Asthmatuner a Self-management App for Asthma
Asthmatuner a Self-management App for Asthma
Primary aim: Evaluating the effect of Asthmatuner on patients´ self-reported asthma control test (ACT/C-ACT)compared with conventional asthma management.
Secondary aim: Evaluating patients´ health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) medical adherence by using Asthmatuner compared with conventional management.
Total sample size: Stratified study population consisting of 43 females and males with diagnosed asthma at the age of at least 6 years pediatric specialist care and 43 females/males in primary care.
Study design: This is a multi-centre, blinded, randomized controlled, cross-over trial over to at least 16 weeks.
Subjects: Two stratified groups of participants with uncontrolled asthma will be recruited; (1) children and adolescents from Astrid Lindgren's Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, and (2) adolescents and adults from the primary health care sector in Stockholm, Sweden. The asthma control test (ACT/C-ACT) will be applied for evaluation of asthma control, a score less than 20 will be required for inclusion.
Intervention: Asthmatuner is an app supporting self-management evaluating symptoms and lung function with external spirometry. The app gathers the information to define patients´ asthma control. Subsequently, Asthmatuner provides the patient with a treatment recommendation based on the individual treatment plan.
Procedures: Participants are randomized (1:1) into the one of two-arms of asthma self-management with Asthmatuner - conventional or conventional - Asthmatuner. Questionnaires will collect information about asthma control, HR-QoL, Medicine adherence report scale (MARS) and history of medical health concerning health care utilization and personal costs and income.
Analysis: The study hypothesis will be tested by examining difference in patients´ change in asthma control (ACT/C-ACT) and HR-QoL (PAQLQ/Mini-AQLQ). Results will be summarized at each management period as mean scores and analysed by paired t-tests.
2. Background Clinical gaps hamper proper asthma management, and leads to delayed or undiagnosed disease, poor adherence to treatment, inadequate self-care abilities, inadequate understanding of disease severity, poor patient education, inadequate measurement of lung function, and inconsistent evaluation of symptoms. To improve the patient's ability to self-manage and to overcome clinical gaps, evidence emphasizes clinics to offer comprehensive patient education. The national Finish asthma programme (1994-2004) focused on applying effective strategies of asthma management, as a result, patient's self-management was improved, and cost-effective through limited demands on the health-care and social security system.
Novel applications embodied in smartphones are straightforward alternative to facilitate health care and support patients with hands-on guidance for self-management of asthma. Asthmatuner is a smartphone app that enables evaluation of lung function and symptoms. The app provides patients with a daily treatment plan adjusted for symptoms and lung function. Additionally, information is accessible and can be assessed by health care providers through a back-end system. Future versions of Asthmatuner will be enabled through patient's own medical record. Self-management apps with hands-on guidance for self-management of asthma present a promising future for closing clinical gaps, but the overall benefits of using the service in the treatment of asthma need comprehensive evaluation that answers scientific questions and end-user opinions.
3. Aims The primary aim is to evaluate Asthmatuner and the clinical effect on patients´ self-reported asthma control test (scores of ACT/C-ACT).
The secondary aim is to evaluate the effect on patients´ and HR-QoL and medical adherence.
Primary outcomes The primary outcome will be scores of ACT/C-ACT and Paediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire (PAQLQ) or Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ).
Secondary outcomes The secondary outcomes are scores of Medicine adherence report scale (MARS) and costs of prescribed dose and type of control medication and total amount of direct and indirect costs for patient/caregiver.
4. Material and methods Study design: Multicenter randomized controlled physician blinded crossover trial, where study participants were randomized to start with AsthmaTuner or conventional treatment, and a washout period between treatments, Figure 1. Primary outcome of asthma control test (ACT) or Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) were measured two times in each treatment period, at baseline and at follow-up visit, equal or more than 8 weeks after treatment started. The participating centers were recommended to comply with Swedish national treatment and management of asthma, which closely resemble with Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). A study nurse at each site performed the randomization by open a sealed envelope indicating the start of either AsthmaTuner or conventional treatment. The physician was blinded for the order of given treatments when one paper personalized treatment plan and one individual treatment plan for AsthmaTuner were arranged to each patient according to levels of controlled, partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma. The regional board of Ethical Committee in Stockholm (number: 2015/1527-31/1 and 2016/1546-32) and Swedish Medical Products Agency (number 5.1-2016-19829) both approved the study. The study was registered at ClinicalTrial.gov
Intervention: Asthmatuner is a CE-marked cloud-based system with healthcare interface and a downloaded patient app (Android or iOS). The intended use of Asthmatuner is to automate and facilitate self-management of asthma, by letting patient register symptoms and to measure forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) with a Bluetooth spirometer (MIR, SmartOne). The patient receives an immediate feedback on asthma control and treatment recommendation with an image of the correct inhaler to use and the dose. Asthma control is defined based on to GINA and a summary of lung function; liter to percentage of personalized best FEV1 using cutoff equal or less than 80%, and asthma symptoms last week in terms of; need for recue medication more than twice, daytime symptoms, nocturnal symptoms/awakenings and limitation of activities. Furthermore, Asthmatuner offers patient and asthma care provider a longitudinal data view of prescribed treatments, lung function and experienced symptoms.
Study subjects, children from 6 years and adults, with doctor's diagnosis of asthma and ACT or C-ACT score below 20 points, were included in the region of Stockholm, Sweden. The study was conducted in the primary health care sector and in asthma clinics specialised for children and adolescents in Stockholm. Patients were included at Liljeholmen Health Care Centre, Sophiahemmet Health Care Centre, and Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital (Lung- and Allergy Department in Solna and Children and Adolescents Health Care Department in Huddinge) during the years of 2016-2018. Exclusion criteria were other ongoing comorbidity impairing the asthma control, participation in other drug trial, and a patient or all caregiver(s) (in case the patient is a child) incapable to read Swedish.
Data collection
Questionnaires:
Power analysis The power analysis is based on our previous analysis of ACT/C-ACT and HR-QoL scores in schoolchildren with uncontrolled severe asthma [21]. The scores for severe uncontrolled asthma were on average for ACT 17 (SD 3.3) and for PAQLQ 5.4 (SD 0.77). Thus, an estimated improvement of ACT from 17 to 19 (two points) or PAQLQ from 5.4 to 5.9 (0.5 points) requires 38-43 patients in each group (Asthmatuner vs. conventional management) to attain an 80 % power at 5% significance level.
Visit 1: Eligibility of participants will be checked. The patient will be given information about the study procedures and must sign the informed consent form. At the visit the following procedures will be conducted and documented:
At visit 2, the following procedures will be conducted and documented:
At visit 3, the following procedures will be conducted and documented:
At visit 4, the following procedures will be conducted and documented:
4.5 Statistical analysis The study hypothesis will be tested by examining patients´ change from baseline in asthma control (ACT/C-ACT), HR-QoL (PAQLQ/Mini-AQLQ), and in MARS scores between asthma management groups. Results will be summarized between each group as mean scores and analysed by paired t-tests.
4.8 Withdrawal A patient should be withdrawn from the trial if, in the opinion of the investigator, it is medically necessary, or if it is the wish of the patient. In any circumstances the reasons for withdrawal should be documented in the Study termination report. Participants who discontinue from the study for any reason will be replaced.
4.9 Safety
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in participants using or not using Asthmatuner. AE include the following:
Preexisting conditions In this trial, a preexisting condition i.e. asthma, should not be reported as an adverse event unless the condition worsens or episodes increases (i.e. exacerbations) in the frequency during the adverse event reporting period.
Procedures Diagnostics and therapeutic non-invasive and invasive procedures, such as surgery, should not be reported as adverse events. However, the medical condition for which the procedure was performed should be reported if it meets the definition of an AE. The AE reporting period begins upon starting the use of Asthmatuner or conventional management (visit 1).
Each participant will be questioned about AE for each visit 2 and 3. All AE that occur in the trial should be reported to investigator and specified in the participants´ medical journal and in a separate AE form with following information:
Gravity
Each AE is to be classified by the investigator as serious or non-serious. This classification of the gravity of the event determines the reporting procedure to be followed. An AE that meets one or more of the following criteria is classified as serious:
5.0 Ethics The trial will be performed in accordance with the World Medical Assembly Helsinki recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects [26]. It is the responsibility of the investigators to obtain approval of the trial from regional ethic committee´.
It is the responsibility of the investigators to give each patient prior to inclusion in the trial, full adequate information regarding the trial and the procedures. The patient must be informed about their right to withdraw from the trial at any time. Written patient information must be given to each patient before enrollment. In addition, it is the responsibility of the investigator to obtain signed informed consent from all participants.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: