A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Acupuncture in the Management of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Acupuncture in the Management of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a course of acupuncture is effective in the management of peripheral neuropathy related pain in patients receiving chemotherapy.
Participants and settings:
- Patients with lung, breast, head & neck, colorectal or gynaecological cancer receiving taxanes or platinum-derivative chemotherapy experiencing CIPN after the end of cycle one will be the population of the study. The study will take place in a large cancer centre in the territory (Prince of Wales Hospital).
Recruitment:
- Potential subjects will be identified (through clinic lists and databases of patients who are undergoing treatment) and approached initially by the relevant clinical team and screening then undertaken by research staff. The trial will be run ethically, details of which process can be seen under additional material.
Randomisation:
- Patients will be allocated to a group through computer-generated randomisation to be done at the Prince of Wales clinical trials unit. Randomisation will consist of minimisation with a random element (stochastic minimisation), balancing for the treatment types (taxanes or platinum analogues received) at a ratio of 1:1 to the two groups.
Intervention:
- The acupuncture intervention is described below based on the STRICTA recommendations for reporting acupuncture trials. In the acupuncture group, patients will receive, in addition to standard care, a standardised 30-minute acupuncture session needling specific body points although there will be flexibility in case some points cannot be punctured (ie. in case of lymphoedema), and alternative points (as in routine practice) may be selected by the therapists using their discretion to maintain an equal dose of treatment to all patients. The points will be standardised according to the clinical manifestations of the subjects.
Standard care:
- The comparison arm will be a standard care control arm.
Study duration:
- Treatment duration will be 8 weeks. The duration of each patient's involvement in the study will be 20 weeks (5 months) with assessments at baseline, end of 8-week treatment, 14 weeks and 20 weeks. Based on available numbers in the study hospital, recruitment will be at 10 subjects/month, requiring 11 months for trial recruitment. Four months are assigned for trial set up, preparation and staff training, 5 months for follow-up of last patient recruited, and 4 months for data cleaning, analysis and report writing (=24 months study).
Outcome measures:
Functional status and Quality of Life [baseline, week 8, week 14, week 20 to assess changes from baseline over time]
Primary outcome is assessment of Pain at 8-weeks (end of acupuncture treatment): Pain: 'worst pain during past week' will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory which measures pain intensity and its interference with function.
Secondary outcomes:
Sensory examination [baseline and at the end of Acupuncture course -8 weeks- to assess change from baseline] Sensory examination will take place by the doctor/nurse using 10-g monofilament to lightly touch the patient's hands and feet bilaterally with the patients eyes closed. The monofilament test is a standardised plastic filament that will be pressed against parts of the hands and feet. When the filament bends, its tip is exerting a pressure of 10-gr. Abnormal responses including hyperesthesia, anesthesia or hypoesthesia will be recorded.
Measurement of costs
We will explore the cost impact data and capture the frequency, type and extent of the costs of and service utilisation by patients. This will be done at week 14 only covering the period from start of treatment until week 14. This is the first time a cost evaluation is taking place in a cancer symptom-related acupuncture trial. More specifically, costs will be identified, measured and valued using a micro-costing approach (by which each component of resource use is identified, estimated and a unit cost derived from market prices and national estimates). The cost analysis will be performed from the perspective of the health service provider and from a societal perspective. Included in the health care provider costs will be those accrued by the hospitals and general practitioners. Costs to the patients and their families, including social care, will be considered as the additional costs for society. Indirect costs in terms of workdays lost will also included. Data will be collected prospectively and retrospectively using a questionnaire designed by the University of Leeds.multiple sources including patient records and patient self reported questionnaires. The questionnaires will determine health service utilisation as a result of CIPN (e.g. outpatient or general practitioner visits), patient out of pocket expenses such as over the counter medicines or transport together with use of services in the social sector such as home help and support from family and friends. Valuation of resource items including hospital resources (e.g. bed days and staff time) and community resources (e.g. general practitioner visits, home help) use will be carried out using national estimates; market prices will be assigned to medication; non-market items, specifically patient time and informal help provided by family and friends, will be valued using market wage rates; out of pocket expenses (e.g. bus fares) will also be obtained. We have used this approach successfully in a multisite acupressure trial with 500 patients
Data analysis:
- Analyses will include descriptive statistics to summarise the data, analysis of variance to assess between-groups differences for primary and each of the secondary outcomes, and regression analysis (such as ANCOVA) using the baseline pain score as covariate. 95% CIs will also be calculated. In more detail, while a t-test is adequate for analysis, analysis of covariance will be used with the baseline pain score as a covariate and centre and trial arm as grouping factors. Equivalent analyses will be performed for the week 20 data (although it is acknowledged that such analyses would not be independent of the 14-week scores, as it is likely the week-14 and week-20 values will be correlated). Drop-out cases and non-respondents will be asked to complete the primary outcome scale (1-item) and the 5 items of the CTC scale on CIPN in order to capture outcomes in as many patients as possible in the intention to treat analysis, and if this is not feasible, we will use data imputation (LVCF: last value carried forward). An intention-to-treat analysis will be carried out.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria will include patients with needle phobia; Patients with low platelet count (<50,000); Comorbidity with a bleeding disorder; Pregnancy, or having received acupuncture treatment in the past three months. In addition, the ipsilateral arm of patients who have undergone axillary dissection will also be excluded from needling as well as lymphoedematous limbs.