Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Leiden University Medical Center | OTHER |
| Stryker Orthopaedics | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The optimal method of total knee replacement component fixation to the bone remains a challenge. The use of bone cement is considered the gold standard and is the preferred technique for most surgeons. However, uncemented fixation methods have been developed in an attempt to tackle problems that can be seen when cement is used. The cement-bone interlock can deform and degrade over the years and can lead to aseptic loosening, especially in young and active patients. A loosened prosthesis results in an impaired functioning and painful knee in daily life for which a revision of the prosthesis may be necessary. To prevent aseptic loosening and subsequent revision surgery, new methods of uncemented fixation have been developed.
One of these methods is to use a highly porous metal called Tritanium®. It can improve the biologic fixation by resembling the characteristics of trabecular bone. It is expected that this surface aids bone ingrowth and to have similar or even better results concerning early fixation properties and long-term durability compared with cemented fixation. Excellent results using this highly porous Tritanium have been seen in total hip surgery already.
This single-blinded, randomized clinical trial will assess clinical and radiological outcomes including Roentgen Stereophotogrammetry (RSA) measurements of a newly approved uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR total knee prosthesis compared with a standard cemented Triathlon metal-backed CR total knee prosthesis (both by Stryker Orthopaedics). Two arms of each 35 patients will be included.
The primary outcome measure will be prosthetic migration after two years of the uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR Total Knee and the cemented Triathlon CR Total Knee by means of RSA. It is hypothesized that the new uncemented Tritanium prosthesis will perform at least equally good in terms of migration and clinical parameters compared with the standard cemented Triathlon.
The secondary outcome measure will be long-term (10-year) survival based on the two-year migration patterns combined with clinical factors and radiographic aspects. In order to identify other clinical parameters besides the fixation of the prosthesis components, clinical scores and radiographic aspects will be correlated with the RSA outcome. The 10-year results will be used to verify the predicted long-term survival results.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR | Experimental | Primary total knee replacement with Uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR Total Knee System |
|
| Cemented Triathlon CR | Active Comparator | Primary total knee replacement with Cemented Triathlon CR Total Knee System |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncemented Triathlon Tritanium CR Total Knee System | Device | Primary Total Knee Replacement |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Migration, measured by means of RSA | Migration (MTPM in mm) of the prosthesis with respect to the host bone measured by means of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Migration, measured by means of RSA | Migration (MTPM in mm) of the prosthesis with respect to the host bone measured by means of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) | 10 years |
| Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with the Knee Society Score (KSS) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient is able to understand the meaning of the study and is willing to sign the Ethics Commission (EC) approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form.
Patients eligible and scheduled to undergo primary total knee replacement with any of the following indication.
Ability and willingness to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level, and to return for follow-up evaluations.
A good nutritional state of the patient.
The subject is a male or non-pregnant female between 40 and 75 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria:
Secondary exclusion criteria: when there are less than five tibia-bone markers or less than three insert markers visible in the baseline RSA photograph and it will not improve by placing the patient in another position, the patient will be excluded from the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sören Toksvig-Larsen, Ass Prof | Department of Orthopaedics Hässleholm-Kristianstad-Ystad, Hässleholm Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leiden University Medical Center | Leiden | 2300RC | Netherlands | |||
| Department of Orthopaedics Hässleholm-Kristianstad-Ystad, Hässleholm Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Cemented Triathlon CR Total Knee System | Device | Primary Total Knee Replacement |
|
|
The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, range of motion (ROM) and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor," a higher value represents a better outcome. |
| pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years |
| Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) patient questionnaire | KOOS consists of 5 subscales: Pain, other symptoms, function in daily living , function in sport and recreation and knee related quality of life (QOL). The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms). | pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years |
| Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with EuroQuol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) patient questionnaire | The EQ-5D health questionnaire provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. | pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years |
| Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) patient questionnaire. | The FJS consists of 12 questions and focuses on the patients' awareness of their joint replacement during a range of day to day and recreational activities. The score has a range of 0-100.questionnaire | pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years |
| Investigation of patient outcome with radiographic analysis | Plain radiographs will be obtained for assessment of fixation of the device. | 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years |
| Hässleholm |
| 28138 |
| Sweden |