Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason-enhanced dobutamine stress echo (DSE) in subjects having a suboptimal left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LV EBD) at rest and who were scheduled for coronary angiography.
The study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason at improving the visualization of the LV EBD during pharmacologic stress echocardiography examinations and for detection or exclusion of the coronary artery disease (CAD). The study population consisted of adult subjects referred for pharmacological stress echocardiography and with suboptimal image quality during unenhanced ultrasound imaging at rest who had known or suspected CAD. Subjects enrolled in the study represented subjects who could benefit most from CEUS stress echocardiography.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lumason | Experimental | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumason | Drug | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity and Specificity of Lumason Enhanced Dobutamine Stress Echo (DSE) for Detection or Exclusion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) | The diagnostic performance of the echocardiographic images was compared to the truth standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. A diagnosis of CAD was determined for both the echo images and truth standard (positive diagnosis for CAD is defined as >/= 50% stenosis of any vessel on coronary angiography or if no coronary angiography was performed the occurence of a cardiac event based on clinical information for up to 6 months post dose; otherwise the diagnosis was negative). Results for sensitivity and specificity are reflected based on difference between contrast enhanced stress echo and unenhanced stress echo. Results for analysis of data based on majority assessment from the three off-site blinded readers are presented. Sensitivity and specificity are the percentages of correctly diagnosed subjects by stress echo over the total positive and negative subjects according to the truth standard respectively. | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography were performed |
| Reader-Specific Percentages of Participants Identified as Having a Critical Shift From Suboptimal to Optimal Echocardiographic Images | The percentage of subjects with suboptimal images (defined as >= 2 adjacent segments with inadequate LV EBD in any of the 3 apical views) at unenhanced stress echo converted to adequate (reduction of suboptimal segments in any of the 3 apical views) at contrast-enhanced stress echo | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Total LV EBD | Measured as the change in the total LV EBD score based on the 17 segments, from peak stress unenhanced vs. peak stress contrast-enhanced. Total LV EBD score ranges from 0 to 34 and higher score is better outcome. | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Was a pregnant or lactating female. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy: by testing on site at the institution (serum or urine βHCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of LUMASON administration(s), by surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy), post menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses;
decompensated or inadequately controlled congestive heart failure (NYHA Class IV);
In addition, due to the use of Atropine in subjects who had not reached targeted heart rate with peak dobutamine infusion, subjects with the following were excluded:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Melda Dolan, MD | Bracco Diagnostics, Inc | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coastal Multi-Specialty Research, Coastal Heart Medical Group | Santa Ana | California | 92704 | United States | ||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Lumason | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection Lumason: Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 30, 2015 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | To obtain safety data in subjects administered Lumason during echocardiography | 72 hours post dose |
| Alfieri Cardiology |
| Wilmington |
| Delaware |
| 19803 |
| United States |
| Homestead Cardiac and Vein Center | Homestead | Florida | 33030 | United States |
| Ochsner Clinic Foundation | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70121 | United States |
| St. Louis University Hospital | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| University of Nebraska Medical Center | Omaha | Nebraska | 68198 | United States |
| Duke University Medical Center Cardiac Diagnostic Unit | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston | Galveston | Texas | 77555 | United States |
| Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Unité de Pathologie Cardio-Vasculaire / Cardiologie | Brussels | 1200 | Belgium |
| Antwerp University Hospital | Edegem | 2650 | Belgium |
| St. Michael's Hospital | Toronto | Ontario | M5B 1W8 | Canada |
| Northwick Park Hospital | Harrow | Middlesex | HA1 3UJ | United Kingdom |
| Hammersmith Hospital | London | W12 0HS | United Kingdom |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Lumason | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection Lumason: Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Sensitivity and Specificity of Lumason Enhanced Dobutamine Stress Echo (DSE) for Detection or Exclusion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) | The diagnostic performance of the echocardiographic images was compared to the truth standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. A diagnosis of CAD was determined for both the echo images and truth standard (positive diagnosis for CAD is defined as >/= 50% stenosis of any vessel on coronary angiography or if no coronary angiography was performed the occurence of a cardiac event based on clinical information for up to 6 months post dose; otherwise the diagnosis was negative). Results for sensitivity and specificity are reflected based on difference between contrast enhanced stress echo and unenhanced stress echo. Results for analysis of data based on majority assessment from the three off-site blinded readers are presented. Sensitivity and specificity are the percentages of correctly diagnosed subjects by stress echo over the total positive and negative subjects according to the truth standard respectively. | The analysis population for CAD included all subjects who received Lumason, had an overall diagnostic conclusion of CAD available at peak stress for both UE-DSE and CE-DSE, and had a definite truth standard diagnosis (Positive, Negative) for CAD (coronary angiography or 6 months collection of cardiac events follow-up data). | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography were performed |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Reader-Specific Percentages of Participants Identified as Having a Critical Shift From Suboptimal to Optimal Echocardiographic Images | The percentage of subjects with suboptimal images (defined as >= 2 adjacent segments with inadequate LV EBD in any of the 3 apical views) at unenhanced stress echo converted to adequate (reduction of suboptimal segments in any of the 3 apical views) at contrast-enhanced stress echo | The analysis population for EBD included all subjects who received Lumason and had EBD data available at peak stress for both UE-DSE and CE-DSE. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Total LV EBD | Measured as the change in the total LV EBD score based on the 17 segments, from peak stress unenhanced vs. peak stress contrast-enhanced. Total LV EBD score ranges from 0 to 34 and higher score is better outcome. | The analysis population for EBD included all subjects who received Lumason and had EBD data available at peak stress for both UE-DSE and CE-DSE. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | total LV EBD | Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | To obtain safety data in subjects administered Lumason during echocardiography | Safety analysis population includes all subjects who received Lumason | Posted | Number | participants | 72 hours post dose |
|
|
All AEs that occurred from the time the subject signed the ICF until 72 hours after the last administration of Lumason or until the subject underwent cardiac intervention, whichever came first, were [recorded] listed, [with predose AEs flagged in the subject data listings.]
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Lumason | Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection Lumason: Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography | 0 | 172 | 3 | 172 | 18 | 172 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myocardial Ischemia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ventricular Fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Electrocardiogram ST Segment Elevation | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood creatinine increased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood glucose increased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Troponin increased | Investigations | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Panic attack | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (18.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melda S. Dolan, MD, FACC, FASE, Head, Medical Affairs and Cardiac Ultrasound | Bracco Diagnostics Inc. | 1-609-514-2506 | Melda.Dolan@diag.bracco.com |
| Jul 21, 2020 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C420843 | contrast agent BR1 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| <0.0001 |
| Superiority |
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Title | Denominators | Categories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects with AEs |
| |||||
| Number of subjects with AEs by intensity - Mild |
| |||||
| Number of subjects with AEs by intensity -Moderate |
| |||||
| Number of subjects with AEs by intensity - Severe |
| |||||
| Number of subjects with serious AEs |
| |||||
| Number of subjects who discontinued due to AE |
|