The vehicle will be supplied as a clear, colorless solution, free from visible particulates, for topical application. This formulation will be similar to the umeclidinium formulation except that it will be devoid of the umeclidinium parent. 2 mg of the vehicle will be applied per square centimeter of the axilla, once a day at night before going to bed for 14 days. The total amount of vehicle applied daily to both axillae is expected to range between approximately 204 and 680 mg.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Day 14 (pre-dose), Day 15 (3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 10 h, 12 h, 16 h, and 24 h following the Day 14 dose), Day 16 (36 h and 48 h following the Day 14 dose). Derivation of t1/2 was planned. However, the parameter could not be derived for any of the participant included in the study because of insufficient data in the elimination phase (< 3 data points, coefficient of determination (R^2) was not adequate).

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Day 14 (pre-dose), Day 15 (3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 10 h, 12 h, 16 h, and 24 h following the Day 14 dose), Day 16 (36 h and 48 h following the Day 14 dose). Calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. Geometric mean of log-transformed values of AUC were reported.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for V1 and V2 was reported as mean (estimate) with relative standard error (RSE). RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) X 100.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for CL and Q was reported as mean (estimate) with RSE. RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) X 100.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for Ka was reported as mean (estimate) with RSE. RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) X 100.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for FA and F2 (FIXED) was reported as mean (estimate) with RSE. RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) x 100.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for ALAG1 was reported as mean (estimate) with RSE. RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) x 100.

AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE include AEs those result in death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.

Single 12-lead ECGs was obtained at Day 1, Day 14 and Day 28 during the study. The standard ECG criteria of potential clinical importance were 1) absolute QTc Interval, > 450 milliseconds (msec), 2) absolute PR Interval, <110 msec, 3) absolute QRS Interval, < 75 msec and 4) increase from baseline in QTc > 60 msec. The number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG findings at any visit were reported.

The clinical chemistry parameters analyzed were albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase, glucose, potassium, sodium, total and direct bilirubin, total protein, uric acid. Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important clinical chemistry findings at any visit were reported.

The hematology parameters analyzed were basophils, eosinophils, erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin, erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume, erythrocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and reticulocytes. Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important hematology findings at any visit were reported.

The urinalysis parameters analyzed were specific gravity, pH, glucose, protein, blood and ketones by dipstick, microscopic examination. Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important urinalysis findings at any visit were reported.

The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters were for systolic blood pressure (<85 and >160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]), diastolic blood pressure (<45 and >100 mmHg) and heart rate (<40 and >110 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported.

The investigator or designated evaluator assessed skin tolerability at each visit using the 5-point tolerability scale. Tolerability of the topical application was assessed and scored as, 0- none (no evidence of local intolerance), 1-mild (minimal erythema and/or edema, slight glazed appearance), 2-moderate (definite erythema and/or edema with peeling and/or cracking but needs no adaptation of posology), 3-severe (erythema, edema glazing with fissures, few vesicles or papules), 4- very severe (strong reaction spreading beyond the treated area, bullous reaction, erosions).

Amount of sweat produced was determined by gravimetry analysis for axilla. Filter paper in a sealed container was weighed. After drying the axillary surface, the filter paper was removed from the container and applied to the axilla. The paper was covered with plastic wrap and tape around the edges with paper tape. The filter paper was left in contact with the axilla for a period of 5 minutes as measured by a stopwatch. The filter paper was then replaced in the sealed container and re-weighed. Rate of sweat production was calculated in milligrams/minute. Assessments conducted at Day 1, Pre-dose time point (average pre-dose measurements for both left and right measurements) were considered as Baseline values. Percent change from Baseline= 100 x ( Day 15 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value. The percentage of participants with cutpoints (-30%, -50, -75%) for percent change from Baseline in sweat production were presented.

The HDSS is a 4-point scale which used to assess the impact of disease. The scores were define as, 1- My (underarm) sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily Activities; 2- My (underarm) sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities; 3- My (underarm) sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities; 4- My (underarm) sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities. Average score of both left and right underarms were used for analysis. The possible average score range from 1 (minimum) to 4 (maximum). The reduction in score on the scale presents betterment and increase in the score represents worsening. Assessments conducted at Day 1, pre-dose time point (average pre-dose measurements for both left and right underarm measurements) were considered as Baseline values. Change from baseline was calculated as Day 15 Visit Value minus Baseline values.

HDSS is a 4-point scale which used to assess the impact of disease. The scores are define as, 1- My (underarm) sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily Activities; 2- My (underarm) sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities; 3- My (underarm) sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities; 4- My (underarm) sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities. Average score of both left and right underarms were used for analysis. The possible average score range from 1 (minimum) to 4 (maximum). Increase in score on scale represents worsening. Assessments conducted at Day 1, pre-dose time point (average pre-dose measurements for both left and right underarm measurements) were considered as Baseline values. Change from baseline was calculated as Day 15 Visit Value minus Baseline values. Percentage of participants with 2-point decrease from Baseline to Day 15 in HDSS score were reported.

Each participant received single dose of treatment in the following order of intravenous GSK573719 20 µg followed by oral GSK573719 1000 μg followed by intravenous GSK573719 50 µg, followed by inhaled GSK573719 1000 μg followed by intravenous GSK573719 65 µg in period 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. The washout was of 5 days between two consecutive periods.

A single dose of topically applied [14C] umeclidinium was administered to the occluded axilla. The dose to be administered was 165 mg of a 1.85% (w/w) solution umeclidinium (equivalent to a 2.2% umeclidinium bromide solution) applied to 40 (cm^2) surface area of occluded axilla (resulting in a calculated net amount of active umeclidinium of 3.06 mg).

Total of all reporting groups

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Day 14 (pre-dose), Day 15 (3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 10 h, 12 h, 16 h, and 24 h following the Day 14 dose), Day 16 (36 h and 48 h following the Day 14 dose). Cmax and Ctau was determined directly from the concentration-time data.

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Day 14 (pre-dose), Day 15 (3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 10 h, 12 h, 16 h, and 24 h following the Day 14 dose), Day 16 (36 h and 48 h following the Day 14 dose). Tmax was determined directly from the concentration-time data.

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Day 14 (pre-dose), Day 15 (3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 10 h, 12 h, 16 h, and 24 h following the Day 14 dose), Day 16 (36 h and 48 h following the Day 14 dose). Derivation of lambda-Z was planned. However, the parameter could not be derived for any of the participant included in the study because of insufficient data in the elimination phase (< 3 data points, coefficient of determination (R^2) was not adequate).

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Population

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Day 14 (pre-dose), Day 15 (3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 10 h, 12 h, 16 h, and 24 h following the Day 14 dose), Day 16 (36 h and 48 h following the Day 14 dose). Derivation of t1/2 was planned. However, the parameter could not be derived for any of the participant included in the study because of insufficient data in the elimination phase (< 3 data points, coefficient of determination (R^2) was not adequate).

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Population

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Day 14 (pre-dose), Day 15 (3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 10 h, 12 h, 16 h, and 24 h following the Day 14 dose), Day 16 (36 h and 48 h following the Day 14 dose). Calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for each incremental trapezoid and the log trapezoidal rule for each decremental trapezoid. Geometric mean of log-transformed values of AUC were reported.

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for V1 and V2 was reported as mean (estimate) with relative standard error (RSE). RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) X 100.

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Populations from studies 202093 (16 participants), AC4112008 (9 participants) and LHH117157 (6 participants) were pooled to population Pk parameter analysis.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for CL and Q was reported as mean (estimate) with RSE. RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) X 100.

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Populations from studies 202093 (16 participants), AC4112008 (9 participants) and LHH117157 (6 participants) were pooled to population Pk parameter analysis.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for Ka was reported as mean (estimate) with RSE. RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) X 100.

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Populations from studies 202093 (16 participants), AC4112008 (9 participants) and LHH117157 (6 participants) were pooled to population Pk parameter analysis.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for FA and F2 (FIXED) was reported as mean (estimate) with RSE. RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) x 100.

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Populations from studies 202093 (16 participants), AC4112008 (9 participants) and LHH117157 (6 participants) were pooled to population PK parameter analysis.

Pharmacokinetic blood sampling was done at Pre-dose, 3h, 6h, 9h, 10h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h of current study (202093), pre-dose, 10, 20, 30, 32, 35, 45 minute, 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 8h, 12h, 16h, 24h, 36h, 48h for study AC4112008, and Pre-dose, 2h, 4h, 5h, 6h, 8h, 8.5h, 9h, 9.5h, 10h, 11h, 12h, 13h, 14h, 16h, 24h, 30h, 36h, 48h, 72h for study number LHH117157. Plasma umeclidinium concentration time data following administration to axilae of hyperhidrosis participants from the current study (202093) were pooled with data from the occluded axilla cohort from study LHH117157 and the IV infusion data from study AC4112008 in order modify the existing population PK model for dermal umeclidinium. Plasma concentration-time data was subjected to nonlinear mixed effects modelling using the program NONMEM to develop a population PK model. The data for ALAG1 was reported as mean (estimate) with RSE. RSE= (Standard error of the estimate/ Final parameter estimate) x 100.

Pharmacokinetic Concentration Populations from studies 202093 (16 participants), AC4112008 (9 participants) and LHH117157 (6 participants) were pooled to population PK parameter analysis.

AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE include AEs those result in death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, a persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal functions, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.

Safety population of study number 202093, LHH117157 (Cohort B) and AC4112008 were used to report AEs.

Single 12-lead ECGs was obtained at Day 1, Day 14 and Day 28 during the study. The standard ECG criteria of potential clinical importance were 1) absolute QTc Interval, > 450 milliseconds (msec), 2) absolute PR Interval, <110 msec, 3) absolute QRS Interval, < 75 msec and 4) increase from baseline in QTc > 60 msec. The number of participants with potentially clinically significant ECG findings at any visit were reported.

Safety Population is defined as all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug in this study (202093).

The clinical chemistry parameters analyzed were albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, chloride, creatinine, gamma glutamyl transferase, glucose, potassium, sodium, total and direct bilirubin, total protein, uric acid. Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important clinical chemistry findings at any visit were reported.

Safety Population is defined as all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug in this study (202093).

The hematology parameters analyzed were basophils, eosinophils, erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, erythrocyte mean corpuscular hemoglobin, erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume, erythrocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and reticulocytes. Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important hematology findings at any visit were reported.

Safety Population is defined as all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug in this study (202093).

The urinalysis parameters analyzed were specific gravity, pH, glucose, protein, blood and ketones by dipstick, microscopic examination. Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important urinalysis findings at any visit were reported.

Safety Population is defined as all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug in this study (202093).

The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters were for systolic blood pressure (<85 and >160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]), diastolic blood pressure (<45 and >100 mmHg) and heart rate (<40 and >110 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported.

Safety Population is defined as all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug in this study (202093).

The investigator or designated evaluator assessed skin tolerability at each visit using the 5-point tolerability scale. Tolerability of the topical application was assessed and scored as, 0- none (no evidence of local intolerance), 1-mild (minimal erythema and/or edema, slight glazed appearance), 2-moderate (definite erythema and/or edema with peeling and/or cracking but needs no adaptation of posology), 3-severe (erythema, edema glazing with fissures, few vesicles or papules), 4- very severe (strong reaction spreading beyond the treated area, bullous reaction, erosions).

Safety Population is defined as all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug in this study (202093).

Amount of sweat produced was determined by gravimetry analysis for axilla. Filter paper in a sealed container was weighed. After drying the axillary surface, the filter paper was removed from the container and applied to the axilla. The paper was covered with plastic wrap and tape around the edges with paper tape. The filter paper was left in contact with the axilla for a period of 5 minutes as measured by a stopwatch. The filter paper was then replaced in the sealed container and re-weighed. Rate of sweat production was calculated in milligrams/minute (mg/min). Participants remained at rest for 20-30 minute before the measurements in order to reduce external interference. Measurements were carried out in a climate-controlled environment (21-24°C). Assessments conducted at Day 1, Pre-dose time point (average pre-dose measurements for both left and right measurements) were considered as Baseline values. Change from baseline was calculated as Day 15 value minus Baseline value.

Full Analysis population comprised of participants receiving study medication and having at least 1 post baseline visit. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Amount of sweat produced was determined by gravimetry analysis for axilla. Filter paper in a sealed container was weighed. After drying the axillary surface, the filter paper was removed from the container and applied to the axilla. The paper was covered with plastic wrap and tape around the edges with paper tape. The filter paper was left in contact with the axilla for a period of 5 minutes as measured by a stopwatch. The filter paper was then replaced in the sealed container and re-weighed. Rate of sweat production was calculated in milligrams/minute. Assessments conducted at Day 1, Pre-dose time point (average pre-dose measurements for both left and right measurements) were considered as Baseline values. Percent change from Baseline= 100 x ( Day 15 value - Baseline value) / Baseline value. The percentage of participants with cutpoints (-30%, -50, -75%) for percent change from Baseline in sweat production were presented.

Full Analysis population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

The HDSS is a 4-point scale which used to assess the impact of disease. The scores were define as, 1- My (underarm) sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily Activities; 2- My (underarm) sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities; 3- My (underarm) sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities; 4- My (underarm) sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities. Average score of both left and right underarms were used for analysis. The possible average score range from 1 (minimum) to 4 (maximum). The reduction in score on the scale presents betterment and increase in the score represents worsening. Assessments conducted at Day 1, pre-dose time point (average pre-dose measurements for both left and right underarm measurements) were considered as Baseline values. Change from baseline was calculated as Day 15 Visit Value minus Baseline values.

Full Analysis population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X in the category titles).

HDSS is a 4-point scale which used to assess the impact of disease. The scores are define as, 1- My (underarm) sweating is never noticeable and never interferes with my daily Activities; 2- My (underarm) sweating is tolerable but sometimes interferes with my daily activities; 3- My (underarm) sweating is barely tolerable and frequently interferes with my daily activities; 4- My (underarm) sweating is intolerable and always interferes with my daily activities. Average score of both left and right underarms were used for analysis. The possible average score range from 1 (minimum) to 4 (maximum). Increase in score on scale represents worsening. Assessments conducted at Day 1, pre-dose time point (average pre-dose measurements for both left and right underarm measurements) were considered as Baseline values. Change from baseline was calculated as Day 15 Visit Value minus Baseline values. Percentage of participants with 2-point decrease from Baseline to Day 15 in HDSS score were reported.

Full Analysis population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Participants topically applied vehicle, OD to both axillae, at night before going to bed for 14 days.

Each participants received single dose of treatment in the following order intravenous GSK573719 20 µg followed by oral GSK573719 1000 μg followed by intravenous GSK573719 50 µg, followed by inhaled GSK573719 1000 μg followed by intravenous GSK573719 65 µg in period 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. The washout was of 5 days between two consecutive periods.

A single dose of topically applied [14C] umeclidinium administered to the occluded axilla. The dose to be administered was 165 mg of a 1.85% (w/w) solution umeclidinium (equivalent to a 2.2% umeclidinium bromide solution) applied to 40 (cm^2) surface area of occluded axilla (resulting in a calculated net amount of active umeclidinium of 3.06 mg).

General disorders and administration site conditions

General disorders and administration site conditions

General disorders and administration site conditions

General disorders and administration site conditions

General disorders and administration site conditions

Umeclidinium, 2 mg/cm^2 of 1.85%, OD Vs Vehicle: <=-70%