Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| AD-1408-19519 | Other Grant/Funding Number | PCORI |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will examine the effectiveness of an 11-session, culturally enhanced, telephone-based pain coping skills training program among African Americans with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study team will enroll n=248 African Americans with hip or knee OA. The participants will be randomized into two groups. One group will take part in an 11-week pain CST intervention. The other group will be a "wait list" that receives the pain CST program after completing all follow-up study measures. All study participants will be able to continue any other usual medical care for their OA during the study period. The pain CST intervention includes 11 individual sessions with a study counselor, delivered via telephone to enhance access and reach. The sessions include the following: general information about why pain coping skills training is important, training in specific pain coping skills (such as progressive muscle relaxation, communication, imagery, and activity pacing), and guided practice with each skill. The CST program will also include information about other behaviors important for OA, such as physical activity and weight management. The main study outcome will be the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Other outcomes will include the WOMAC function subscale, Coping Strategies Questionnaire, Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale, depressive symptoms, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Patient Global Impression of Change.
Background and Significance: OA is a leading cause of pain and disability. African Americans have a greater burden of OA. In this demographic group OA is more common and associated with more severe pain and activity limitations, compared with Caucasians. Prior research suggests that a program called pain Coping Skills Training (CST) has strong potential for helping African Americans with OA to reduce their symptoms. However, there are still some important limitations to what is known in this research, which limits putting this program into practice. First, there is a need to incorporate the perspectives of African Americans with OA, as well as other key Stakeholders, into this program. This is important for ensuring the program is culturally relevant and can be successfully used in a variety of clinical and community settings. Second, there is still a need for a study that will test the effectiveness of pain CST specifically among African Americans with OA in "real world" settings. Therefore the objective of this project is to examine the effectiveness of a culturally enhanced pain CST program among African Americans with OA.
Study Aims: This project has three specific aims: 1.) Engage African American patients with OA, their support partners, health care providers, clinic administrators, and public health representatives in a process of evaluating and enhancing a pain CST program for culturally appropriate content and dissemination potential. 2.) Examine the effectiveness of a 12-session, culturally enhanced, telephone-based pain CST program among African Americans with hip or knee OA. 3.) Examine whether individual patient characteristics are associated with different levels of improvement in the CST program. The long-term objective of this research is to develop and disseminate an evidence-based pain CST intervention among African Americans with OA, to reduce disparities in outcomes.
Study Description: Following the incorporation of Stakeholder perspectives into the pain CST program, the investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial. The investigators will enroll n=248 African Americans with hip or knee OA. They will be randomized into two groups. One group will take part in a 2-week pain CST intervention. The other group will be a "wait list" that receives the pain CST program after completing all follow-up study measures. All study participants will be able to continue any other usual medical care for their OA during the study period. The pain CST intervention includes 12 individual sessions with a study counselor, delivered via telephone to enhance access and reach. The sessions include the following: general information about why pain coping skills training is important, training in specific pain coping skills (such as progressive muscle relaxation, communication, imagery, and activity pacing), and guided practice with each skill. The CST program will also include information about other behaviors important for OA, such as physical activity and weight management. The main study outcome will be the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Other outcomes will include the WOMAC function subscale, Coping Strategies Questionnaire, Arthritis Self Efficacy Scale, depressive symptoms, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Patient Global Impression of Change. These measures were selected based on Stakeholder input and prior research that showed these outcomes are important to patients with OA. Statistical models will be used to compare outcomes between the two study groups at each time point: baseline, 12 weeks (after completion of the initial CST intervention), and 36 weeks (about 6 months after intervention completion). The investigators will also assess whether there are different levels of improvement in outcomes of the CST intervention, based on participant characteristics.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain Coping Skills Training | Experimental | This group will take part in an 11-week pain coping skills training (CST) intervention. |
|
| Wait list Control | No Intervention | The other group will be the wait list group and will receive the pain CST program after completing all follow-up study measures. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain Coping Skills Training (CST) | Behavioral | The pain CST intervention includes 11 individual sessions with a study counselor, delivered via telephone to enhance access and reach. The sessions include the following: general information about why pain coping skills training is important, training in specific pain coping skills (such as progressive muscle relaxation, communication, imagery, and activity pacing), and guided practice with each skill. The CST program will also include information about other behaviors important for OA, such as physical activity and weight management. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale | Change over time in the primary outcome measure for this study, the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale is a measure of lower extremity pain. It includes 5 items rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), with a total range of 0-20 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function. | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Total Score | In addition to the pain subscale, the WOMAC includes stiffness (2 items) and function (17 items) subscales. All items are listed rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), with ranges of 0-96 for the total score (pain, stiffness, and function subscales), with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kelli D Allen, PhD | UNC Chapel Hill | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNC Thurston Arthritis Research Center | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32795282 | Derived | Dharmasri CJ, Griesemer I, Arbeeva L, Campbell LC, Cene CW, Keefe FJ, Oddone EZ, Somers TJ, Allen KD. Acceptability of telephone-based pain coping skills training among African Americans with osteoarthritis enrolled in a randomized controlled trial: a mixed methods analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Aug 14;21(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03578-7. | |
| 30227841 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Pain Coping Skills Training | This group will take part in an 11-week pain coping skills training (CST) intervention. Pain Coping Skills Training (CST): The pain CST intervention includes 11 individual sessions with a study counselor, delivered via telephone to enhance access and reach. The sessions include the following: general information about why pain coping skills training is important, training in specific pain coping skills (such as progressive muscle relaxation, communication, imagery, and activity pacing), and guided practice with each skill. The CST program will also include information about other behaviors important for OA, such as physical activity and weight management. |
| FG001 | Wait List Control | The other group will be the wait list group and will receive the pain CST program after completing all follow-up study measures. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Pain Coping Skills Training | This group will take part in an 11-week pain coping skills training (CST) intervention. Pain Coping Skills Training (CST): The pain CST intervention includes 11 individual sessions with a study counselor, delivered via telephone to enhance access and reach. The sessions include the following: general information about why pain coping skills training is important, training in specific pain coping skills (such as progressive muscle relaxation, communication, imagery, and activity pacing), and guided practice with each skill. The CST program will also include information about other behaviors important for OA, such as physical activity and weight management. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale | Change over time in the primary outcome measure for this study, the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale is a measure of lower extremity pain. It includes 5 items rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), with a total range of 0-20 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function. | All randomized participants | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
|
Data were collected for 12 months, ending at participants' final follow up time point.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Pain Coping Skills Training | This group will take part in an 11-week pain coping skills training (CST) intervention. Pain Coping Skills Training (CST): The pain CST intervention includes 11 individual sessions with a study counselor, delivered via telephone to enhance access and reach. The sessions include the following: general information about why pain coping skills training is important, training in specific pain coping skills (such as progressive muscle relaxation, communication, imagery, and activity pacing), and guided practice with each skill. The CST program will also include information about other behaviors important for OA, such as physical activity and weight management. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lower GI bleed | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelli D. Allen, PhD | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | 919-966-0558 | kdallen@email.unc.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 6, 2017 | Oct 26, 2018 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D015207 | Osteoarthritis, Hip |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
| Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Function Subscale | In addition to the pain subscale, the WOMAC includes stiffness (2 items) and function (17 items) subscales. All items are listed rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), with ranges of 0-68 for the function subscale, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function. | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
| Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in PROMIS Pain Interference (Short Form 6a) | The PROMIS Pain Interference (Short Form 6a) instrument measures the self-reported consequences of pain across aspects of life including social, cognitive, emotional, physical and recreational activities; this instrument refers to the past seven days. This validated scale has five response options, with scores ranging from one to five. Scores are converted to t-scores, and higher scores indicate greater pain interference. | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
| Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Short Form (SF)-12 Physical Component Health Score | This 12-item measure covers domains of general health, physical health, work and activity limitations, and emotional health. Mental Health and Physical Health Composite Scores were computed, both of which range from 0-100 with lower scores indicating poorer health. | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
| Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in SF-12 Mental Component Health Score | This 12-item measure covers domains of general health, physical health, work and activity limitations, and emotional health. Mental Health and Physical Health Composite Scores were computed, both of which range from 0-100 with lower scores indicating poorer health. | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
| Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) | This scale includes 48 items that assess 6 cognitive domains (Catastrophizing, Diverting Attention, Ignoring Sensations, Coping Self-Statements, Reinterpreting Pain Sensations, Praying-Hoping) and 1 behavioral domain (Increasing Behavioral Activities). Each domain includes 6 items, and participants rate the frequency of their use of specific coping strategies on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 ("Never do that") to 6 ("Always do that"). A Total Coping Attempts score was created, which includes 5 cognitive domains and 1 behavioral domain but excludes the Catastrophizing domain, similar to prior studies. Total range is 252, with higher scores indicating more coping attempts. | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months |
| Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) | This 8-item survey of depressive symptoms includes items corresponding to the depression criteria listed in the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) [38]. All items are scored as 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
| Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale | This scale includes 8 items asking respondents how certain they are that they can manage arthritis pain and keep it from interfering with specific activities All items are scored on a scale of 1 (very uncertain) to 10 (very certain), with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy for managing arthritis symptoms. | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
| Patient Global Impression of Arthritis Symptom Change From Baseline (BL) at 3 and 9 Months | This measure asks participants to describe their change in pain on a 7-point rating scale with the following options: "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," and "very much worse." The total range is 0-7, with lower scores indicating more improvement. | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
| Allen KD, Arbeeva L, Cene CW, Coffman CJ, Grimm KF, Haley E, Keefe FJ, Nagle CT, Oddone EZ, Somers TJ, Watkins Y, Campbell LC. Pain coping skills training for African Americans with osteoarthritis study: baseline participant characteristics and comparison to prior studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 19;19(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2249-6. |
| 27553385 | Derived | Schrubbe LA, Ravyts SG, Benas BC, Campbell LC, Cene CW, Coffman CJ, Gunn AH, Keefe FJ, Nagle CT, Oddone EZ, Somers TJ, Stanwyck CL, Taylor SS, Allen KD. Pain coping skills training for African Americans with osteoarthritis (STAART): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 23;17(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1217-2. |
| BG001 | Wait List Control | The other group will be the wait list group and will receive the pain CST program after completing all follow-up study measures. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Some education above high school | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Working | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Married or living with partner | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Low Perceived Income | Self-report of either "just meet basic expenses" or "don't even have enough to meet basic expenses" | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m² |
|
| Number of Self-Reported Comorbidities | Mean | Standard Deviation | comorbidities |
|
| OG001 | Wait List Control | The other group will be the wait list group and will receive the pain CST program after completing all follow-up study measures. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Total Score | In addition to the pain subscale, the WOMAC includes stiffness (2 items) and function (17 items) subscales. All items are listed rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), with ranges of 0-96 for the total score (pain, stiffness, and function subscales), with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function. | All randomized participants | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Function Subscale | In addition to the pain subscale, the WOMAC includes stiffness (2 items) and function (17 items) subscales. All items are listed rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (extreme symptoms), with ranges of 0-68 for the function subscale, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function. | All randomized participants | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in PROMIS Pain Interference (Short Form 6a) | The PROMIS Pain Interference (Short Form 6a) instrument measures the self-reported consequences of pain across aspects of life including social, cognitive, emotional, physical and recreational activities; this instrument refers to the past seven days. This validated scale has five response options, with scores ranging from one to five. Scores are converted to t-scores, and higher scores indicate greater pain interference. | All randomized participants | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | t-score | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Short Form (SF)-12 Physical Component Health Score | This 12-item measure covers domains of general health, physical health, work and activity limitations, and emotional health. Mental Health and Physical Health Composite Scores were computed, both of which range from 0-100 with lower scores indicating poorer health. | All randomized participants | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in SF-12 Mental Component Health Score | This 12-item measure covers domains of general health, physical health, work and activity limitations, and emotional health. Mental Health and Physical Health Composite Scores were computed, both of which range from 0-100 with lower scores indicating poorer health. | This variable was analyzed as a change score (baseline to 3-month and baseline to 9-month), due to normality assumptions. Therefore only participants with complete data at baseline and follow-up could be included in the analysis, resulting in a smaller sample than the total population. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) | This scale includes 48 items that assess 6 cognitive domains (Catastrophizing, Diverting Attention, Ignoring Sensations, Coping Self-Statements, Reinterpreting Pain Sensations, Praying-Hoping) and 1 behavioral domain (Increasing Behavioral Activities). Each domain includes 6 items, and participants rate the frequency of their use of specific coping strategies on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 ("Never do that") to 6 ("Always do that"). A Total Coping Attempts score was created, which includes 5 cognitive domains and 1 behavioral domain but excludes the Catastrophizing domain, similar to prior studies. Total range is 252, with higher scores indicating more coping attempts. | All randomized participants | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 3 months, 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) | This 8-item survey of depressive symptoms includes items corresponding to the depression criteria listed in the Diagnostic and Statistics Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) [38]. All items are scored as 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. | All randomized participants | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Month 3 and Change From Baseline to 9 Month in Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale | This scale includes 8 items asking respondents how certain they are that they can manage arthritis pain and keep it from interfering with specific activities All items are scored on a scale of 1 (very uncertain) to 10 (very certain), with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy for managing arthritis symptoms. | All randomized participants | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Global Impression of Arthritis Symptom Change From Baseline (BL) at 3 and 9 Months | This measure asks participants to describe their change in pain on a 7-point rating scale with the following options: "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," and "very much worse." The total range is 0-7, with lower scores indicating more improvement. | All randomized participants | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 3 months and 9 months |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 124 |
| 15 |
| 124 |
| 0 |
| 124 |
| EG001 | Wait List Control | The other group will be the wait list group and will receive the pain CST program after completing all follow-up study measures. | 0 | 124 | 6 | 124 | 0 | 124 |
| Chest Pain | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Congestive Heart Failure | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Total knee arthroplasty of right knee | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Laparoscopic Gastrocutaneous Fistula Takedown | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Surgical removal of lymphedema lobe on left leg | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Accidental exposure to trichoroacetic acid | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Food impaction in esophagus | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fractured ribs | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Asthma Exacerbation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoxia and dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Implantation of catheter-delivered aortic heart valve, insertion of temporary pacemaker, introductio | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Sepsis 2/2 Abdominal cellulitis | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.084 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| -3.31 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -7.07 |
| 0.44 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.128 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| -2.20 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -5.03 |
| 0.63 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.128 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| -1.14 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -2.60 |
| 0.33 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.502 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| 0.73 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.42 |
| 2.88 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.120 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| 1.71 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.45 |
| 3.86 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| 11.67 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 5.08 |
| 18.27 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.087 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| -1.02 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -2.19 |
| 0.15 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.002 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| 0.67 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.24 |
| 1.09 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| <0.001 |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| -0.87 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.24 |
| -0.51 |
| Superiority |