Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01MH106536 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| R01MH064089 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Connecticut | OTHER |
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is being done to compare three types of talk therapies for youth who struggle with emotional and behavioral problems (e.g., anxiety, sadness, worries) in Community Mental Health Clinics in Connecticut (CT) and Florida (FL).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unified Protocol for Adolescents (UP-A) | Experimental | Participants will be treated with the Unified Protocol for the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescence. Their clinicians will also receive feedback using the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire feedback system. |
|
| Treatment as Usual Plus (TAU+) | Experimental | Participants will be treated by clinicians who receive feedback using the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire, but who otherwise use Treatment as Usual |
|
| Treatment as Usual (TAU) | Active Comparator | Participants will receive Treatment as Usual provided at the study clinics. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unified Protocol for Adolescents (UP-A) | Behavioral | The UP-A is an emotion-focused, transdiagnostic approach for adolescents (ages 12-18) with a primary emotional disorder. It is a developmental adaptation of the Unified Protocol, a transdiagnostic treatment for adults with emotional disorders. Clinicians present all skills in the context of the emotions most salient to presenting concerns and adolescent/caregiver conceptualizations of treatment needs, thereby personalizing treatment. The UP-A is delivered in 8-21 weekly sessions, with clinician flexibility regarding the sequencing and depth with which various sections are presented to clients and caregivers, as well as the emotions targeted during the course of the intervention. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scores | This is a independent evaluator rated measure of improvement in symptoms and functioning. The CGI-I has a total range from 1-7 with the lower scores indicating more improvement in functioning. | At 16 weeks, at 28 weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scores | This is a independent evaluator rated measure of severity of symptoms. The CGI-S has a total range from 1-7 with the higher scores indicating higher symptom severity. | At 16 weeks, at 28 weeks. |
| Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Scores |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Golda Ginsburg, Ph.D. | University of Connecticut | Principal Investigator |
| Amanda Jensen-Doss, Ph.D. | University of Miami | Principal Investigator |
| Jill Ehrenreich-May, Ph.D. | University of Miami | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Connecticut Health Center | West Hartford | Connecticut | 06119 | United States | ||
| University of Miami |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40014505 | Derived | Ehrenreich-May J, Jensen-Doss A, Milgram L, Rosenfield D, Shaw AM, LoCurto J, Nanda Robinson M, Caron EB, Lee P, Ginsburg GS. A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of transdiagnostic treatment and measurement-based care for adolescents with emotional disorders in community clinics. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2025 Mar;93(3):144-160. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000947. | |
| 39397117 | Derived | Casline E, Woodard GS, Lane E, Pollowitz S, Douglas S, Ehrenreich-May J, Ginsburg GS, Jensen-Doss A. Consultation Content and Techniques for measurement-Based Care Implementation in Youth Community Mental Health Settings. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Mar;52(2):401-414. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01417-8. Epub 2024 Oct 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Unified Protocol for Adolescents (UP-A) | Participants will be treated with the Unified Protocol for the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescence (UP-A). Their clinicians will also receive feedback using the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire feedback system, consisting of youth and caregiver progress measures. The UP-A is an emotion-focused, transdiagnostic approach for adolescents (ages 12-18) with a primary emotional disorder. Clinicians present all skills in the context of the emotions most salient to presenting concerns and adolescent/caregiver conceptualizations of treatment needs, thereby personalizing treatment. The UP-A is delivered in 8-21 weekly sessions, with clinician flexibility regarding the sequencing and depth with which various sections are presented to clients and caregivers, as well as the emotions targeted during the course of the intervention. |
| FG001 | Treatment as Usual Plus (TAU+) | Participants will be treated by clinicians who receive feedback using the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire, but who otherwise use Treatment as Usual Youth Outcomes Questionnaire: The YOQ consists of parent- and youth-report measures of symptoms and alliance administered weekly on a tablet computer. The YOQ online system then generates reports to provide clinicians with systematic feedback about client progress, flagging "critical items" that have been endorsed (e.g., suicidality, hallucinations), presenting graphs of ratings over time, and providing empirically-derived "alerts" when clients are failing to progress or showing deterioration. Clinicians will be trained to use this feedback to modify treatment as needed, share it with families as appropriate, and use it to enhance use of supervision. Treatment as Usual: Clinicians assigned to the TAU condition will be instructed to use whatever treatment methods and outcome monitoring strategies they typically use with adolescents with internalizing disorders. |
| FG002 | Treatment as Usual (TAU) | Participants will receive Treatment as Usual provided at the study clinics. Treatment as Usual: Clinicians assigned to the TAU condition will be instructed to use whatever treatment methods and outcome monitoring strategies they typically use with adolescents with internalizing disorders. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Unified Protocol for Adolescents (UP-A) | Participants will be treated with the Unified Protocol for the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescence (UP-A). Their clinicians will also receive feedback using the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire feedback system, consisting of youth and caregiver progress measures. The UP-A is an emotion-focused, transdiagnostic approach for adolescents (ages 12-18) with a primary emotional disorder. Clinicians present all skills in the context of the emotions most salient to presenting concerns and adolescent/caregiver conceptualizations of treatment needs, thereby personalizing treatment. The UP-A is delivered in 8-21 weekly sessions, with clinician flexibility regarding the sequencing and depth with which various sections are presented to clients and caregivers, as well as the emotions targeted during the course of the intervention. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scores | This is a independent evaluator rated measure of improvement in symptoms and functioning. The CGI-I has a total range from 1-7 with the lower scores indicating more improvement in functioning. | Not all participants were able to complete the CGI-I Questionnaire at Post Visit (16 Weeks) and at Follow Up Visit (28 weeks). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 16 weeks, at 28 weeks. |
|
28 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Unified Protocol for Adolescents (UP-A) | Participants will be treated with the Unified Protocol for the Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescence (UP-A). Their clinicians will also receive feedback using the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire feedback system, consisting of youth and caregiver progress measures. The UP-A is an emotion-focused, transdiagnostic approach for adolescents (ages 12-18) with a primary emotional disorder. Clinicians present all skills in the context of the emotions most salient to presenting concerns and adolescent/caregiver conceptualizations of treatment needs, thereby personalizing treatment. The UP-A is delivered in 8-21 weekly sessions, with clinician flexibility regarding the sequencing and depth with which various sections are presented to clients and caregivers, as well as the emotions targeted during the course of the intervention. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitalization due to Suicidality | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Amanda Jensen-Doss | University of Miami | +1 (305)284-8332 | ajensendoss@miami.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 13, 2021 | Jul 17, 2021 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Sep 16, 2019 | Nov 10, 2020 | ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Youth Outcomes Questionnaire | Behavioral | The YOQ consists of parent- and youth-report measures of symptoms and alliance administered weekly on a tablet computer. The YOQ online system then generates reports to provide clinicians with systematic feedback about client progress, flagging "critical items" that have been endorsed (e.g., suicidality, hallucinations), presenting graphs of ratings over time, and providing empirically-derived "alerts" when clients are failing to progress or showing deterioration. Clinicians will be trained to use this feedback to modify treatment as needed, share it with families as appropriate, and use it to enhance use of supervision. |
|
| Treatment as Usual | Behavioral | Clinicians assigned to the TAU condition will be instructed to use whatever treatment methods and outcome monitoring strategies they typically use with adolescents with internalizing disorders. |
|
This is a independent evaluator rated measure of global functional impairment.The GCAS has a total range from 1-100 with the higher scores indicating better functioning. |
| At 16 weeks, at 28 weeks. |
| Coral Gables |
| Florida |
| 33124 |
| United States |
| BG001 | Treatment as Usual Plus (TAU+) | Participants will be treated by clinicians who receive feedback using the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire, but who otherwise use Treatment as Usual Youth Outcomes Questionnaire: The YOQ consists of parent- and youth-report measures of symptoms and alliance administered weekly on a tablet computer. The YOQ online system then generates reports to provide clinicians with systematic feedback about client progress, flagging "critical items" that have been endorsed (e.g., suicidality, hallucinations), presenting graphs of ratings over time, and providing empirically-derived "alerts" when clients are failing to progress or showing deterioration. Clinicians will be trained to use this feedback to modify treatment as needed, share it with families as appropriate, and use it to enhance use of supervision. Treatment as Usual: Clinicians assigned to the TAU condition will be instructed to use whatever treatment methods and outcome monitoring strategies they typically use with adolescents with internalizing disorders. |
| BG002 | Treatment as Usual (TAU) | Participants will receive Treatment as Usual provided at the study clinics. Treatment as Usual: Clinicians assigned to the TAU condition will be instructed to use whatever treatment methods and outcome monitoring strategies they typically use with adolescents with internalizing disorders. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Treatment as Usual Plus (TAU+) | Participants will be treated by clinicians who receive feedback using the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire, but who otherwise use Treatment as Usual Youth Outcomes Questionnaire: The YOQ consists of parent- and youth-report measures of symptoms and alliance administered weekly on a tablet computer. The YOQ online system then generates reports to provide clinicians with systematic feedback about client progress, flagging "critical items" that have been endorsed (e.g., suicidality, hallucinations), presenting graphs of ratings over time, and providing empirically-derived "alerts" when clients are failing to progress or showing deterioration. Clinicians will be trained to use this feedback to modify treatment as needed, share it with families as appropriate, and use it to enhance use of supervision. Treatment as Usual: Clinicians assigned to the TAU condition will be instructed to use whatever treatment methods and outcome monitoring strategies they typically use with adolescents with internalizing disorders. |
| OG002 | Treatment as Usual (TAU) | Participants will receive Treatment as Usual provided at the study clinics. Treatment as Usual: Clinicians assigned to the TAU condition will be instructed to use whatever treatment methods and outcome monitoring strategies they typically use with adolescents with internalizing disorders. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scores | This is a independent evaluator rated measure of severity of symptoms. The CGI-S has a total range from 1-7 with the higher scores indicating higher symptom severity. | Not all participants were able to complete the CGI-S Questionnaire at Post Visit (16 Weeks) and at Follow Up Visit (28 weeks). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 16 weeks, at 28 weeks. |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Scores | This is a independent evaluator rated measure of global functional impairment.The GCAS has a total range from 1-100 with the higher scores indicating better functioning. | Not all participants were able to complete the CGAS Questionnaire at Post Visit (16 Weeks) and at Follow Up Visit (28 weeks). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At 16 weeks, at 28 weeks. |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 68 |
| 5 |
| 68 |
| 0 |
| 68 |
| EG001 | Treatment as Usual Plus (TAU+) | Participants will be treated by clinicians who receive feedback using the Youth Outcomes Questionnaire, but who otherwise use Treatment as Usual Youth Outcomes Questionnaire: The YOQ consists of parent- and youth-report measures of symptoms and alliance administered weekly on a tablet computer. The YOQ online system then generates reports to provide clinicians with systematic feedback about client progress, flagging "critical items" that have been endorsed (e.g., suicidality, hallucinations), presenting graphs of ratings over time, and providing empirically-derived "alerts" when clients are failing to progress or showing deterioration. Clinicians will be trained to use this feedback to modify treatment as needed, share it with families as appropriate, and use it to enhance use of supervision. Treatment as Usual: Clinicians assigned to the TAU condition will be instructed to use whatever treatment methods and outcome monitoring strategies they typically use with adolescents with internalizing disorders. | 0 | 60 | 2 | 60 | 0 | 60 |
| EG002 | Treatment as Usual (TAU) | Participants will receive Treatment as Usual provided at the study clinics. Treatment as Usual: Clinicians assigned to the TAU condition will be instructed to use whatever treatment methods and outcome monitoring strategies they typically use with adolescents with internalizing disorders. | 0 | 68 | 1 | 68 | 0 | 68 |
| Suicidal behavior | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Follow-up (28 weeks) |
|
|
DV = CGI-S at Follow-Up |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.66 |
Threshold: p < .05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 0.12 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| .27 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.42 |
| 0.67 |
A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. |
| Superiority |
| DV = CGI-S at Post | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.629 | Threshold: p < .05 | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.1 | Standard Error of the Mean | .21 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.51 | 0.31 | A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. | Superiority |
| DV = CGI-S at Post | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.938 | Threshold: p < .05 | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.02 | Standard Error of the Mean | .20 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.41 | 0.38 | A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. | Superiority |
| DV = CGI-S at Post | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.68 | Threshold: p < .05 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.09 | Standard Error of the Mean | .21 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.32 | 0.49 | A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. | Superiority |
| DV = CGI-S at Follow-Up | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.479 | Threshold: p < .05 | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.2 | Standard Error of the Mean | .28 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.75 | 0.35 | A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. | Superiority |
| Follow-up (28 weeks) |
|
|
DV = CGAS at Post |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.917 |
Threshold: p < .05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -0.17 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 1.62 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -3.41 |
| 3.07 |
A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. |
| Superiority |
| DV = CGAS at Post | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.778 | Threshold: p < .05 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.47 | Standard Error of the Mean | 1.66 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.81 | 3.74 | A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. | Superiority |
| DV = CGAS at Follow-Up | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.66 | Threshold: p < .05 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.95 | Standard Error of the Mean | 2.12 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.3 | 5.19 | A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. | Superiority |
| DV = CGAS at Follow-Up | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.935 | Threshold: p < .05 | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.18 | Standard Error of the Mean | 2.19 | 2-Sided | 95 | -4.55 | 4.19 | A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. | Superiority |
| DV = CGAS at Follow-Up | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.615 | Threshold: p < .05 | Mean Difference (Net) | 1.13 | Standard Error of the Mean | 2.21 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.29 | 5.55 | A negative value for the mean difference indicates that the lower numbered Group has a lower mean than the higher numbered group. | Superiority |