017-01321 | Registry Identifier | NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Sirtex Medical | INDUSTRY |
| Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a phase I dose escalation study (3+3 design) with a dose expansion arm (12 patients) designed to evaluate safety of the combination of Tas-102 and radioembolization using Yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres for patients with chemotherapy-refractory liver-dominant chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Randomized studies have demonstrated that Tas-102 has single agent activity against chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer. A recent pre-clinical study has shown that Tas-102 may have activity as a radiation sensitizer in bladder cancer cell lines. Benefit of single agent Tas-102 against chemotherapy refractory colon cancer and the drug's promise a radiosensitizer make Tas-102 a potential candidate drug for testing in combination with radioembolization using Yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with liver-dominant chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. This is a phase I dose escalation study with a dose expansion arm designed to evaluate safety of the combination of Tas-102 and radioembolization using 90Y resin microspheres for patients with chemotherapy-refractory colon or rectal adenocarcinoma metastatic to the liver.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tas-102 and radioembolization | Experimental | Combination therapy with Tas-102 and radioembolization using 90Y resin microspheres |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tas-102 | Drug | Oral nucleoside antitumor agent consisting of α,α,α-trifluorothymidine (FTD) and 5-chloro-6-(2-iminopyrrolidin-1-yl) methyl-2,4 (1H,3H)-pyrimidinedione hydro chloride (TPI) at a molar ratio of 1:0.5. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Determine dose limiting toxicities (DLT) | Any adverse events grade ≥ 3 will be reviewed by the treating interventional radiologist and medical oncologist within 24 hours of being informed event. If none of the 3 patients in a cohort experiences a DLT, another 3 patients will be treated at the next higher dose level. However, if 1 of the first 3 patients experiences a DLT, 3 more patients will be treated at the same dose level. The dose escalation will continue until at least 2 patients among a cohort of 3-6 patients experience DLTs (i.e., ≥ 33% of patients with a dose-limiting toxicity at that dose level) or until 3-6 patients had been treated at TAS-102 dose of 35mg/m2 per day in 2 divided doses (up to a maximum of 80 mg per dose) administered concurrently with radioembolization cycles 1 and 2 without experiencing a DLT. DLT window will be 56 days (cycle 1, day 1 to cycle 2, day 28). Dose limiting toxicity will be reached when one of the clinical and/or laboratory parameters are met | 56 days |
| Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Traditional 3+3 design will be used to determine the recommended dose for the dose expansion phase will be defined as the dose level just below this toxic dose level. | Up to 4 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall response rate (ORR) | Radiographic overall response rate (measured in accordance to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1) using imaging. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR): 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesionsStable Disease (SD): Small changes that do not meet the criteria for CR, PR, or Progressive Disease (PD): 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. ORR will be defined as a ratio of the number of patients who demonstrated complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to the number of all evaluated patients. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
At risk of hepatic or renal failure
Contraindications to angiography and selective visceral catheterization
Symptomatic lung disease
Prior therapy with Tas-102.
Contraindications to Tas-102
Unresolved toxicity of greater than or equal to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Grade 2 due to prior therapies.
Evidence of potential delivery of
Evidence of any detectable Tc-99m macro aggregated albumin flow to the stomach or duodenum, after application of established angiographic techniques to stop such flow.
Previous radiation therapy to the lungs and/or to the upper abdomen
Any prior arterial liver-directed therapy, including chemoembolization, bland embolization, and 90Y radioembolization
Any intervention for, or compromise of the ampulla of Vater
Active uncontrolled infection. Presence of latent or medication-controlled HIV and/or viral hepatitis is allowed.
Significant extrahepatic disease
Life expectancy less than 3 months
Pregnant or lactating female
In the investigator's judgment, any co-morbid disease or condition that would place the patient at undue risk and preclude safe use of radioembolization or Tas-102.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nicholas Fidelman, MD | University of California, San Francisco | Principal Investigator |
| Katherine Van Loon, MD | University of California, San Francisco | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94143 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36514060 | Derived | Fidelman N, Atreya CE, Griffith M, Milloy MA, Carnevale J, Cinar P, Venook AP, Van Loon K. Phase I prospective trial of TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil) and radioembolization with 90Y resin microspheres for chemo-refractory colorectal liver metastases. BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):1307. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10401-0. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003110 | Colonic Neoplasms |
| D012004 | Rectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000613803 | trifluridine tipiracil drug combination |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| SIR-Sphere | Device | 20-60mm resin microspheres containing Yttrium-90 (90Y, Y90) radioisotope |
|
|
| Up to 4 years |
| Progression-free survival (PFS) | PFS will be defined as a time period that started at enrollment, during which a patient neither progressed nor died based on radiographic response. | Up to 4 years |
| Hepatic progression-free survival (HPFS) | HPFS will be defined as a time period that started at enrollment, during which a patient neither progressed in the liver nor died based on radiographic response. | Up to 4 years |
| Extrahepatic progression free survival (EHPFS) | EHPFS will be defined as a time period that started at enrollment, during which a patient neither progressed outside the liver nor died based on radiographic response | Up to 4 years |
| Overall survival (OS) | Overall Survival will be analyzed 12 months after the last patient is enrolled. Overall survival will be assessed using a two-sided, log-rank test. The survival function will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. In addition, two-sided 95% confidence intervals for the median overall survival will be computed | Up to 12 months |
| Biomarker response | Proportion of patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) response with ≥ 50% decline from baseline (in patients with baseline level ≥ 3.2) post combination therapy with Tas-102 and 90Y radioembolization. Maximum percent change will be calculated. CEA level will only be followed for participants with elevated level (≥3.2) at baseline. | Up to 4 years |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |